MSPs back new powers supporting Gaelic and Scots
MSPs have voted unanimously in favour of new powers aimed at encouraging greater use of Gaelic and Scots.The Scottish government said the Scottish Languages Bill would strengthen parents' rights to ask their local authority for a Gaelic school in their area.Other measures include establishing Gaelic and Scots as official languages.The figures from the 2022 Census showed 130,161 people in Scotland had some Gaelic skills - an increase of 43,105 people from 2011.
The statistics also suggested 2.4 million people in Scotland had some skills in Scots in 2022 - an increase of more than 515,000 on 2011.
Growth in the language
The bill supports the creation of "areas of linguistic significance" in Gaelic communities.The Scottish government said this would help ministers to better target policies to support growth in the language.More qualifications are also to be made available in Gaelic.Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes said: "This legislation will introduce powers to accelerate the growth of Gaelic and Scots."It will establish them as official languages, introduce new educational standards and support the creation of areas of linguistic significance in Gaelic communities."She added: "While there has been an encouraging increase in the number of Gaelic speakers across Scotland, we recognise that more support is needed in communities where the language is traditionally spoken."This year marks 20 years since the introduction of the Gaelic Language (Scotland) Act 2005.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Gregor Poynton MP meets UK Veterans Minister to raise plight of Linburn Veterans and Scotland's Military Museum
Gregor Poynton, MP for the Livingston constituency, has today met with the UK Labour Government's Veterans Minister, Al Carns, to highlight the urgent situation facing residents at the Linburn Park in West Lothian. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... At the meeting in Westminster, Mr Poynton outlined the distress caused by Sight Scotland Veterans' plans to sell parts of the Linburn Estate and pressed the Minister to explore what support the UK Government can provide to protect veterans and their families affected by the decision. The Linburn Estate has long been home to veterans, including many elderly and disabled former service personnel, who now face uncertainty about their future housing after the charity's decision to sell the site. The estate is also home to Scotland's Military Museum, and its future is similarly at risk unless a new location can be secured. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Poynton emphasised the importance of finding a solution that keeps residents in secure, appropriate housing and preserves Scotland's military heritage. The UK Labour Government recently announce a new consumer charter for families in Miliary Homes and additional funding to support veterans. Me Poynton said: 'I am working closely with the UK Government to find a solution that delivers for Linburn's residents. It is vital that we see real pace, urgency and joint working between governments to support veterans and their families. Sight Scotland Veterans Charity and I are still waiting for a response from the Scottish Government's Veterans Minister on what action he will take, and time is of the essence. "I am also seeking to visit the estate soon to meet on site with Sight Scotland Veterans, to learn more about the vital services that will continue, to speak directly with affected residents, and to explore options for the future of Scotland's Military Museum. I'm committed to working with all partners to help secure a future for the museum in West Lothian and ensure we continue our proud military links. "Our veterans and their families deserve nothing less than decisive action and long-term support. Labour in government is determined to deliver for those who have served our country.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Feminists threaten to sue SNP for ‘ignoring' Supreme Court trans ruling
SNP ministers have been threatened with legal action for failing to comply with the Supreme Court ruling that banned biological men from women's toilets and changing rooms. Human rights charity Sex Matters has given the Scottish Government two weeks to introduce new policies and guidance or face further court action. In a formal 'letter before action' sent to ministers, the charity demanded that they issue a statement that policies allowing trans people to access women-only spaces be 'suspended with immediate effect'. 'Updated and lawful guidance' should be issued 'at the earliest opportunity', the letter said, with public bodies ordered 'to take immediate action to provide single-sex facilities on the basis of biological sex '. Ruling is 'the law now' First Minister John Swinney has said Scotland's public sector should await guidance on implementing the ruling from the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) before acting. But Sex Matters said April's Supreme Court ruling was 'the law now' and it had not been 'suspended in any way' pending the EHRC guidance, which is expected to be published later this summer. The EHRC has previously told the Scottish Government it did not need to delay, noting that the law was already set out in the Supreme Court's 'very readable' ruling and this was 'effective immediately'. Interim guidance has also been issued by the equalities watchdog stating that access to single-sex facilities in workplaces and public services should be based on biological sex. The Tories said Sex Matters had been left with 'no choice' but to threaten legal action to force SNP ministers to comply, 'leaving taxpayers on the hook for costly payouts'. Sturgeon's self-ID When Nicola Sturgeon was in government she proposed allowing trans people to self-identify – meaning they could change gender by signing a declaration without a medical diagnosis. However, after it was passed by MSPs, the controversial Gender Recognition Reform Bill was vetoed by the UK Government over concerns it undermined safety in single-sex spaces. But swathes of Scotland's public sector adopted self-ID, allowing trans people access to female toilets and changing rooms. On April 16, feminist campaign group For Women Scotland won against the Scottish Government in the Supreme Court, which ruled that the definition of woman was based on biological sex. Maya Forstater, chief executive of Sex Matters, said the ruling 'made the law absolutely clear' about who could access women's toilets, changing rooms and refuges but 'the Scottish Government is dragging its feet'. She told BBC Radio's Good Morning Scotland programme: 'It hasn't changed its policies. It still has a policy in schools of saying that schools should allow a child who identifies as transgender to use opposite sex toilets and changing rooms and for its employees in government buildings. 'That exposes women and girls, in particular, to harassment because of their sex. Allowing a man or a boy into a women's toilet creates a hostile environment for women and girls, and that's unlawful.' Ms Forstater said the charity had held a meeting two weeks ago with Scottish Government officials but argued that they were 'passing the buck' by claiming they had to wait for the EHRC guidance. Although she acknowledged that small businesses without access to legal advice may rely on the EHRC, she said this did not apply to SNP ministers. She added: 'They do understand the law, they have legal advisers on tap and they should act now.' She said there was 'no reason to wait' and noted that any woman forced to share a female-only safe space with a biological man could take legal action against the Scottish Government. Asked about the charity's next move, she said: 'They have 14 days to reply. What we've asked them to do is something quite simple. They have the facilities already. 'They have male toilets, female toilets and unisex and all we're asking them to do is put a simple statement on their website that says that their facilities are separated by sex and that they also provide unisex facilities, so that everyone's included.' The letter, which was signed by Ms Forstater, also told SNP ministers that their guidance in a document called 'Supporting transgender pupils in schools' is 'wrong and must be withdrawn with immediate effect'. If the Scottish Government fails to comply within 14 days, she warned 'we may commence proceedings without further warning'. Ms Forstater added: 'For the avoidance of any doubt, we have already consulted with solicitors and counsel in relation to the matters set out in this letter and are prepared to litigate in relation to them.' 'Reckless pandering' Tess White, the Scottish Tories' equalities minister, said: 'The Supreme Court's judgment was crystal clear, but John Swinney still refuses to follow it. 'Sex Matters shouldn't have to threaten legal action, but the SNP government is leaving them no choice by clinging to unlawful guidance on single-sex spaces. 'This reckless pandering to gender ideologues is putting women and girls at risk – and leaving taxpayers on the hook for costly payouts.' Shirley-Anne Somerville, the SNP's Social Justice Secretary, said the Scottish Government accepted the court's decision and was 'moving forward right across government with work on this issue'. She said: 'That's exactly why we have the short-life working group that brings together the civil servants from right across government to ensure that we're delivering at pace and we're delivering consistently.' A Scottish Government spokesman said: ''We are reviewing policies, guidance and legislation potentially impacted by the judgment. 'This will prepare us to take all necessary steps when the regulator of the Equality Act 2010, the Equality and Human Rights Commission, publishes its revised statutory code of practice and associated guidance for services, public functions and associations. 'The EHRC is currently consulting on this revised code of practice. We will respond to any letter received in due course.'
STV News
an hour ago
- STV News
Scottish Government threatened with legal action over single-sex spaces
The Scottish Government has been threatened with legal action if it fails to implement the recent Supreme Court judgement on biological sex in equalities law. Sex Matters, which intervened in the For Women Scotland case against the government, has sent ministers a formal 'letter before action'. In April, the Supreme Court said the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex – a ruling which had implications for access to single-sex spaces. Sex Matters argue the Scottish Government is failing to implement the ruling in the public sector, though ministers including John Swinney have said they accept the judgment and are waiting for further guidance from the Equalities and Human Rights Commission before taking the next steps. 'It is clear that taking no action at the moment is not a lawful option that is available to the Scottish Government,' the letter said. 'As a bare minimum, the Scottish Government is required – now – to review and amend its practices and policies and guidance to ensure that it is made clear that 'single-sex spaces' means single biological sex spaces. 'A failure to take that step will mean that the Scottish Government is deliberately choosing to act unlawfully.' The letter urges the Scottish Government to comply with the UK Supreme Court ruling from April, which determined that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the 2010 Equality Act refer to biological women and sex. Scottish ministers previously said the judgement will 'inevitably' mean changes to the advice given to public bodies and health boards about single-sex spaces. However, the Scottish Government has been waiting for fresh guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (ECHR) before making any permanent changes. This 'proposed delay' has caused concern for the Sex Matters group. Speaking to BBC's Good Morning Scotland radio programme on Wednesday, the charity's CEO Maya Forstater said: 'The Supreme Court has made the law absolutely clear: men are male and women are female and both have a right to dignity and privacy in things like toilets and changing rooms as well as specialist services like women's refuges. 'The Scottish Government is dragging its feet, it hasn't changed its policies.' Ms Forstater said the government had not implemented the ruling in schools or in its own facilities. She said the government has 14 days to reply to the letter, adding: 'All we're asking them to do is put a simple statement on their website which says that their facilities are separated by sex and they also provide unisex facilities so everyone's included.' In response to Sex Matters' concerns, a spokesman for the government told The Times: 'The Scottish Government has been clear that we accept the Supreme Court judgment. 'We are reviewing policies, guidance and legislation potentially impacted by the judgment. 'This will prepare us to take all necessary steps when the regulator of the Equality Act 2010, the Equality and Human Rights Commission, publishes its revised statutory code of practice and associated guidance for services, public functions and associations. The EHRC is currently consulting on this revised code of practice. 'We will respond to any letter received in due course.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
