Reeves clashes with Sky News presenter over calls for grooming gangs apology
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said the priority was helping victims of systematic sexual exploitation 'not people's hurt feelings about how they've been spoken about'
Rachel Reeves clashed with Sky News presenter Sir Trevor Phillips after the Government dropped its opposition to a national inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal.
The Chancellor said the priority was helping victims of systematic sexual exploitation 'not people's hurt feelings about how they've been spoken about' when asked to apologise to critics.
It comes after Keir Starmer previously hit out at opposition politicians calling for an inquiry, accusing them of "jumping on a bandwagon" and "amplifying what the far-right is saying" to gain attention.
But the Prime Minister confirmed on Saturday that he had accepted a recommendation from Baroness Louise Casey for a full probe after tasking her to carry out an audit. Her findings are expected to published this week.
The Government initially resisted calls for a national inquiry into grooming gangs, arguing it had been looked as part of a seven-year probe into child sexual abuse in England and Wales by Professor Alexis Jay, which reported in 2022.
Widespread sexual abuse of young girls in a number of English towns was uncovered over a decade ago, with victims repeatedly failed by the police and child protection.
The scandal hit the headlines again in January after Elon Musk seized on reports that Home Office Minister Jess Phillips had rejected calls for a public inquiry, in favour of allowing councils to launch local probes.
The tech billionaire launch an onslaught of online attacks against Keir Starmer and Ms Phillips, including reposting a call for her to be jailed.
Asked if there will be an apology for people who were criticised for raising the issue of grooming gangs, Ms Reeves said: "What is the most important thing here? It's the victims."
She added: "It's not people's hurt feelings about how they've been spoken about. The most important thing here is the victims of these evil crimes."
Sir Trevor hit back: 'The reason this matters is because those people who raised these matters on behalf of victims, who cannot often speak for themselves, were accused by government ministers of 'total nonsense, misinformation and racism'. Surely that's important as well?'
But Ms Reeves said: 'The most important thing is the victims themselves, and we have been busy as a government implementing the 200 or so recommendations of the previous inquiry.'
Prof Jay's inquiry (IICSA) looked at child sexual abuse in a number of different setting. It included abuse by organised groups following multiple convictions of sexual offences against children across the UK between 2010-2014, including in Rotherham, Cornwall, Derbyshire, Rochdale and Bristol. But there has never been a public inquiry solely focused on grooming gangs.
The PM said he would commission a national public inquiry, which will be able to compel witnesses to give evidence. It is understood that it will be national in scope, co-ordinating a series of targeted local investigations.
An independent report in 2014 found that more than 1,400 children in Rotherham, south Yorkshire were exposed to sexual abuse and violence between 1997 and 2013 by gangs of predominantly British Pakistani men.
Up to 1,000 girls were abused over 40 years in Telford, Shropshire, by men of south Asian heritage, an inquiry found, after a lengthy investigation by the Sunday Mirror. Chairman Tom Crowther QC said concerns had been ignored for decades due to "nervousness about race".
Another high profile report found children were left at the mercy of grooming gangs in Rochdale between 2004 to 2013, carried out by predominantly Asian men.
A Home Office study in 2020 found data on the ethnicity of perpetrators was significantly limited and research found "group-based CSE (child sexual exploitation) offenders are most commonly White."
The report added: "Some studies suggest an over-representation of Black and Asian offenders relative to the demographics of national populations. However, it is not possible to conclude that this is representative of all group-based CSE offending."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
30 minutes ago
- Times
No concessions on benefits reform, Starmer tells rebels
Sir Keir Starmer has warned Labour rebels there will be no concessions on cuts to disability benefits as he vows to press ahead with reforming a welfare system he says is 'not working for taxpayers'. The prime minister said he has 'got to get the reforms through' as ministers prepare to publish legislation this week that is likely to prompt Starmer's biggest backbench rebellion yet. While ministers insist they are confident of avoiding defeat, there is nervousness in government after 170 Labour MPs raised concerns about reforms which will make it harder to claim personal independent payments (PIP), the main disability benefit. But Starmer insisted that even critics agreed that 'we've got to reform the welfare system', saying: 'The principles remain the same: those who can work should work; those who need support into work should have that support into work, which I don't think they are getting at the moment; those who are never going to be able to work should be properly supported and protected, and that includes not being reassessed and reassessed.' Speaking on his way to the G7 summit in Canada, Starmer said: 'We need reform and we will be getting on with that reform when the bill comes.' About 800,000 people will lose thousands of pounds a year under the reforms and MPs are alarmed by official estimates that a quarter of a million people will be pushed into poverty as a result. • Thanks to the PIP benefit I could work. So why remove it? Last week ministers offered rebels a £500 million 'olive branch', promising that those who lost PIP would have 13 weeks before their payments stopped, and that the same three-month transition period would also apply to 150,000 people who stand to lose a carer's allowance linked to a cancelled PIP claim. Ministers say this is longer than any other transition payment and will mean that no one loses out before 2027. They say there can be no change to the main thrust of the reforms, which will make it harder to qualify for help with everyday tasks such as washing and dressing. They are alarmed by the soaring cost of sickness benefits, which have risen by £20 billion since the pandemic and which will rise by another £18 billion by the end of the parliament. This is despite reforms that will save £5 billion. Asked if there would be any softening of the bill before a vote expected at the end of the month, Starmer said: 'We've got to get the reforms through. I've been clear about that from start to finish — the system is not working. It's not working for those that need support. It's not working for taxpayers. Everybody agrees it needs reform. We've got to reform it and that's what we intend to do with the bill.' • A quarter of Britons now disabled Leading rebels have dismissed last week's attempts at reassurance, saying they want a fuller impact assessment and an immediate review of PIP criteria. A wider review promised by ministers is not expected to be completed until after tougher rules come into effect in November 2026. Neil Duncan-Jordan, a leading backbench critic of the bill, agreed with ministers last week that the extra transition periods were 'not a concession', and confirmed he would vote against it. He said MPs should recognise the cuts 'will make disabled people poorer. No amount of warm words mask the reality — cuts don't create jobs, they create austerity'. Brian Leishman, another backbench leftwinger, attacked the reforms as 'a complete insult to disabled people and against everything a Labour government should ever do to people that need help'. Ministers believe that less hardline critics will be persuaded to fall into line by evidence that the government is listening to concerns. A suggestion by Kemi Badenoch, the Tory leader, that her party would vote against the bill is also seen as helpful by party managers who say Labour MPs will not want to walk through lobbies alongside Conservative MPs. An extension of free school meals to all pupils on universal credit has also helped as ministers have pointed out that this will lift 100,000 children out of poverty, twice the number pushed into poverty by welfare cuts.
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
PM to raise small boats with Macron at G7, as migrants continue to evade French police
Sir Keir Starmer says he will speak to his French counterpart Emmanuel Macron and other European leaders at the G7 summit on stepping up efforts to stop small boat crossings across the English Channel. In a briefing with journalists before arriving in Canada for the meeting of the world's most advanced economies, the prime minister was asked if French authorities are doing enough to stop small boats. It comes after more than 900 people made the perilous crossing on Friday alone, taking the provisional annual total to 16,183. Despite existing security arrangements between the UK and France, ITV News reported last month on how French police are continuing to be outpaced by people smugglers. "Look, one of the things we've worked hard at is improving the relations with the French in relation to the work we both need to do to stop these boat crossings, which I'm determined we will absolutely bear down on," Starmer said. "Nobody should be making that journey. As a result of that we are seeing a much greater cooperation in northern France." However, the PM said he wanted to see "more cooperation" in northern France, adding: "It's an issue that I have raised and will raise again with President Macron. "It's one of the issues I'll be discussing - not just with Macron, actually, but discussing it with [Italy's] Giorgia Meloni, [Germany's] Friedrich Merz, and others. Asked if time had been set aside at the G7 for specific meetings on this issue, or if talks would only take part on the fringes, a spokesperson for the PM that immigration would be a discussion topic among leaders. They added that Starmer has "always been clear" this is an issue that "requires international partnerships and solutions to make a difference". The current provisional annual total of small boat Channel crossings, standing at 16,183 as of Saturday, is understood to be 42% higher than the same point last year and 79% up on the same date in 2023. Friday was not even the highest daily total so far this year, with 1,195 people arriving on Britain's shores on May 31. The UK is currently funding equipment for French police to stop these migrants, but, as ITV News observed in Dunkirk last month, many have been able to exploit stretches of beaches with no visible police presence. A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We all want to end dangerous small boat crossings, which threaten lives and undermine our border security.'The people-smuggling gangs do not care if the vulnerable people they exploit live or die as long as they pay, and we will stop at nothing to dismantle their business models and bring them to justice.'That is why this government has put together a serious plan to take down these networks at every stage, and why we are investing up to an additional £280 million per year by 2028-29 in the Border Security Command.'Through international intelligence-sharing under our Border Security Command, enhanced enforcement operations in northern France and tougher legislation in the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill, we are strengthening international partnerships and boosting our ability to identify, disrupt and dismantle criminal gangs whilst strengthening the security of our borders.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Reeves plots Budget tax raid on dividends
Rachel Reeves is drawing up plans for a tax raid on dividends in her autumn Budget in a hunt to find tens of billions in revenue. The Chancellor of the Exchequer's officials are understood to have drawn up a menu of tax increases, including a raid on dividends suggested by Angela Rayner in a leaked memo. Officials are considering abolishing the £500 tax-free allowance for dividend payments, or increasing the rate of tax from its current level of 39 per cent. Removing the allowance could raise the Treasury more than £300 million and may allow the Chancellor to claim she has not increased taxes on 'working people', a Labour pledge before last year's general election. But the Conservatives said the rise would amount to Ms Reeves 'putting her hands in the pockets of British taxpayers and businesses'. The so-called 'dossier' of tax changes, first reported by The Sunday Times, was not denied by senior government officials last night. It included an increase on the levy on bank profits, which is charged on top of the normal corporation tax rate of 25 per cent.
