logo
I grew up on Alcatraz—this is what living on the notorious prison island was really like

I grew up on Alcatraz—this is what living on the notorious prison island was really like

New York Post11-05-2025

President Donald Trump may want to open up the once-notorious Alcatraz Island prison to again house the 'worst of the worst' criminals, but one woman remembers 'The Rock' as a wonderful place to grow up.
'Weren't you scared?' is a question that Jolene Babyak routinely gets about her childhood on a prison island known for housing infamous criminals such as gangsters Al Capone, George 'Machine Gun' Kelly, and Mickey Cohen.
Located about 1.25 miles off the San Francisco shore and overlooking the Golden Gate Bridge, the federal penitentiary, which once housed approximately 250 men, became famous for being 'impossible' to escape — though many tried.
Only five succeeded in getting off the island, but are missing and presumed to have drowned in the surrounding choppy waters of San Francisco Bay.
Many movies were based on the notorious prison, including Clint Eastwood's 1979 film 'Escape from Alcatraz.'
But 'scared' is not a word that Babyak would use to describe living on the island.
5 President Trump has ordered the reopening of the notorious Alcatraz Island prison in the San Francisco Bay.
REUTERS/Fred Greaves
'We had a very tight-knit community, plenty of entertainment, a low-crime neighborhood, and million dollar views!' she says.
The children of Alcatraz
Most people don't realize prison staff and their children lived on the island alongside the prisoners.
Babyak resided there from 1954 to 1955 (from the age of 7 to 9) and again in 1962 when she was 15 years old. Her father, Arthur Dollison, was the associate and also acting warden.
With her parents and her two older siblings, Babyak first lived in a two-bedroom apartment in Building 64, an old military barracks.
5 Jolene Babyak lived on Alcatraz as a child when her father was associated and acting warden.
Getty Images for Alcatraz City Cruises
The bottom portion of the building dated back to the 1860s, and the top (where they lived) was finished in 1906. Babyak and her sister, Corinne (who passed away in 2016), shared one large bedroom, while her brother got an 'unlighted hallway.'
The island had a small general store and a post office but not much else. There wasn't a hospital or medical clinic.
'Don't get hurt,' was the advice the kids got.
Babyak, who today is one of the island's premier historians and has written several books about the prison, once fell and hit her head.
A 'minimally trained' medical technician monitored her for a concussion, but that was all for medical care.
'If it was really serious, like you were bleeding out, you'd have to go to the city,' she says.
This required catching a ferry, which ran frequently from a dock on the island.
As a second grader in the 1950s, Babyak was sent into the city by herself for school.
'Different times,' she says, laughing.
She and other kids from the island would take the ferry and then a bus to their school, and back again.
No telephones on the island could reach the city, so once she left for the day, she was essentially on her own — with a few older kids to make sure she got around OK.
Classmates knew she lived on the notorious island.
'They were fascinated,' she says. 'They mostly wanted to know about Al Capone, who was dead by then. I got the feeling they thought that the kids and prisoners all ate dinner together at one long table.'
A unique—but 'ideal'—childhood
She remembers a childhood full of adults who were 'very actively involved' in their kids' lives — constantly putting on events, parties, dances, 'watermelon feeds,' and performances to keep the young ones occupied and out of trouble.
While they all played on a large playground in the middle of the island, adults were constantly monitoring them, either keeping watch from the surrounding homes' windows or as the men walked past while going to and from prison work shifts.
5 Jolene Babyak and her older sister Corinne on Alcatraz.
jolenebabyakauthor.com
As a teen, Babyak enjoyed her first kiss after an island 'beatnik'-themed party with another teen resident. (They are Facebook friends today.)
'We had this life on a prison island that was ideal,' she says.
She notes that this is the exact opposite of the childhood most of the prisoners had, and why they ended up where they did.
'They were throwaway kids,' she says. 'The product of trauma.'
As an adult, she realized that the prisoners weren't there because of their supposed terrible crimes but because of their anti-social behavior in other prisons—and that most were mentally ill.
Despite growing up always being told that her prisoner neighbors were the 'worst of the worst' offenders, Babyak is adamant that she was never frightened of them. One prisoner even handed her a stray ball through a fence.
'He must have gotten permission from a guard,' she says.
Later on, other prisoners told her they had enjoyed listening to the sound of children playing, that it brought a bit of sunshine and normalcy to their lives.
Others, however, said they felt sorry for the kids, imagining them to be 'trapped' on the island.
An infamous escape
Babyak was living in a nicer duplex house on the island in 1962, when the island's most infamous escape happened. She was asleep when an alarm jolted her awake.
'My mother met me on the stairs, and she said, 'Get dressed, there's been an escape, we have to search the house,'' she says.
She and her mother, Evelyn, had to go down to the basement to see if the three escapees were hiding out there.
5 One of the prison cells on Alcatraz.
UPI/AFP via Getty Images
'That part was a little scary,' she says, though her mother told her in all likelihood the men had already gotten off the island.
The escapees were three bank robbers, John Morris, John Anglin, and Clarence Anglin. Their ingenious escape involved putting papier-mache model heads resembling their own heads into their beds, breaking out of the prison via ventilation ducts, and fleeing aboard an improvised inflatable raft.
While it assumed they all drowned, their bodies were never found, leaving open the possibility that the trio enjoyed freedom for the rest of their lives. But Babyak doubts this.
'They didn't have food or money and two had never been to San Francisco before. They were rural farm kids,' she says.
She believes the men would have committed another crime eventually and been found out.
5 The year 1909 is carved on a wall on Alcatraz Island.
AP Photo/Jed Jacobsohn
Alcatraz reboot?
Alcatraz is suddenly in the spotlight after Trump said he wants to reopen the island to prisoners, calling it a 'symbol of law and order.'
The penitentiary was shut down in 1962 due to the difficulty and high costs associated with maintaining it. For one, there is no real sewage system — sewage was dumped into the bay. Water had to be brought in via a boat and stored in a large tank. For the small amount of prisoners it housed, only about 250, the cost wasn't worth it.
'It's been very odd and unexpected,' Babyak says of the surge of media attention due to the president's remarks.
Today, the island is a tourist attraction. Babyak has been selling books and giving talks there for 30 years, along with former prisoners and at least one other former resident. The speakers have dwindled over the years, as more people who lived on the island pass away.
Babyak says she cherishes her time on the notorious island and was sad to leave when it closed.
'We were all sad,' she says. 'The prisoners—not so much.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump to California: Surrender
Trump to California: Surrender

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump to California: Surrender

President Donald Trump walks on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, DC, on Monday, June 9, 2025. Credit - Yuri Gripas—Abaca/Bloomberg via Getty Images This article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME's politics newsletter. Sign up here to get stories like this sent to your inbox. President Donald Trump seems on the cusp of getting everything he appears to love out of the crisis in Los Angeles. An opportunity to stoke political divisions and suppress dissent. A showdown with a deep-blue state's Governor with White House ambitions. A chance to nurse grievances dear to his base and largely ungrounded in reality. And an opposition party left unsure of how to navigate a minefield of Trump's making. Taken together, the blend of circumstances seems trending in Trump's gleeful direction. The President on Monday told reporters on the White House' South Lawn that he would be fine arresting California Gov. Gavin Newsom, called protesters against his mass immigration raids 'insurrectionists,' and blamed the unrest on professional agitators. He said the United States cannot accept any disrespect for law enforcement. And he seemed on the edge of invoking a 19th Century law that could be used to quash civic protest and sidestep basic constitutional rights. 'Order will be restored, illegals will be expelled, and Los Angeles will be set free,' Trump posted on social media. Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta responded with a suit against Trump for overstepping his power in sending 2,000 troops into Los Angeles to quell protests against federal immigration raids. The escalating situation seems destined to set up a clash that has no apparent off-ramp, winners, or remedies. It's quite the split screen for a President who, just four years ago, unleashed a violent mob on the U.S. Capitol after he lost his re-election bid in 2020. Whereas Trump gave a blanket pardon for those accused of the Jan. 6 insurrection against Congress that left 138 police injured, he is now professing fealty to the uniform. While insisting he is steadying security for borders, Trump is at the same time launching the West Coast's population center into a freefall of uncertainty. And even as he casts the liberal elite as out-of-touch with so-called American values, he is threatening a core of U.S. character: immigration. 'They spit, we hit,' Trump said, suggesting protests against his raids were insulting police and necessitating a violent response. It has more than a few echoes to his impertinent reaction to the Black Lives Matter activism that marked the final year of his first term. These days, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers have been wading more aggressively into workplaces and courthouses as part of Trump's promised crackdown on those in the country without proper papers. Officers are operating in overdrive as they try to hit White House-prescribed quotas for deportations. In response, protests have broken out as activists see the efforts as capricious and mean-spirited. L.A. police have said the protests there were mostly peaceful, although things in the nation's second-largest city did escalate over the weekend, with some of that spurred by the guardsmens' arrival. While arrests reached double digits, the situation was nowhere near the crisis White House aides tried to suggest. Rather than letting this play out, the White House has exacerbated tensions and the city has responded by declaring downtown an illegal demonstration. While making clear he's prepared to fight back, Newsom has tried to de-escalate the situation: 'Don't take the bait,' he told Californians. 'Never use violence or harm law enforcement.' Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass likened it to 'intentional chaos.' Democratic lawmakers in Congress are similarly casting this as a mess of Trump's making, not one rooted in reality. But here's the thing: once the kindling is lit, it may be impossible to stop it—especially if the country's top leader is keen to watch it spread. 'We're going to have troops everywhere,' Trump said Sunday. And Trump's top White House aides suggested the snowballing situation was exactly what they had in mind. 'This is a fight to save civilization,' posted White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, an architect of Trump's hardline anti-immigrant policies. This is a moment of political testing unseen since 1965, when President Lyndon B. Johnson deployed the National Guard without a Governor's request to protect civil rights demonstrators. No White House since then has dared to go around a state chief to activate domestic troops, and the seeming trigger for a careening upswing is an 1807 law that allows the military to be used to quash a domestic uprising. At the same time, the Pentagon has put Marines stationed at Camp Pendleton on high alert and ready to mobilize if things escalate. The fast-moving clash between a Republican President and the nation's largest Democratic-led state has left insiders on both sides of the aisle craning for answers. Los Angeles, a city rooted as much in Hollywood as its rich immigrant communities, is not one to be idle as Washington takes a heavy hand. And Washington, a company town driven by ego more than anything, is flexing its muscle over its West Coast power rival. The fight seems to be on the upswing, not a descent. Trump is spoiling for the battle and Newsom is laying the groundwork for a 2028 presidential bid. Put all of this together and it's a big ol' mess primed to spiral in ways that are hard to predict, but destined to define this part of Trump's legacy. Make sense of what matters in Washington. Sign up for the D.C. Brief newsletter. Write to Philip Elliott at

The History of White Refugee Narratives
The History of White Refugee Narratives

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The History of White Refugee Narratives

White South Africans who support U.S. President Donald Trump in front of the U.S. Embassy in Pretoria, South Africa on February 15, 2025. Credit - Marco Longari—AFP/Getty Images In May, a charter flight from Johannesburg landed at Dulles International Airport. About 50 white South Africans, known as Afrikaners, were on board, claiming that their livelihoods were jeopardized by a climate of "anti-white racism." This depiction of South Africa has resonated among American right-wing commentators since at least the first Trump Administration. In the view of folks such as Tucker Carlson, Charlie Kirk, and Stephen Miller, efforts to redress inequalities and injustices borne of the Apartheid era constitute, in Miller's words, 'race-based persecution.' The Afrikaners' whiteness, they claim, opens them up to discrimination, threatens the seizure of their farms, and makes them targets of violence. In response, the Trump Administration has granted some Afrikaners refugee status, a glaring exception to the general halt it has put on the entry of people fleeing persecution from around the world. President Donald Trump has rationalized this exceptional treatment by gesturing to unsubstantiated and debunked reports of racialized attacks. 'It's a genocide that's taking place,' he told reporters. Trump recently used the same terms in an attempt to browbeat South African president Cyril Ramaphosa in the oval office. Now, the Afrikaners are on a fast-track to citizenship. The characterization of 'Black' government as existentially threatening has a long history in the United States. Slaveholders first developed the trope in the 1790s in their representations of the emergent nation of Haiti, framing it as a dangerous site of social experimentation and savagery where Black freedom would inexorably lead to white death. This depiction was reductive, and purposeful. Haiti's 'horrors' served as a rallying cry and a cautionary tale; they justified a certain understanding of the nature (and future) of racial pluralism in the United States. Today, spurious depictions of South Africa as an anti-white hellscape swim in the same waters. The treatment of refugees, then and now, brings this similarity into high relief. The Long History of the U.S. Backing White South Africans Haitian independence was declared on January 1, 1804. Before that, Haiti was known world-wide as Saint Domingue, a French colony on the western third of Hispaniola that generated tremendous wealth on the backs of enslaved Africans. The series of events that history deems 'the Haitian Revolution' spanned the prior 14 years and encompassed a staggering array of changes. Americans were intimately aware of those events. Over the period, 'St. Domingo' was depicted as a beleaguered colony, a site of fights over racial equality, a plantation economy unraveled by slave rebellion, a place where slavery was legally abolished, a diplomatic partner, and a player in European geopolitics. After 1804, the country became the second independent nation in the Western hemisphere, one expressly defined around the absence of slavery and colonial control. All Haitians, regardless of their ethnicity, were constitutionally defined as 'Black'; land was to be shared; runaway slaves were declared free the moment they touched its shores. In an age of revolutionary change, there was perhaps no more radical shift than this. For most white Americans, and especially enslavers, the white colonists of Saint Domingue experiencing these changes were a focus of racial empathy. 'When we recollect how nearly similar the situation of the Southern States and St. Domingo are in the profusion of Slaves,' South Carolina's governor wrote to the colony's General Assembly in September 1791, 'we cannot but sensibly fear for your situation.' The thousands of white French colonists who fled Haiti and arrived in American communities after a particular moment of disruption in June 1793 were met with open arms, receiving support from private groups, state governments, and the U.S. Congress alike. Dominguans of color, meanwhile, were painted as figures of terror. 'French negroes' prowled Southern nightmares. Southern states and municipalities quickly passed laws that prevented Black refugees from entering their borders (and requiring those present to depart). Rumors of connections between Saint Domingue and slave resistance abounded in Virginia after 1793 and shaped how whites understood Gabriel's revolt in Richmond in 1800. Denmark Vesey's rumored insurrectionary plot in Charleston, South Carolina in 1822 centered around the notion that he had been in contact with Haitian leaders. While posed as being about a threat from without, this U.S. hysteria had everything to do with domestic realities. White American anxiety over 'the horrors of St. Domingo' reified a nation that was white. The phrase cropped up repeatedly as a way to describe the dangers of antislavery activism and 'fanatical' notions of human equality within the United States that weakened the master class's authority and opened the floodgates for Black violence. This narrative proved to be powerful and long-lasting. In 1859, 68 years after the initial insurrections, a proslavery writer would describe John Brown's raid as 'nothing more nor nothing less than an attempt to do on a vast scale what was done in St. Domingo in 1791.' A pro-Confederate cartoon in 1863 showed Abraham Lincoln penning the Emancipation Proclamation with his foot on the Constitution, the devil on his desk, and a blood-drenched picture of Haiti over his shoulder. By this treatment, Haiti was an upside-down world: Black people were free and white people were dead, a depiction that normalized and celebrated the United States as a white slaveholding republic. The Vilification of Springfield's Haitians Taps Into a Long and Troubling History There were other American understandings of the burgeoning Haitian Revolution alongside this one. Some Americans looked to Saint Domingue and saw a just struggle for human dignity and racial equality. Alongside the Revolution in France, Saint Domingue sparked conversations about an oncoming global democratic wave rooted in universal human rights, one that would sweep away tyranny of all sorts. The fact that Americans, white and Black, made these cosmopolitan connections reminds us that, although the American war for independence was in the (recent) past, the American Revolution—the meaning, and quality of the new polity—was very much in flux. White Americans' reactions to events in Saint Domingue allowed for discussions about an American future in which slavery would not exist. The white Dominguans refugees arriving in Philadelphia in 1793 entered a state in which slavery was being gradually ended and in which white and Black activists were attempting to spread that ethos nationwide. As elsewhere, Philadelphia's philanthropic community rose up to provide them food, shelter, and succor, but the white Dominguans were not permitted to maintain their slaves (despite their best efforts to do so). In the 19th century, Americans of color would take Haiti as an emblem of possibility, one that helped bolster pride and engender action. Like the proslavery usage, these efforts were an attempt to make Haiti into an argument about citizenship, race, and rights in the United States. The Trump Administration's decision to grant Afrikaners refugee status flies in the face of U.S. procedures and practice in place since the 1980 Refugee Act, which, in accordance with the international definition, defines a refugee as a person with a 'well-founded fear of persecution.' This initiative bears many of the hallmarks of a Trump policy—it originates from a selective understanding of the realities on the ground; it has been conveyed, explained, and rationalized via a blend of bullying and bluster; above all, it is driven by a venal self-interest. At its heart, the policy seems to bolster Trump's picture of the dangers of initiatives that place value on striving for racial equality. In this view, the Afrikaners are quite literally pale-faced messengers: their plight fits snugly alongside Trump's attacks on institutions of higher education and the U.S. civil service as bastions of antisemitism and DEI initiatives. As such, the administration is overtly taking a side in a longstanding, and ongoing, battle over the meaning of the American nation. James Alexander Dun is a historian at Princeton University and the author of Dangerous Neighbors: Making the Haitian Revolution in Early America. Made by History takes readers beyond the headlines with articles written and edited by professional historians. Learn more about Made by History at TIME here. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors. Write to Made by History at madebyhistory@

Dr. Phil was on hand at ICE field office during LA immigration raids
Dr. Phil was on hand at ICE field office during LA immigration raids

New York Post

time16 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Dr. Phil was on hand at ICE field office during LA immigration raids

TV personality Dr. Phil McGraw and his camera crew were on hand before and after the Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in Los Angeles that triggered violent mass protests in the city. The 74-year-old, who covered the ICE raids in Chicago earlier this year, interviewed Trump's border czar Tom Homan to 'get a first-hand look at the targeted operations' in the California city, CNN reported. McGraw, however, did not directly embed himself with ICE officers this time, instead opting to remain at a field office as he spoke with Homan on 'the day before and day after the LA operation,' his office said. 5 Dr. Phil McGraw was at the ICE field office in Los Angeles speaking with agents before and after Friday's chaotic immigration raid. Getty Images 5 Protests erupted in Los Angeles and nearby cities as mobs of demonstrators confronted ICE and the LAPD. AFP via Getty Images 'In order to not escalate any situation, Dr. Phil McGraw did not join and was not embedded' directly during the LA raids, his office explained. McGraw's footage and interview with Homan is set to air on 'Dr. Phil Primetime' on Monday and Tuesday night. A snippet of the interview with Homan posted online earlier in the day showed that the ICE chief was aware things could get hectic in California ahead of the raid. 'You can hate what ICE does and who ICE is. You can protest and throw out all the nasty words you want, but you can't cross that line,' Homan warned if demonstrators get in the way of his officers. 5 Protestors holding signs that read 'ICE out of LA!' during a demonstration. AFP via Getty Images 5 Officers fire soft rounds at demonstrators near the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown LA on Sunday. AP 'It's getting out of control. It's getting to be a significant threat to our officers,' he added. Los Angeles descended into multiple days of chaos after ICE officials began an immigration raid on Friday to nab undocumented migrants, with a mob of protesters confronting ICE and the LAPD. The protests devolved into violence on Saturday, with rioters pummeling federal agents with rocks after a raid at a Home Depot in Paramount, California. 5 A mounted police officer confronts a protester hugging the horse during a demonstration against immigration raids. Getty Images Trump has since authorized the deployment of 2,000 National Guard members to contain the riots and restore order. McGraw's presence at yet another high-profile ICE raid in a major American city has reignited the criticisms of the 'made-for-TV' nature of the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. The TV host was at the center of ICE's raids in Chicago back in January, where agents were told to be 'camera-ready' for McGraw and his television crew.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store