Removing homeless encampments could be violation of human rights
State officials are reminding local governments that removing unhoused people from parks could be a violation of their human rights.
Driving the news: The Illinois Department of Human Rights and the Illinois Office to Prevent and End Homelessness sent a letter last week to municipalities, emphasizing that all individuals — including those seeking shelter — must have non-discriminatory access to public spaces under the state's Bill of Rights for the Homeless Act.
Why it matters: The Chicago Coalition to end Homelessness (CCH) estimates that more than 75,000 people in Chicago are experiencing homelessness. Many shelter in parks and congregate in public places like the CTA and libraries.
The letter is a reminder that it is within those individuals' legal rights to be in those spaces without harassment and removing them would allow them to file a complaint with IDHR.
Reality check: Municipalities could still cite trespassing laws as the reason for removal, but IDHR and advocates say removal and fines just for being unhoused is a violation.
Between the lines: Congregations of unhoused communities in parks can create a "not in my backyard" response from neighbors, sometimes leading to intervention by law enforcement and the removal of unhoused people.
Mayor Brandon Johnson and the city were accused of clearing encampments near the United Center last summer so Democratic National Convention visitors wouldn't see unhoused people.
The latest: Chicago officials earlier this month cleared an encampment in Gompers Park in Mayfair. The mayor's office said they had connected all people who had been living at the park with a housing provider.
Yes, but: One Gompers Park resident told Block Club last week that the available housing was on the South Shore, which would make it difficult to get to his job on the northwest side.
Context: Peoria narrowly passed a law last year that prohibits encampments.
Granite City and Alton have also enacted bans.
What they're saying: IDHR would not comment on Gompers Park, but says it was not targeting any particular city or town. The letter said "at least 25 Illinois communities have passed ordinances criminalizing unsheltered homelessness."
"In issuing the letter, we sought to prevent incidents of discrimination with proactive guidance," IDHR spokesperson Addie Shrodes tells Axios.
"What we've also heard from a lot of these municipalities that are passing these it's not their intention, they say, often, to actually cite and fine people under them," CCH attorney Melissa West tells Axios. "We've heard them called stick or a tool to, in their minds, encourage people towards resources, which the reality is, that's not how this goes, right?"
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Incensed House Democrats plan ICE funding war
House Democrats, incensed at being repeatedly denied access to ICE facilities, are warming to the idea of using the appropriations process to force policy changes at the agency if they retake Congress. Why it matters: ICE-focused protests and pressure from their grassroots are forcing Democrats to inch away from their instinctively defensive crouch on immigration. But there is internal division on how far to go. "You've got a situation where our base is demanding more and more of us every day," said one House Democrat, speaking on the condition of anonymity. The lawmaker added that "a number of us have been told by constituents that we have to be willing to get shot" while trying to conduct oversight at ICE facilities and "be able to make news out of it." Many Democrats are still scarred by GOP attacks on the #AbolishICE movement and hesitant to take steps that appear to be aimed at dismantling or downsizing the agency. State of play: Just over the weekend, House Democrats in California and New York were refused access to ICE facilities in their respective states to perform checks on detained migrants. Reps. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.) and Norma Torres (D-Calif.) have alleged that ICE officials even sprayed "some type of irritant into the air to push us back." Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) is being prosecuted by the Justice Department for allegedly assaulting law enforcement — which she denies — during a visit to an ICE facility in her state during which she was initially refused entry. What they're saying: Congressional Hispanic Caucus chair Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.) said he believes Democrats should "reassess the funding possibilities. Absolutely." He said of being denied access to an ICE facility this weekend: "They ask for money, right? And then ... I go there and they don't allow us to go and check out the facilities." Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.), a member of Democratic leadership, told Axios, "Everybody's on board with the fact that what's going on right now is not right, and ... reform is needed." "This administration is ... rounding people up by mistake — they don't care," said Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.), chair of the center-left New Democrat Coalition. "We can't let that happen." Zoom in: Key Democrats on the House Appropriations Committee signaled that ICE is on the table as part of a broader effort to scrutinize Trump administration spending. "There will be a review of everything ... looking at what are the kinds of things we can do to get our government back on track," said Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), the panel's ranking member. Rep. Lauren Underwood (D-Ill.), the ranking member of the homeland security subcommittee, told Axios: "We're going to look at all funding. ... What's happening right now is really bad." Between the lines: A clash is already brewing over how far to go — with some progressives eyeing actual funding cuts as moderate border hawks draw a bright red line in opposition to that idea. "Some of us would like to see it completely broken down ... I've been talking about reducing funding," said Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.). Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) criticized "hypocrisy" among Democrats, "where folks want to campaign against ICE when we're in the minority, but then when we're in the majority, we continue to funnel unfettered funds with absolutely no guardrails." Centrist Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas), a member of the Appropriations Committee, told Axios he is "sure there will be a push," but he "will not support reducing ICE" funding. The bottom line: Even centrists like Cuellar aren't ruling out supporting potential policy riders to appropriations bills to try to reform the agency. "It's a policy. The men and women, they're the same. It just depends what policy comes down," he told Axios. Ramirez, for her part, was clear-eyed that "you're not going to see an abolishing of ICE" even though "some of us might want that."
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
House GOP to Senate: "Touch very lightly" on Trump budget bill
House Republican Conference Chair Lisa McClain has a stern warning for her Senate colleagues on the House-passed Trump budget bill: "Touch very lightly" and don't force a conference process. Why it matters: Senate Republicans are determined to put their mark on the "one big, beautiful bill." But the changes they're signaling would cross red lines for House GOP holdouts. "Change it 10%, but I think 30% is a lot," McClain (R-Mich.) told Axios in a wide-ranging interview on Wednesday. McClain was responding to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who on Wednesday talked about preserving just 60% or 70% of the House-passed legislative text. "I realize the Senate has to put their fingerprints on it," McClain told Axios. "Touch very lightly." Driving the news: Senate Finance Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) laid out the changes he plans to make to his portion of the bill to fellow senators on Wednesday. Atop his list: Bring the SALT cap down, and make the business tax cuts permanent. They're also looking at changes to renewable energy tax credits and the number on border security. If the Senate makes substantial changes, Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) will be forced to go to conference and hammer out the differences in July, with the threat of a debt default hanging over negotiations. "I really don't think there's a huge appetite to go to conference because of the timing," McClain said. Zoom out:"I happen to believe them when they say that," McClain told Axios about blue state Republicans threatening to crash the entire bill if the $40,000 SALT deduction cap is lowered. The big picture: House lawmakers want to move on a $9.4 billion rescissions package on Thursday. "If we can't pass this rescission package, we are really in trouble," she said. "I think we're going to pass it," she said, saying she expected more rescissions requests throughout the year. Go deeper: As conference chair, McClain is working to elevate her members and often does joint media appearances with them.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Bloodthirsty' Kristi Noem and Stephen Miller Want More Military on Streets
Stephen Miller and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem are two of the loudest voices in the room encouraging Donald Trump to militarize Los Angeles, a presidential aide has disclosed. Both urged the president to federalize and deploy California Army National Guard troops and send U.S. Marines to Los Angeles in response to protests against federal immigration raids, even though local officials opposed the move. 'Stephen has been clear in all the meetings: More military, faster,' a Trump adviser told Axios. Miller has called for using the military to crack down on protesters who try to block federal agents from making immigration arrests, even though federal troops are generally barred from domestic policing. He's been backed by Noem, who is 'practically bloodthirsty' in demanding tougher immigration enforcement, the adviser said. On Sunday, the homeland security secretary asked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to instruct U.S. Marines to arrest rioters. A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security told Axios in a statement that Noem is 'antithetical to bloodthirsty—she is trying to prevent bloodshed.' The Daily Beast has reached out to the White House and DHS for comment. Trump took the extraordinary step over the weekend of deploying 4,000 National Guard troops and hundreds of U.S. Marines to Los Angeles in defiance of California Gov. Gavin Newsom's warnings that sending in federal troops would only make things worse. 'This brazen abuse of power by a sitting president inflamed a combustible situation, putting our people, our officers, and even our National Guard at risk,' Newsom said. The governor has sued to block the deployments. After five days of protests, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass enacted a partial curfew Tuesday night for downtown L.A. The reason, she said, was to 'stop bad actors who are taking advantage of the president's chaotic escalation.' Rioters have set off fireworks at officers, lit cars on fire, and thrown pieces of concrete at police, according to the Los Angeles Police Department. Video also shows the police using tear gas, flash-bangs, and non-lethal bullets to disperse crowds downtown. City officials, however, have said that the people peacefully protesting during the day are not the same ones who are clashing with police at night. Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell said Sunday that Trump had called in the National Guard troops prematurely. The president has long regretted not sending in the National Guard to quell the 2020 protests that broke out in major cities nationwide after the Minneapolis police killing of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man. At the time, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Mark A. Milley, convinced Trump not to invoke the Insurrection Act or deploy active-duty troops against the protesters. A federal law known as the Posse Comitatus Act prohibits using federal troops for domestic policing, except when expressly authorized by the Constitution or an act of Congress, according to the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law. The main exception to the rule is the Insurrection Act, a compilation of statutes that allows the U.S. president to use the military to quash an armed rebellion or other insurrection, according to Lawfare. As of Wednesday, the president hadn't invoked the Insurrection Act, which limits the federal troops' mission to protecting federal property and personnel. According to Axios, that hasn't stopped Noem and Miller from calling for the military to do more, faster.
