logo
AI: Meta may have used Gerry Adams' books to train AI

AI: Meta may have used Gerry Adams' books to train AI

BBC News09-04-2025

Former Sinn Féin president Gerry Adams is among a number of authors whose books may have been accessed by technology company Meta to train their latest AI (artificial intelligence) model. Mr Adams said the books had "been used without his permission", and the matter is now with his solicitor. An investigation by The Atlantic magazine revealed Meta may have accessed millions of pirated books and research papers through LibGen - Library Genesis - to train its generative AI (Gen-AI) system, Llama.A spokesperson for Meta said: "We respect third-party intellectual property rights and believe our use of information to train AI models is consistent with existing law."
The Atlantic magazine also published a database of books that had been pirated by LibGen, so many authors have been able to find out if their work appears on the site.When BBC News NI searched the database a number of authors from Northern Ireland appeared on the list, including Jan Carson, Lynne Graham, Deric Henderson, and Booker prize winner Anna Burns. Authors from around the world have been organising campaigns to encourage governments to intervene.Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, is currently defending a court case brought by multiple authors over the use of their work.
'Most lucrative act of theft in history'
Michael Taylor, a historian from Ballymena, said it is "infuriating" that Meta may have used his work. Two of his books, The Interest and Impossible Monsters, both appear on the LibGen database. "Writers spend years on their books, and contrary to what anybody thinks, very few people make enough money out of writing to live by their pen," he said."Meta might be worth more than a trillion dollars, and it might be politically untouchable, but by violating the copyright of so many thousands of books, its actions amount to the single greatest and the most lucrative act of theft in history."
Prof Monica McWilliams is an academic and former politician who has written extensively about the Northern Ireland peace process and domestic violence. More than 20 of her academic papers and books appear on the database, including those on intimate partner violence and domestic violence against women during conflict.She said when it came to her attention, she found it "quite shocking"."The first principle in the academic world is that you direct your reader to your source material, and that isn't happening here," she said. "It begs the question of what does copyright even mean anymore.Prof McWilliams donates the royalties from sales of her writing to domestic violence charities like Women's Aid. "If royalties are not being paid for the work to be used, then ultimately it is the charities that will lose out."
Last week, authors gathered in London to protest against Meta's actions and high profile authors including Kate Mosse, Richard Osman, and Val McDermid signed an open letter calling on the Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy to bring Meta management to parliament.Posting on X, Richard Osman, who wrote the popular Thursday Murder Club series, said: "Copyright law is not complicated at all. If you want to use an author's work you need to ask for permission."If you use it without permission you're breaking the law. It's so simple. "It'll be incredibly difficult for us, and for other affected industries, to take on Meta, but we'll have a good go!"
What is Llama?
Llama is a large language model, or LLM, similar to Open AI's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini.The systems are fed huge amounts of data and trained to spot patterns within it. They use this data to create passages of text by predicting the next word in a sequence.Despite the systems being labelled intelligent, critics argue LLMs do not "think", have no understanding of what they produce and can confidently present errors as fact.Tech companies argue that they need more data to make the systems more reliable, but authors, artists, and other creatives say they should pay for the privilege.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Declan Lynch: The BBC got us through endless Northern nights, Gerry Adams
Declan Lynch: The BBC got us through endless Northern nights, Gerry Adams

Belfast Telegraph

time7 hours ago

  • Belfast Telegraph

Declan Lynch: The BBC got us through endless Northern nights, Gerry Adams

The BBC is 'The British Broadcasting Corporation', but nobody calls it that except Gerry Adams. Again and again, very deliberately, as he savours his triumph in the recent libel action against 'The British Broadcasting Corporation', he gives it the full official title — almost as if the 'British' part has connotations of inherent badness. He claims that his purpose in taking the action was to 'put manners' on this British Broadcasting Corporation. There were even suggestions — later denied — that the BBC would consider blocking the transmission of its programmes in this country, rather than risk further exposure to our atrocious libel laws.

Gerry Adams's lawyer to pursue chatbots for libel
Gerry Adams's lawyer to pursue chatbots for libel

Telegraph

time12 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Gerry Adams's lawyer to pursue chatbots for libel

The high-profile media lawyer who represented Gerry Adams in his libel trial against the BBC is now preparing to sue the world's most powerful AI chatbots for defamation. As one of the most prominent libel lawyers in the UK, Paul Tweed said that artificial intelligence was the 'new battleground' in trying to prevent misinformation about his clients from being spread online. Mr Tweed is turning his attention to tech after he recently helped the former Sinn Fein leader secure a €100,000 (£84,000) payout over a BBC documentary that falsely claimed he sanctioned the murder of a British spy. The Belfast-based solicitor said he was already building a test case against Meta that could trigger a flurry of similar lawsuits, as he claims to have exposed falsehoods shared by chatbots on Facebook and Instagram. It is not the first time tech giants have been sued for defamation over questionable responses spewed out by their chatbots. Robby Starbuck, the US activist known for targeting diversity schemes at major companies, has sued Meta for defamation alleging that its AI chatbot spread a number of false claims about him, including that he took part in the Capitol riots. A Norwegian man also filed a complaint against OpenAI after its ChatGPT software incorrectly stated that he had killed two of his sons and been jailed for 21 years. Mr Tweed, who has represented celebrities such as Johnny Depp, Harrison Ford and Jennifer Lopez, said: 'My pet subject is generative AI and the consequences of them repeating or regurgitating disinformation and misinformation.' He believes statements put out by AI chatbots fall outside the protections afforded to social media companies, which have traditionally seen them avoid liability for libel. If successful, Mr Tweed will expose social media companies that have previously argued they should not be responsible for claims made on their platforms because they are technology companies rather than traditional publishers. Mr Tweed said: 'I've been liaising with a number of well-known legal professors on both sides of the Atlantic and they agree that there's a very strong argument that generative AI will fall outside the legislative protections.' The lawyer said that chatbots are actually creating new content, meaning they should be considered publishers. He said that the decision by many tech giants to move their headquarters to Ireland for lower tax rates had also opened them up to being sued in Dublin's high courts, where libel cases are typically decided by a jury. This setup is often seen as more favourable to claimants, which Mr Tweed himself says has fuelled a wave of 'libel tourism' in Ireland. He also said Dublin's high courts are attractive as a lower price option compared to London, where he said the costs of filing libel claims are 'eye-watering'. He said: 'I think it's absurd now, the level of costs that are being claimed. The libel courts in London are becoming very, very expensive and highly risky now. The moment you issue your claim form, the costs go into the stratosphere. 'It's not in anyone's interest for people to be deprived of access to justice. It will get to the point where nobody sues for libel unless you're a billionaire.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store