logo
Trump tells administrative judges to speed up dismissing arrest cases so they can deport faster

Trump tells administrative judges to speed up dismissing arrest cases so they can deport faster

Independenta day ago

President Donald Trump 's administration has urged justices to speed up the dismissal of pending immigration cases so that federal agents can arrest their subjects, according to a report.
This comes as part of an attempt to bolster the total number of undocumented migrants being held in detention.
Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration has intensified in the last week, inspiring the protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in Los Angeles that have since spread to other cities.
The new tactic to increase the number of arrests was outlined in a memo from the Justice Department sent to immigration judges, which was seen by NBC News.
The justices in question, who answer to the executive branch and are not part of the independent judiciary, are instructed to permit Department of Homeland Security (DHS) attorneys to make oral motions to dismiss. Then, justices are told to move swiftly to grant those dismissals, rather than allow immigrants the 10-day response time.
'Oral decisions must be completed within the same hearing slot on the day testimony and arguments are concluded,' states the memo, which is dated Friday, May 30.
It also instructs the judges that no 'additional documentation or briefing is required,' in the hope of cutting down on bureaucratic delays.
Once the cases in question are dismissed, the immigrants concerned can be entered into expedited removal proceedings or deemed 'subject to mandatory detention' by ICE without being granted an opportunity to present their case for asylum in the United States before they are deported, the memo advises.
A source close to the judges' union told NBC that, while the move was legal, it has nevertheless caused consternation to many immigration judges.
'They think it makes a mockery of the whole process and that it flies in the face of what Trump ran on,' the insider said. 'Immigration enforcement means it's done in a fair manner... and this isn't fair.'
The memo notes a provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act that outlines the conditions under which the U.S. government can move to dismiss an immigrant's case. Still, it misstates the wording of the statute in doing so.
Judges may grant motions to dismiss a migrant's case when 'circumstances have changed to such an extent that continuation is no longer in the best interest of the government,' the memo claims.
However, the precise wording of the act makes clear that this can only happen when 'circumstances of the case have changed to such an extent that continuation is no longer in the best interest of the government.'
Greg Chen, senior director of government relations at the American Immigration Lawyers Association, told NBC that he believes the Justice Department 's guidance order is not legal because it omits those crucial three words.
'The omission of the words 'of the case' is deliberate because DHS is trying to avoid having to speak to the individual case,' he said.
'The law requires them to provide particular reasons for their motion, and they are not doing that. The email is the written policy that contradicts the law.'
Former ICE chief of staff Jason Houser said that the purpose of speeding up case dismissals was to enable agents to arrest more people, but, in practice, it would not actually help with Trump's mass deportation push because there is simply not enough space at already-overcrowded detention centers to accommodate more detainees.
Over 51,000 immigrants were being held in ICE custody as of May 23, according to the agency's own official data, while it only has the funding to hold 41,500, which means it risks keeping people in substandard living conditions that fall below court-mandated standards.
'Flooding the system with thousands of non-criminals wastes time and resources when federal law enforcement should be focused on national security threats,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Here are the three reasons why tariffs have yet to drive inflation higher
Here are the three reasons why tariffs have yet to drive inflation higher

NBC News

time14 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Here are the three reasons why tariffs have yet to drive inflation higher

Despite widespread fears to the contrary, President Donald Trump 's tariffs have yet to show up in any of the traditional data points measuring inflation. In fact, separate readings this week on consumer and producer prices were downright benign, as indexes from the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed that prices rose just 0.1% in May. The inflation scare is over, then, right? To the contrary, the months ahead are still expected to show price increases driven by Trump's desire to ensure the U.S. gets a fair shake with its global trading partners. So far, though, the duties have not driven prices up, save for a few areas that are particularly sensitive to higher import costs. At least three factors have conspired so far to keep inflation in check: Companies hoarding imported goods ahead of the April 2 tariff announcement. The time it takes for the charges to make their way into the real economy. The lack of pricing power companies face as consumers tighten belts. 'We believe the limited impact from tariffs in May is a reflection of pre-tariff stockpiling, as well as a lagged pass-through of tariffs into import prices,' Aichi Amemiya, senior economist at Nomura, said in a note. 'We maintain our view that the impact of tariffs will likely materialize in the coming months.' This week's data showed isolated evidence of tariff pressures. Canned fruits and vegetables, which are often imported, saw prices rise 1.9% for the month. Roasted coffee was up 1.2% and tobacco increased 0.8%. Durable goods, or long-lasting items such as major appliances (up 4.3%) and computers and related items (1.1%), also saw increases. 'This gain in appliance prices mirrors what happened during the 2018-20 round of import taxes, when the cost of imported washing machines surged,' Joseph Brusuelas, chief economist at RSM, said in his daily market note. One of the biggest tests, though, on whether the price increases will prove durable, as many economists fear, or as temporary, the prism through which they're typically viewed, could largely depend on consumers, who drive nearly 70% of all economic activity. The Federal Reserve's periodic report on economic activity issued earlier this month indicated a likelihood of price increases ahead, while noting that some companies were hesitant to pass through higher costs. 'We have been of the position for a long time that tariffs would not be inflationary and they were more likely to cause economic weakness and ultimately deflation,' said Luke Tilley, chief economist at Wilmington Trust. 'There's a lot of consumer weakness.' Indeed, that's largely what happened during the damaging Smoot-Hawley tariffs in 1930, which many economists believe helped trigger the Great Depression. Tilley said he sees signs that consumers already are cutting back on vacations and recreation, a possible indication that companies may not have as much pricing power as they did when inflation started to surge in 2021. Fed officials, though, remain on the sidelines as they wait over the summer to see how tariffs do impact prices. Markets largely expect the Fed to wait until September to resume lowering interest rates, even though inflation is waning and the employment picture is showing signs of cracks. 'This time around, if inflation proves to be transitory, then the Federal Reserve may cut its policy rate later this year,' Brusuelas said. 'But if consumers push their own inflation expectations higher because of short-term dislocations in the price of food at home or other goods, then it's going to be some time before the Fed cuts rates.'

Sen Alex Padilla dragged out of Noem immigration briefing in LA
Sen Alex Padilla dragged out of Noem immigration briefing in LA

BBC News

time19 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Sen Alex Padilla dragged out of Noem immigration briefing in LA

Democratic US Senator Alex Padilla has been forcibly removed from a news conference held by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in Los was offering the latest figures on immigration enforcement in the area, which has led to nearly a week of protests in the city, to members of the news media when Sen Padilla interrupted and started shouting a removed from the room, the California senator was removal caused condemnation on both sides of the aisle, with fellow senators calling the arrest shocking and a "sickening disgrace" and the Trump administration dubbing it "disrespectful political theatre". "I'm Senator Alex Padilla," he said as he was confronted by authorities. "I have questions for the secretary!" Noem, who was speaking about immigration and the protests in LA, continued addressing reporters and law enforcement officers while the senator was ejected from the office said he was "forced to the ground and handcuffed" by federal agents when trying to ask the secretary a question, and added that he was not currently being detained. The Department of Homeland Security said Padilla had engaged in "disrespectful political theatre" and that Noem met with the senator after the news Mayor Karen Bass called the incident "absolutely abhorrent and outrageous", adding that the Trump administration's "violent attacks on our city must end". Padilla told reporters that he was already in the federal building for a previously scheduled meeting. He said he stopped by Noem's news briefing because he and his colleagues have received "little to no information in response" to several immigration-related the son of Mexican immigrants, is the most senior Democrat on the Senate's Border Security and Immigration subcommittee."I came to the press conference to hear what she had to say, to see if I could learn any new additional information," he said. "If this is how the Department of Homeland Security responds to a senator with a question, you can only imagine what they're doing to farm workers, to cooks, to day labourers out in the Los Angeles community and throughout California and throughout the country."He urged Americans across the country to "continue peacefully protesting" the Trump administration and its DHS in a statement said Padilla didn't identify himself and was not wearing the Senator's pin on his clothing so officers thought he was an attacker. Video footage of the incident shows Padilla saying he was he was a senator as he was being pushed outside the room. California's Governor Gavin Newsom called on Republican congressional leadership to condemn the detaining of Padilla. "If they can handcuff a U.S. Senator for asking a question, imagine what they will do to you," Newsom wrote on social the White House accused the California senator of storming the press conference, and said he "yelled and lunged toward Secretary Noem". "Padilla didn't want answers; he wanted attention," Abigail Jackson, White House spokesperson said. "Padilla embarrassed himself and his constituents with this immature, theater-kid stunt – but it's telling that Democrats are more riled up about Padilla than they are about the violent riots and assaults on law enforcement in LA."Former vice-president and Trump opponent, Kamala Harris also criticised the move and said the California senator was trying to get answers for his constituents about the ongoing immigration raids in the state. "United States Senator Alex Padilla was representing the millions of Californians who are demanding answers to this Administration's actions in Southern California," she said on Twitter. "This is a shameful and stunning abuse of power."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store