Oceti Sakowin Essential Understandings revised
PIERRE, S.D. (KELO) — Some Native Americans pressed the South Dakota Education Standards Board to hold off a year so that formal consultations could be held on how public schools should present information about indigenous people and cultures to their K-12 students.
But the governor-appointed board's five members are instead following the recommendation from South Dakota Education Secretary Joseph Graves and have gone ahead with approval of a revised version of what are known as the Oceti Sakowin Essential Understandings.
The board also decided during its meeting on Monday in Rapid City to adopt a first-ever set of computer science standards for K-8 students and approved a revised set of standards for English language arts.
Pronounced oh-chet-ee sak-oh-in, the understandings originally came together through work by a group of indigenous elders and educators in 2008. South Dakota law requires teachers take a three-credit course in South Dakota Indian studies. But decisions on how to use OSEUs are left to local school districts.
The main complaint voiced Monday about the OSEU revisions was that state government failed to formally consult with any of the nine tribal governments. Several people called for the state board to pause a year and allow time for the consultations.
'A rushed process cannot produce strong standards, but an inclusive one can,' said Deborah Bordeaux, executive director for the tribally-run Commission for Oceti Sakowin Accreditation and a member of the Oglala Sioux Tribe.
The state board spent a half-hour listening to testimony from Bordeaux and eight others, and then considered for another 30 minutes what to do on the proposed OSEU revisions.
Secretary Graves defended the preparation of the OSEU revisions, telling the board there was a complete review by a committee of 34 that was double the normal number and included anyone who asked to be on it. He said the review committee spent three days developing the revisions.
Monday marked the last of the four public hearings that state law requires the board to hold before adopting or changing K-12 standards. The Oceti Sakowin Essential Understandings had also become a regular agenda item for the state Indian Education Advisory Council, whose members include all nine of the tribal education directors, as well as a variety of other appointees chosen by the governor.
'So this was not a rushed process,' Graves told the state standards board. He added, 'If we continue to pause, my fear is we're simply going to pause forever.'
Sarah White, an Oglala Lakota who founded and is executive director for the South Dakota Education Equity Coalition, said the Indian Education Advisory Council has been 'gagged and censored,' the group's meetings are scheduled without consideration for other duties of the tribal education directors, and that state Office of Indian Education director Fred Osborn has been 'superficial' in his dealings.
Former Gov. Kristi Noem moved the Office of Indian Education from the state Department of Education to the state Department of Tribal Relations six years ago. 'To date not a single tribal consultation has taken place,' White said.
State law says the Department of Education is to consult with the Indian Education Advisory Council to develop and review the OSEUs.
The state board's president, Steve Perkins of Sioux Falls, said he was born and raised at Pipestone, Minnesota, a place of significance in Plains Indian culture. 'This is important to me,' he said.
Perkins acknowledged that school districts vary in their use of OSEUs and said South Dakota generally was 'moving in the right direction' in recognizing the importance of indigenous people and history. But he also said that the state board and the state Department of Education clearly need to work harder on communication.
Gov. Larry Rhoden, who succeeded Noem earlier this year, has called for a restart of relations between state and tribal governments. 'That's going to take some time,' Perkins said.
He assured the people who had called for a pause that he wasn't voting against them. He said the process of revising the OSEUs was similar to what was done on the science standards that the board approved a year ago. The science standards weren't everything he wanted, Perkins said, but they were an improvement over the ones they replaced.
'This is even more important than that,' Perkins said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Supreme Court said no, but this legal battle lives on
A major mining project in Arizona remains on hold this month even after the Supreme Court declined to consider a faith-based plea to block it. The justices said on May 27 that they wouldn't hear a religious freedom case aimed at preventing federal officials from transferring Oak Flat, a site that's sacred to the Western Apache, to Resolution Copper. At first, that announcement seemed like the end of the road for the mining project's opponents. But then on Monday, they secured a small but potentially significant victory in a federal court in Arizona in separate but related lawsuits on the future of Oak Flat. According to Inside Climate News, one of the ongoing lawsuits was brought by the San Carlos Apache Tribe and argues that the land transfer would violate a treaty between the tribe and the government, as well as environmental and historic preservation laws. The other lawsuit was brought by a group of environmental activists, who claim the government has failed to fully study the environmental impact of the proposed mining project. In Monday's ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Dominic W. Lanza said the government can't transfer the land until at least 60 days after the publication of the Environmental Impact Statement on the mining project and promised to revisit the transfer during that 60-day period to consider implementing an injunction that would block it. The battle over Oak Flat dates back to 2014, when Congress removed the federal protections that were preventing mining in the area, as the Deseret News previously reported. That legal shift made it possible for the land to be transferred to a private company, although seven years passed with no major developments along those lines. But then, in 2021, the federal government published an Environmental Impact Statement on Oak Flat, signaling that mining was soon to begin. That's when a group of Native Americans filed a religion lawsuit to block the land transfer, arguing that destroying Oak Flat would violate their religious freedom rights. While the lawsuit, called Apache Stronghold v. United States, delayed the mining project, it didn't restore land protections. Apache Stronghold lost at the district and circuit court level, where judges said destroying Oak Flat would not violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. With its May 27 announcement, the Supreme Court allowed those decisions to remain in place. Justice Neil Gorsuch criticized the court's refusal to take up the case in a strongly worded dissent, which was joined by Justice Clarence Thomas. 'Just imagine if the government sought to demolish a historic cathedral on so questionable a chain of legal reasoning. I have no doubt that we would find that case worth our time. Faced with the government's plan to destroy an ancient site of tribal worship, we owe the Apaches no less,' Gorsuch wrote. Although the Supreme Court's announcement brought an end to the religious freedom case, it did not end the battle. Two other lawsuits aimed at blocking the mining are ongoing, as Inside Climate News reported. By ensuring that the land transfer won't happen before late August, Judge Lanza in Arizona created time for those lawsuits to move forward. The mining project's opponents present the judge's move as significant, noting that they haven't given up hope. 'We are grateful that Judge Lanza has provided us an opportunity to be heard,' San Carlos Apache Tribe Chairman Terry Rambler said in a statement provided to the Deseret News. But the mining project's supporters believe their plan is still on track. 'The court correctly found no legal basis for a preliminary injunction, and its order is consistent with prior decisions about this project at every level, including the Supreme Court's recent decision to deny further review in Apache Stronghold v. United States,' said Vicky Peacey, president and general manager of Resolution Copper, in a statement. 'The order simply gives the parties time to review the (Environmental Impact Statement) within the timeframe Congress directed for the land exchange. We are confident the project satisfies all applicable legal requirements.' The statement is expected to be published by June 20, Inside Climate News reported. Once it's released, the 60-day countdown will start.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
State plans to decrease its payments to the needy
PIERRE, S.D. (KELO) — The South Dakota Department of Social Services has announced its intention to cut by 10% the amount of welfare aid paid to several thousand households receiving public assistance. DSS will hold a public hearing on Friday, June 20, at 11:00 a.m. CT at state government's new One Stop Center at 1501 S. Highline Avenue in Sioux Falls. The number of South Dakota families receiving payments from the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families program varies month to month, according to DSS statistics. In April, the most recent month for which data was publicly reported, there were 2,487 families. That was down from a 12-month high of 2,567 in October. New Spring Creek owner shares golf course plans The department's proposed TANF cuts come at the same time that the Legislature gave state government employees a 1.25% pay raise that takes effect July 1. State aid to K-12 education and for health-care providers will rise 1.25% as well. DSS officials say the proposed cuts result from the Legislature reducing the department's general funding for the coming year by $5.3 million. Actually, then-Gov. Kristi Noem had recommended in her December budget proposal a $5,168,200 general-fund reduction for the economic assistance division in DSS that oversees TANF payments. The department, in turn, planned to use a similar additional amount of federal funds as an offset, according to page 20 of a presentation made on January 21 to the Legislature's Joint Committee on Appropriations. That presentation referred to the maneuver as 'Temporary Assistance to Needy Families Fund Swap.' The document made no mention of any proposed cut to TANF payments. The department's then-chief financial officer, Jason Simmons, didn't speak about it either. 'This year, in working with the governor's office and BFM (Bureau of Finance and Management), with revenues down and having to fund things like FMAP (federal medical assistance percentage) change and different things, our directive is to spend down some of that carryover. So this would be more of a temporary solution,' Simmons told the committee. He continued, 'This is not something that we're going to be able to do for many, many years, but it's something we can do in a pinch for a few years to get us through, to spend down that carryover and continue to deliver these services.' Five minutes later, DSS Secretary Matt Althoff expanded on those remarks. Responding to a question from Democratic Rep. Erik Muckey, Althoff said, 'We're going to examine our benefits and say, Is there a way we can reduce those as well? So we'll continue to look at that. We've got a preliminary plan that, as recommended, would take effect July first.' One of the panel's co-chairs, Republican Rep. Mike Derby, asked Simmons to go through the mechanics of the TANF fund swap one more time. Simmons explained that money left over from the federal block grant that the department receives each year can be placed in a carryover account. Simmons said the department gets $21.2 million of federal funds each year and state government puts in $8.5 million for a total TANF funding of $29.7 million. At the end of fiscal 2024, the department had $23.4 million of carryover funds available. Simmons said the plan was to tap the federal carryover to offset reductions in state general funds, spending the oldest layer of federal funds first. Noem's $34,665,498 recommendation of general funds for the new budget year that starts July 1 would have returned the division's general funding to roughly the $34,415,895 actually spent in 2024. State lawmakers in March ultimately appropriated $34,517,352 of general funds to the economic assistance division for the 2026 budget year. That was slightly more than the amount actually spent in 2024 and slightly less than the amount Noem had recommended. Asked Monday about the proposed TANF cuts, Republican Sen. Ernie Otten told KELOLAND News that he expects to see the department make reductions in other areas too. Otten and Derby co-chair the Legislature's Joint Committee on Appropriations that assembles state government's budget each year. DSS never came back to the committee with a detailed plan or a change from what they presented, according to information that Derby received from the Legislature's chief fiscal analyst Jeff Mehlhaff and forwarded on Tuesday to KELOLAND News. Mehlhaff told Derby, 'We have reached out to the Secretary of DSS multiple times with no response.' An average of 2,460 households per month received TANF payments during the 2024 budget year, according to the DSS fiscal note that was prepared for the proposed 10% cut. The average monthly amount was $518.06. Altogether, those payments totaled $15,293,131.20 in annual TANF costs, the department said, and a reduction of 10% from the current TANF payment standards equals $1,529,313.12. A statement signed by Secretary Althoff says the proposed financial cuts in TANF payments would have 'no impact' on small businesses. 'TANF is a needs-based program for families with children under age 18 (or under age 19 if the child is in high school) who need financial support because of the death of a parent; a parent is absent from the home; or the physical or mental incapacity or unemployment of a with serious financial needs may qualify for TANF monthly payments,' the statement says. Public comments at the June 20 hearing about the TANF reductions can be made in person at the Sioux Falls One Stop Center or by telephone at 1-605-679-7263 and using conference code 183 579 146 #. Written public comments can be sent through June 30 to Teresa Schulte, Administrative Rules C219, Department of Social Services, 1501 S. Highline Ave., Sioux Falls, SD 57110 or can be emailed to DSSAdminRules@ Many lawmakers also were upset during the 2025 legislative session after learning about the Noem administration's decisions to enter long-term leases for new One Stop centers in Sioux Falls and Rapid City. Most of state government's local offices including those of DSS in the two communities have since moved to the centers. Noem resigned as governor in January after she received U.S. Senate confirmation as the new federal Homeland Security secretary. After she left, the Legislature unanimously adopted a new law requiring lawmakers' approval of any lease longer than 15 years and costing more than $5 million in total or more than $50,000 per month. Leases for One Stop centers in Sioux Falls and Rapid City are for 30 years and will cost an estimated $200 million more during that time than had state government continued with previous leases for locations scattered throughout the communities. The new law however doesn't apply to any past lease agreements. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
The NY State Education Department's self-damning war on the Massapequa Chiefs
Policing speech is so important to the State Education Department that's it's launched a two-front war on the Massapequa Chiefs mascot name — fighting not just the school district, but also the feds. SED years ago ordered all New York public schools to abandon anything resembling an Indian mascot, because progressives think they're all evil, even if plenty of regular folks (including many Native Americans) see them as honoring a heritage. Massapequa resisted on those grounds ('Massapequa' itself is a Native name, after all); now SED threatens to withhold funds if the district won't fold. That's even as SED is rejecting federal orders for a cease-fire in its mascot wars — orders that come with their own implicit threat to withhold funds from the state. Instead, SED offers a 'compromise' that's worse than the disease: It suggests banning any mascot based on any 'ethnic group' — Vikings, Fighting Irish, Cowboys, etc. We know: 'Cowboy' is an occupation, not an ethnicity, but that was SED's example. Which suggests why SED is bothering with stupid battles such as these, rather than focusing on New York's failing public schools: These 'educators' are themselves mired in ignorance.
