
Scottish nuclear plant emptied of fuel as UK winds down ageing gas-cooled reactors
Unlock the Editor's Digest for free
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.
The first of the UK's seven advanced gas-cooled reactor nuclear power stations has been emptied of fuel, kick-starting a decommissioning process that will cost at least £27bn in total and take almost a century.
EDF said on Thursday it had defuelled Hunterston B, on the west coast of Scotland, paving the way for the transfer of the site and 250 staff from the French power company to the UK Nuclear Decommissioning Authority next April.
The site provided most of Scotland's energy for more than 40 years from its launch in 1976 until its final closure in 2022.
Andy Dalling, station manager at Hunterston B, said the process was 'on time and to budget and marked the first time this type of station has been defuelled'.
'That means lessons we've learned over the past three years will be applied to the rest of the fleet,' he added.
EDF owns seven advanced gas-cooled reactors (AGRs) plants in the UK, which were built between the 1960s and 1980s and differ from newer nuclear plants that use water for cooling. Just four are still operating.
The uranium fuel has been packaged into 350 large flasks, which will be stored by the NDA at the Sellafield nuclear site in Cumbria for at least 50 years until a longer-term underground facility has been built.
Although the process took just three years and £400mn, it will take almost a century to eradicate the radiation from the land and buildings, EDF has said.
The decommissioning of the seven AGRs is separate to a much wider £105bn decommissioning programme, which will cover an additional 17 closed nuclear sites over the next 120 years, according to the NDA.
The closures will leave the UK with just one nuclear power plant still running by 2030 — Sizewell B in Suffolk, which is also managed by EDF and uses a pressurised water reactor.
The NDA said it was 'acutely aware of the costs associated with delivering our mission'.
The cost of decommissioning nuclear power plants is under scrutiny as the UK presses ahead with new nuclear projects, including the £40bn Sizewell C, which is expected to get government go-ahead this spring, and the £46bn Hinkley Point C, which is still under construction and will open by 2030 at the earliest.
EDF has a 72.6 per cent stake in Hinkley Point C and is tipped to take a 10- 20 per cent stake in Sizewell C, though discussions with the government are ongoing. The decommissioning on both Hinkley and Sizewell C is expected to be shorter, with separate funds planned to cover the costs.
Steve Thomas, emeritus professor of energy policy at Greenwich university, said the cost of decommissioning should be taken into account when the government decided on new nuclear plants as 'no scheme can be guaranteed to meet a cost more than a century into the future'.
Although EDF has owned Hunterston B and the seven other AGR nuclear plants since 2009, the cost of decommissioning is being paid for through the ringfenced Nuclear Liabilities Fund (NLF), which was set up in 1996 after privatisation and is valued at £20.6bn.
Decommissioning costs have soared over the past three decades, with the fund requiring cash injections from the Treasury, including £5bn in July 2020 and a further £5.6bn in March 2022, according to the NLF.
Recommended
The last of the AGR reactors is expected to be defuelled and transferred to the NDA by 2035, though they may receive further life extensions. Hunterston worked for 20 years more than was originally intended.
Although controversial, nuclear power complements the intermittency of renewable energy such as wind and solar power. But there are concerns that the UK has no permanent and safe facility for storing the waste.
Most of the waste is stored at Sellafield, where 140 tonnes of plutonium is held in decaying containers and ageing buildings, though in line with regulatory requirements.
The government is seeking a site where treated high-hazard waste could be safely disposed of underground with three potential locations in Cumbria and Lincolnshire identified.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Valley Kitchen: Shrimp, grits, or lemon ricotta blueberry pancakes
BOARDMAN, Ohio (WKBN) – A local restaurant's second location, open just a few months, has exploded in Boardman. Valley Kitchen on Route 224 has a massive menu with a full bar and incredible breakfast and lunch entrees, whether you want sweet or savory. 'On the sweeter side, we have the lemon ricotta blueberry pancakes. We start fresh every day with our lemon ricotta pancake mix. We have a fresh lemon curd, fresh blueberries, and we top it all with whipped cream. This is a very big seller here at Valley Kitchen at both Boardman and Hermitage,' said Valley Kitchen General Manager Rachel Gassner. 'A little more on the savory side, we have our shrimp and grits. Shrimp freshly cooked along with bacon, peppers, onions, and we serve a side of Thai sauce with grits made in-house every day.' The Roasted Beet salad and variety of skillets are also big draws at Valley Kitchen. 'Fresh spring mix, pistachios, beets, feta cheese, Granny Smith apples, onions, and dried cranberries served with your dressing of choice, but most people like our white balsamic on that. You can add grilled chicken, blackened chicken, fresh shrimp,' said Gassner. 'We offer a wide variety of skillets. Our Chorizo Lime skillet. It has Chorizo sausage in there. There's corn, there's peppers, eggs of your choice, and it comes with our fresh bread, either multigrain, white rye, or a biscuit and a lime on the side.' If you've never tried Valley Kitchen's stuffed French toast, you're truly missing out. 'Our Strawberry Nutella stuffed French toast is three pieces of French toast with Nutella in the middle,' said Gassner. 'Our in-house housemade strawberry glaze, whipped cream, and topped with fresh strawberries.' Valley Kitchen also offers healthier dishes like the 'Locks and Loaded.' 'The Locks and Loaded starts with an everything bagel. Then we add dill seasoning, cream cheese, smoked salmon, onions, cucumbers, and capers,' said Gassner. 'It does come with a side of your choice being either grits, potatoes, or fresh fruit, which includes bananas, strawberries, and blueberries.' Not only is the menu at Valley Kitchen packed with variety and fresh choices, but so is the full bar. 'We can do coffee drinks, and we also serve alcohol. A Cinnamon Roll latte–you could do this. Hot or iced, and then toppings of choice. We can mix flavors together. Whatever you're interested in, we probably have it here,' said Gassner. 'Next, we will go to our Espresso martini. Then we have our in-house Margarita, and then here we have a Lavender lemonade martini.' No matter what day you head to Valley Kitchen, expect it to be buzzing with lots of customers and a great open atmosphere with a patio. Valley Kitchen also offers catering and has another location at 3640 State Street in Hermitage. Valley Kitchen is located at 1393 Boardman Canfield Road in Boardman, across from Meijer's. Visit them Monday through Sunday from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. Call 234-338-9191, visit them online on Facebook. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Liberals under fire for rushing bill through Parliament to speed up resource projects
OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney's government is coming under fire for seeking to rush through a major piece of legislation that grants cabinet sweeping powers to quickly approve major projects. Government House leader Steven MacKinnon put a motion on notice Thursday that would push Bill C-5 through the House of Commons by the end of next week — leaving just one day to hear from civil society groups, stakeholders and experts. Critics charge the move is anti-democratic. In a fiery exchange in question period, Bloc Québécois House Leader Christine Normandin accused Prime Minister Mark Carney of trying to "steamroll" a bill through the House that would greatly expand his own powers. "The prime minister has no right to impose C-5 under closure when the bill gives him exceptional powers unlike anything that we've seen before," she said in French. "Is that the prime minister's intention, to bypass Parliament and govern by decree like Donald Trump?' MacKinnon pushed back by saying "Canadians and Quebecers spoke loud and clear" in the last election for action to shore up the economy, in part due to the illegal trade war initiated by U.S. President Donald Trump. "We are acting in a democratic way," he said, noting the bill delivers on election promises laid out clearly in the Liberal platform. The bill includes controversial provisions that could allow cabinet to skirt existing processes and laws to fast-track approvals for projects the government deems to be in the national interest. The government aims to streamline disparate processes to limit approval timelines for big projects to a maximum of two years, boosting investor confidence. When asked about the timeline at a press conference Thursday, Energy Minister Tim Hodgson said the legislation needs to pass quickly to shore up an economy being undermined by Trump's tariffs. "We have a trade war that is affecting sector after sector after sector. Canadians' jobs are at risk. Canadians' livelihoods are at risk. And quite frankly, the prosperity of the country is at risk," Hodgson said. But NDP MP Leah Gazan said in the House of Commons foyer Thursday that the bill isn't going to build the economy out because it will trigger a series of court challenges. She called on the government to extend the time frame of the public study and do more to consult with Indigenous Peoples — something she said got shortchanged in the bill. "I'm calling on the prime minister to slow it down, to not rush a bill that has this much consequence through in five days," she said. Hodgson pointed to support for the bill from the First Nations Major Projects Coalition, which represents more than 100 First Nations seeking to have their own projects advanced, and said he is consulting privately with stakeholders. "I can tell you I've got multiple conversations going on with different rights holders and business leaders as part of my department's efforts to ensure that consultation is robust," he said. Indigenous Services Minister Mandy Gull-Masty said there will be a meeting between the Prime Minister's Office and First Nations leaders, citing the wildfires as one reason it has been delayed. "I also want to acknowledge that because there are many communities in a critical state of wildfire and evacuation, that time will be taken to have that dialog," she said. "I know that it is the intention of the Prime Minister's Office to sit down with First Nation's leadership directly and to have the economic discussion and hear from them." But Anna Johnston, staff lawyer at West Coast Environmental Law, said the drive to push the bill through quickly is "incredibly concerning" because the government has done "very little engagement" so far on such a major piece of legislation. "The biggest concern is that it's going to give cabinet the power to approve projects before they have any information about them beyond what the proponent has decided to give the government," she said. "There's a reason why we have decisions at the end of environmental assessments and regulatory processes. It's so that governments can make informed decisions about projects that have the potential to harm Canadians and to harm the environment." Stuart Trew, a senior researcher with the left-leaning think tank Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, said the bill is "destined to end up in court" and "really bump up against the government's commitments to reconciliation with First Nations." "It seems geared to let the government ram projects through, without adequate study, without all the usual considerations about the impacts on endangered species," he said. "We should raise our eyebrows any time a government claims a national emergency in order to rush through legislation with implications as significant as this does." The legislation also looks to break down internal trade barriers and make it easier for workers to take jobs in other provinces. MacKinnon rejected a call from the Bloc Québécois this week to split the landmark legislation in two. That would have allowed the House to speed through the less contentious internal trade provisions while putting the controversial major projects portion under the microscope. Carney has vowed repeatedly to eliminate interprovincial trade barriers by Canada Day, 19 days from now. The House has been sitting for just three weeks and is currently scheduled to rise next week on June 20. MacKinnon said in a scrum on Wednesday that he has not tried to get consensus from the other parties to have the House sit any later. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 12, 2025. Kyle Duggan, The Canadian Press


Business of Fashion
4 hours ago
- Business of Fashion
Lead EU lawmaker on sustainability laws proposes more cuts
The European Union should further slash the number of companies subject to its environmental and corporate sustainability rules, the European Parliament member leading negotiations on the policies said on Thursday. The European Commission proposed a 'simplification omnibus' in February that it said would help European firms compete with foreign rivals by cutting back on sustainability reporting rules and obligations intended to root out abuses in their supply chains. Those proposals did not go far enough, according to Swedish centre-right lawmaker Jörgen Warborn, who has drafted amendments to scale back the laws further to only cover companies with 3,000 employees or more and over 450 million euros ($521 million) in turnover. The Commission proposal would exempt companies with fewer than 1,000 employees - already, cutting out more than 80 percent of the roughly 50,000 companies currently covered by the green reporting rules. The EU counts around 6,000 companies with more than 1,000 employees. 'Europe is falling behind the US and China in the global race for competitiveness. I'm entering this process with a clear ambition: to cut costs for businesses and go further than the Commission on simplification,' Warborn said in a statement on Thursday. His draft proposal must be negotiated in the European Parliament where other lawmakers can propose their own amendments. The Parliament will agree the final changes with EU member countries in the coming months. Warborn, a member of the centre-right European People's Party lawmaker group, is facing competing calls from some right-wing lawmakers to scrap the policies entirely, and Socialist and Green lawmakers vowing to preserve them. French president Emmanuel Macron and German chancellor Friedrich Merz have both demanded the EU scrap the supply chain law. But the walk-back on ESG rules has met resistance from some investors and campaigners, who have warned it weakens corporate accountability and hurts the bloc's ability to attract more investments towards meeting climate goals. Warborn said his proposed changes will not weaken Europe's sustainability standards, but rather free up resources that companies can instead invest in innovation. By Kate Abnett; Editor: Joe Bavier Learn more: Op-Ed | Dear Fashion CEOs, Stop Undermining Climate Action Too many brands have set ambitious emissions goals while their trade associations quietly work to block the regulations needed to achieve them, argues Maxine Bédat.