Donald Trump sues Bruce Springsteen for defamation over explosive onstage comments
The battle between politics and pop culture just took a legal turn.
Donald Trump
is suing
Bruce Springsteen
for defamation after the singer made some very harsh comments during his recent concert tour. This started as a fight over words and has turned into a legal battle that has sparked a national debate.
The lawsuit brings up questions about free speech, political criticism, and whether comments from celebrities can make things more exciting in court.
Bruce Springsteen is accused of making "false, malicious, and damaging statements" about Trump in recent interviews and during his 2025 concert tour, according to the filing, which was filed in federal court in New Jersey.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
She Was Beautiful, Now Its Hard To Look At Her
Crowdy Fan
Undo
The lawsuit is the result of a sour public dispute between the two well-known individuals, whose ideological differences have always been apparent, that has been simmering for months.
ALSO READ
: Canadian outrage erupts after citizen dies in ICE custody - Carney vs Trump tensions boil over
Live Events
What did Bruce Springsteen say on stage?
In particular, Springsteen's remarks on stage at his June 3rd performance in Philadelphia, where he called Trump 'a conman who tried to hijack democracy and sell it back to us at a profit,' are cited by Trump's legal team. Springsteen reiterated his claims that Trump "represents the very worst of America's past dressed up as its future" in a subsequent interview with Rolling Stone, as per a report by Tempo de Conhecer.
The lawsuit claims that these statements were "knowingly false and intended to harm Mr. Trump's reputation and influence," particularly during a period when Trump is actively campaigning for a 2028 reelection.
Why is Donald Trump taking legal action now?
President Trump's attorneys contend that Springsteen's remarks have done "irreparable damage" to the president's reputation and political prospects because of his global following and devoted fan base.
Springsteen views the lawsuit as "another bullying tactic" from a man who can't stand dissent, according to those close to him. Springsteen, a longtime Trump critic, has frequently portrayed Trump as the opposite of the working-class values he extols in his music and has used his platform to express concerns about what he perceives to be a threat to American democracy.
However, this legal action seems to have gone too far, even for the vocal singer.
The President isn't deterred, though. Trump wrote, "Springsteen has been lying about me for years. Enough is enough. You can't just call someone a criminal without evidence and expect no consequences. This is America not a rock concert.'
Is this about reputation or free speech?
An unnamed friend of Springsteen told a reporter, "This is not about protecting reputation." 'This is about silencing critics. Bruce has been writing and singing about injustice his entire life. Trump just picked the wrong guy to sue,' as quoted in a report.
Public opinion has been sharply split on this case; Springsteen fans see it as another assault on free speech in a nation where criticizing political leaders should be tolerated rather than punished, while supporters see it as a daring protest against liberal elites using their platforms to disparage conservatives.
According to legal experts, it will be challenging to prove defamation in the lawsuit against Donald Trump and Bruce Springsteen.
Known as "The Boss," Springsteen has a career of singing about the hopes and hardships of regular Americans, frequently with a gritty honesty that goes beyond politics. Conversely, President Trump has emerged as a highly divisive figure whose ideas for America frequently diverge from Springsteen's.
The case has brought controversy and attention to both men involved.
FAQs
What specifically did Bruce Springsteen say about Donald Trump?
During a concert, he called Trump "a conman who tried to hijack democracy" and later said in an interview that he "represents the worst of America's past."
Does Donald Trump have a strong case?
Legal experts say it will be difficult. Public figures must demonstrate "actual malice," and Springsteen's comments may be protected as opinion under the First Amendment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Disgusting. F*ck her': Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce's NFL flex pose sparks political controversy over Donald Trump comparison
Taylor Swift's recent appearance at an NFL event has stirred unexpected political controversy (Image via Backgrid) Taylor Swift has once again found herself in the center of a media storm — but this time, it's not about her music, her relationship, or a tour announcement. Instead, a simple flex pose at the Kansas City Chiefs' Tight End University camp ignited wild speculation about whether the global pop star was subtly supporting President Donald Trump . Taylor Swift's flex at NFL event sparks viral speculation In a viral photo circulating on social media, Taylor Swift is seen striking a muscle-flexing pose alongside her boyfriend, Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce , and several NFL players. What would normally be dismissed as a playful and sporty gesture suddenly took on political overtones when a user on X (formerly Twitter) suggested the pose looked eerily similar to one previously performed by Donald Trump and his supporters. Taylor Swift faces backlash for flexing (Image via Twitter) As images comparing Swift's pose to Trump's began spreading online, a culture war narrative quickly developed. Some interpreted the moment as politically symbolic. One X user commented that Swift had 'mimicked a pose associated with Donald Trump and his allies,' fueling partisan debates across social platforms. @BeYAYA444 wrote, 'Disgusting. F*ck her.' @olwestside wrote, 'Taylor Swift with her republican boyfriend and his republican friends referencing a Donald Trump pose…. ' But critics of the theory were quick to push back. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Remember Tiger's Ex-Wife? Try Not To Smile When You See Her Now Paperela Undo Outkick's Zach Dean, never known as a Swiftie, jumped to her defense — albeit with sarcasm. 'The Swifties have made me defend Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce – two people who annoy the piss out of me,' he wrote. 'It's a flex pose, which we've all seen/done a billion times.' Dean went on to clarify that Swift's political stance is well-documented: 'Taylor Swift ain't a Donald Trump fan. Duh. She openly endorsed Kamala Harris last year. Joe Biden in 2020. She's a Dem, through and through.' The controversy reflects a larger pattern in Swift's public appearances. Whether it's her support for Brittany Mahomes or her presence at NFL games, the singer's actions are often filtered through a hyper-politicized lens. Swift's presence at the Super Bowl and other NFL events has sparked debates about celebrity influence in male-dominated spaces — and now, about the unintended symbolism of a pose. Also Read: Taylor Swift's surprise NFL takeover continues while Travis Kelce preps for another dominant season At a time when cultural figures are constantly scrutinized for hidden messages, this latest episode shows how a seemingly innocent moment can become a viral lightning rod. Whether coincidence or calculated, one thing is clear: Taylor Swift's shadow now looms large not just in entertainment, but in America's political and sports discourse. Game On Season 1 continues with Mirabai Chanu's inspiring story. Watch Episode 2 here.
Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
Katy Perry shares her 'mood' in first post after her split from Orlando Bloom
Washington DC [US], June 28 (ANI): Katy Perry and Orlando Bloom have called off their relationship. American singer-songwriter has shared her first social media post since the news of her split from Orlando Bloom emerged, reported People. A source confirmed to PEOPLE that the couple, who got engaged in 2019, have decided to part ways. Sharing her "mood," the singer, 40, posted a carousel of photos on Instagram from her day at Rottnest Island in Australia on Friday, June 27. Her visit to the nature reserve came a day after a source confirmed to People that the longtime couple had called off their nearly 6-year engagement. Among the collection of photos shared was Perry posing alongside a quokka before later spotting a chocolate version of the animal in a shop. She also shared a video of herself being surrounded by birds on the beach and embracing "brain rot" with her team while on a boat. Perry appeared in good spirits in all of the photos and clips taken just hours before she was set to perform in Adelaide as part of the sold-out Australia leg of her Lifetimes tour. "mood: Quokka," the "Hot N Cold" musician captioned the post. According to National Geographic, the "teddy bear-sized marsupial" is only found in southwestern Australia and is considered the "happiest animal in the world." Perry's reference to feeling like a quokka comes after it was confirmed that she and Bloom, 48, are going their separate ways after nine years together, reported People. On Thursday, June 26, a source told People, "They're pretty much done," adding that they "don't really see them being able to turn things around here." The pair, who met at a Golden Globes afterparty in 2016, got engaged in 2019 and welcomed their daughter Daisy Dove on Aug. 26, 2020. Bloom is also a father to son Flynn Bloom, 14, whom he shares with his ex-wife, Miranda Kerr, reported People. While Perry has been in Australia for her tour, Bloom has been in Venice for Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez's lavish wedding festivities. The actor has been spotted hanging out with Tom Brady, attorney, Alex Spiro and Kris Jenner's boyfriend, Corey Gamble, along with Kris, 69, and her daughters Kim and Khloe Kardashian, reported People. (ANI)
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Shirsat's son backs out of hotel purchase after failing to deposit money
Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar: Siddhant Shirsat, son of social justice minister Sanjay Shirsat, has backed out of a hotel purchase deal after a political controversy erupted over the alleged undervalued purchase, by not depositing the required 25% bid amount. Siddhant Material Procurement and Supplies, linked to Sanjay Shirsat's son, was the highest bidder for two prime properties of defunct Dhanada Corporation in a court-monitored auction. However, the company backed out, stalling the sale process, which aimed to recover dues for investors alleging financial fraud. A fresh hearing is set for July 5. The auction triggered a political backlash, with Shiv Sena (UBT) Rajya Sabha member Sanjay Raut alleging that a property with a ready reckoner value of over Rs 100 crore, and a much higher market value, was being offloaded for just Rs 64 crore. Legislative council's leader of opposition Ambadas Danve also targeted Sanjay Shirsat for carrying out such suspicious deals, by taking undue advantage of being in power. Following mounting criticism, minister Shirsat announced on June 2 that his son would withdraw from the deal to avoid further political controversy. Despite winning the auction by quoting Rs 15 lakh above the base price for each property, Siddhant Material Procurement and Supplies failed to deposit the required 25% of the amount by the June 20 deadline. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like One of the Most Successful Investors of All Time, Warren Buffett, Recommends: 5 Books for Turning... Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Click Here Undo As per rules, the failure to deposit the amount within the stipulated time nullified the bid. Sub-divisional officer Vyankat Rathod confirmed that the matter was reported to the special court, and further steps would be taken as per its directives. "The next phase of the auction process will depend on the court's decision," Rathod said. With the top bidder out, the second-highest bidder, Nirmal Holiday Home, has expressed its willingness to match the required amount. The third bidder, Kalyan Toll Infrastructure Ltd, has also shown readiness to increase its bid by Rs 5 lakh. The auction process underwent seven rounds and involved three bidders. The district administration carried out the sale on court orders, after multiple complaints of investor fraud were filed against Dhanada Corporation.
