MSNBC Unpacks The 1 Constant In The 10 Chaotic Years Since Trump's Escalator Ride
Monday marks 10 years to the day since then-reality TV personality Donald Trump descended a golden-colored escalator at Trump Tower in New York City and officially announced he would run in the 2016 presidential election.
The occasion was marked on MSNBC's 'The Weekend' show when The New York Times' Peter Baker and The New Yorker's Susan Glasser examined how Trump has completely transformed American politics — but as a person has actually remained exactly the same.
Trump's divisive rhetoric — including about Mexicans — during his speech announcing his candidacy 'is reflective of the same themes, the same arguments, the same language that he uses today,' said Baker.
It was 'shocking' at the time and felt like 'a huge scandal,' he noted, with 'lots of discussion and commentary about how out of the norm it was, how a lot of people thought it was very racist, very demagogic.'
But today Trump used that kind of language 'all the time' and 'people don't really bat an eye anymore because it's become part of our national political conversation, rightly or wrongly,' Baker added.
Glasser agreed, noting how 'inured we've become to the casual lying as he breathes.'
The 'divisiveness, the hatefulness, the demagoguery' were all evident during Trump's very first speech, she said, and 'those have now just become accepted facts of our politics, actively cheered on by a huge swath of America.'
Watch the full analysis here:
Fascism Expert Shares Big Fear That Prompted Her To Leave Trump's America
Lawrence O'Donnell Nails Exact Moment A Massive Trump Fantasy Collapsed
MAGA Boxer Ryan Garcia Punches Back At Trump: 'I Can't Stay Silent…'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
30 minutes ago
- New York Times
Minnesota Governor Praises Hoffman Family for ‘Heroic Actions'
Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota praised Hope Hoffman, the daughter of State Senator John A. Hoffman and his wife, saying her actions at the family home after a gunman wounded her parents were 'heroic' and saved countless lives. The suspected gunman, Vance Boelter, 57, was arrested on Sunday after a two-day manhunt, the largest in state history. Officials said the suspect entered the Hoffmans' home in suburban Minneapolis early Saturday by posing as a police officer. Hope Hoffman called 911, according to charging documents, prompting a law enforcement alert that led officers to also check the home of State Representative Melissa Hortman nearby. On arrival at the Hortmans' house, officers exchanged gunfire with the gunman before he escaped. Ms. Hortman and her husband, Mark, were killed in that attack. 'I'd like to say on behalf of the state of Minnesota, the heroic actions by the Hoffman family and their daughter, Hope, saved countless lives, and we are grateful,' Mr. Tim Walz said at a news conference late Sunday to announce the arrest of Mr. Boelter. Mr. Walz did not elaborate on the Hoffmans' actions. The couple's nephew, Mat Ollig, wrote in a Facebook post on Saturday that has since been deleted that Mr. Hoffman's wife, Yvette, 'threw herself onto her daughter, using her body as a shield to save her life.' Drew Evans, the head of the state's Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, said investigators had talked with the Hoffmans on Sunday but provided no new details about the events at their home. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


Hamilton Spectator
30 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Wisconsin dairy farmer sues Trump administration claiming discrimination against white farmers
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin dairy farmer alleged in a federal lawsuit filed Monday that the Trump administration is illegally denying financial assistance to white farmers by continuing programs that favor minorities. The conservative Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty filed the lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture in federal court in Wisconsin on behalf of a white dairy farmer, Adam Faust. Faust was among several farmers who successfully sued the Biden administration in 2021 for race discrimination in the USDA's Farmer Loan Forgiveness Plan. The new lawsuit alleges the government has continued to implement diversity, equity and inclusion programs that were instituted under former President Joe Biden. The Wisconsin Institute wrote to the USDA in April warning of legal action, and six Republican Wisconsin congressmen called on the USDA to investigate and end the programs. 'The USDA should honor the President's promise to the American people to end racial discrimination in the federal government,' Faust said in a written statement. 'After being ignored by a federal agency that's meant to support agriculture, I hope my lawsuit brings answers, accountability, and results from USDA.' Trump administration spokesperson Anna Kelly did not immediately respond to an email Monday seeking comment. The lawsuit contends that Faust is one of 2 million white male American farmers who are subject to discriminatory race-based policies at the USDA. The lawsuit names three USDA programs and policies it says put white men at a disadvantage and violate the Constitution's guarantee of equal treatment by discriminating based on race and sex. Faust participates in one program designed to offset the gap between milk prices and the cost of feed, but the lawsuit alleges he is charged a $100 administrative fee that minority and female farmers do not have to pay. Faust also participates in a USDA program that guarantees 90% of the value of loans to white farmers, but 95% to women and racial minorities. That puts Faust at a disadvantage, the lawsuit alleges. Faust has also begun work on a new manure storage system that could qualify for reimbursement under a USDA environmental conservation program, but 75% of his costs are eligible while 90% of the costs of minority farmers qualify, the lawsuit contends. A federal court judge ruled in a similar 2021 case that granting loan forgiveness only to 'socially disadvantaged farmers' amounts to unconstitutional race discrimination. The Biden administration suspended the program and Congress repealed it in 2022. The Wisconsin Institute has filed dozens of such lawsuits in 25 states attacking DEI programs in government. In its April letter to the USDA, the law firm that has a long history of representing Republicans said it didn't want to sue 'but there is no excuse for this continued discrimination.' Trump has been aggressive in trying to end the government's DEI efforts to fulfill a campaign promise and bring about a profound cultural shift across the U.S. from promoting diversity to an exclusive focus on merit. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


CNN
30 minutes ago
- CNN
Supreme Court to hear arguments over whether states may subpoena faith-based pregnancy centers
The Supreme Court agreed Monday to take up a First Amendment appeal from a faith-based nonprofit that runs five 'crisis pregnancy centers' in New Jersey and that is fighting a subpoena from the state's Democratic attorney general. First Choice Women's Resources Centers had urged the conservative court to throw out a decision from the Philadelphia-based 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals siding with the state. That decision required the nonprofit to continue litigating its objections to the subpoena in state court. New Jersey officials subpoenaed the center in 2023 as part of investigation into whether the organization violated consumer fraud laws. Pregnancy centers are opposed to abortion, but New Jersey officials said their marketing may have left some patients with the impression that they could receive abortions at the facilities. The subpoena was aimed at evaluating whether the center 'or its staff engaged in misrepresentations and other prohibited conduct,' according to the state. It sought advertisements, donor solicitations, and the identification of licensed medical personnel. The center framed the subpoena as a demand for donor names. If that view of the subpoena prevails, then New Jersey's actions may be in conflict with a 2021 Supreme Court decision in which a majority found unconstitutional a California law requiring the conservative Americans for Prosperity Foundation to disclose its donors. A divided 3rd Circuit ruled in December that the center's claims were not yet ripe because state courts had not yet enforced the subpoena against them.