Farmers devastated as sudden shift wipes out 80% of avocado harvest — here's what you need to know
Avocado farmers in Taiwan are suffering from production yield losses as high as 80% due to extreme weather, Taiwan News reported.
A healthy, mature avocado tree produces 100 to 200 avocados per year, according to Avocado Variety Collection.
Farmers in Pingtung, Taiwan, are looking up at their avocado trees to see only "two to three small fruits on many trees this harvest season," per Taiwan News.
The extreme weather in Taiwan in recent years has led to dismal avocado production losses, which are tangible financial losses affecting farmers' livelihoods in Southern Taiwan. Mango farmers in Bangladesh and Belgian winemakers have experienced similar production declines.
Despite Taiwan being one of the wettest places in the world — receiving about 100 inches of rain per year, with rainfall particularly concentrated during monsoon and typhoon events — Taiwan has been experiencing some of the worst drought conditions the island has seen in nearly a century.
Taiwan depends on the area's heavy rainfall to replenish water reservoirs that support agricultural activities, as well as semiconductor manufacturing (manufacturing computer chips) — both of which are water-intensive activities.
Due to drought conditions, however, Taiwanese farmers are being subsidized not to plant certain water-hungry crops, such as rice, to leave enough water for semiconductor manufacturing activities to persist.
Taiwanese avocado farmers with mature, fruit-producing trees, however, can only follow the course of nature.
One farmer, who saw his avocado production yields fall by 80%, joked that there won't be much work for him this year, per Taiwan News.
Rising global temperatures are causing wild swings in climate conditions (e.g., lack of rain, followed by erratic, intense rainfall), which have harrowing consequences on the land and available water resources. This affects crop yields, making produce and groceries more expensive.
What is the biggest reason you don't grow food at home?
Not enough time
Not enough space
It seems too hard
I have a garden already
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Farmers also depend on available and affordable water to grow crops and food for humans, but if water is scarce or not predictably available, water prices become more expensive. That increased cost is also passed on to consumers, who notice increasing grocery prices.
Gaoshu township chief Liang Cheng-han petitioned Taiwan's legislators and agricultural officials for subsidies to alleviate the financial burden of farmers' production losses. He also pushed for more research on how Taiwan's recent and changing climate conditions will impact avocado seedlings and future harvests.
In the United States, scientists at the University of California, Riverside successfully developed a new smaller avocado variety that allows for more efficient harvest capabilities that may aid the global avocado shortage.
Disruptions to the global food supply may inspire more consumers to pursue food security at home. While many of us may not have access to acres of land for farming, a small garden plot may do. You can grow your own food by replanting vegetable scraps, making the most of your produce.
Join our free newsletter for easy tips to save more and waste less, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
3 hours ago
- CNBC
China's tight grip on rare earths shows little sign of weakening
China's dominance of the global rare earths supply chain won't dwindle easily, even if Beijing decides to approve more export licenses through deals with Europe and the U.S. Three Shenzhen-listed Chinese companies this month said that Beijing approved their exports of magnets with rare earths — metals critical for cars, defense, semiconductors and other industrial products. But another firm, Baotou INST Magnetic New Materials, said last month the export licenses can only be used for one shipment. In Europe, automotive industry groups have said that, in the case of magnets and heavy rare earths, long-term export licenses from China were only valid for a maximum of six months. Diversifying away from Chinese sourcing of rare earths is likely to be "extremely difficult" and, at best, a limited long-term solution, according to a Tuesday note from Rico Luman, senior sector economist for transport and logistics at Dutch bank ING. China is the undisputed leader of the critical minerals supply chain, producing roughly 60% of the world's supply of rare earths and processing almost 90%, which means it is importing these materials from other countries and refining them. "Europe currently produces no rare earths, and the U.S. has only recently begun small-scale production of neodymium and praseodymium. However, both regions hold only a fraction of global reserves, limiting their ability to scale up," Luman said. Already, European automakers and U.S. high-tech businesses in China have halted production or warned of a shortage this summer. China announced export controls on seven rare earths in early April, following a series of tighter restrictions in the last two years on a broad range of critical minerals. Washington had expected a rollback of the April controls once the U.S. and China agreed to a 90-day tariff reprieve in mid-May. After trade talks in London this week, U.S. officials indicated Beijing will soon allow more rare earths exports. China has approved "a certain number" of export permits for rare earth elements and related items, a spokesperson for the commerce ministry said Thursday, adding that China will continue to step up examination and approval for such license applications. This has yet to significantly improve business conditions. The market remains "volatile" even after the U.S.-China trade negotiations in London, said Philippe Kehren, CEO of Belgian chemicals group Solvay, which operates the largest rare earths processing plant outside of China in La Rochelle, France. In response to that unpredictability, he said the company is using recycled material and studying sourcing alternatives to China. "This is how we adjust to the current, unpredictable situation and I think the best mitigation in this type of circumstance is indeed to master the technology," Kehren said. Solvay aims to supply 30% of Europe's processed rare earth demand for permanent magnets by 2030. Beijing will likely keep up its restrictions on rare earths to deter Washington from ratcheting up restrictions on high tech exports to China, said Dennis Wilder, a former senior White House intelligence official. "If new export controls [against China] are implemented, China may pull back again from the rare earth understanding," said Wilder. Gabriel Wildau, managing director at risk consultancy Teneo, echoed the view and warned that even as Beijing signaled a willingness to ease rare earth exports, "supply cutoffs will remain an ever-present threat." Beijing has made the licensing regime "permanent," despite perceptions that it was an "act of retaliation" amid tit-for-tat escalation with the U.S., Wildau noted. That would allow China to deter stockpiling of the critical mineral by U.S. firms and ensure its negotiating leverage remains undiminished, he added. "Firms now have no choice but to invest in and develop alternative sources, substitutes, and re-export solutions to hedge against the risk of a supply loss from China," said Matt Gertken, senior vice president at BCA Research. That's easier said than done, as China has built up control over vast amounts of global supply chains. In batteries, for example, China has mined 68% of the graphite needed, refined 60% of the world's lithium and 72% of cobalt used globally, according to a U.S. Congressional report citing data from 2019. In a sign of the challenge for global businesses to shake off reliance on Chinese rare-earth supplies, several automakers, including General Motors and BMW and major suppliers, have been developing electric vehicles with little to no rare-earth content. Few have managed to scale production to levels that could reduce costs. Automakers will have to "operate two ecosystems: one exclusively for China in China, and one outside of China," said Lei Xing, an independent analyst on China's auto industry. Separately, Lewis Black, CEO of Almonty Industries, said it's going to take "a significant amount of time" to find alternatives to China's supply of rare earths. Speaking to CNBC's "Squawk Box Asia" on Friday, Black said China has protected its market share by pushing prices down to levels at which other countries' companies went out of business and investors weren't incentivized to pour in capital. Late last year, China increased restrictions on exports of civilian-use products deemed likely to end up having military use. The rules aren't bounded by geographical location, meaning they could cover any Chinese transaction with a foreign entity or individual, pointed out law firm Morrison Foerster. In February, China then announced export controls on five critical minerals, including tungsten, an extremely hard metal used for precision cutting tools, weapons and semiconductor production. The country controls 80% of the tungsten supply chain. Last week, a European company that needs tungsten powder shut down for a week, said Oliver Kleinhempel, executive director of EQ Resources, which says it is one of the top two tungsten recycling companies. He warned of a "complete structural shift" if Western businesses that consume tungsten are forced to shut down, incentivizing their Chinese peers to take that market share. Almonty Industries is working to reopen a large tungsten mine this year in South Korea, but the company expects its supply of the metal will only be able to satisfy U.S., EU and South Korean defense needs. "This was always going to happen, it was inevitable, it was not something that caught anyone by surprise until it happened, and then everyone['s question] was: 'What do we do?'" Black said. He said he is hopeful that the company's tungsten lab can make progress in the next two years on recovering more of the metal from tailings currently wasted in production.
USA Today
4 hours ago
- USA Today
How will Trump's immigration crackdown in California impact the economy?
How will Trump's immigration crackdown in California impact the economy? Show Caption Hide Caption National Guard major general clarifies military's role in Los Angeles National Guard Major General Scott Sherman outlined the role of military personnel in Los Angeles and said troops will not conduct arrests. President Donald Trump's administration is stepping up deportation efforts in California with immigration raids at restaurants, traffic stops and routine legal check-ins. The immigration crackdown, while popular with voters in polls, has sparked protests in Los Angeles. Long term, economists warn that fewer immigrants could take a hit to the economy, prompting labor shortages and slowing economic growth. "Immigrants play a huge role in the California economy,' said Giovanni Peri, an economics professor at the University of California, Davis. Without immigrants, 'there will be less economic growth. Less opportunity, also, for local companies and American workers.' 'Wave of panic': Businesses are in crosshairs of Trump immigration crackdown Why the U.S. is 'immigrant dependent' The country's economy has become 'very immigrant dependent,' according to Christopher Thornberg, founding partner at Beacon Economics, a Los Angeles research and consulting firm. About 479,000 U.S.-born workers were added to the labor force over the last five years compared with 3.6 million foreign-born workers, according to an October report from the National Foundation for American Policy, a nonpartisan research organization. The report pointed to a spike in immigration and retirements, coupled with a slowdown in U.S.-born working-age population growth. In California, immigrants make up roughly one-third of workers and comprise an outsized share of the workforce in physically intensive sectors like construction and agriculture. Critics say these workers are lowering wages for American-born citizens or taking away jobs. But Peri said that doesn't pan out in the data. Immigrants may reduce wages for native-born Americans with competing skills, according to Harvard economics professor George Borjas, but it slightly increases the income of native-born citizens overall. A separate 2024 working paper co-authored by Peri found immigrants had no significant effect on wages for those born in the U.S. who are college educated and a positive effect on wages for their American-born peers who are less educated. Instead, Peri said immigrants are filling the holes in industries struggling to hire. Immigrants account for 28% of care workers in long-term care settings, according to the nonprofit health policy organization KFF. In California, immigrants make up 44% of manufacturing jobs and 40% of construction jobs, according to the Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think tank based in Washington D.C. Some of those jobs are held by undocumented workers. About 1.8 million people, or 17% of immigrants in California, were undocumented as of 2022, according to Pew. The vast majority – 1.4 million – had no legal protections through programs like Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or active asylum claims. "It would be lovely to deal with this with an expansion of the legal immigration system,' Peri said. 'But lacking that, undocumented immigrants are doing a lot of these jobs. And losing some of them would make the situation worse.' Pushing away immigrants, Peri argues, prevents companies from growing and creating more jobs that would benefit U.S.-born workers. One 2024 analysis from Jamshid Damooei, executive director of the Center for Economics of Social Issues at California Lutheran University, found work from undocumented employees created an additional 1.25 million jobs in California. And because the vast majority of undocumented immigrants are not criminals, but people who have been part of their local communities for years if not decades, 'in the majority of cases, the effects of just indiscriminately deporting these people is going to have very little benefit for the American people,' Peri said. Revenue vs. cost It's true that immigrants add costs for the government; they benefit from public education, health services and other state-specific policies. But research generally finds immigration tends to raise the federal government's revenue more than its costs, with immigrants adding an estimated $1.2 trillion in federal revenues between 2024 and 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. State and local governments' costs tend to increase more than their revenues from a surge in immigration, but Peri said the rise in immigration is a net benefit overall. Even undocumented workers, Peri argued, boost the government's coffers because they pay a considerable amount of taxes. At the same time, they are ineligible for most federal benefits like Social Security and food stamps. Undocumented immigrants contributed $8.5 billion in state and local taxes in 2022, according to a 2024 study from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, a nonpartisan think tank. Trump and Newsom: Trump's battle with Newsom, California expands beyond immigration What happens if the immigration crackdown continues? Thornberg doesn't expect Trump to deport every undocumented worker in the country, and views the crackdown in California as 'more of a blown-up spectacle' that 'may get tied up in the courts.' Already, Trump has said he would back off certain deportation efforts to avoid labor shortages in areas like agriculture and hospitality. 'Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,' Trump said in a June 12 post on Truth Social. 'Changes are coming!' While an immediate labor shortage is unlikely, Thornberg believes we're more likely to see people discouraged from coming to the U.S. in the years to come, resulting in a tighter labor market. That could mean higher wages for workers as companies step up recruitment efforts, but it would slow economic growth overall. Trump's efforts to constrain immigration during his first term played out in a similar fashion; by 2019, the unemployment rate had dropped to 3.5%, its lowest level since 1969, with earnings up 3.5% from 2018. Meanwhile, economic growth slowed to 2.3%, down from 2.9% the year prior, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Peri said a tight labor market could have ripple effects across the economy, such as driving up the cost to produce certain items. Companies may be more inclined to import cheaper goods at a time when the Trump administration is pushing for more U.S. manufacturing through tariffs. 'This could have a cascade of effects,' he said. 'There is no doubt at all that immigration and immigrants who do those simple, manual jobs are very important at making the economy go.'
Miami Herald
20 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Taiwan's chip dominance becomes global security, economic flashpoint
WASHINGTON, June 12 (UPI) -- Taiwan may be an island of just over 23 million people, but what happens there could ripple across the global economy. The small democratic nation produces the vast majority of the world's most advanced semiconductors -- chips that are used in everything from smartphones and electric cars to defense systems and spacecraft. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. "produces roughly 90% of the most sophisticated computer chips, and the loss of that would be devastating," said Steven David, a professor of political science at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore. "We can't get around without it." For Taiwan, this manufacturing dominance isn't just economic -- it's strategic. Analysts call it the island's "silicon shield." The world relies heavily on Taiwan's chips, which deters China from launching a military attack and pushes allies like the United States to come to Taiwan's defense. The geopolitical stakes around Taiwan's semiconductor dominance have soared as China escalates military pressure, through increased fighter jet incursions, large-scale naval drills and explicit threats of reunification. U.S. lawmakers from both parties have increasingly voiced concern that a Chinese invasion could upend global chip supply chains and empower Beijing with outsized economic leverage. "It [would be] monumentally stupid to try to keep something as fragile as chips production going during the time of war," said Kitsch Liao, associate director of the Atlantic Council's Global China Hub. "One stray shell could destroy that plant and you're done." The United States has taken steps to address this vulnerability. In 2022, former President Joe Biden signed the CHIPS and Science Act, allocating $280 billion to support domestic semiconductor manufacturing and research, including subsidies for Taiwan Semiconductor to build a plant in Phoenix. In March, President Donald Trump announced a new $100 billion deal with the company to dramatically expand its manufacturing presence in the United States. "America is building plants with Taiwanese investment and cooperation in Arizona and elsewhere, but it would still be devastating," David said, referring to the potential impact of a Chinese attack on chip production. Taiwan's government has had to carefully balance cooperation with the United States against growing fears at home that shifting too much chip production abroad could weaken its security. Taiwan's two main political parties, the Kuomintang, or KMT, and the Democratic Progressive Party, or DPP, have debated the best approach to cross-strait relations. While the KMT supports closer ties with China, the DPP, which currently holds the presidency under Lai Ching-te, has leaned toward reinforcing Taiwan's democratic independence and diversifying trade, actions that could increase already mounting pressure from China. "If China does successfully invade Taiwan and takes over the TSMC plant, it won't be able to use the plant the way Taiwan does," David said. "But it would deny its use to others, and that would be devastating to the world economy. Several percentages of world GDP would drop as a result." Analysts worry that even the threat of invasion could destabilize markets. Blockades or gray zone tactics by Beijing, short of all-out war, could still limit Taiwan Semiconductors' ability to export. "Any erosion in Taiwan's ability to trade with the rest of the world would have a significant impact on the global economy," said Jack Burnham, a research analyst at the Washington-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies. "It would disrupt the flow of semiconductors to a variety of different industries that are incredibly valuable to the United States, its allies and partners, and the global community." Taiwan has long been one of the most contentious issues in United States-China relations. After the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist government fled to Taiwan in 1949, and the Chinese Communist Party established the People's Republic of China on the mainland. Since then, Beijing has claimed Taiwan as an inalienable part of its territory. In 1979, the United States. ended formal diplomatic recognition of Taipei in favor of Beijing, but passed the Taiwan Relations Act, which commits the United States to help Taiwan maintain a "sufficient self-defense capability." The United States, though, has remained deliberately vague about whether it would come to Taiwan's defense in the event of a Chinese invasion -- a policy known as strategic ambiguity. But as threats of an invasion increased, this stance continued to be tested. In a speech in Singapore last month, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth vowed that "devastating consequences" could result should China seek to "conquer" Taiwan, warning that an invasion could be "imminent." Beyond semiconductor and chips manufacturing, Taiwan remains a core interest in the Indo-Pacific region. The island sits at the heart of the "first island chain," a line of U.S.-aligned territories stretching from Japan to the Philippines. If China were to take over Taiwan, experts warned it could use the island as a launchpad to project power deep into the Pacific, posing a direct challenge to U.S. interests. "Should China be successful [in a reunification scenario], it would have a significant impact on the lives of everyday Americans -- both in their wallets and in the political situation they find themselves in," Burnham said. "What's at stake when it comes to Taiwan is the free flow of trade, a significant part of the American economy, and the health and stability of the United States' key allies and partners in the region." Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
