Kenya President William Ruto apologies to Tanzania over deportation row
Kenya's President William Ruto has publicly apologised to Tanzania following days of tension between the neighbouring countries.Some Kenyans on social media have been targeting Tanzania's President Samia Suluhu Hassan following the recent detention and deportation of prominent East African activists.Angry Tanzanian MPs on Monday accused Kenyans of cyberbullying and disrespecting Tanzanian sovereignty and "meddling in domestic affairs". Speaking at a national prayer breakfast on Wednesday, Ruto appeared to extend an olive branch to Tanzania.
"To our neighbours from Tanzania, if we have wronged you in any way, forgive us," he said."If there is anything that Kenyans have done that is not right, we want to apologise," the president added. Ugandan activist alleges she was raped while in Tanzanian detentionWhy Samia's hesitant reforms are fuelling Tanzanian political angerRuto also apologised to young Kenyans, popularly known as Gen-Zs, who have been critical of his administration since the deadly anti-tax protesters last June. The president made the remarks in response to a call by visiting American preacher Rickey Allen Bolden, who urged leaders to pursue reconciliation.The diplomatic row was triggered by the deportation of activists who had travelled to Tanzania to attend the trial of opposition leader Tundu Lissu.Among them were Kenyan Boniface Mwangi and Agather Atuhaire from Uganda. The two said they were held incommunicado for several days and tortured, before they were left at the border by Tanzanian security forces, sparking widespread condemnation across the region and from international rights groups. Tanzania is yet to comment on the torture claims but President Samia had earlier warned that she would not allow activists from neighbouring countries to "meddle" in her country's affairs and cause "chaos".Both Kenya and Ugandan had formally protested against the detention of the activists, accusing the Tanzanian authorities of denying consular access despite repeated requests.The alleged mistreatment of the activists triggered an online war, with social media users from Kenya and Tanzania clashing over the claims.In a heated debate on Monday, Tanzanian parliamentarians expressed outrage over the young Kenyans trolling President Samia.The MPs said Samia had every right to defend Tanzania's national interests. The legislators' comments angered some Kenyans who hit back by sharing lawmakers' contacts and flooding their phones with messages to express their disapproval.Tanzania's Iringa Town MP Jesca Msambatavangu said that most of the messages came via WhatsApp, forcing her to temporarily switch off her phone.Msambatavangu, however, welcomed the engagement, encouraging Kenyans on social media to "counter ideas with ideas". She asked young Kenyans to create a WhatsApp group for further engagement and promised to engage them in a live session on Saturday."Kenyans are our neighbours, our brothers, and we cannot ignore each other," she added.
You may also be interested in:
El Chapo & Deputy Jesus - why Kenya's president has so many nicknamesCould this be the end of the road for Tanzania's great survivor, Tundu Lissu?How Kenya's evangelical president has fallen out with churchesX restricted in Tanzania after police targeted by hackers
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Royal author suggests Prince Harry's upbringing is to blame for his inability to 'take responsibility for his own actions'
After the Court of Appeal threw out Prince Harry's attempt to reinstate his 24/7 police protection while in Britain, he sat down for a lengthy interview with the BBC in which he claimed to be a victim of an 'Establishment stitch-up'. The Duke of Sussex, 40, chillingly insinuated his downgraded security status could leave him and his family to suffer the same fate as the late Princess Diana, who died in a fatal car crash in Paris in 1997. He also launched a blistering attack on King Charles, saying he 'won't speak to me' and that he doesn't know 'how much longer' there was left for his father, who is battling cancer. 'I would love reconciliation with my family.' he said. 'There is no point in continuing to fight anymore.' With their eyes glued to the screen, royal commentators such as Tina Brown could not help but notice that Harry, who quit frontline royal duties in 2020, did not take responsibility for his own actions in causing the rift between him and The Firm. When asked for her reaction by the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg, Brown said: 'I didn't hear two very crucial words in that entire sort of jeremiad about, you know, "I'd like to reconcile, I'm sorry". 'I mean, he never said, "I'm sorry, I'm sorry I caused my family all of this pain". That is really what they're upset about, not the security.' Although she could not have predicted what Harry would say in his extraordinary BBC interview, royal author Ingrid Seward put the Duke's general lack of contrition down to his childhood in her book My Mother and I. Seward, who has edited Majesty Magazine since 1983, theorised that had Charles been firmer with Harry, the prince 'might not have caused him so much worry' in later life. 'Like his mother and grandmother, Charles hated confrontation and did what he usually did when faced with a crisis beyond his immediate control: turned away from it,' she wrote. 'This course of inaction would come to haunt Charles over the years. His youngest son, Prince Harry, complained how difficult it was to get hold of "Pa", as he calls him, when his father didn't want to take his calls, which he frequently didn't. 'After Harry and Meghan married, there was seldom a simple phone call from his father. They all contained various demands or requests, sometimes wrapped up in niceties, sometimes not. 'Again, had Charles been firmer with Harry and, to some extent, William, in their formative years, they might not have caused him so much worry.' Like many journalists of her generation, Seward would often find herself invited to Kensington Palace for cosy chats with Princess Diana or to the ski slopes of Switzerland with Charles, William and Harry. She witnessed at close quarters 'the boys' grow into men, becoming one of the most qualified people to comment on what went wrong in Harry's upbringing. Seward describes how, for a long time, Princess Diana called Harry 'her little baby' and that he didn't want to share his mother with William, who is two years his senior. Perhaps due to their thirst for attention over their mother, Harry also always felt like he needed to compete in everything with his brother, which was especially difficult given William was notably more successful at school. Diana was concerned everyone was going to think her younger boy was 'thick' as he didn't have any thirst for knowledge and was never interested in sitting down with a book, Seward wrote. Despite getting the finest education at Eton, he struggled at school and exams, with his housemaster admitting he was not cut out for university. In Spare Harry claimed that his memory was bad because after his mother's death he 'didn't want to fix it, because memory equalled grief'. Prince William, on the other hand, did well at school and at university. Learning was so hard for Harry growing up that Diana's friend and alternative healer Simone Simmons was called in to give healing to him - partly for headaches but also because he was struggling with dyslexia. Seward wrote that growing up, the late Queen had always thought Charles and Diana's children were 'unruly little boys'. She recalled: 'On one occasion they climbed onto the grand piano at Sandringham and Harry knocked a vase of flowers onto the floor, where it broke. 'Nanny was summoned to organise clearing the mess, but the Queen got to hear about the boys' antics and was not pleased. Charles and Prince Harry at The Eton Boys' Tea Party at The Guards Polo Club. Despite getting the finest education at Eton, he struggled at school and exams, with his housemaster admitting he was not cut out for university 'It may have been holiday time, but this was still a court bound by rules and conventions that had changed little since Victorian times.' At the age of nine, Harry turned to his brother and declared: 'You're going to be King; it doesn't matter what I do.' Put another way, according to Seward, he saw this as a licence to do almost whatever he wanted. But it appears Harry may have been enabled at times with his rulebreaking by both Charles and Diana. For instance there are reports that he showed an early talent for mimicry that took scant account of the importance of the person he was imitating. But instead of telling him off, it appears his antics amused his parents. 'Later events suggest, however, that a bit more early discipline might have been helpful', Seward wrote. Perhaps Charles and Diana's softness towards their children was due to the guilt of what they were putting them through as their marriage became riven with acrimony. It is thought that often they may have heard their parents fighting and witnessed Diana's tearful outbursts, although as Harry was two years younger, he might have been shielded from any unpleasantness by being whisked off by nannies. Prince Harry leaves Raffles nightclub in London on March 7, 2009 However looking back on Harry's upbringing, Seward claims Charles 'probably regrets' that he wasn't stricter with Harry and William. She told Fox News: 'He went on with Diana's freestyle of bringing up children. 'Diana allowed them to do, more or less, what they wanted, which was very fashionable in those days. You let children just get on with things.' The Princess of Wales ditched a more formal approach to raising her children and became known for her unconventional hands-on approach behind Palace doors. Instead of formal events, she prioritised playtime, scheduled impromptu trips with her sons and attended more to their emotions. However Charles was raised in a more traditional environment as a future sovereign and kept things more formal with his children. It seems Charles's way of showing them love, rather than smothering them with hugs and kisses, was to teach Harry about nature and plants - saying 'they have feelings too'. 'I think Charles probably regrets that he wasn't a bit stricter, because it might've given both boys a few more boundaries,' wrote Seward.
Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
World Bank to resume Uganda funding after halt over anti-LGBT law
KAMPALA, June 5 (Reuters) - The World Bank said on Thursday it would resume funding to Uganda, nearly two years after the global lender suspended new financing to the country in response to an anti-LGBT law that imposes penalties including death and life imprisonment. The bank halted funding to the East African country in August 2023 after Uganda's parliament passed the Anti-Homosexuality Act (AHA), saying the law contradicted its values. The bank had worked with Ugandan authorities to put in place strong measures to mitigate against potential harm from the law, a World Bank spokesperson told Reuters via email. "We have now determined the mitigation measures rolled out over the last several months in all ongoing projects in Uganda to be satisfactory," said the spokesperson, who asked not to be named. "Consequently, the Bank has prepared three new projects in sectors with significant development needs – social protection, education, and forced displacement/refugees – which have been approved by the Board." The World Bank is one of Uganda's biggest sources of external financing, especially in infrastructure construction in the transport sector. AHA mandates the death penalty for so-called "aggravated homosexuality" which includes among other categories having same-sex relations with a disabled person or where gay sex results in transmission of a terminal illness to a victim. It also decrees a 20-year sentence for "promoting" homosexuality.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘We wanted to tell the wider story': play highlights impact of ‘spycops' scandal
There's one moment from the public inquiry into undercover police officers – known as 'spycops' – that sticks in the theatre director Rhiannon White's mind. It was during the questioning of Bob Lambert, an officer who deceived at least four women into sexual relationships in the 1980s, and fathered a child with one of them. 'Lambert's lack of attention to detail was shocking; the whole thing seemed like a process to him. Whereas Belinda Harvey, one of the women, meticulously remembered every single detail of their relationship, every feeling, every thought. She said she was in her early 20s when she met him, and she was basically groomed into activism by him. This is someone whose life was completely turned inside out and upside down by the state. This is someone who was raped by the state.' White, the artistic director of Cardiff and Bradford-based theatre company Common/Wealth, is directing a new play based on the scandal and inquiry. Entitled Demand the Impossible, the play – written by Taylor Edmonds and initially commissioned by National Theatre Wales – interrogates police injustice and the infiltration of more than 1,000 political groups between 1968 and 2010. The play has been developed in close collaboration with campaign groups including Undercover Research Network and Police Spies Out of Lives, drawing on the victims' enormous sense of betrayal and their ongoing fight for justice. 'My own friends who were part of the Cardiff Anarchist Network [CAN] were spied on by the police,' White said. 'My friend Tom Fowler found out his best friend of four years was an undercover copper called Mark 'Marco' Jacobs.' According to CAN, Jacobs took minutes at meetings and made newsletters and banners, but in reality he was gathering intelligence, disrupting the group's activities, and using it to infiltrate other groups, including a European network of activists. 'Tom was frustrated because a lot of people were taking on the spycops story and sensationalising it without talking to the activists involved. So we decided to put on our own play,' White said. 'We wanted to tell the wider story of how activism has been affected. The impact on society has been massive. Some of the changes that historically activists have campaigned for, and which are now enshrined in law, like the right of women to have bank accounts, or animal rights, were slowed down because of the effects of infiltration. The spycops turned people against each other, pulled them apart. 'We also wanted to ask: how do we go beyond that state interruption, to really demand a better world and be defiant with it?' The spycops scandal, one of the most closely guarded secrets in British policing, has been the subject of extensive reporting, spearheaded by the Guardian since 2010. At least 144 undercover officers in deployments typically lasting four years were sent to infiltrate mainly leftwing and progressive groups, and at least four of the undercover officers are known or alleged to have fathered children with women they met during their deployments. Fowler, who hosts the Spycops Info podcast, said it was challenging to express 'how fundamental the impact of the infiltration of progressive social movements has been, not just on the individuals who were targeted but also on society at large. 'We are in Britain all haunted by successive governments' decisions to suppress dissidents on the left and allow the far right to flourish – so much so that through the vetting and the blacklisting, nobody with any serious leftwing credentials gets into any positions of influence within society, whilst those on the right are all around us. 'I really hope the play serves as a glimpse into just how dystopian this country has become,' he added. Demand the Impossible premieres at the Corn Exchange, Newport, from 6 to 13 October 2025.
