logo
KCPS bond issue being voted on; previewing St. Patrick's Day Parade

KCPS bond issue being voted on; previewing St. Patrick's Day Parade

Yahoo16-03-2025

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Kansas City voters in the Kansas City Public School District will weigh in for the first time since 1967 on a capitol improvements bond issue.
The $474 million package being voted on in April will upgrade buildings, build up to three new schools, and provide classroom tools the district says are much need to help students learn, and it would help the district overcome the challenges of being in an urban setting.
Superintendent Dr. Jennifer Collier joins us to discuss the need for a YES vote, and whether she is concerned the bond issue shares the ballot with a Kansas City, MO public safety sales tax extension.
Then, we're previewing the St. Patrick's Day Parade on Monday, March 17.
See the latest headlines in Kansas City and across Kansas, Missouri
Grand Marshal Ronan Collins and FOX4's Kathy Quinn join to talk about the city's Irish heritage, and the history of the parade itself. Plus, a preview of what to expect on Monday.
Kathy, Erin Gabert and John Holt will co-host FOX4's live coverage of the 51st parade from Noon-2 p.m. with and .
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration extends tariff pause on Chinese-made chips for 90 days
Trump administration extends tariff pause on Chinese-made chips for 90 days

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump administration extends tariff pause on Chinese-made chips for 90 days

The Trump administration has extended a long-running exemption for Chinese-made chips from a 25 percent tariff imposed during President Trump's first administration. The office of U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said in a notice posted Saturday it was extending the exemption, set to expire that day, to Aug. 31. The 25 percent tariff, which initially went into effect in 2019, would have applied to a variety of products, including graphics processing units — the chips at the heart of the artificial intelligence (AI) boom. The extension of the years-long tariff exemption comes as the second Trump administration weighs whether to impose separate import taxes on semiconductors. Trump has imposed wide-ranging tariffs in his second term, instituting hefty 'reciprocal' tariffs on dozens of countries, including China. However, he has put many of these import taxes on hold in the face of market concerns. Semiconductors were exempted from these tariffs, although the president has said he plans to impose separate sector-specific tariffs. The White House announced in April it opened a national security investigation into the effects of importing semiconductors, the first step toward instituting tariffs under a provision known as Section 232. Semiconductor tariffs, like other import taxes on tech products, pose difficulties for companies given tech firms' heavy reliance on international supply chains. Nvidia, a leading chipmaker, has begun producing some of its advanced chips at a factory in Arizona and plans to spend $500 billion expanding its AI infrastructure in the U.S. over the next four years. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Supreme Court blocks Mexico's lawsuit against major U.S. gunmakers in win for firearms industry
Supreme Court blocks Mexico's lawsuit against major U.S. gunmakers in win for firearms industry

CBS News

time3 hours ago

  • CBS News

Supreme Court blocks Mexico's lawsuit against major U.S. gunmakers in win for firearms industry

Washington — The Supreme Court on Thursday blocked the Mexican government's lawsuit against major U.S. gun manufacturers, delivering a win for the firearms industry in a test of a federal law that shields them from civil suits. The high court unanimously rejected Mexico's arguments that its effort to hold firearms makers accountable for the violence wreaked by drug cartels armed with their products should proceed because it satisfied an exception to the liability shield provided through the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, or PLCAA. In the case known as Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, Mexico had argued that gun manufacturers are knowingly aiding and abetting the unlawful sale of their firearms to straw purchasers, who are trafficking them across the southern border to give to drug cartels. But the justices said that because Mexico's complaint does not plausibly allege that the gunmakers aided and abetted dealers' unlawful sale of weapons to Mexican traffickers, it was barred by PLCAA. Justice Elena Kagan delivered the opinion for the court. Between 200,000 to 500,000 American-made firearms are trafficked into Mexico each year, a pipeline that's become known as the "iron river." Nearly half of all guns recovered at Mexican crime scenes are manufactured in the U.S., according to data from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. As part of its efforts to stem the flow of guns illegally trafficked across the U.S.-Mexico border to arm drug cartels, the Mexican government sued seven of the biggest gunmakers in the U.S. and one wholesaler in 2021. It is seeking $10 billion in damages from the industry, as well as other forms of relief. Mexico has argued that its suit fell under one of PLCAA's exceptions, known as the predicate exception, because the gun manufacturers allegedly knew they were breaking the law by selling to known straw purchasers, and that violation led directly to Mexico's injuries: the millions of dollars in damage to its military and property caused by cartel violence. The law was passed with bipartisan support from Congress in 2005 and broadly provides a legal shield for gun companies from civil suits that seek to hold them liable for harms stemming from the criminal misuse of their products by another person. A federal district court in Massachusetts dismissed Mexico's suit in 2022 after finding that PLCAA "unequivocally" bars lawsuits seeking to hold firearms manufacturers liable for the actions of people using their products. The court also ruled that PLCAA's narrow exceptions did not apply to the case. But in early 2024, a panel of three judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit revived Mexico's lawsuit, concluding it fell under one of PLCAA's exceptions, known as the predicate exception. That allows suits against gunmakers to be sued if they knowingly broke the law, and if that legal violation led directly to Mexico's injuries. The appeals court found that the gun industry was "aiding and abetting" the unlawful sale of firearms to traffickers for cartels in Mexico, and that the trafficking of those guns has foreseeably forced the Mexican government to incur significant costs because of cartel violence. The case arrived at the Supreme Court while it was in its early stages. As the gunmakers' appeal was pending, the district court dismissed six of the eight manufacturers from the case. The remaining companies are Smith & Wesson and Interstate Arms, a wholesaler.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store