
Live Updates: Trump and Musk Have a Lot at Risk in Feud
White house memo
Elon Musk with President Trump at the White House in March, during happier days.
The moment had finally come, and it was every bit as lowdown, vindictive, personal, petty, operatic, childish, consequential, messy and public as many had always expected it would be.
'One thing's for sure,' Elon Musk posted on X midway through his relentless hourslong attack on Donald Trump, 'it ain't boring!'
The clash of the titans was upon us, and the gloves were off.
The speed of the fallout was breathtaking. Up until about 14 seconds ago, Mr. Musk was flying on Mr. Trump's planes, staying at his homes, socializing with his children. On Friday, Mr. Trump celebrated him with an Oval Office farewell address and gave him a novelty, oversize key to the White House.
But all was not well. Mr. Musk had been stewing about the sweeping domestic policy bill that the White House was pushing through Congress. By Thursday afternoon, he started spitting venom.
Image
Less than a week ago, Mr. Musk was all smiles during his farewell in the Oval Office.
Credit...
Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times
'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' Mr. Musk wrote on X. 'Such ingratitude.'
How sharper than a serpent's tooth it is!
Usually, when Mr. Trump has a big, messy falling-out in public, it is with someone who needs him, a lesser being who lives in fear of a primary challenge or somehow being ruined. But now he was beefing with the rare person who has leverage over him — political and financial leverage and perhaps even some emotional leverage. When Mr. Trump said on Thursday that he was 'very disappointed in Elon,' he sounded as if he meant it.
But Mr. Trump, being the president of the United States, had some leverage of his own.
He mused on Truth Social that the 'easiest way to save money in our Budget' would be to wipe out Mr. Musk's government subsidies and contracts. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Mr. Trump added, causing Mr. Musk to erupt further.
There was a screwball element to their back-and-forth: Because Mr. Trump and Mr. Musk are each the masters of their own social media platform, neither one was directly replying to the other. Anyone following along at home (which is to say, everyone) had to toggle between platforms to keep up with these keyboard cowboys as they aimed shots at each other.
'THE GIRLS ARE FIGHTING' was a top trending topic on Mr. Musk's platform Thursday. There was a schoolyard aspect to their scrap as many on the playground rushed to jump in. 'SPICY,' Laura Loomer posted. 'hey @realDonaldTrump lmk if u need any breakup advice,' posted Ashley St. Clair, the mother of one of Mr. Musk's children. Mr. Musk began to hit the 'unfollow' button on accounts belonging to close Trump allies such as Charlie Kirk and Stephen Miller.
Image
Mr. Musk posted that Mr. Trump would never have won the election without his help. 'Such ingratitude," he wrote.
Credit...
Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times
Four hours into the shootout, a peacekeeper emerged in the form of Kanye West. 'Broooos please noooooo,' he posted on X with an emoji of two people hugging. 'We love you both so much.'
But they seemed far beyond the point of hugging it out. A line had been crossed that probably could never be uncrossed. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' Mr. Musk wrote shortly after 3 p.m., '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' The implication that Mr. Trump is somehow connected to Mr. Epstein's crimes was an especially explosive one to make, given that large swaths of Mr. Trump's base remain so animated by the sordid details of that particular case.
'Some food for thought,' Mr. Musk wrote in another especially cutting post. 'Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years.'
Questions swirled above the fray: Just how hard might Mr. Trump, who has been shown to have no qualms about weaponizing government, actually go after Mr. Musk? Are Tesla and SpaceX about to get DOGE'd?
What would happen to that red Tesla that Mr. Musk parked at the White House, the one that Mr. Trump's young aides love to drive around and post pictures from?
And would Mr. Musk have to send back his key to the White House?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
26 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Supreme Court Leaves Intact Ban on High-Capacity Gun Magazines
The US Supreme Court turned away a fresh gun-rights appeal, refusing to question the District of Columbia's ban on large-capacity ammunition-feeding devices. The justices on Friday rejected arguments from four firearms owners who said the ban violates the gun-rights protections in the Constitution's Second Amendment.


Fox News
27 minutes ago
- Fox News
'The Five' touts need for 'transparency' following Biden's doctor being subpoenaed
All times eastern Special Report with Bret Baier Maria Bartiromo's Wall Street FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage MOMENTS AGO: Trump takes questions as Abrego-Garcia faces human trafficking charges


CNN
27 minutes ago
- CNN
Proud Boys members suing Justice Department for January 6 prosecutions
Members of the Proud Boys who were convicted by a jury on several counts related to the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack – each of whom were later pardoned or had their sentences commuted by President Donald Trump – are now suing the Justice Department for what they say was a 'political prosecution.' The individuals, including several former leaders of the group, say the prosecution in the case amounted to an 'egregious and systemic abuse of the legal system and the United States Constitution to punish and oppress political allies of President Trump, by any and all means necessary, legal, or illegal.' Four of the five men – Enrique Tarrio, the former leader of the group; Joseph Biggs; Ethan Nordean; Trump Zachary Rehl; and Dominic Pezzola – were convicted of seditious conspiracy and each received lengthy sentences prior to Trump's absolution. The group wants the government to pay $100 million in restitution for the criminal prosecution and has asked for a jury trial in the matter. In the wake of Trump's election for a second term, the administration granted full clemency to hundreds of people convicted of felony crimes like destroying property and assaulting police on January 6. Trump's reelection also brought with it a complete about-face on investigations into those who attacked the Capitol that day, effectively ending the largest ever investigation conducted by the FBI. Trump's Justice Department also recently announced it had reached a settlement in the lawsuit brought by the family of Ashli Babbitt, who was shot and killed by an officer on January 6 after attempting to breach the Speaker's Lobby near the House chamber. CNN has reached out to the Justice Department for comment. Republicans and Trump allies have long argued that the hundreds of cases brought against people who participated in the January 6 attack often amounted to political persecution from Joe Biden's Justice Department because they targeted Trump supporters. The lawsuit filed Friday could either force the administration to defend its prosecution of the Proud Boys or settle with the men. One of the men suing the Justice Department, Dominic Pezzola, was the first rioter to break open a window at the Capitol, allowing scores of protestors to enter the building, prosecutors said during the trial. Prosecutors argued that the other four men were leaders of the group and helped coordinate and helm elements of the attack. 'Now that the Plaintiffs are vindicated, free, and able to once again exercise their rights as American citizens, they bring this action against their tormentors for violations of their Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment Rights,' the lawsuit says. The lawsuit argues that prosecutors went after the five men despite knowing they never organized or coordinated the events of January 6. Prosecutors, the lawsuit alleges, invented 'a whole new legal theory,' stacked the jury and breached attorney-client communications.