Long-running dispute over Confederate statue drives tension in Liberty mayoral election
During City Council meetings, Liberty Mayor Greg Canuteson can be seen making faces, rolling his eyes and whispering to other council members while residents speak during public comment.
Several of those residents — including his opponent in next week's mayoral election Giselle Fest — have said Canuteson is rude to Liberty citizens and lacks transparency. Fest says Canuteson refuses to answer questions from residents, citing the Missouri Sunshine Act, a state law meant to promote access to public records and information about the government.
But Canuteson, a full-time lawyer in Liberty and former legislator in the Missouri House of Representatives, said it's important to put his facial expressions in context.
He said the people he reacts to during public meetings, including Fest and her friends, are not just random residents. They are members of the Sons of Confederate Veterans, a group that has organized and shown up to speak at meetings for years to make sure a statue of a Confederate soldier remains standing in a nearby cemetery.
Canuteson says Fest and members of the group frequently disrupt council meetings by spreading what he considers misinformation during public comment time and asking questions that the city has answered several times before, costing the city money in labor and time.
'They make these allegations that the city has to respond to, but for the city to respond and make sure they're accurate they spend a lot of time…over and over,' he said.
'Everybody else that comes up comes in good faith, we listen to them, and then we try to refer them to whoever might be able to answer the question,' Canuteson said. 'But that's not a time for [four people] to come up and berate council members.'
Now, the long-running tension between Canuteson and Fest over the Confederate statue and a smattering of other key local issues has boiled over into the city's mayoral election.
Fest, a Republican, said she likes to think of herself as more of a community activist than a politician. In fact, she said she was not thinking about running for mayor until multiple people in the community asked her to run against incumbent Canuteson.
For five years now, Fest and others have attended the city meetings to protect the unmarked graves of Confederate soldiers in Fairview & New Hope cemeteries in Liberty.
The city has agreed to leave the graves alone, but residents disagree about whether a statue of a Confederate soldier should be removed, a matter that is now tied up in court.
The issue has been one Canuteson has had to face for his entire time in office. The previous mayor had banned public comment about the statue during city meetings.
'I'm uniquely built for this…I have no problem going in every two weeks and fighting for the community against a small group of angry people who want to celebrate the first grand wizard of the KKK,' Canuteson said.
Fest rejected his claim that the soldier was affiliated with the KKK.
'He wants to go to the ugliest part of history, which is not really me,' Fest said. 'It's what he does. It divides our community. It's not good for the discussion…it just frustrates me.'
She said Canuteson often brings up the city's history of a man being lynched at the city's courthouse.
Fest's husband has family members buried in the cemetery and is very passionate about preserving their names. She said she doesn't care about the statue necessarily and has agreed to put a plaque over the soldier's name.
Recently, what Canuteson calls a 'small group' of people associated with the Sons of Confederate Veterans have opposed a 1% sales tax on Tuesday's ballot that would increase first responders' pay and renovate the city's police department. If approved by voters, the tax would provide the city $7.5 million.
Canuteson has said this will be the last tax increase in Liberty for a while if voters pass it and choose to re-elect him.
Meanwhile, Fest, a Republican, has embraced the slogan, 'No tax increases,' in her opposing campaign.
Canuteson said public safety is his number one priority in his re-election campaign, especially to ensure that the city's crime and unemployment rates remain some of the lowest in the metro.
While some residents have criticized his proposed public safety tax on the ballot, he said a sales tax seemed to be the way to avoid raising homeowners' property taxes. He said the sales tax would be spread across the city and include shoppers who buy things in Liberty but live elsewhere.
Fest remembers her time as a single mother in Liberty, pinching together change to make ends meet.
'The reason why I'm running is to look at those interests for our people,' she said. 'If you look at the regressive tax, it'll tell you that it harms that people, the middle, the average and the below income people.'
The idea of building a new facility for law enforcement isn't new to the Northland. The Clay County Sheriff's Department recently broke ground on their new training center without raising county taxes. Fest is questioning why Liberty cannot do the same and suggesting that the city is not managing its money wisely.
She said Liberty should use money from its existing tax revenue to address public safety concerns.
Canuteson said it's not as simple as that. Certain taxes must be used for specific purposes such as roads and the general fund, he said.
Fest said she's not necessarily against supporting first responders, but she has seen firsthand how retired citizens like herself are barely making it by with current property and sales tax rates.
'We need to take a breath,' Fest said. 'We need a citizen, a full citizens committee, to look at a
zero-based budget.'
Right now, Liberty has a budget committee that meets at least once a month, sometimes more, as well as a Citizens Sales Tax Oversight Committee.
Beyond the proposed tax, Fest and her supporters have criticized the city's spending under Canuteson more broadly. One of their biggest complaints is what they have deemed as the unnecessary spending of $300,000 on Christmas lights.
But Canuteson said this was part of an effort to add street lights and revitalize one of the city's most forgotten areas: a historically Black neighborhood including Garrison School Historic District, the first public school for African American youth in Liberty.
Canuteson sent out a task force to evaluate neighborhoods close to downtown where most Black residents lived in the past, he said. The task force came back to report that the areas were not walkable and lacked critical infrastructure and street lights.
'I find it really ironic that one thing they've identified to cut is the one project we're doing in the historically Black section of the town,' he said. Especially since the city has done similar projects in two other historically white neighborhoods downtown.
'It's ridiculous,' he added.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
State Department shifts $250 million from refugee aid to 'self-deportations'
By Jonathan Landay WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. State Department has moved $250 million to the Department of Homeland Security for voluntary deportations by migrants without legal status, a spokesperson said, an unprecedented repurposing of funds that have been used to aid refugees uprooted by war and natural disasters. The money has been transferred "to provide a free flight home and an exit bonus to encourage and assist illegal aliens to voluntarily depart the United States," the State Department spokesperson told Reuters. Historically, those funds have been used "to provide protection to vulnerable people" overseas and to resettle refugees in the U.S., said Elizabeth Campbell, a former deputy assistant secretary of state. The re-routing of the money comes as President Donald Trump pushes to reshape U.S. government agencies to serve his 'America First' agenda. The State Department's planned reorganization explicitly states that the agency's refugee bureau now largely will focus on efforts to 'return illegal aliens to their country of origin or legal status.' The funds came from Migration and Refugee Assistance (MRA) overseen by the Bureau of Population, Refugee and Migration. Its website says its mission is to "reduce illegal immigration," aid people "fleeing persecution, crisis or violence and seek durable solutions for forcibly displaced people." Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau, citing the law authorizing the funding, said in a May 7 Federal Register notice that underwriting the repatriation of people without legal status will bolster the "foreign policy interests" of the U.S. He did not mention the $250 million transfer to DHS. The DHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump's administration is working to speed up deportations in a crackdown that the Republican president vowed during the 2024 campaign would expel millions of people illegally in the U.S. It has encouraged migrants to leave voluntarily by threatening steep fines and deporting migrants to notorious prisons in Guantanamo Bay and El Salvador. But the volume of deportations since he took office in January appears to be less than those overseen by his predecessor Joe Biden in the February-May period of 2024, about 200,000 people versus 257,000. On May 9, Trump announced Project Homecoming, an initiative overseen by DHS that offers $1,000 stipends and travel assistance to migrants who "self-deport." DHS said in a May 19 news release that 64 people had "opted to self deport" to Honduras and Colombia on a charter flight under the program. Some experts said that while legal, sending the money to DHS for deportation operations was an unprecedented use of MRA funds. The main purpose of the funds historically has been "to provide refugee and displacement assistance, refugee processing and resettlement to the U.S., and respond to urgent and emerging humanitarian crises - not to return those very people to the harm or persecution they fled,' said Meredith Owen Edwards, senior director of Policy and Advocacy at the Refugee Council USA.

Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sterling invokes eminent domain, will pay $450K to obtain land for new wastewater treatment plant
Jun. 4—STERLING — Sterling city officials have taken action that will finalize the location of its yet-to-be-constructed wastewater treatment facility. The City Council unanimously approved an ordinance Monday night to accept a court order allowing the city to use eminent domain to purchase several parcels of property near the current facility's discharge line, at a cost of $450,000, to house the new plant. Eminent domain grants governments the power to take private property for public use, even if the owner does not want to sell it. The government must be taking the property for a public purpose and pay the owners "just compensation." After searching for possible locations for the new facility, engineers and city officials decided properties located near the current wastewater plant's existing discharge line were the ideal location. Those properties and their owners include: * Valley Bio Consulting Inc.: Parcel ID number — 11-20-351-009 (two parcels). * Illinois Rock Tech Inc.: Parcel ID number — 11-20-351-004 (one parcel). * Daniel & Roberta Witmer: Parcel ID number — 11-20-352-006 (one parcel). After appraising the properties, which were already listed for sale, the city entered negotiations with the owners, who, according to City Attorney Tim Zollinger, were asking for a "substantial" amount above fair market value. Despite the city offering above the appraised value, it could not reach a reasonable price for the properties with the owners, leading to eminent domain legal proceedings, according to city documents. During those litigations, the city and the owners negotiated the $450,000 selling price. Wastewater Superintendent Cory Bradshaw said the project to replace the city's 46-year-old plant has been planned for several years to address upcoming state regulatory changes, including phosphorous reduction, which the current facility cannot accommodate. Wastewater treatment facilities in Illinois are facing tougher phosphorus reduction regulations. The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency's new restrictions mainly apply to larger plants treating at least 1 million gallons a day. By 2030, these facilities will need to lower phosphorus levels to 0.5 milligrams per liter, as part of the Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy. Bradshaw said construction is expected to begin two to three years after the acquisition, with an additional two years for completion. The new plant will replace Sterling's aging wastewater facility at 2400 W. Lynn Blvd., which was built in the 1970s. Bradshaw said the current lagoon-based treatment system is becoming outdated and inefficient in terms of cost and environmental performance. Original cost projections for the project from several years ago were calculated at $50 million to $60 million, although that figure may increase. While the exact size and square footage of the new plant has not been finalized, Bradshaw said it will be "completely different" from the current facility. The current plant will not be decommissioned, but will instead be converted into a large lift station. Half of its 32-acre lagoon will be filled in, while the remaining portion will be used for stormwater retention. From there, wastewater will be pumped to the new facility for treatment. Despite the size of the project, Bradshaw does not anticipate any service disruptions for residents, and the new facility will not require additional staff.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Top Dems claim 51K people will die annually from the 'big beautiful bill' and its Obamacare freeze
Two top Democrats claimed the Republicans' budget reconciliation bill and its proposal to let enhanced Obamacare credits expire will cause the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans. Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, along with Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., announced findings that an estimated 51,000 Americans could die each year due to Republican-led changes to the federal healthcare system and the broader reconciliation bill. The national debt — which measures what the U.S. owes its creditors — fell to $36,214,400,664,854.53 as of June 3rd, according to the latest numbers published by the Treasury Department. That is down about $1.4 billion from the figure reported the previous day. Wyden called the "stakes" of the 'big, beautiful bill' debate "truly life and death," as a statement from his office read that "a new analysis estimates that more than 51,000 people will die per year as a direct result of the Republican reconciliation bill, and their refusal to extend Affordable Care Act premium tax credits." "Taking away health insurance and benefits like home care and mental healthcare from seniors, people with disabilities, kids, and working families will be deadly," Wyden said. "This analysis shows the dire consequences of moving ahead with this morally bankrupt effort," he said, referring to a study he and Sanders asked the University of Pennsylvania and Yale to conduct. Read On The Fox News App Liberals Blame Big Beautiful Bill's Loss On Dying Dems The Democrats employed the Philadelphia college's Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, as well as the Yale School of Public Health's Center for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis. "Let's be clear," Sanders said in a statement, "The Republican reconciliation bill which makes massive cuts to Medicaid in order to pay for huge tax breaks for billionaires is not just bad public policy." "It is not just immoral. It is a death sentence for struggling Americans." "[N]ot only will some of the most vulnerable people throughout our country suffer, but tens of thousands will die. We cannot allow that to happen," Sanders added. Winners, Losers And Grab-bags From House Gop's Narrow Passage Of 'Big, Beautiful Bill' In a copy of the study posted on UPenn's website, economics and health-centric academics found 7.7 million people would be estimated to lose Medicaid or Obamacare coverage by 2034, and 1.38 million "dual-eligible beneficiaries" would find themselves "disenroll[ed]." In a statement, Wyden cited figures of 11,300 deaths from the loss of Medicaid or Obamacare coverage, 18,200 deaths from the loss of Medicaid coverage among low-income beneficiaries and 13,000 deaths of Medicaid enrollees in nursing homes due to the rollback of a "nursing home minimum staffing rule" from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Wyden attributed an additional projected 8,811 deaths per year to the "failure to extend the enhanced [Obamacare] premium tax credits," citing the academics' analysis. Fox News Digital reached out to House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., -- who spearheaded the "big, beautiful bill" in the House -- for comment. A representative for UPenn told Fox News Digital the university sent the results of their analysis to Wyden and Sanders in response to a request on the matter. "The estimates of mortality that are contained in the letter were based on peer-review research that was done independently and well before their request," the UPenn representative said. "The senators' request was to take the research results and translate into the estimated number of deaths."Original article source: Top Dems claim 51K people will die annually from the 'big beautiful bill' and its Obamacare freeze