logo
Santa Ana officials want the National Guard removed. But how?

Santa Ana officials want the National Guard removed. But how?

The California National Guard and its Humvees are no longer blocking vehicle traffic through 4th Street in downtown Santa Ana while protests against federal immigration sweeps have quieted down.
But as a legal battle between Gov. Gavin Newsom and the Trump administration ensues over who controls the troops, Santa Ana elected officials are seeking a way out from what some are calling a continued 'occupation' of the only sanctuary city in Orange County.
Santa Ana Councilmember David Peñaloza penned a letter to Rep. Young Kim, a Republican, on June 18 apprising her of the situation, as her 40th congressional district does not include Santa Ana.
'The deployment of the National Guard into Santa Ana has terrified our families and paralyzed our downtown,' his letter stated. 'Foot traffic has dried up. Stores are closing early. Families are staying home not because of crime, but because of intimidation from our own federal government.'
Peñaloza's stern letter urged Kim to work with Rep. Lou Correa, a Democrat, whose 46th congressional district encompasses Santa Ana, in demanding the removal of the National Guard, which President Trump made the controversial move to mobilize in response to protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids earlier this month.
'I made the letter very public because the whole point was to get other residents to reach out to her office,' Peñaloza told TimesOC. 'Her chief of staff replied within a couple minutes, actually, with a simple 'thank you.''
In a statement to TimesOC, Kim claimed some protesters in Santa Ana had 'escalated violence toward law enforcement' but peace was restored.
'Residents shouldn't be living in fear, and ICE's immigration efforts should be focused on finding illegal immigrants with criminal records in our communities and be in coordination with local law enforcement,' she said. 'I have voiced our community's concerns to the administration, and I will continue to work to fix our broken immigration system.'
Kim did not directly address the question of the National Guard's presence.
Peñaloza confirmed that the strategy of reaching out to Kim arose out of a series of conference calls between local law enforcement, city officials and U.S. Atty. Bill Essayli, a Trump appointee, over the troop presence around federal buildings in Santa Ana.
Though he did not attend any meetings himself, Peñaloza received word that Essayli suggested local officials reach out to Republican lawmakers if they wanted any progress on the National Guard.
A day before Peñaloza's letter, Kim led a delegation of California Republican representatives in introducing a House resolution condemning 'riots' in Los Angeles where the National Guard is predominately deployed.
'The riots escalated before the National Guard was sent in and were enabled by California's soft-on-crime policies,' Kim claimed in a press release.
The resolution thanked the Orange County Sheriff's Department, among other law enforcement agencies, which sent 138 staff to Los Angeles County in response to protests on June 8.
Orange County Sheriff Don Barnes confirmed his participation in meetings with Essayli about the National Guard's presence closer to home.
'The National Guard's role in demonstrations at the local level should be limited to the protection of federal buildings and assets,' Barnes told TimesOC. 'National Guard members do not have the benefit of training alongside local law enforcement to prepare for managing demonstrations and ensure they remain safe and lawful. It proves difficult to blend resources and can result in a variable response.'
During a contentious, 10-hour long Santa Ana City Council meeting on June 17, Councilmember Thai Viet Phan addressed the National Guard issue directly with city officials.
'We had our officers go out there to secure the federal building… in an effort to prevent the National Guard from coming to Santa Ana,' Phan said.
Santa Ana Police Chief Robert Rodriguez affirmed the notion.
'The city cannot directly remove the National Guard,' City Atty. Sonia Carvalho added. 'We don't have the resources to make that happen, if the governor can't make that happen.'
Santa Ana Councilmember Jessie Lopez credited protests in the city and demands made by the public at the council meeting for the National Guard's diminished presence.
'We have to make sure that we are consistently vocalizing our dissent against the National Guard being in our community,' she told TimesOC. 'We can send letters to representatives like Young Kim, but she has made it very clear through her actions that her loyalty lies — not with the [U.S.] Constitution, not with Californians — but with the MAGA-wing of her party.'
Lopez won't be writing a letter to Kim's office.
As Santa Ana officials differ on how to achieve the same objective, downtown businesses continue to suffer.
Ana Laura Padilla co-owns Perla Mexican Cuisine, which is across the street from the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse on 4th Street, where troops remain on guard. She wonders how bored troops must be with next to nothing to do.
The restaurant has fallen on more idle times, itself.
'Business has dropped dramatically,' Padilla said. 'It's been very hard on my employees, too. We've had to cut a lot of hours because we're not very busy.'
Padilla doesn't believe the message has gotten out about the streets reopening as far as her customers are concerned.
'We're not breaking even, at all,' she said.
Padilla recalled Black Lives Matter protests in 2020 during the pandemic when fencing and boarded up windows protected the federal building across the street from her restaurant. She said the National Guard response, this time, was 'too much.'
Protests on June 9 led to 11 arrests with the National Guard stationed in downtown Santa Ana the following morning. But no protests have occurred in the city since at least June 22, according to Natalie Garcia, a Santa Ana police spokesperson.
Rep. Correa questions the rationale behind the troop deployment, especially as protests have cooled off and small businesses continue to be impacted.
'You deal with the facts,' Correa told TimesOC. 'Everything has been relatively peaceful, especially for the past few days. What's the purpose?'
His Congressional office remains focused on cases related to ICE and U.S. Customs and Border Protection arrests in his district, including Narciso Barranco, a landscaper punched by a masked federal agent in a viral video.
But Correa signaled a willingness to work with Kim on the National Guard issue.
'Having the National Guard is not the right call,' he said. 'I'll work with everyone that wants to work with me. I would love to work with her on this issue.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'We Hope So': Trump On MEGABILL Meeting July 4 Deadline
'We Hope So': Trump On MEGABILL Meeting July 4 Deadline

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

'We Hope So': Trump On MEGABILL Meeting July 4 Deadline

President Trump hosted a 'One Big, Beautiful Event' Thursday afternoon from the White House as the GOP "Megabill" full of his domestic priorities makes its way through Congress. Republican leaders have voiced optimism they can get the legislation to Trump's desk by July 4 — but that timeline has faced some road bumps due to internal divisions over certain spending cuts and tax provisions. The Senate parliamentarian has also rejected many of the House-passed measures. The president has pressured GOP holdouts to support the bill, even if it means pushing into the lawmakers' recess. Thursday's event has been billed as his last-ditch effort to win them over.

Supreme Court meets Friday to decide 6 remaining cases, including birthright citizenship
Supreme Court meets Friday to decide 6 remaining cases, including birthright citizenship

Hamilton Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Supreme Court meets Friday to decide 6 remaining cases, including birthright citizenship

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is meeting Friday to decide the final six cases of its term, including President Donald Trump's bid to enforce his executive order denying birthright citizenship to U.S.-born children of parents who are in the country illegally. The justices take the bench at 10 a.m. for their last public session until the start of their new term on Oct. 6. The birthright citizenship order has been blocked nationwide by three lower courts. The Trump administration made an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court to narrow the court orders that have prevented the citizenship changes from taking effect anywhere in the U.S. The issue before the justices is whether to limit the authority of judges to issue nationwide injunctions, which have plagued both Republican and Democratic administrations in the past 10 years. These nationwide court orders have emerged as an important check on Trump's efforts and a source of mounting frustration to the Republican president and his allies. Decisions also are expected in several other important cases. The court seemed likely during arguments in April to side with Maryland parents in a religious rights case over LGBTQ storybooks in public schools. Parents in the Montgomery County school system, in suburban Washington, want to be able to pull their children out of lessons that use the storybooks, which the county added to the curriculum to better reflect the district's diversity. The school system at one point allowed parents to remove their children from those lessons, but then reversed course because it found the opt-out policy to be disruptive. Sex education is the only area of instruction with an opt-out provision in the county's schools. The justices also are weighing a three-year battle over congressional districts in Louisiana that is making its second trip to the Supreme Court. Before the court now is a map that created a second Black majority congressional district among Louisiana's six seats in the House of Representatives. The district elected a Black Democrat in 2024. Lower courts have struck down two Louisiana congressional maps since 2022 and the justices are considering whether to send state lawmakers back to the map-drawing board for a third time. The case involves the interplay between race and politics in drawing political boundaries in front of a conservative-led court that has been skeptical of considerations of race in public life. At arguments in March, several of the court's conservative justices suggested they could vote to throw out the map and make it harder, if not impossible, to bring redistricting lawsuits under the Voting Rights Act . Free speech rights are at the center of a case over a Texas law aimed at blocking kids from seeing online pornography. Texas is among more than a dozen states with age verification laws. The states argue the laws are necessary as smartphones have made access to online porn, including hardcore obscene material, almost instantaneous. The question for the court is whether the measure infringes on the constitutional rights of adults as well. The Free Speech Coalition, an adult-entertainment industry trade group, agrees that children shouldn't be seeing pornography. But it says the Texas law is written too broadly and wrongly affects adults by requiring them to submit personal identifying information online that is vulnerable to hacking or tracking. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman to lie in state as suspect faces court date
Former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman to lie in state as suspect faces court date

Washington Post

time2 hours ago

  • Washington Post

Former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman to lie in state as suspect faces court date

MINNEAPOLIS — Former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman will lie in state in the Minnesota Capitol rotunda on Friday while the man charged with killing her and her husband, and wounding a state senator and his wife, is due in court. Hortman, a Democrat , will be the first woman and one of fewer than 20 Minnesotans accorded the honor. She will lie in state with her husband, Mark, and their golden retriever, Gilbert. Her husband was also killed in the June 14 attack, and Gilbert was seriously wounded and had to be euthanized.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store