'Trump's brain' behind migration crackdown
FOR Stephen Miller, the architect of United States President Donald Trump's hardline migration policy, the protests in Los Angeles were nothing less than the frontline of a "fight to save civilisation itself".
Hyper-loyalist Miller, 39, has carved out a niche as Trump's most powerful and hawkish adviser on the Republican's signature issue of immigration.
A combative presence on the White House driveway, Miller is frequently rolled out in public to double down on the president's comments in front of the cameras and frequently spars with reporters.
But the sharp-suited adviser's comments on Los Angeles — which echo hard-right talking points about the decline of the West as it faces an "invasion" of migrants — underscored that the topic is not just political for him, but existential.
His fingerprints have been all over the White House's unprecedented assertion of its right to use presidential power to pursue its agenda, often using centuries-old or rarely cited laws to deport migrants.
And Miller, who is formally Trump's Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and Homeland Security Adviser, is at the sharp end of things, too.
It was Miller who, according to the Wall Street Journal, issued US Immigration and Customs Enforcement with orders last month to step up its work after the number of daily deportations under Trump fell below those carried out by Joe Biden's administration last year.
Those orders led to the immigration raids on a Home Depot in Los Angeles that triggered clashes between protesters and federal agents — and Trump's decision to send in thousands of troops.
Miller has since taken to social media to battle Democrats who accuse Trump of authoritarianism.
"We've been saying for years this is a fight to save civilisation. Anyone with eyes can see that now," he said on X on Sunday.
A few days earlier, he set out his right-wing worldview more explicitly as he pushed for Trump's new "big, beautiful" spending bill, which contains provisions for migration.
"We will be debating these matters over the ruins of the West if we don't control migration," he wrote on June 4.
Critics say such comments echo the far-right "replacement theory" about migration undermining Western society.
Indeed, during Trump's first term, Miller's hardline stance made him something of an outlier. As a young firebrand, Miller was one of the architects of the so-called "Muslim travel bans" in Trump's first presidency, which later ran into legal difficulties after they were poorly drafted.
Miller largely avoided the chaotic feuding that engulfed Trump's first White House, resulting in somewhat more moderate voices winning out on immigration policies.
Miller, however, remained loyal, and stuck by his boss even as Trump's first term ended in the disgrace of the US Capitol attack on Jan 6, 2021.
In the second Trump administration, Miller's views have become mainstream.
"I call Stephen 'Trump's brain'," Republican former House speaker Kevin McCarthy told the New York Times just before Trump's inauguration.
Miller was the driving force in particular behind the use of an obscure 200-year-old wartime law to deport undocumented migrants — and a vocal defender when that crackdown saw a man wrongly deported to El Salvador.
He also outraged Democrats when he said on May 9 the White House was "looking into" suspending habeas corpus, which would prevent migrants targeted for mass deportations from appealing for their right to appear in court.
One blip, however, came when Miller and his wife Katie found themselves caught up in the split between Trump and his billionaire adviser Elon Musk.
Katie Miller had been a senior adviser and spokesman in Musk's Department of Government Efficiency.
But the couple now find themselves, professionally speaking, on opposite sides of the break-up between the world's richest person and its most powerful.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
42 minutes ago
- The Star
Georgia jails third opposition leader as crackdown expands
FILE PHOTO: Leader of the Coalition for Change party Nika Gvaramia, who was arrested amid Georgian opposition protests against the government's decision to suspend the European Union accession talks, reacts inside an enclosure for defendants during a court hearing in Tbilisi, Georgia December 6, 2024. REUTERS/Irakli Gedenidze/File photo TBILISI (Reuters) -Georgian opposition politician Nika Gvaramia was placed in pre-trial detention on Friday for up to nine months, the latest of several prominent government critics to be jailed. Having weathered mass demonstrations over a disputed October election and a subsequent decision to halt talks on joining the European Union, Georgian authorities have moved to clamp down on leading figures of the protest movement. Gvaramia had refused to testify to a parliamentary commission investigating alleged wrongdoing under jailed ex-president Mikheil Saakashvili, who was in power from 2004 to 2012. If convicted of failing to comply with the commission, he could be jailed for up to one year. Gvaramia is a leader of the pro-Western Coalition for Change bloc which came second in the October election that the opposition rejected as fraudulent. The government rejected the allegation, but two U.S. polling organisations said there was evidence of manipulation. Gvaramia did not attend his court hearing, instead reporting to prison before the verdict was announced, in what his party said was an effort to show the decision was pre-determined by a biased court. In a post on Facebook, he wrote: "Not one step back! Our homeland is behind us! The oligarchy must fall! Glory to Georgia!" Two other Coalition for Change leaders, Zurab Japaridze and Nika Melia, are already in jail on similar charges. A media entrepreneur who served under Saakashvili in a series of ministerial roles, Gvaramia was previously imprisoned for abuse of office from 2022 to 2023, in a case Western countries said was politically motivated. Traditionally one of the Soviet Union's most pro-Western and democratic successor states, Georgia has moved in a sharply authoritarian direction in the past two years, with the ruling Georgian Dream party passing a series of laws critics have described as draconian. Bidzina Ivanishvili, a billionaire ex-prime minister widely seen as the country's most powerful man, has repeatedly pledged to ban opposition parties, whilst also presiding over warming ties with Russia and souring relations with the West. Earlier this week, authorities issued court summons to over a dozen activists, journalists and opposition politicians on charges of insulting ruling party lawmakers. On Thursday, a court jailed a 21-year-old protester for four and a half years for assaulting police, in a case government critics have said is fabricated. (Reporting by Felix Light; Editing by Mark Trevelyan)
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Soccer-'Suited and booted' immigration officials may stoke Club World Cup anxiety
NEW YORK/MEXICO CITY (Reuters) -U.S. Customs and Border Protection has promised to be "suited and booted" at the first round of Club World Cup soccer matches, as the curtain-raiser event for next year's World Cup kicks off amidst anxiety from some fans in the United States. The tournament starts in Miami on Saturday as soccer great Lionel Messi and his MLS team Inter Miami play Egypt's Al Ahly, as protests over U.S. President Donald Trump's immigration policies continue across the country. "CBP will be suited and booted, ready to provide security for the first round of games," the department wrote in a widely reported social media post that added to some fans' concerns over attending the Club World Cup. The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to a request for comment over the now-deleted post. Tom Warrick, a former DHS deputy assistant secretary, told Reuters that while it is a normal practice for agencies like ICE and CBP to provide surge capacity security at major sporting events, the language from the post caused understandable alarm. "I suspect it was just a moment of inattention before somebody cleared a message that someone else should have said, 'Oh, whoa, wait a minute, we need to change the messaging'," said Warrick, a non-resident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council think tank. "They may also need to change the security posture because very clearly, you know, uniformed officers or people in tactical gear are going to be looked at very differently, especially by a sporting event that is of such interest to people who come from countries that have citizens that have been the target of some of Trump's immigration enforcement measures." Trump deployed the Marines in Los Angeles this week in response to civilians protesting against his immigration policies, as Immigration and Customs Enforcement ramps up raids to deliver on his promise of record-level deportations. California Governor Gavin Newsom and other Democratic leaders said the deployment was unnecessary, while Trump defended his decision, saying the city would be in flames if he had not done so. Protests so far have been mostly peaceful. "I'm scared because things have got ugly. But let's hope that things calm down a bit and let us enjoy the games," said bricklayer Tono, who was originally from Monterrey, in northern Mexico, and now works in Los Angeles. The 25-year-old, who has been in the United States for five years and declined to share his last name, said he and his friends had tickets to see Liga MX side Monterrey, who play all three of their group-stage matches at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena. "If things get uglier, we'll talk about it, after all we have time to decide," he said. The Club World Cup will see 32 teams competing in 12 stadiums across the United States, after world soccer's governing body FIFA expanded the format in a billion-dollar gamble to revolutionise the club game. The tournament is a curtain-raiser for the 2026 World Cup, as organisers try to fan enthusiasm for the quadrennial global spectacle in the soccer-ambivalent U.S., which is co-hosting next year's finals with neighbours Canada and Mexico. Jorge Loweree, managing director at U.S. advocacy group American Immigration Council, said that soccer owes some of its growing popularity in the U.S. to immigrants. "It's reasonable to expect that lots and lots of folks that just want to attend these events are either immigrants themselves here permanently, temporarily - even folks that may be undocumented," he told Reuters. "It's perfectly reasonable to be scared. We haven't seen large-scale immigration enforcement actions at sporting events like this historically, but this is also a moment that is not like any other moment in history in the U.S." (Reporting by Amy Tennery in New York and Carlos Calvo in Mexico City; additional reporting by Angelica Medina and Janina Nuno Rios in Mexico City, Kurt Hall, Maria Alejandra Cardona and Ramiro Scandolo in Miami, and Javier Leira in Santiago, Chile; Editing by Ken Ferris)
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Muslim convert loses appeal to restore birth name on identity card
PUTRAJAYA: A 50-year-old Muslim convert has failed in his appeal to compel the National Registration Department (NRD) to reinstate his birth name on his identity card. The Court of Appeal, in a unanimous decision by a three-member panel comprising Justices Datuk Supang Lian, Datuk Collin Lawrence Sequerah and Datuk Dr Alwi Abdul Wahab, upheld the High Court's dismissal of his judicial review application. Delivering the court's judgment, Justice Sequerah held that Regulation 14(2A) of the National Registration Regulations 1990 does not permit the reversion to the original name once a new name has been lawfully assumed. 'The name change is made because the person making the application has absolutely renounced and abandoned the use of his original name and assumed a new name,' he said, adding that the law envisages a change of name but not a reversion to the original name. He stated that the court was of the view that there are compelling public policy considerations as to why the law permits a change of name but does not contemplate a reversion to the original name once a new name has been lawfully adopted. The 28-page grounds of judgment dated yesterday were uploaded to the judiciary's website today. The man, who embraced Islam in 2005 and adopted a Muslim name following his conversion, claimed he was denied entry into India in 2016 despite travelling with a Malaysian passport bearing his Muslim name. He claimed Indian immigration authorities refused entry on the grounds that he had previously entered the country under his original Hindu name, resulting in his deportation to Malaysia. He then applied for a new passport using his birth name, but the application was rejected by the Immigration Department as his identity card still bore his Muslim name. Subsequently, he applied to have his current name in his identity card changed back to his original name, but the application was rejected by the NRD director-general in December 2021. This led to him filing for a judicial review in the High Court, naming the NRD director-general and the Government of Malaysia as respondents, seeking a mandamus order compelling the NRD to amend and re-register his birth name in his identity card. He argued that he faced complications arising from the presence of two different names in his previous passport, which led to his denial of entry into India. He further submitted that he owns immovable properties abroad registered under his original name, which may give rise to confusion when dealing with foreign authorities due to the inconsistencies between the names in his identity card, passport and other official documents. The NRD director-general maintained that the application could not be approved under Regulation 14(2A) of the National Registration Regulations 1990, which does not permit a reversion to a name that has been lawfully renounced. On Nov 20, 2023, the High Court dismissed the man's judicial review application, upholding the NRD's decision to reject the request for a name amendment.
