logo
Pentagon chief warns of imminent China threat

Pentagon chief warns of imminent China threat

Dubai Eye2 days ago

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth warned on Saturday that the threat from China was real and potentially imminent as he pushed allies in the Indo-Pacific to spend more on their own defence needs.
Hegseth, speaking for the first time at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Asia's premier forum for defence leaders, militaries and diplomats, underlined that the Indo-Pacific region was a priority for the Trump administration.
"There's no reason to sugar coat it. The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent," Hegseth said, in some of his strongest comments on the Communist nation since he took office in January. He added that any attempt by China to conquer Taiwan "would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world", and echoed Trump's comment that China will not invade Taiwan on the president's watch.
China views Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to "reunify" with the democratic and separately governed island, by force if necessary. It has stepped up military and political pressure to assert those claims, including increasing the intensity of war games around Taiwan.
Taiwan's government rejects Beijing's sovereignty claims, saying only the island's people can decide their future.
"It has to be clear to all that Beijing is credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo Pacific," Hegseth said.
But his comments on allies needing to increase spending is likely to cause consternation amongst partners, even though experts said Hegseth would face a relatively friendly audience in Singapore. China's Defence Minister Dong Jun has decided to skip the major Asian security forum and Beijing has sent only an academic delegation.
Hegseth has previously taken aim at allies in Europe for not spending more on their own defence. In February, he warned Europe against treating America like a "sucker" while addressing a press conference at NATO headquarters in Brussels.
On Friday, while delivering the keynote address at the Shangri-La Dialogue, French President Emmanuel Macron said Hegseth was justified in asking Europe to increase its own defence spending.
"It's hard to believe, a little bit, after some trips to Europe that I'm saying this, but thanks to President Trump, Asian allies should look to countries in Europe as a new found example," Hegseth said.
"NATO members are pledging to spend 5% of their GDP on defence, even Germany. So it doesn't make sense for countries in Europe to do that while key allies in Asia spend less on defence in the face of an even more formidable threat, not to mention North Korea."
Dutch Defence Minister Ruben Brekelmans said it was important to have Hegseth acknowledge that European countries were stepping up.
"It was for me maybe the first time or one of the first times I heard the U.S administration acknowledge this explicitly," Brekelmans said, referring to Hegseth's comments.
'PATRONISING'
US Democratic Senator Tammy Duckworth, who is co-leading a bi-partisan delegation to the Shangri-la Dialogue, said it was noteworthy that Hegseth emphasised that the United States was committed to the region, but his language on allies was not helpful.
"I thought it was patronising of our friends in the Indo-Pacific in particular," Duckworth said.
Spending on weapons and research is spiking among some Asian countries as they respond to a darkening security outlook by broadening their outside industrial partnerships while trying to boost their own defence industries, according to a new study by the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies, the organisation that runs the Shangri-La Dialogue.
The spike comes even as Asian nations spent an average of 1.5 per cent of GDP on defence in 2024, a figure that has kept relatively constant over the last decade, it said.
Hegseth suggested that allies in Europe focus on security on the European continent, so that Washington could focus on the threat posed by China in the Indo-Pacific, alongside more participation by allies in Asia.
"We would much prefer that the overwhelming balance of European investment be on that continent, so that as we partner there, which we will continue to do, we're able to use our comparative advantage as an Indo-Pacific nation to support our partners here," he said in response to a question after his speech.
But some of the Trump administration's early moves in the Indo-Pacific have raised eyebrows. The US moved air defence systems from Asia to the Middle East earlier this year as tensions with Iran spiked - an effort that took 73 C-17 flights.
Hegseth, a former Fox TV host who has spent much of his first months in office focused on domestic issues, spoke to the international audience on topics that he has frequently talked about when in the United States, like "restoring the warrior ethos."
"We are not here to pressure other countries to embrace or adopt our politics or ideology. We are not here to preach to you about climate change or cultural issues," Hegseth said. "We respect you, your traditions and your militaries. And we want to work with you where our shared interests align."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

IAEA points to Iran's secret nuclear facilities
IAEA points to Iran's secret nuclear facilities

Gulf Today

time2 hours ago

  • Gulf Today

IAEA points to Iran's secret nuclear facilities

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the global nuclear watchdog, has apparently given a confidential report to the 35 members of the board. It is about Iran not disclosing about its secret experiments in three places. The report is rather vague about when Iran had conducted these experiments and the IAEA inspectors were kept in the dark. It could be as far back as 2000. The IAEA had expressed its dissatisfaction with Iran on several occasions earlier. The report says, 'The Agency concludes that Iran did not declare nuclear material and nuclear-related activities at three undeclared locations in Iran, specifically, Lavisan-Shian, Varamin, and Turquzabad.' West Germany, France and Britain are to use this information to rap Iran, and also increase pressure on the United States to come to the negotiating table, and work out a fresh nuclear deal. US President Donald Trump had pulled out of the deal during his first presidential term. But now he is keen that the deal should be worked out. It appears that Trump believes that the nuclear deal with Iran is a means of satisfying Israel, which in turn will help forging peace in Gaza. It is not clear how right and relevant the assumption is. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu might continue his offensive against Gaza despite the US, Germany, France and Britain signing a nuclear deal with Iran, and ensure that Iran will not have the nuclear weapons which would pose a security threat to Israel. The U-turn on the part of President Trump in his keenness to clinch the nuclear deal with Iran is surprising. Trump, of course, approaches Iran with the offer of a deal in his inimitable style. He tries to browbeat, threaten, arm-twist Iran to join talks for the deal. Iran has predictably adopted a defiant stance. However, the two sides, behind their hardline stances, seem to be only too willing to talk to each other and get the deal done. Iran feels the pinch of the economic sanctions, and it does want to free itself so that it can sell oil in the global markets and also strengthen its economy. For Trump, it is a question of providing safety for Israel. It is for the same reason that he shook hands with Syria's President Ahmed al-Sharaa. Iran has said time and again that its nuclear programme is meant for peaceful uses, for generating electricity. But it has not been able to keep the programme transparent so that no one can point an accusing finger at it. It is its reluctance to fully disclose the details of its nuclear programme that raises doubts in the minds of other countries who are not necessarily hostile to it. Tehran's policymakers perhaps will have to decide that the nuclear programme will be open because it is meant for civil purposes. The other reason there is pressure on Iran is the fact that Iran is a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) of 1968. It was signed by the then government of Shah Reza Pahlavi, who was overthrown in the 1979 revolution led by Ayatollah Khomeini. So, Iran is treaty-bound not to manufacture nuclear weapons. What raises the suspicion is the uranium enrichment process that it carries out. If the uranium enrichment is over 60 per cent, it is 90 per cent weapons grade stuff. It is this borderline uranium enrichment process that is causing all the trouble. Iran might have to soften its stance and work its way out of the tight spot it finds itself in. Then it will gain support of the neighbouring Arab countries as well.

Nuclear missile build up as Starmer spends billions more on defence
Nuclear missile build up as Starmer spends billions more on defence

The National

time8 hours ago

  • The National

Nuclear missile build up as Starmer spends billions more on defence

Britain is to announce billions more spending in defence to show its rivals that it is serious about a pledge to get the country ready for full-scale war with new missiles, nuclear platforms and a boost to troop numbers. Keir Starmer, the prime minister, is to announce from the docks of a shipyard that the Strategic Defence Review calls for an expansion of the nuclear deterrent. Writing 24 hours earlier in a newspaper, he said war-fighting readiness was overriding priority. "It's time to flood the zone with new ­initiatives and new investments," he wrote. "It's time to bring together a whole-of- society effort to keep Britain safe.' John Healey, the defence secretary, said on Sunday that he had no doubt that defence spending would rise to 3 per cent of GDP in the foreseeable future, implying an extra £17bn in the budget. The SDR was led by former Nato Secretary General Lord Robertson, a former Labour statesman, and makes 62 recommendations in its 150 pages. Central to the plans are the construction of up to 12 new nuclear-powered attack submarines, as well as investment of £15 billion in the nuclear missile warheads. While the SDR has been revised several times in recent months, its main themes are rearmament and "getting the armed forces to a stage where it would be ready to fight a war". Other immediate drives by the government include £6bn for new weapons, including £1.5bn for new production lines for weapons. When the government asserts that Russia is mounting digital attacks on the UK everyday and other states, such as Iran pose incessant dangers there is a new offensive strategy. This means setting up a new cyber command and investing £1 billion in digital capabilities Other announcements: – Boosting weapons and equipment stockpiles and making sure there is capacity to scale up production if needed in a crisis or war – Buying up to 7,000 UK-built long-range weapons in a move due to support 800 defence jobs – More than £1.5 billion of additional funding to repair and renew armed forces housing. The £15 billion investment into the warhead programme will back the government's commitments to maintain the continuous-at-sea nuclear deterrent, build a new fleet of Dreadnought submarines and deliver all future upgrades. 'With new state-of-the-art submarines patrolling international waters and our own nuclear warhead programme on British shores, we are making Britain secure at home and strong abroad,' Mr Healey will say on Monday. From the late 2030s, the fleet of up to 12 SSN-Aukus conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines will replace seven astute class attack submarines the UK is due to start operating. The build up is part of a partnership with Australia and the US that has promised a global arc of security between the three allies. Mr Robertson, warns that Britain is entering "a new era of threat" as drones and artificial intelligence transform modern warfare. The document also describes the "immediate and pressing" danger posed by Russia, as well as urging the government to focus on the dangers emanating from China, Iran and North Korea. Robertson has described the four countries as a "deadly quartet" that were "increasingly working together".

Gaza war: Hamas ready to start talks on ceasefire deal
Gaza war: Hamas ready to start talks on ceasefire deal

Khaleej Times

time11 hours ago

  • Khaleej Times

Gaza war: Hamas ready to start talks on ceasefire deal

Hamas expressed its readiness to immediately start a round of indirect negotiations to reach an agreement on points of contention in the Gaza ceasefire deal proposed by US President Donald Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, the group said on Sunday in a statement. Earlier in the day, Egypt and Qatar said they had continued efforts to converge views and overcome disagreements to reach a truce between Hamas and Israel.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store