
Evangelion Voice Actress Megumi Hayashibara Deletes ‘Invasive Species' Comment on Blog
Prominent Japanese voice actress Megumi Hayashibara sparked an online debate earlier this week foll
owing
her
blog post
on Sunday. The 58-year-old Tokyo native,
who's
most well known for her role as Rei Ayanami in
Neon Genesis Evangelion
,
shared
her concerns about Japan's cultural identity and political apathy. The blog
, titled 'Indifference, Ignorance, and Not Knowing,'
quickly went viral. The comments that drew the most attention regarded international students receiving subsidies and foreign tourists behaving badly. Referring to the latter, she used a metaphor of a Japanese crayfish being overwhelmed by an 'invasive species.' She later deleted the remark.
List of Contents:
Megumi Hayashibara's Blog
The Online Reaction
Related Posts
Megumi Hayashibara Urges Japanese People To Vote
'Some international students receive subsidies for free, whereas Japanese students need to take out a student loan (which must be paid back, leading to debt),' wrote Hayashibara. 'The truth is being twisted. Don't leave it up to others. You must vote. We're at a point where just saying 'whatever' or 'it won't change' doesn't cut it anymore. If things continue as they are, Japanese unique qualities, such as our manners, our attitude, our technology and possibly even anime as a form of freedom of expression, will be lost.
'In the midst of all this, there are some people staying at vacation rentals with no manners, foreign tourists who don't know what it means to yield, and even those who go so far as to remove bamboo from trees in Kyoto,' continued Hayashibara. 'If we don't have regulations that are properly enforced, it could become dangerous. It will be like how Japanese crayfish were instantly devoured by invasive species. For instance
,
the Japanese rule of lining up to buy things could end up disappearing.'
Hayashibara went on to say that she wasn't trying to criticize any specific country. She just feels that tax money should first go to people who pay taxes here, including foreign residents, as well as to disaster-hit areas and to students who are supporting the country. The original blog post also included a section discussing South Korean politics. That was later edited out after a Korean friend contacted her to say that her comments could inadvertently fuel political divisions.
The Online Reaction
While there have been several comments online criticizing Hayashibara's blog, including one X user who
described
it as 'hate speech,' many agree with her views. 'The behavior of many international tourists is really bad, she's not wrong to call out the problem,'
posted
one person on X. Another
pointed out
that Japanese crayfish was 'a metaphor for how traditional Japanese culture is being overwhelmed by outside influences. This is supported by the following line about the decline of the unspoken rule of lining up.'
On Wednesday,
Hayashibara deleted the line about the crayfish. 'Part of the way I expressed myself was deemed too extreme, so I removed it,' she wrote. 'I used it to illustrate the kind of person mentioned above, but it has hurt people who are not involved. I will learn. Thank you for letting me know.'
Related Posts
Suzie Yeung on Voice Acting in Anime and Video Games
Voice Actors From Japan Insist on Tighter AI Regulation
Voice Actor Hideyuki Umezu Dies Aged 68
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Kyodo News
19 minutes ago
- Kyodo News
Panel to propose Japan weigh defense spending above 2% of GDP
KYODO NEWS - 6 hours ago - 22:01 | All, Japan A Defense Ministry panel is set to propose that the government consider raising defense spending beyond the current goal of 2 percent of gross domestic product, sources close to the matter said Sunday. In a draft proposal to be presented to the government soon, the panel, set up in February 2024, also calls for discussions on deploying submarines equipped with long-range missiles, including nuclear-powered ones, to strengthen the country's deterrence capability, the sources said. It remains unclear how the proposal will be reflected in Japan's defense policy, as questions remain over how to fund a larger budget and whether using nuclear power for defense purposes would conflict with the country's policy of peaceful atomic energy use. The government "should not hesitate to pursue the further strengthening of defense capabilities after the achievement" of the current target to have defense-related spending account for 2 percent of GDP, the panel says in the draft proposal, according to the sources. The panel says submarines that enable Japan to strike from beyond an enemy's missile range would significantly enhance the country's deterrence capability. The government should discuss all possible options for propulsion systems, including nuclear power for the submarines, "without taboos," the panel says. The panel, chaired by Sadayuki Sakakibara, the former chairman of the Japan Business Federation, was set up to discuss how the country's defense capabilities should be bolstered in line with its current defense buildup plan. The plan, known as the Defense Buildup Program, allocates 43 trillion yen ($298 billion) over five years through March 2028, aiming for defense spending to reach 2 percent of GDP in fiscal 2027. Japan's annual defense budget had long been capped at around 1 percent of GDP. The program was adopted in December 2022 as part of three key security documents that marked a major shift in defense policy for a country with a pacifist Constitution, including a plan to acquire strike capabilities that could reach an adversary's territory. "It is necessary to make efforts to achieve the 2 percent target ahead of schedule and compile the next defense strategy and the buildup plan," the panel says in the draft proposal. The panel, made up of experts in security, the economy, and science and technology, also calls for the full-fledged introduction of unmanned defense equipment using cutting-edge artificial intelligence technologies, the sources said. The government should consider using unmanned aircraft for continuous day-and-night aerial monitoring, the panel says, following a May incident in which a Chinese military helicopter entered Japanese airspace near the Japanese-administered Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea, which are claimed by Beijing. Related coverage: Philippines, Japan conduct joint exercise in South China Sea Japan draws up 100 bil. yen policy to attract foreign researchers Japan conveys strong concern over China jet flying close to SDF plane


Kyodo News
2 hours ago
- Kyodo News
Building in North Korea's Yongbyon possibly to house new centrifuges
KYODO NEWS - 13 hours ago - 13:34 | World, All A building currently under construction at the Yongbyon nuclear complex in North Korea's northwest is possibly intended to accommodate an advanced type of centrifuge for uranium enrichment, according to a Japanese expert. Yuki Kobayashi, research fellow at the Sasakawa Peace Foundation in Tokyo who is well-versed in nuclear proliferation, recently told Kyodo News he cannot confirm whether the building is a uranium enrichment facility based on satellite images, but Pyongyang is in "desperate need" of such a building for its nuclear program. In September, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un called for the introduction of new centrifuges, which were in the final stage of development, to boost the country's production of nuclear weapons. International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Rafael Grossi said Monday in Vienna that the nuclear watchdog is monitoring the construction of the new structure, which he said has similar features to an existing uranium enrichment plant in Kangson near Pyongyang. Kobayashi said the new building, which would be the third uranium enrichment facility in North Korea along with existing ones in Yongbyon and Kangson, may only accommodate the updated type of centrifuge. The Center for Strategic and International Studies, a U.S. think tank, has released several satellite images of the suspected new uranium enrichment facility in Yongbyon. Its analysis showed the construction had started in mid-December. The building was externally completed by early June and internal construction continues, according to the think tank. Kim toured a nuclear material production base and the Nuclear Weapons Institute last September and January, the country's state-run media had said without reporting the location of the sites. In an unusual move, the official Korean Central News Agency published pictures in September and January showing arrays of centrifuges at one or more undeclared facilities visited by Kim. In September 2017, North Korea claimed it detonated a hydrogen bomb that can be mounted on an intercontinental ballistic missile, in its sixth and most powerful nuclear test. As a miniaturized hydrogen bomb needs both plutonium and highly enriched uranium for detonation, North Korea may be expanding its capacity for uranium enrichment. Related coverage: North Korea says damaged destroyer repaired, relaunched successfully U.S. expert posts satellite image of suspected North Korea nuke facility South Korea's military halts loudspeaker broadcasts against North Korea


Yomiuri Shimbun
4 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
‘Golden Share' Served as Solution in Trump's Approval of U.S. Steel Acquisition; Solution Found but Challenges Remain
The Yomiuri Shimbun U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at a U.S. Steel Corp. steel plant in Pennsylvania on May 30. With U.S. President Donald Trump having approved a partnership between Nippon Steel Corp. and U.S. Steel Corp., the Japanese company's acquisition of U.S. Steel is expected to be realized. The Trump administration appears to have concluded that by signing a national security agreement with Nippon Steel and acquiring a 'golden share' in U.S. Steel the administration can contain opposition from hard-liners who support an 'America First' policy. Eighteen months after the plan was announced, negotiations between Japan and the United States over the acquisition, a development that escalated into a diplomatic issue, are set to conclude. Change of mind Trump, who views the steel industry as a critical sector directly linked to national security, has referred to U.S. Steel — once the world's largest steel manufacturer — as a 'symbol of America' and had opposed Nippon Steel's bid to acquire it. What prompted Trump to change his mind were Nippon Steel's proposed additional investments and the Japanese company's measures to mitigate security threats. Nippon Steel increased the amount it would invest in the U.S. company after acquiring it from $2.7 billion to $14 billion (about ¥2 trillion). It is also believed that Nippon Steel promised that the majority of U.S. Steel's board members would be U.S. nationals and that the company's production capacity would not be reduced. In response to these proposals, local lawmakers and other interested parties in Pennsylvania, where U.S. Steel is headquartered, moved to persuade Trump, apparently by pointing out the economic benefits of the acquisition, such as employment and plant modernization. In addition, key U.S. Cabinet members including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent — who also chairs the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, whose duties include reviewing foreign acquisitions — and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick are said to have urged Trump to approve the acquisition. Trump himself began to judge that Nippon Steel's huge investment would benefit his administration and leaned toward approving the acquisition. Political risk However, the acquisition could give the impression to the American people that a symbolic U.S. company is being sold to a foreign company, which would pose a significant political risk for Trump. Even within his administration, senior officials who support his 'America First' policy position opposed the acquisition. Avoiding backlash from his supporters was also necessary with the 2026 midterm elections in mind. As negotiations between the Japanese and U.S. steel companies progressed behind the scenes, there emerged the idea of issuing a golden share to the U.S. administration to grant it veto power over important management decisions. According to sources, the initial U.S. plan was to approve the acquisition on the condition that a national security agreement was signed, but in the final stages of the negotiations, the U.S. side demanded a golden share. Trump apparently judged that acquiring a golden share in U.S. Steel as a symbol of 'U.S. control' would help persuade opponents of the acquisition and gain the understanding of Trump's supporters. The executive order that Trump signed Friday also made no mention of the fact that U.S. Steel would come under foreign ownership. Intentions of both sides It can be said the golden share proposal led Trump to be able to successfully utilize Nippon Steel's financial strength and technological capabilities without compromising his 'America First' policy stance. Meanwhile, Nippon Steel has concluded that the golden share provides no voting rights and is largely symbolic, so the U.S. administration's influence on management and investment decisions will be limited. 'We will have 100% of the voting rights in U.S. Steel, so management freedom will be maintained,' a senior Nippon Steel executive said. Nippon Steel has previously insisted that 100% ownership of shares is a prerequisite for major investments, and the U.S. government has also refused to compromise over 'U.S. control.' Amid conflicting interests between the two parties, the idea of a golden share ultimately served as a solution, but challenges remain.