Racist gunman jailed for life over U.S. supermarket massacre
Crusius drove hundreds of miles to the Walmart Supercenter in El Paso, where he killed 23 people
The racist gunman who killed 23 people at a crowded supermarket near the Mexico border was sentenced to life in prison without parole Monday after admitting capital murder in one of the deadliest shootings in U.S. history.
Patrick Crusius, who struck at a Walmart in the majority-Hispanic Texas city of El Paso in 2019, pleaded guilty at a state court as part of a deal that enabled him to avoid the death penalty.
The 26-year-old white supremacist was already serving 90 consecutive life terms over hate crimes convictions handed down last year in federal court.
Clad in a bulletproof vest, Crusius stared straight ahead as the El Paso County District Attorney James Montoya named his victims.
"You came to inflict terror, to take innocent lives, and to shatter a community that had done nothing but stand for kindness, unity and love," District Judge Sam Medrano told him. "You slaughtered fathers, mothers, sons and daughters."
Crusius drove 660 miles (1,060 kilometers) from Allen, Texas, near Dallas to the Walmart Supercenter in El Paso with an AK-47-style assault rifle and 1,000 rounds of ammunition.
He opened fire on people in the supermarket parking lot, killing 23 and wounding 22.
He had uploaded a document to the internet entitled "The Inconvenient Truth" in which he said the attack was "a response to the Hispanic invasion of Texas."
He said he was "defending my country from cultural and ethnic replacement," referring to a far right conspiracy theory that other ethnic groups are "replacing" white Americans.
When police showed up Crusius got out of his car and identified himself as the shooter. While in custody he told police he wanted to kill "Mexicans."
The massacre -- which took place during Donald Trump's first term -- ignited a debate on how president's repeated criticism of immigrants influenced the behavior of people who supported him.
At his July 2024 federal sentencing, then-assistant attorney general Kristen Clarke described the shooting as "one of the most horrific acts of white nationalist-driven violence in modern times."
It came two years after a gunman killed 58 people at an outdoor concert in Las Vegas and three years after a man murdered 49 at an LGBTQ nightclub in Orlando, Florida.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Today
8 hours ago
- Japan Today
A lingering Musk: Will ex-aide Elon get up Trump's nose?
By Frankie TAGGART Donald Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill has careened into an Elon Musk-shaped brick wall, complicating its passage into law and risking a schism between the most powerful man in the world and the wealthiest. The U.S. president's "big, beautiful bill" -- the centerpiece of his domestic agenda -- could define his second term and make or break Republican prospects in the 2026 midterm elections. But the package is getting a rough ride in Congress over proposals to fund an extension of his 2017 tax cuts by piling on debt and cutting social welfare for the poorest Americans. Enter tech billionaire Musk, who dropped a nuclear bomb on the 1,100-page blueprint at a crucial stage in negotiations Tuesday, calling it a "disgusting abomination." And on Wednesday he called for Republicans to "kill the bill," and for an alternative plan that "doesn't massively grow the deficit." In its latest estimate released Wednesday, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office said the bill would add $2.4 trillion to US debt by 2034. Musk, who last week ended his brief advisory tenure as Trump's cost-cutter-in-chief, tore into the bill in a prolonged denouncement. The South African-born tycoon has voiced concerns before, but his language was much more combative, coming across as a declaration of war on the Republican Party, if not Trump himself. The White House brushed off the criticism, saying Trump "already knows where Elon Musk stood," but the remarks will likely have gotten under the president's skin. The stakes could hardly be higher for Trump, who has made clear, with signature hyperbole, that he sees his bill as "arguably the most significant piece of legislation that will ever be signed." He has yet to respond personally to Musk's social media rant -- sustained over six hours and 13 posts on Tuesday and still going well into Wednesday. But Washington watchers aren't necessarily expecting a public falling-out. Behind the scenes, a careful circling of the wagons is underway, with pro-Trump pundits under orders to refrain from trashing Musk and to instead frame his broadside as what Politico called "principled self-interest." Still, for analysts contacted by AFP, there may be choppier waters ahead. "It's the Lennon and McCartney of modern politics. Two egos, one spotlight, and a fragile alliance built on mutual benefits," said Evan Nierman, the founder and CEO of global crisis PR firm Red Banyan. "The moment either one sees more upside in conflict than cooperation, the breakup goes public." But political consultant and former Senate aide Andrew Koneschusky, a key player in negotiations over Trump's 2017 tax cuts, believes the Republican leader has nothing to gain by biting back. "Musk has more money. Musk's megaphone, X, is bigger than Trump's. And Musk was deeply embedded in the administration for months," he told AFP. "There's no telling what Musk heard or saw that could be embarrassing or problematic for the administration if the two were to go to war." Musk —- who has cash to spare for his political adventures, including $280 million lavished on Trump's election campaign -- slammed the Republicans who cleared the bill for Senate consideration and threatened to have their jobs in the midterms. And the de facto leader of America's "tech bro" community demonstrated his political firepower with a single tweet in December that blew up a government funding bill that had enjoyed bipartisan support. His take on the deficit implications of Trump's proposals is evidenced by copious independent research and he was immediately backed by some fiscal hawks in the Senate. Continued interventions by Musk could be an ongoing headache for Trump, as he bids to shepherd his policy priorities through razor-thin Republican majorities in Congress. But cheerleaders of the package -- and independent analysts contacted by AFP -- believe the Tesla magnate may discover that his celebrity in Trumpworld relies on the say-so of its mercurial chieftain. "Musk may have had influence in December when his bromance with Trump was in full bloom," said Donald Nieman, a political analyst and professor at Binghamton University in New York state. "But his break with Trump and his massive unpopularity with voters makes it easy for lawmakers to ignore him. If anything, it helps Trump by distancing him from a man who has become a pariah." © 2025 AFP
Japan Today
12 hours ago
- Japan Today
Canada prepares reprisals over U.S. metals tariffs; EU reports progress in talks
By David Ljunggren, Andrea Shalal and Julia Payne Canada prepared possible reprisals while the European Union reported progress in trade talks on Wednesday as new U.S. metals tariffs triggered more disruption in the global economy and added urgency to negotiations with Washington. President Donald Trump's doubling of tariffs on steel and aluminum imports kicked in on Wednesday, the same day his administration sought "best offers" from trading partners to avoid other punishing import levies from taking effect in July. The move will hit the closest U.S. trading partners - Canada and Mexico - especially hard. Canada is the top exporter of both steel and aluminum to the United States. Prime Minister Mark Carney said Canada is prepared to strike back against the United States if talks with Washington to remove Trump's tariffs did not succeed. "We are in intensive negotiations with the Americans, and, in parallel, preparing reprisals if those negotiations do not succeed," Carney told the House of Commons. Canada's labour union Unifor called for retaliatory tariffs, while Ontario Premier Doug Ford urged Carney not to "sit back and let President Trump steamroll us." Trump has made charging U.S. importers tariffs on goods from foreign countries the central policy of his trade wars, which have severely disrupted global trade flows and roiled financial markets. The Republican president has long been angered by the massive federal trade deficit, saying it was emblematic of how trading partners "take advantage" of the U.S. He sees tariffs as a tool to bring more manufacturing - and the jobs that go with that - back to the United States. However, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office said on Wednesday that U.S. economic output will fall as a result of Trump's new tariffs on foreign goods that were in place as of May 13. The U.S. tariff hike on the two metals to 50% from the 25% rate introduced in March took effect at 12:01 a.m. (0401 GMT) Wednesday. It applies to all trading partners except Britain, the only country so far to strike a preliminary trade agreement with the U.S. during a 90-day pause on a wider array of Trump tariffs that ends on July 8. The 27-nation EU's trade negotiator, Maros Sefcovic, and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said their meeting in Paris was constructive. "We both concluded that we are advancing in the right direction, at pace," Sefcovic told reporters. Technical talks were ongoing in Washington, he said, and high-level contacts will follow. "What makes me optimistic is I see the progress ... the discussions are now very concrete," Sefcovic said. Greer said the talks were advancing quickly and demonstrated "a willingness by the EU to work with us to find a concrete way forward to achieve reciprocal trade." Sefcovic said he deeply regretted the doubling of the steel tariffs, stressing that the EU has the same challenge - overcapacity - as the United States on steel, and that they should work together on that. About a quarter of all steel used in the U.S. is imported. GLOBAL DISRUPTION, LOCAL PAIN In another sign of disruptions to global trade, concerns about the damage from China's restrictions on critical mineral exports deepened, with some European auto parts plants suspending output and German carmaker BMW warning that its supplier network was affected by shortages of rare earths. Separately, Trump said early on Wednesday that Chinese President Xi Jinping is tough and "extremely hard to make a deal with," exposing frictions after the White House raised expectations for a long-awaited phone call between the two leaders this week over trade issues including critical minerals. The expected hike in the levies jolted the market for both steel and aluminum this week, especially the latter. Global forex, bond and stock markets took the latest tariffs in their stride, with many investors betting that the current levies may not last and that the president will back off from such extreme actions. Uncertainty around Trump's trade policy has created havoc around the world. The new tariffs will affect "everything from autos to aircraft to aluminum beer containers to cans for processed goods to machinery and equipment," said Georgetown University professor Marc Busch, a trade policy expert. The American Automotive Policy Council said the tariffs will increase the cost of assembling a car in the United States and put the U.S. industry and workers at a disadvantage in the global marketplace. Bernard Yaros, lead U.S. economist at Oxford Economics, estimated the new metals tariffs will cut business spending on equipment and structures by as much as 0.4% to 0.5%, "more than twice as large as the expected hit to consumer spending." The Aluminum Association urged the Trump administration to reserve high tariffs for bad actors including China and include carve outs for partners like Canada. Wednesday is also when the White House expects trading partners to propose deals that might help them avoid Trump's hefty "reciprocal" tariffs on imports across the board from taking effect in five weeks. U.S. officials have been in talks with several countries since Trump announced a pause on those tariffs on April 9, but so far only the UK deal has materialized and even that pact is essentially a preliminary framework for more talks. Reuters reported on Monday that Washington was asking countries to list their best proposals in such key areas as suggested tariffs and quotas for U.S. products and plans to remedy any non-tariff barriers. In turn, the letter promises answers "within days" with an indication of what tariff rates countries can expect after the 90-day pause ends. © Thomson Reuters 2025.
Yomiuri Shimbun
a day ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump Asks Congress to Defund PBS and NPR
Tom Brenner/For The Washington Post The entrance to NPR's Washington headquarters. CPB received $525 million in federal funding in 2024 and $535 million in 2025. But under the new plan, if passed into law, it would see its federal budget completely slashed for 2026 and 2027. A spokesperson from the White House Office of Management and Budget told The Washington Post that it is requesting to rescind about $1.1 billion in funding, and in a post on X called the organization 'left wing.' 'Federal spending on CPB subsidizes a public media system that is politically biased and is an unnecessary expense to the taxpayer,' OMB Director Russell Vought wrote in a letter to the president, which was included in the formal rescission request. The proposed cuts to CPB's budget are part of a larger $9.4 billion rescission package that otherwise largely targets foreign aid through the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development. In a budget appendix released Friday for fiscal 2026, the White House proposed cutting all but $30 million in federal funding to CPB, 'to conduct an orderly closeout of Federal funding for the Corporation.' CPB is an independent nonprofit established by the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 that steers congressional allocations to public media entities like PBS and NPR, and their member stations. But President Donald Trump has sought to end taxpayer support for what he considers 'biased' media. In April, he first confirmed his intent to request formal rescission from Congress before attempting to unilaterally defund CPB through a May 1 executive order. On May 27, NPR sued the government in U.S. District Court in Washington, alleging that the executive order violates its First Amendment rights. PBS followed with a similar lawsuit against the government Friday. Paula Kerger, president and CEO of PBS, wrote in a statement that the rescissions would 'have a devastating impact' on PBS member stations, meaning Americans will lose important local coverage. 'There's nothing more American than PBS and we are proud to highlight real issues, individuals, and places that would otherwise be overlooked by commercial media,' Kerger wrote. 'Public media is a public-private partnership and our work is only possible because of the bipartisan support we have always received from Congress. 'During this fight we will demonstrate our value to Congress, as we have over the last 50 years, in providing educational, enriching programs and critical services to all Americans every day free.' Patricia Harrison, president and CEO of CPB, wrote that the organization cannot take criticism seriously and work to improve if its funding is completely cut. 'Federal funding for the public broadcasting system is irreplaceable,' Harrison wrote. 'Public media serves all – families and individuals, in rural and urban communities – free of charge and commercial free. American taxpayers rely upon and trust public media for high quality educational content, information, and lifesaving alerts.' NPR CEO Katherine Maher wrote that this bill would hurt Americans. 'This rescission would have a negligible impact on reducing the deficit and provide little-to-no savings for taxpayers, yet it would harm all Americans, shutting off access to local news, national reporting, music and regional culture, and emergency alerting,' Maher wrote in a statement. Trump has also taken aim at individual CPB officials. Three of CPB's five board members received letters of termination from a White House official on April 28. The next day, CPB and the board members in question sued the government, saying the president – who nominates board members, who are then confirmed by the Senate – does not have the power to unilaterally remove them. The ordeal has been just one prong of a multifaceted war on the media initiated by the Trump administration. The administration has feuded in court with the Associated Press over access to covering White House events, and the president personally sued CBS over an interview with rival Kamala Harris and has since encouraged the FCC to investigate the network. The administration is also in the process of dismantling Voice of America and government-funded nonprofit media networks. Federal funding to PBS and NPR makes up about 15 percent and 1 percent of their respective budgets. Those numbers are higher for PBS and NPR member stations: 18 percent and 13 percent, respectively. More Americans support federal funding to public media than oppose it, the Pew Research Center found in a survey published in March. About 43 percent of U.S. adults said that PBS and NPR should continue receiving taxpayer dollars while 24 percent disagreed and another 33 percent weren't sure. But the issue was much more popular among Democrats, with 69 percent support, as opposed to Republican respondents – only 19 percent thought funding these media outlets was a good idea.
