logo
National Guard troops arrive in LA on Trump's orders to stop immigration protests

National Guard troops arrive in LA on Trump's orders to stop immigration protests

Independent4 hours ago

National Guard troops arrived in Los Angeles on President Donald Trump's orders to address clashes between federal immigration authorities and protesters.
The deployment includes members of the 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, stationed at the federal complex in downtown Los Angeles.
Trump stated he is deploying 2,000 National Guard troops to quell protests he described as "a form of rebellion."
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said the National Guard would "keep peace and allow people to be able to protest but also to keep law and order,' while Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth threatened to deploy active-duty Marines if violence escalates.
Gov. Gavin Newsome criticised Trump's decision as "purposefully inflammatory" and Hegseth's threat to deploy Marines as 'deranged behavior,' noting the activation occurred without the governor's request, a rare occurrence.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

National Guard face protesters hours after arriving in LA on Trump's orders
National Guard face protesters hours after arriving in LA on Trump's orders

Leader Live

time8 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

National Guard face protesters hours after arriving in LA on Trump's orders

The confrontation broke out in front of the Metropolitan Detention Centre in central Los Angeles, as a group of demonstrators shouted insults at members of the federal guard lined shoulder to shoulder behind plastic riot shields. There did not appear to be any arrests. About 300 National Guard troops arrived in Los Angeles on Sunday on orders from Mr Trump, in response to clashes in recent days between federal immigration authorities and protesters seeking to block them from carrying out deportations. Members of California's National Guard had mobilised at the federal complex in central Los Angeles that includes the Metropolitan Detention Centre, one of several sites that have seen confrontations involving hundreds of people in last two days. The troops included members of the 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, according to a social media post from the Department of Defence that showed dozens of National Guard members with long guns and an armoured vehicle. Mr Trump has said he is deploying 2,000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles to quell the protests, which he called 'a form of rebellion'. California — Don't give Donald Trump what he wants. Speak up. Stay peaceful. Stay calm. Do not use violence and respect the law enforcement officers that are trying their best to keep the peace. — Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) June 8, 2025 The deployment was limited to a small area in central Los Angeles. The protests have been relatively small and limited to that area. The rest of the city of four million people is largely unaffected. Their arrival follows clashes near a Home Depot in the heavily Latino city of Paramount, south of Los Angeles. As protesters sought to block Border Patrol vehicles, some hurling rocks and chunks of cement, federal agents unleashed tear gas, flash-bang explosives and pepper balls. Tensions were high after a series of sweeps by immigration authorities the previous day, as the weeklong tally of immigrant arrests in the city climbed past 100. A prominent union leader was arrested while protesting and accused of impeding law enforcement. On Sunday, homeland security secretary Kristi Noem said the National Guard would 'keep peace and allow people to be able to protest but also to keep law and order'. In a signal of the administration's aggressive approach, defence secretary Pete Hegseth also threatened to deploy active-duty marines 'if violence continues' in the region. The move came over the objections of governor Gavin Newsom, marking the first time in decades that a state's national guard was activated without a request from its governor, according to the Brennan Centre for Justice. In a directive on Saturday, Mr Trump invoked a legal provision allowing him to deploy federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States'. Mr Newsom, a Democrat, said Mr Trump's decision to call in the National Guard was 'purposefully inflammatory'. He described Mr Hegseth's threat to deploy marines on American soil as 'deranged behaviour'. In a statement on Sunday, assistant homeland security secretary Tricia McLaughlin accused California's politicians and protesters of 'defending heinous illegal alien criminals at the expense of Americans' safety'. A message to the LA rioters: you will not stop us or slow us down. @ICEgov will continue to enforce the law. And if you lay a hand on a law enforcement officer, you will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. — Secretary Kristi Noem (@Sec_Noem) June 7, 2025 'Instead of rioting, they should be thanking Ice (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) officers every single day who wake up and make our communities safer,' Ms McLaughlin added. Vermont senator Bernie Sanders said the order by Mr Trump reflected 'a president moving this country rapidly into authoritarianism' and 'usurping the powers of the United States Congress'. Mr Trump's order came after clashes in Paramount and neighbouring Compton, where a car was set on fire. Protests continued into the evening in Paramount, with several hundred demonstrators gathered near a doughnut shop, and authorities holding up barbed wire to keep the crowd back. Crowds also gathered again outside federal buildings in central Los Angeles, including a detention centre, where police declared an unlawful assembly and began to arrest people.

Labour can't preach about hard choices while spending billions on migrant hotels… tax hikes will see Reform surge higher
Labour can't preach about hard choices while spending billions on migrant hotels… tax hikes will see Reform surge higher

The Sun

time13 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Labour can't preach about hard choices while spending billions on migrant hotels… tax hikes will see Reform surge higher

EVERY single day, every ­single penny paid in tax by enough workers to fill a city the size of Manchester goes toward just one thing. Some 582,000 folk, including nurses, teachers, builders, ­drivers and shop workers, all striving and ­contributing their fair share for one goal . . . 2 Their entire income tax and National Insurance contributions hoovered up by the same mind-boggling government bill. They are paying to keep migrants in hotels, often rather nice ones. The National Audit Office puts the bill for asylum accommodation and support last year at an eye-watering £4.7billion. And that's before healthcare costs and the price of the thousands of ­officials processing claims are factored in. Now, new analysis by former Office for National Statistics numbers man Jamie Jenkins reveals who is picking up the tab. 'Deeply concerned' The mean average salary across all UK workers was £38,224 last year, generating an estimated £8,081 in tax per head. Divide the hotel and support bill by that and you get 582,000 workers — almost exactly the population of the City of Manchester. Or just over the size of ­ Liverpool. Or bigger than Leicester or Leeds. Last Tuesday, Home ­Secretary Yvette Cooper told MPs she was 'deeply concerned about the level of money' being spent on hotels, adding: 'We need to end asylum hotels ­altogether.' But by the end of the week, her own department quietly admitted they are diverting another £2.2billion of money earmarked for overseas development assistance cash for hotels this year. Fury as hotel firm housing asylum seekers in 'all-inclusive resorts' paid £700M a year of YOUR money That's basically the same amount as last year, despite shameless ministers sent out to insist on the airwaves that hotel use is falling and this Government has got a grip. And the numbers blow away claims from politicians of all hues that we need a period of belt-tightening, with hard ­choices to be made. Fair-minded voters — who believe in so-called sound money, restraint, spending within our means or whatever you want to call it — have every right to look upon this aghast. And where the public might have had some sympathy over tough choices needing to be addressed, that argument is holed below the waterline by the seemingly endless magic money tree available for new arrivals to be housed while our veterans sleep on the streets. The screeching U-turn on slashing Winter Fuel Payments is a case in point, after Labour MPs were hammered on the doorstep while campaigning in last month's local elections. Voters who were sympathetic towards the two-child benefit cap a few years ago are now looking — through the prism of asylum hotels — at a state that is willing to pay such sums towards foreign arrivals, rather than on hungry British kids. Billions to spend And why can't we spend more on our defence sooner rather than later, when we clearly have billions to spend on this? Which puts a deeply unpopular and struggling Government in something of a bind. How can Rachel Reeves preach fiscal responsibility while chucking such vast amounts of cash out the door? As the Chancellor's negotiations with Cabinet ministers ahead of Wednesday's Spending Review go to the wire, it's going to be a very hard sell that police and crime budgets need to be cut in the same department that is bleeding out cash on migrant hotels. But the Home Office will see a reduction in their share of the pie, with Reeves playing hardball. And while she will heavily play up this week that there will be no return to 'austerity', with some eye-catching investment announcements across the country in a bid to buy off angry voters eyeing up Reform, her fundamental problems have not changed. The Chancellor has Labour MPs on one side demanding more cash in their areas, ­alongside furious Cabinet colleagues fighting cuts to their departments, while on the other side, the international bond markets, which keep the spending merry-go-around going, are looking at the numbers with deep suspicion. Looking wobbly Reeves' attempts to cut the benefits bill are being met with fierce opposition from Labour MPs, armed with this very argument: Why should disabled constituents see their support cut while billions are handed to young men who have come here after passing through numerous safe countries? The self-proclaimed Iron Chancellor was looking wobbly already after a series of U-turns, but if she is agreeing to billions more for the NHS and our Armed Forces, cuts are going to have to come from somewhere . . . and soon. Her allies insist there will be some iron on Wednesday, yet until the Government fixes the hotels mess, I'm not sure they will receive much sympathy or praise from a furious public that sees the current priorities as completely bonkers. And heaven knows how high Reform's polling lead will be if the Chancellor decides tax hikes in the autumn to pay for this crazy spending are the right way forward. THE row over trans people using women's loos rumbles on after the Supreme Court ruling of the bleedin' obvious: that there are only two sexes and women's spaces need protecting. That argument can be found in depth elsewhere, but more and more public places are making all their toilets gender-neutral. Without going full Alan Partridge, that is having a major side-effect . . . queues. Unlike the ladies, I can't remember having to queue for the gents in a cafe, bar, club or theatre ever. Now it's endless. WE have all sent an angry message then regretted it the next morning – well, I certainly have. But fair cop to Reform's former chairman Zia Yusuf, who spectacularly stormed out of Nigel Farage's party on Thursday night after furious backroom bust-ups. He's now back in a different role, having made up his differences behind the scenes. Cue much social media mockery and crowing from Reform's online enemies that the rag-tag bunch of surging upstarts couldn't run a bath, let alone a country. But I can't help thinking there's actually something quite grown up about throwing your hands up in the cold light of day and admitting you overcooked it and got it wrong. I wonder if it might be more wishful thinking from Reform's panicking opponents that any of this will really change the price of fish. It's hardly like either rival party – especially the Tories – have a leg to stand on when having a pop at others for squabbling.

Trump orders law enforcement to ‘liberate' LA from ‘migrant invasion' amid clashes over ICE raids
Trump orders law enforcement to ‘liberate' LA from ‘migrant invasion' amid clashes over ICE raids

The Independent

time15 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump orders law enforcement to ‘liberate' LA from ‘migrant invasion' amid clashes over ICE raids

Donald Trump has vowed to 'liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion,' amid violent clashes between members of the state national guard and anti-immigration enforcement protesters. The president took to Truth Social on Sunday, where he promised that 'the Illegals will be expelled' and that the city would be 'set free.' 'A once great American City, Los Angeles, has been invaded and occupied by Illegal Aliens and Criminals,' he wrote. Now violent, insurrectionist mobs are swarming and attacking our Federal Agents to try and stop our deportation operations — But these lawless riots only strengthen our resolve. 'I am directing Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, and Attorney General Pam Bondi, in coordination with all other relevant Departments and Agencies, to take all such action necessary to liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion, and put an end to these Migrant riots. 'Order will be restored, the Illegals will be expelled, and Los Angeles will be set free. Thank you for your attention to this matter!'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store