logo
Karen Read found not guilty of second-degree murder, guilty of drunken driving in boyfriend's death

Karen Read found not guilty of second-degree murder, guilty of drunken driving in boyfriend's death

DEDHAM, Mass. (AP) — A jury found Karen Read not guilty of second-degree murder and manslaughter charges Wednesday in the 2022 death of her Boston police officer boyfriend, a case that attracted legions of true crime followers who erupted in cheers when word of the acquittal spread outside court.
The same jury also found her guilty of a lesser charge of drunken driving after deliberating for at least 22 hours since June 13.
Cheers from the crowd outside could be heard in the courtroom as the verdict was read. With gleeful supporters, Read departed the courthouse with her attorneys and family.
It was a huge victory for Read's lawyers, who have long asserted that she was framed by police after dropping John O'Keefe off at a party at the home of a fellow officer. Prosecutors argued that the 45-year-old Read hit O'Keefe, 46, with her SUV before driving away, but the defense maintained that he was killed inside the home and later dragged outside.
'No one has fought harder for justice for John O'Keefe than I have,' Read said.
Members of O'Keefe's family left the courtroom with bowed heads. Prosecutors did not speak to reporters outside.
The verdict came nearly a year after a separate jury deadlocked over Read's involvement in the January 2022 death of John O'Keefe and resulted in a mistrial.
Read faced charges of second-degree murder, manslaughter and leaving the scene outside Boston. A second-degree murder conviction would have carried a life sentence. She will face a year of probation for the drunken driving conviction.
Read's father, Bill Read, told reporters outside the courthouse that he felt relief and gave 'tremendous thanks' to God when the verdict was read.
'We need to get our life back together, and we will,' he said.
Asked why he thought the second trial's outcome was different, he said, 'Another year of information circulating in the public, and people are aware of what's happened.'
Some witnesses see miscarriage of justice
Several witnesses in the case said in a statement Wednesday that their 'hearts are with John and the entire O'Keefe family.' Those who signed the statement included Jennifer McCabe, who was with Read and O'Keefe the night of his death, and Brian Albert, who owned the home where the party took place.
'While we may have more to say in the future, today we mourn with John's family and lament the cruel reality that this prosecution was infected by lies and conspiracy theories spread by Karen Read, her defense team, and some in the media. The result is a devastating miscarriage of justice,' the statement said.
Jubilation among Read's supporters
Outside the court, Read supporters celebrated in an atmosphere similar to sports fans reveling in a team's championship, complete with pink confetti.
T.D. Floras of Nashua, New Hampshire, stood next to the barrier facing the courthouse holding Lucy, her chorkie, a cross between a Chihuahua and a Yorkie. The dog wore a sign around its neck that read 'Free Karen.' Floras said she was 'beyond thrilled and excited' about the outcome.
'I would do that OUI probation for her myself,' she said. 'It's been a long time coming, so let's put this behind her now so she can have some peace in her life.'
The trial
Much like during the first trial, attorneys spent months presenting their case, featuring hundreds of pieces of evidence and dozens of witnesses.
Read's defense said O'Keefe was beaten, bitten by a dog and left outside a home in the Boston suburb of Canton, in a conspiracy orchestrated by police that included planting evidence.
Prosecutors have described Read as a scorned lover who chose to leave O'Keefe dying in the snow after striking him with her SUV.
Shira Diner, a lecturer at the Boston University Law School, said the verdict 'gives us an opportunity to reflect how this case would have been different if Karen Read was not a white woman of privilege and means.'
'The criminal legal system is full of inequities, and the fact the defendant in this case was able to post bail and wasn't held in custody while the case was pending made a huge difference,' Diner said. 'She was able to work directly with her lawyers in a way that people can't from behind bars. She was able to give interviews and craft a public narrative that a person without means would be unable to do. All of that work helped contribute to the verdict, and that is a privilege that most people charged with second-degree murder do not have.'
Daniel Medwed, a law professor at Northeastern University, said it was a mercy or compromise verdict, in which jurors opt for acquittal on the most serious charges but convict on lesser offense when they have doubts about the case but want to hold the person accountable.
'Here the evidence — including the defendant's own admissions — made it clear that she drove while intoxicated, and therefore OUI was a natural place for the jury to land,' Medwed said.
Blogger and Read champion 'overcome with emotion'
A blogger who has championed Read's innocence and has been charged with witness intimidation in connection with her case, told AP he was 'overcome with emotion' after the verdict.
'Two and a half years of this. It's finally over. Karen Read's free,' Aidan Kearney said. 'Everything I did was worth it, and we finally have justice. We finally put this nightmare behind us.'
The state's case was led by special prosecutor Hank Brennan, who called fewer witnesses than prosecutor Adam Lally, who ran the first trial against Read.
Describing O'Keefe as a 'good man' who 'helped people,' Brennan told jurors during closing arguments that O'Keefe needed help that night and the only person who could provide it was Read.
'She was drunk. She hit him and she left him to die,' he said.
The defense rejected the idea that there was ever a collision at all and called expert witnesses who agreed.
'There is no evidence that John was hit by a car. None. This case should be over right now, done, because there was no collision,' attorney Alan Jackson said during closing.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former Georgia jail guard abused inmates with Taser and lied about it, authorities say
Former Georgia jail guard abused inmates with Taser and lied about it, authorities say

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Former Georgia jail guard abused inmates with Taser and lied about it, authorities say

ATLANTA (AP) — A former Fulton County jail guard has been indicted on federal civil rights charges after prosecutors said she used her Taser abusively against three inmates and then lied to cover it up. Khadijah Solomon, a 47-year-old Fairburn resident, pleaded not guilty to the six-count indictment in federal court in Atlanta on Tuesday and was released on bail. The troubled jail where Solomon worked has been under a federal civil rights investigation for the past two years and was also the site where Donald Trump surrendered on election interference charges in 2023. Solomon's lawyer, Devin Rafus, said his client will fight the allegations. 'The Fulton County Sheriff's Office is under a lot of political pressure with the Department of Justice investigating the jail,' Rafus said via email. 'My client is collateral damage of that pressure.' The June 11 indictment said Solomon used her Taser 'without legal justification" against separate inmates at the Atlanta jail on Jan. 16, Jan. 25 and Jan. 27. The indictment alleges that Solomon then wrote reports falsely justifying what she did. In reality, sheriff's office investigators said body-worn camera video showed the pretrial detainees were compliant and not resisting. In the Jan. 16 incident, sheriff's office investigators said Solomon approached an inmate who was kicking his cell door and said she was about to 'pop' him before opening the cell and using the Taser on the inmate. Investigators said Solomon then stunned the inmate twice more. She later claimed in her report that the inmate 'was getting ready to throw' a tray at her. The sheriff's office in February announced that it had fired Solomon and two other jail officers — Chantrece Buggs and LaQuondria Pierce — arrested them, and charged them with state crimes including aggravated assault and violating their oath of office. Solomon, a jail sergeant, was also charged with cruelty to inmates and false statements or writings. At the time, investigators said Pierce used her Taser without justification on an inmate Feb. 13 and Buggs encouraged Solomon's violence. No federal charges against the other two were announced, and neither has yet been indicted in a state court. Rafus, who is also the lawyer representing Pierce, did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment on her state charges. Natalie Ammons, a spokesperson for Fulton County Sheriff Pat Labat, said the sheriff's office had worked with the FBI in the Solomon case. 'On three occasions, Khadijah Solomon allegedly tased Fulton County Jail detainees without a legitimate purpose, causing each of them pain and injury," U.S. Attorney Theodore S. Hertzberg said in a statement. "Abuses of power of this kind are unconstitutional, erode our community's trust, and will be prosecuted.' The U.S. Justice Department in July 2023 opened a civil rights investigation into jail conditions in Fulton County, citing violence, filthy living quarters and the in-custody death of a man whose body was found covered in insects. That investigation found that jail officers didn't receive adequate training and guidance on the use of force and were found to engage in 'a pattern or practice of using excessive force' against people in county custody. The Justice Department and Fulton County officials announced in January that they had entered into a court-enforceable consent decree. An independent monitor was appointed in February to oversee that agreement.

Lawyer who once represented drug kingpin El Chapo wins judge post in Mexico
Lawyer who once represented drug kingpin El Chapo wins judge post in Mexico

Associated Press

time2 hours ago

  • Associated Press

Lawyer who once represented drug kingpin El Chapo wins judge post in Mexico

MEXICO CITY (AP) — A lawyer who once represented drug kingpin Joaquín 'El Chapo' Guzmán won a judgeship in the northern state of Chihuahua in Mexico's historic judicial elections this month, according to the vote count concluded Wednesday. Silvia Delgado García won a spot as a criminal court judge in Ciudad Juarez, across the border from El Paso, Texas. The winners were scheduled to have their results certified on Thursday. In 2016, Delgado García was a member of Sinaloa cartel leader Guzmán's legal team when he was temporarily held in a prison in Ciudad Juarez before being extradited to the United States. He was eventually tried, convicted and sentenced to life in prison in the U.S. Some critics of electing judges, and a human rights litigation group called Defensorxs, had labeled Delgado García 'high risk' before the June 1 vote, because 'she defends alleged drug traffickers.' Hailed as a way to make corrupt judges accountable to the people and clean up Mexico's judiciary by former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, the historic elections that covered more than 2,600 positions ranging up to the country's Supreme Court, drew only a paltry 13% voter participation. Critics feared it would politicize the judiciary and offer organized crime an easier to influencing judicial decisions. Mexico's governing Morena party was poised to gain control of the Supreme Court as a majority of the winners had strong ties to the party or were aligned ideologically. Delgado García did not respond to requests for comment after the election, but spoke to the AP before it. Delgado García explained her decision to represent Guzmán as a fundamental right of the legal system: 'Everyone has a right to an effective defense.' She noted that she only helped at one hearing where the power went out, and her job was to visit him in the Ciudad Juarez prison where he was being held. 'If they give me a client of that magnitude, in terms of resume that's going to help me,' she said. She campaigned on her 18 years of experience as a criminal defense attorney. 'I am a citizen who believes in the law, and I am extremely prepared to carry out the job and I aim to be impartial in the decisions I hand down.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store