Former Trump Lawyer Rips Karoline Leavitt With A New Nickname After She Lashed Out At Judges
A former White House lawyer who served President Donald Trump during his first term took a jab Thursday at press secretary Karoline Leavitt with a new nickname as he called her out for attacking federal judges who blocked the president's tariff plans.
Leavitt slammed three U.S. Court of International Trade judges at Thursday's White House press briefing, labeling them 'activist judges' and accusing them of abusing their power to 'usurp the authority of President Trump.'
The press secretary's comments came shortly after the judges paused Trump's sweeping tariffs Wednesday, arguing that the president exceeded his authority by imposing the tariffs under an emergency powers law. The tariffs were not blocked for long, however, after a federal appeals court temporarily reinstated most of them Thursday.
'There is a troubling and dangerous trend of unelected judges inserting themselves into the presidential decision-making process,' Leavitt said. 'America cannot function if President Trump or any other president for that matter has their sensitive diplomatic or trade negotiations railroaded by activist judges.'
Former White House lawyer Ty Cobb told CNN's Erin Burnett on 'OutFront' that Leavitt's comments 'are clearly so defensive and so ill-informed that people might largely [tune] her out.'
'I don't think creepy Karoline — when she speaks — I don't think anybody in America really takes her seriously on a matter of substance. I mean, she's not learned by any imagination,' Cobb said.
The CNN guest tells Burnett the courts are not trying to participate in international trade but are ruling on whether a statute authorizes actions by a president.
'The statute in question has never in history been used in connection with tariffs,' Cobb said. 'So I think the likelihood is that this statute will be upheld and enforced in a way that precludes the president from trying to pretend that he has these all-encompassing powers.'
Appeals Court Reinstates Most Of Trump's Tariffs For Now
Ex-Obama Adviser Spots Exactly How Trump Caught A Big Break With Tariff Decision
White House Lashes Out At Judges After Court Blocks Trump's Tariffs
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
10 minutes ago
- CBS News
Bessent defends tariff policy as retailers weigh price hikes: "Some are and some aren't"
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Sunday defended the Trump administration's escalating tariff policies, saying that while some companies have already announced price hikes, he thinks others will choose not to. "Some are and some aren't," Bessent said on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan." He pointed to companies like Home Depot and Amazon who have indicated they will not pass on tariff costs to consumers, whereas others, such as Walmart and Best Buy, have signaled potential price increases. President Trump on Friday announced that the tariff on foreign steel will double from 25% to 50%, effective June 4, and accused Beijing of violating a recent trade agreement by withholding critical exports like rare earth minerals. "I made a FAST DEAL with China in order to save them from what I thought was going to be a very bad situation, and I didn't want to see that happen. Because of this deal, everything quickly stabilized and China got back to business as usual," Mr. Trump wrote on Friday morning on his Truth Social app. He added, "The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US. So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!" Mr. Trump's announcement is the latest in the tariff standoff, coming nearly two months after Mr. Trump announced "Liberation Day" tariffs on the U.S.' trading partners, eventually hiking the levy on Chinese to 145%. China responded with a 125% tariff on U.S. goods. In May, the U.S. eased the tariff on Chinese imports from 145% to 30%, including a 10% baseline levy plus a fentanyl-specific 20% levy. China agreed then to reduce its 125% tariff on American goods to 10%. Bessent on Sunday emphasized the White House's intention is not to "decouple" from China but to "de-risk,"and defended the new trade stance as essential to national and economic security. "What China is doing is holding back products essential for industrial supply chains in India and Europe," Bessent said. "That is not what a reliable partner does." Retailers, however, have sounded the alarm about the ripple effects of the ongoing U.S.-China trade standoff. Walmart, Best Buy, and Target have warned that high tariffs on imports from Asia could drive up prices for American consumers. Bessent addressed such warnings as speculative, highlighting companies who have opted not to raise prices. "I know what Home Depot and Amazon are saying," he said. "They're not raising prices. There's a wide aperture here. Different companies are doing different things. They are making decisions based on their customers, what they think they're able to pass along to their customers, what they want to do to keep their customers." Asked whether the administration has identified sectors where Americans will feel the impact most, Bessent pointed to easing food and energy prices, and insisted that overall inflation is falling. "Egg prices have collapsed," he said, crediting the administration's economic council and trade policies. Although egg prices have come down from the highest levels earlier this year, the Consumer Price Index showed in May that egg prices are still 49% higher than they were in May 2024. Despite industry concerns, Bessent argued Sunday that companies often offer worst-case scenarios on earnings calls to shield themselves from legal risk. "They have to give the worst case," he said. "Because if they haven't, and something bad happens, then they'll be sued."
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump is reshaping businesses and institutions to benefit him, not voters
Is the US federal government mostly beneficial or detrimental? To the Trump administration and his DOGE cabal, the answer seems to be the latter. But are they right? What impact will their actions have on our economy and freedoms? I once heard two Mid-Columbian citizens discussing our history: 'The government provided the water, and the farmers took it from there' one said, receiving a nod of agreement. As I reflected, however, it dawned on me how many governmental contributions are ignored, for the government didn't just provide water; they also advanced electricity, roads, ports, schools, police and fire services, Hanford cleanup, airports, grants, subsidies, railroads, etc. Moreover, by establishing land-grant universities, such as WSU, the federal government supplied generous research funds for improving agriculture. Following WWII, a system was developed whereby federal government agencies, such as the NIH and NSF, furnished our nation's universities with needed research dollars for agriculture, medicine, engineering, science, etc. This often-overlooked funding helped to build our university system into the envy of the world and has been of immense benefit to society. When Trump cuts off federal funding to universities and governmental agencies, he's eliminating important support for medical research, technology, etc. People often assume that corporations such as Space X are wonderful examples of private entrepreneurship independent of governmental bureaucracy. But, on the contrary, Space X got much of its technology from NASA, and the success of many businesses is based on thousands of behind-the-scenes government-financed loans and research projects. As a professor, I've had a front-row seat to DEI and other overly woke policies, some of which do need to be moderated. The actions of the Trump administration, however, go far beyond this; for their attacks are excessive, and unfounded accusations of DEI and antisemitism are being used to muzzle and control our governmental institutions and universities. Trump thinks, if he can just take down Harvard, our whole university system will submit. The proper role of government is to follow, defend, and promote our Constitution, which is the salutary law of the land and embodies Enlightenment ideas going beyond most people's day-to-day thinking. Until recently the federal government has primarily done that, and most Americans have benefited exceedingly, although we have been sliding into oligarchy recently. Our economy has been performing strongly with growth, high employment, and expanding productivity. Contrary to Trumpian rhetoric, America has been a great nation for centuries, particularly following WWII. Our economy is the world's largest and pulling further ahead. It's true that some of our NATO allies have fallen short of their required contribution, and many nations do have higher tariffs on our products than we have on theirs. But these discrepancies are relatively small and could be addressed better with less bullying. The partisan ideology that America is the victimized pansy of the world is completely wrong, as is the accusation that our federal government is an inefficient, ever-growing monster. We have, in reality, prospered tremendously from the domestic and world orders Trump is now disassembling. Government should be the adult in the room, using the resources it commands to build a better society for all people, not just a privileged few. And it should nurture friendly and productive relationships with other nations. What we're witnessing instead is the ugly imposition of patrimonialism (mob boss rule), complete with protection rackets and shakedowns. Everything is personal to Trump, and he governs to enrich and exalt himself. The press, universities, corporations, courts, and government agencies must kneel before him and his gang of fascistic oligarchs. As Trump proudly boasts, both domestic and foreign leaders must now kiss his 'butt' for favors, such as relaxing tariffs. He's creating a corrupt, pay-to-play, mafia-style autocracy with Trump as the Godfather. Tragically, most Republican politicians, instead of fighting for the people, the rule of law, and for democracy, cheer with wild applause. Mark Mansperger of Richland, WA., is a professor of anthropology. His research includes cultural ecology, societal development and political economy. The views presented in this column are his own.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bessent says China already violating its latest trade deal
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday that China is withholding critical minerals it agreed to release in a trade deal the country signed with U.S. negotiators last month in Geneva. "What China is doing is they are holding back products that are essential for the industrial supply chains of India, of Europe, and that is not what a reliable partner does," he told CBS host Margaret Brennan on "Face the Nation." Bessent's comments came just days after President Donald Trump slammed China in a post on Truth Social, writing that "China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US. So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!" Though Trump has long been critical of China on trade, Trump ratcheted up the brewing trade war against China in early April, triggering a tit for tat that eventually lead to an effective halt on all Chinese imports to the United States. American tariffs on China climbed to 145 percent at one point, but in Switzerland, the two sides agreed to roll back their sky-high punitive tariffs for 90 days and continue negotiations. But talks with China are reportedly now stalled. "We will see what the consequences are," Bessent told Brennan. "I am confident that when President Trump and party Chairman Xi [Jinping] have a call, that this will be ironed out. But the fact that they are withholding some of the products that they agreed to release during our agreement — maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system, maybe it's intentional. We'll see after the president speaks with the party chairman." The Treasury secretary told Brennan he believes long-sought-after direct talks between Trump and Xi will occur soon. "I think we're going to let the two principals have a conversation, and then everything will stem from that," Bessent said.
