‘Lives torn apart': Miami activists decry Supreme Court ruling on migrant protections
Reacting to the Trump administration's aggressive push to deport hundreds of thousands of migrants, a coalition of Miami-based activist organizations declared Monday that the campaign to expel their 'neighbors, coworkers, and even lovers' demands a response free of diplomatic restraint.
'I've realized that while we try to be politically correct, lives are being torn apart,' said Tessa Petit, executive director of the Florida Immigrant Coalition. 'We've become a quota. Because they can't meet their deportation targets, they're fabricating charges — illegally— just to satisfy an inhumane drive rooted in racism, xenophobia and white supremacy.'
Petit spoke during a press conference at the headquarters of the Family Action Network Movement, where activists condemned Friday's Supreme Court decision to dismantle the so-called CHNV humanitarian parole program, for the initials of the nationalities affected. The program had allowed hundreds of thousands of people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela to legally enter the United States for two years.
The ruling threatens the legal status of more than half a million migrants — many of them now settled in South Florida.
Petit and others stressed that protecting migrants serves the national interest, calling on the U.S.-born children of earlier immigrant generations to stand in solidarity.
'To the American people, I say this: It's us now, but your turn will come,' Petit warned. 'If you don't look, speak, or act a certain way, your turn will come. You are allowing precedents that will change your world forever.'
Linda Julien, the first Haitian-American elected to the Miami Gardens City Council, denounced what she called the hypocrisy at the heart of U.S. immigration policy.
'We are a nation that sings liberty but whispers restrictions. A nation that demands labor but blocks legal pathways,' she said. 'Enough with the contradictions. Let this moment reflect not just compassion, but consistency.'
Haitians are the largest group affected by the CHNV program, with approximately 211,010 beneficiaries by the end of 2024. Initially excluded, Haitians were later included by the Biden administration in response to the country's collapse into violent instability. The goal was twofold: provide humanitarian relief and avert a mass migration crisis in South Florida.
Speaking on behalf of the 117,330 Venezuelans also facing deportation in the CHNV ruling, Adelys Ferro, executive director of the Venezuelan American Caucus, stressed that this is not an abstract policy dispute.
'This is about families. About dignity. About human beings who followed the rules and are now being punished for it,' she said.
Ferro pointed out that more than 530,000 CHNV recipients complied with a rigorous vetting process — undergoing background checks and securing U.S.-based sponsors who committed to financially supporting them.
For many Venezuelans fleeing the Nicolás Maduro regime—marked by violence, persecution and economic collapse—CHNV was a critical lifeline.
'It was the bridge that reunited parents with children, siblings torn apart by years of trauma, and survivors of authoritarian regimes who finally had a chance to rebuild in safety,' Ferro said.
The Supreme Court's ruling, she warned, jeopardizes even those who did everything right. 'This isn't about illegal entries or breaking the law,' she said. 'It targets people who entered legally, passed background checks and were federally approved.'
For Ana Sofia Pelaez, the fight for Cuban freedom is deeply personal — woven through generations. It's her grandparents arriving in Miami in the 1960s, her parents' sacrifices, her community's struggle. Today, it's also about over a hundred thousand Cubans facing potential detention and deportation following a ruling that sent shockwaves through immigrant communities nationwide.
'To force Cubans who have applied and received parole to return now would be a moral failure,' said Pelaez, co-founder and executive director of the Miami Freedom Project. 'The island is under a repressive dictatorship, where dissent is punished with imprisonment, torture and exile.'
The ruling is viewed by many in the Cuban-American community as a profound betrayal. Cuba remains gripped by crisis after the historic July 11, 2021, protests—the largest anti-government demonstrations in decades—were met with brutal crackdowns, mass arrests and long prison terms.
Cuba continues to suffer widespread shortages of food and medicine, a collapsing economy and unrelenting state surveillance.
'The government silences opposition through harassment and brutality,' Pelaez said. 'And economic desperation pushes people to the brink. This is not a place to which anyone should be forcibly returned.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
11 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump Amid Weak Jobs Report: 'Too Late' Powell Must Lower Rates - Erin Burnett OutFront - Podcast on CNN Audio
Trump Amid Weak Jobs Report: 'Too Late' Powell Must Lower Rates Erin Burnett OutFront 48 mins Trump takes on the Federal Reserve president for bad jobs numbers. Plus, Trump announces to the world that Putin is about to attack Ukraine as revenge for an air assault. Also, a Chinese couple is charged with trying to smuggle a dangerous biological pathogen into the United States, capable of decimating crops and poisoning humans.

Washington Post
12 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump proclamation seeks to restrict international students from Harvard
President Donald Trump on Wednesday evening sought to restrict international students and scholars from entering the country to attend, conduct research or teach at Harvard University, further escalating the administration's strong-armed attempts to force change in higher education. The proclamation, 'Enhancing National Security by Addressing Risks at Harvard University,' comes days after a federal judge blocked the administration's attempts to revoke the school's ability to host foreign students and scholars. The administration has said forceful action is needed to address complaints of antisemitism after protests disrupted college campuses during the 2023-2024 academic year over the Israel-Gaza war. The temporary restraining order issued by U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs last week halted a Department of Homeland Security move to revoke Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification. The administration alleged that Harvard allowed 'anti-American, pro-terrorist' foreigners 'to harass and physically assault individuals … and obstruct its once-venerable learning environment.' The administration has demanded that Harvard comply with numerous directives it says are aimed at ensuring more forceful action against campus antisemitism, among other concerns. Harvard has contested the actions with two lawsuits challenging the administration's actions as unconstitutional and unlawful, and has said it has and is continuing to take measures to address discrimination on its campus. In response, the Trump administration has taken a number of actions, including announcing that billions of dollars of federal grant funding is under review, terminating research contracts, launching investigations and threatening to revoke the school's tax-exempt status. Harvard has called those actions retaliation for its refusal to relinquish its academic independence. Trump's proclamation says 'it is necessary to restrict the entry of foreign nationals who seek to enter the United States solely or principally to participate in a course of study at Harvard University or in an exchange visitor program hosted by Harvard University,' because entry of those foreign nationals is 'detrimental to the interests of the United States because, in my judgment, Harvard's conduct has rendered it an unsuitable destination for foreign students and researchers.' He said the denial of access would continue until the university shares information the federal government requires 'to safeguard national security and the American public.' DHS had demanded information about foreign students that included known illegal activity or threats against students or faculty. According to the proclamation, Harvard provided data on misconduct by only three students, which 'was so deficient that the DHS could not evaluate whether it should take further actions.' 'Harvard's actions show that it either is not fully reporting its disciplinary records for foreign students or is not seriously policing its foreign students,' Trump's proclamation states. Spokespeople for Harvard did not immediately respond to requests for comment, but the school has said in the past that it responded to DHS requests for information as required by law but was told its responses were insufficient. More than 7,000 international students and scholars are currently at Harvard, and the school is expecting thousands more to arrive for the summer and fall terms. More than a quarter of Harvard students come from other countries, drawn by the university's internationally known reputation and opportunities. U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a post on social media Wednesday that the Justice Department would 'vigorously defend the President's proclamation suspending the entry of new foreign students at Harvard University based on national security concerns.' This story is developing and will be updated.


New York Times
12 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Orders Investigation of Biden and His Aides
President Trump ordered his White House counsel and the attorney general on Wednesday to investigate former President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and his staff in Mr. Trump's latest attempt to stoke outlandish conspiracy theories about his predecessor. In an executive order, Mr. Trump put the power and resources of the federal government to work examining whether some of Mr. Biden's presidential actions are legally invalid because his aides had enacted those policies without his knowledge. The executive order came after Mr. Trump shared a social media post over the weekend that claimed Mr. Biden had been 'executed in 2020' and replaced by a robotic clone, following a pattern of suggestions by the president and his allies that Mr. Biden was a mentally incapacitated puppet of his aides. 'The White House issued over 1,200 presidential documents, appointed 235 judges to the federal bench, and issued more pardons and commutations than any administration in United States history,' the executive order said, after asserting that 'former President Biden's aides abused the power' of his office. A central claim of the conspiracy theory, as described by Mr. Trump himself, is that Mr. Biden's use of the autopen system — which reproduces a person's signature to be affixed to official documents — can legally invalidate those documents. Mr. Trump has claimed, for example, that some pardons Mr. Biden had made during his time in office were invalid because they were signed using an autopen. (There is no power in the Constitution or case law to undo a pardon.) Mr. Trump has acknowledged that his administration uses the autopen system on occasion. But his executive order asserts without evidence that the Biden administration's own use of the system may have 'implications for the legality and validity' of some of Mr. Biden's actions as president. The Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel had weighed in on this issue at the request of President George W. Bush in 2005. Howard C. Nielson Jr., the top official at the Office of Legal Counsel, concluded that 'the president need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill he approves and decides to sign in order for the bill to become law.' He added that the president instead could direct 'a subordinate to affix the president's signature to such a bill, for example by autopen.' Mr. Nielson is now a Federal District Court judge in Utah, nominated to the position by Mr. Trump during his first term.