logo
Can Canada just build its own cars? Experts say no — here's why, and what we could do instead

Can Canada just build its own cars? Experts say no — here's why, and what we could do instead

CBC13-02-2025

Social Sharing
U.S. President Donald Trump's threats of tariffs on Canadian products and his imposition of tariffs on imported steel and aluminum have triggered alarm in the Canadian auto sector, with experts warning of possible work stoppages and supply chain disruptions.
But experts say building cars in Canada for the Canadian market isn't the answer — instead, Canada could look outside the "north-south" corridor in the face of tariffs.
Canada has a strong and thriving manufacturing sector with five global auto manufacturers, said Brian Kingston, the president and CEO of the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers Association.
"But the whole industry has been designed around this north-south integration," he said.
"If we are entering an era of highly protected domestic markets … that is highly inefficient. It's extremely costly to do because Canada is a relatively small market."
Canadians purchase under two million vehicles each year – about the same number the country assembles, he said.
But the cars assembled in Canada are largely destined for the U.S. market.
Trump wants Canadian-assembled vehicles made in Detroit
Trump has expressed his disdain for those exports, saying he'd rather build the cars in Detroit.
The U.S. president has three times since his Jan. 20 inauguration threatened tariffs that would affect the North American auto industry.
He first promised 25 per cent tariffs on all Canadian goods and a 10 per cent tariff on energy, all of which have been suspended for 30 days while Canada seeks to address U.S. concerns about border security.
Then on Monday, Trump told a Fox News reporter that he would levy a tariff of up to 100 per cent on Canadian-made automobiles, "if [the U.S. doesn't] make a deal with Canada."
That same day, he announced a 25 per cent tariff on imported steel and aluminum to take effect March 12.
But the auto industry has become so integrated over the past 60 years as a result of successive free trade agreements that car components travel across the Canada-U.S. border multiple times before a final vehicle rolls off the assembly line, said Dimitry Anastakis, a professor in the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto.
Tariffs preventing the free flow of parts between Canada and the U.S. could lead to work stoppages due to cross-border supply chain disruptions, Kingston has said.
However, building vehicles for the Canadian market in Canada is "a cute idea" but not a sustainable alternative, according to a mechanical and automotive engineering professor at the University of Windsor.
Peter Frise was part of a team that tried to design a Canadian car and said they couldn't get industry to touch it.
Australia unable to sustain domestic auto industry, expert says
"It was absolutely out of the question," said Frise, who founded the National Automotive Research Network in 2000.
"As soon as we talked to industry about it, they started slamming the door as hard as they could on that. … They said that is absolutely impossible. We would never do that. We don't even want to talk about it. …We could never afford to do that."
For example, Australia tried for many years to compete in the auto sector, said Dennis Darby, the president and CEO of Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters.
"It had its own car companies, which were all global car companies that operated in Australia protected by tariffs," Darby said.
"And they eventually gave up, and there's no production at all in Australia because they just couldn't."
It was once common to see branches of American plants in Canada building all kinds of products for the Canadian market, but technology has evolved, Darby said, and auto makers have consolidated.
"It's just not practical to build a car company from scratch," Darby said. "The last person to do that was Elon Musk, and he had billions of dollars of capital."
These days Canada is home to massive parts manufacturers such as Magna International, which produce products for the global supply chain.
Canada needs to look for new markets, expert says
The best course of action for Canada, he said, is to look at ways to grow the market for those products outside the U.S.
"What we have not done as Canadians is build really good east-west corridors," he said.
"We have these free trade agreements with Asia, and we have free trade agreements with Europe. And … we have not taken advantage of those."
Frise said Americans will also find themselves struggling as a result of the tariffs and tariff threats.
About 90 per cent of the aluminum used in the auto industry comes from Quebec, he said.
"They can't realistically replace it," Frise said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

26/11 Terror Attack: Delhi Court grants Tahawwur Rana a one-time phone call, seeks health report from Tihar
26/11 Terror Attack: Delhi Court grants Tahawwur Rana a one-time phone call, seeks health report from Tihar

Canada Standard

time21 minutes ago

  • Canada Standard

26/11 Terror Attack: Delhi Court grants Tahawwur Rana a one-time phone call, seeks health report from Tihar

New Delhi [India], June 9 (ANI): The Delhi's Patiala House Court on Monday granted 26/11 Mumbai Terror attack accused Tahawwur Rana permission to make a single phone call to his family for the time being. The call will be strictly conducted in accordance with jail regulations and under the supervision of a senior official from the Tihar jail authorities, said the Court. The Additional Sessions Judge (NIA) Chander Jit Singh on Monday also sought a detail status report on Rana's health issues, which must be submitted within 10 days. In its response to the jail authorities, the NIA had approved permission for this one-time phone call. Furthermore, the court has also sought a detailed report from the jail authorities, clarifying their stance on whether Rana should be allowed regular phone calls in the future, as per the Jail Manual. On Friday, the court extended Rana's judicial custody, scheduling his next appearance for July 9. Due to security concerns, he was presented via virtual mode. On the last date of hearing, Rana personally addressed the court, requesting a hearing aid for an ear-related medical issue. Recently, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) collected voice and handwriting samples from Rana, who was extradited from the United States earlier this month. His legal aid counsel, Advocate Piyush Sachdev, confirmed that he fully complied with the court directive. The NIA had previously informed the court that Rana was confronted with substantial evidence related to the 26/11 attacks. The agency argued for further custody, citing his evasive behaviour during questioning and lack of cooperation. Senior Advocate Dayan Krishnan and Special Public Prosecutor Narender Mann represented the NIA in the proceedings, while Advocate Piyush Sachdeva defended Rana. A 64-year-old Canadian businessman of Pakistani origin, Rana, was extradited recently in connection with his alleged involvement in the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks. The devastating attack, orchestrated by Lashkar-e-Taiba, claimed over 170 lives and left hundreds injured. (ANI)

Canada plans to hit NATO spending target early and reduce reliance on US defense, Carney says
Canada plans to hit NATO spending target early and reduce reliance on US defense, Carney says

Globe and Mail

time25 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

Canada plans to hit NATO spending target early and reduce reliance on US defense, Carney says

TORONTO (AP) — Canada will meet NATO's military spending guideline by early next year and diversify defense spending away from the United States, Prime Minister Mark Carney said Monday, asserting that Washington no longer plays a predominant role on the world stage. The announcement means Canada will achieve NATO's spending target of 2% of gross domestic product five years earlier than previously planned. 'Our military infrastructure and equipment have aged, hindering our military preparedness," Carney said. 'Only one of our four submarines is seaworthy. Less than half of our maritime fleet and land vehicles are operational. More broadly, we are too reliant on the United States.' According to NATO figures, Canada was estimated to be spending 1.33% of GDP on its military budget in 2023, below the 2% target that NATO countries have set for themselves. Canada previously said it was on track to meet NATO's target by the end of the decade. 'Our goal is to protect Canadians, not to satisfy NATO accountants,' Carney said. Canada is about to host U.S. President Donald Trump and other leaders at a summit of the Group of Seven leading industrialized nations in Alberta on June 15-17, and before the NATO summit in Europe. NATO allies are poised to increase the commitment well beyond the 2% target. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said last week that most U.S. allies at NATO endorse Trump's demand that they invest 5% of gross domestic product on their defense needs and are ready to ramp up security spending even more. Carney has said he intends to diversify Canada's procurement and enhance the country's relationship with the EU. 'We should no longer send three-quarters of our defense capital spending to America,' Carney said in a speech at the University of Toronto. 'We will invest in new submarines, aircraft, ships, armed vehicles and artillery, as well as new radar, drones and sensors to monitor the seafloor and the Arctic.' Canada has been in discussions with the European Union to join an EU drive to break its security dependency on the United States, with a focus on buying more defense equipment, including fighter jets, in Europe. Carney's government is reviewing the purchase of U.S. F-35 fighter jets to see if there are other options. 'We stood shoulder to shoulder with the Americans throughout the Cold War and in the decades that followed, as the United States played a predominant role on the world stage. Today, that predominance is a thing of the past,' Carney said in French, one of Canada's official languages. He added that with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, the United States became the global hegemon, noting that its strong gravitational pull became virtually irresistible and made the U.S. 'our closest ally and dominant trading partner.' 'Now the United States is beginning to monetize its hegemony: charging for access to its markets and reducing its relative contributions to our collective security,' Carney said. Trump's calls to make Canada the 51st U.S. state have infuriated Canadians, and Carney won the job of prime minister after promising to confront the increased aggression shown by Trump. The prime minister said "a new imperialism threatens.' 'Middle powers compete for interests and attention, knowing that if they are not at the table, they will be on the menu," Carney said. Carney said the long-held view that Canada's geographic location will protect Canadians is increasingly archaic. European allies and Canada have already been investing heavily in their armed forces, as well as on weapons and ammunition, since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022.

States sue US government over deal ending ban on triggers that make some rifles fire more rapidly
States sue US government over deal ending ban on triggers that make some rifles fire more rapidly

Winnipeg Free Press

time30 minutes ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

States sue US government over deal ending ban on triggers that make some rifles fire more rapidly

Sixteen states have sued the Trump administration over its plan to allow the sale of forced-reset triggers that make semiautomatic rifles fire more rapidly and return devices already seized to their owners. The suit announced Monday argues that returning the triggers would violate federal law, pose a threat to residents and law enforcement and worsen gun violence. It was filed in federal court in Maryland. There had been several legal battles over the devices, which replace the typical trigger on an AR-15-style rifle. The Biden administration had previously argued the triggers qualify as machine guns under federal law because constant finger pressure on the triggers will keep a rifle firing, essentially creating an illegal machine gun. Rare Breed Triggers, the maker of the devices, had argued that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives was wrong in its classification and ignored demands to stop selling the triggers before being sued by the Biden administration. The Justice Department reached a deal announced last month to allow the sale of forced-reset triggers with Rare Breed Triggers, which was previously represented by David Warrington, Trump's current White House counsel. Under the settlement, Rare Breed Triggers agreed not to develop such devices to be used on handguns, according to the Justice Department. The settlement requires the ATF to return triggers that it had seized or that owners had voluntarily surrendered to the government. The states' lawsuit is being led by the attorneys general of Delaware, Maryland and New Jersey. Other states involved are Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, along with the District of Columbia.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store