Ratubatsi Super Moloi: Hamba Kahle to a Patriot, Freedom Fighter and Seasoned Diplomat
Ambassador Ratubatsi 'Thabiso' Super Moloi's diplomatic service was marked by professionalism, integrity, and a deep understanding of international affairs says the writer.
Ambassador Welile Nhlapo
Ambassador Ratubatsi 'Thabiso' Super Moloi was a distinguished freedom fighter, seasoned diplomat, and lifelong servant of the African National Congress (ANC). His passing away at his parents' home in Mzimhlophe on Monday morning marks the end of a life devoted to the liberation and development of South Africa.
Early Activism and the 1976 Uprising
Cde Moloi's political consciousness was ignited during his youth in Soweto, where he became a prominent student leader, as a member of the South African Students Movement (SASM) and the Action Committee, which subsequently led to the June 16, 1976, student uprisings against Afrikaans as a medium of instruction in schools.
With the subsequent formation of the Soweto Students' Representative Council (SSRC), he played a significant role in its affairs through the Shadow Committee. His leadership during this pivotal moment in South Africa's history demonstrated his unwavering commitment to justice and equality. Later, he became a member of the ANC Youth Council formed in 1982 under the leadership of Ambassador Welile Nhlapo.
Underground work and imprisonment
Following the 1976 uprising, Moloi joined the ANC's underground structures, working closely with the Joe Gqabi-led machinery. His dedication to the cause led to his arrest and subsequent imprisonment for six months for refusing to testify in the ANC 12 trial. This act of defiance exemplified his steadfast loyalty to the Movement and its principles.
Exile and military service
After his release, Moloi went into exile, where he became a member of Umkhonto we Sizwe (MK), the ANC's armed wing. He served in the Department of Intelligence and Security, operating in the Kingdom of Swaziland, Mozambique, the Republic of Zambia, and ultimately in the Republic of Zimbabwe. His work in these countries was instrumental in coordinating the ANC's military and intelligence efforts during the struggle against apartheid.
Diplomatic career
With the advent of democracy in South Africa, Moloi transitioned into a diplomatic role, representing the country with distinction. He served as South Africa's Ambassador to Algeria, the first South African Ambassador to the Saharawi Arab Democratic Republic, Vietnam and later to Kenya, strengthening bilateral relations and promoting South Africa's interests abroad. His diplomatic service was marked by professionalism, integrity, and a deep understanding of international affairs.
Legacy
Ambassador Moloi's life was characterised by his unwavering dedication to the liberation and advancement of South Africa. From his early activism in Soweto to his international diplomatic engagements, he remained committed to the principles of the ANC and the betterment of his country. His legacy serves as an inspiration to future generations committed to justice, equality, and service.
The ANC mourns the loss of a true patriot and extends its deepest condolences to his family, friends, and comrades.
Hamba kahle, Ambassador Super Moloi. Your service and sacrifice will never be forgotten.
* Welile Nhlapo is a former ambassador, National Security Adviser to the President of South Africa and Struggle Veteran.
** The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Pro-Palestinian activists detained in Cairo while marching for Gaza aid
South African delegation at the third checkpoint with global activists from 80 different countries. Image: Jimi Matthews Over 200 international pro-Palestinian activists, including notable figures like Mandla Mandela, were arrested in Cairo, while attempting to march to the Rafah border crossing to demand increased humanitarian aid for Gaza. Among the detainees were activists from Algeria, Australia, France, Morocco, the Netherlands, Spain, the United States and South Africa. Mandela, Chief of the Mvezo Traditional Council and grandson of former South African president Nelson Mandela, was among the activists who were detained at a checkpoint for over six hours on June 13. Basheerah Soomar, the head of the South African delegation for Global March to Gaza, was among 53 South Africans, who travelled to Cairo, Egypt, as part of the delegation. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ 'About half of us left South Africa for Cairo on June 11 and the remainder left on June 12. Seven South Africans were detained at the airport upon arrival. They were kept for a few hours without being told why they were there, along with activists from other countries, including Greece and Spain. 'Our embassy put immediate pressure on the authorities to demand reasons for their detention and release. The authorities could not give a clear answer and eventually allowed them into Cairo where they rejoined the bigger group,' said Soomar. She said after the issue at the airport, none of their delegates were detained again but most of them had their passports forcibly removed at various tollgates as they were leaving Cairo to travel to Ismailia, a city in north-eastern Egypt. 'We were travelling in small groups of two to four people via taxis and Ubers when they trapped us into a large group at the tollgates. We were stranded without our passports and they forced us into a group to make it seem as though we were gathering illegally. 'We were held at these points for up to six hours before our passports were returned. Some people from our delegation were violently thrown into buses and others peacefully complied. We were then dropped off at random points across the city. "Half of the delegates have since returned to South Africa, while the other half have flights booked to return to the country by the end of this week. They are all safe and all 22 of them will return home this week. They are able to return whenever they want but they are not there under duress." Soomar, who returned home to Johannesburg on Sunday, said she was not surprised by the treatment meted out in Cairo. 'I was prepared for this scenario and worse scenarios as the head of the delegation. It was stressful, of course, because I felt responsible for others. But I managed to remain level-headed and I kept emotion out of it. "I put the Palestinian people at the centre of every decision that we made as we were purely there for them. We had a great support team at home, who we were liaising with us 24/7; such as lawyers, coordinators, and media liaisons." Hasina Kathrada, an activist and journalist from Johannesburg, also returned home on Sunday. She said she left for Egypt on June 11 and faced challenges at the final checkpoint. 'My passport was taken at Kamphasheer tollgate, an hour away from Cairo. We were heading to Arish, from where we were going to walk to Rafah. There were 3 checkpoints. My passport was held at the third checkpoint along with about 250 other activists from around the world. 'Through it all, there was great camaraderie among activists. We shared food and water and supported each other during the six hours that we were together. The march to Rafah may have been stopped but the solidarity continues. The people of Gaza know they are not alone. The world has not forgotten them,' said Kathrada. In a video that has been circulating on social media, Mandela explained with a large crowd behind him facing the same issue, that he was being detained. 'We are about an hour out of Cairo and our passports have been confiscated. We are held here at one of the checkpoints without being permitted to proceed,' said Mandela on Saturday. Mandela, in another video highlighted the issues he and other activists faced while trying to get through Egypt. 'Those who managed to come into Cairo, such as myself, had no problems entering Egypt and coming through the airport but we have had immense challenges with going through each and every tollgate. We have been subjected, just like how Palestinians are in the Westbanks in checkpoints, where they have to produce their identity documents. We have been subjected to that in the second checkpoint that we are in. Our passports were taken away and we were held here for over six hours."
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
Xenophobia is an attack on democratic life and must be stopped (Part 1)
To voice xenophobic statements and behaviour, as Gayton McKenzie has done, is to spit on the freedom of all South Africans, because freedom is universal. Excluding some means we do not have freedom. (Part one of a two-part series on xenophobia and democracy.) Gayton McKenzie's recent xenophobic statements have evoked some concern among political commentators and sections of the public. He is reported to have said that 'some of you here (have) the audacity to hire foreigners instead of South Africans'; 'I don't care how you used to do it. But for as long as I am the minister, there will be no foreigner that will work in an entity while a South African can do the same thing.'; and 'foreigners' employed by government departments needed to be 'out in three weeks… I said it, I want them out, get them out'. His utterances are not surprising since he has made similar public remarks before, and then, as now, there's been no remark from other members of the Government of National Unity (GNU) or the president himself. McKenzie, the leader of the Patriotic Alliance and Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture in the GNU, repeatedly enters this terrain — without facing consequences. We need to be clear why it is wrong to scapegoat poor people from other countries in the Global South. It's important to understand why we should be concerned as patriots and believers in democracy, not simply to remove McKenzie from the Cabinet and other individual expressions of displeasure. One of the reasons we should be concerned goes to the basis of freedom in South Africa, that the country, in the words of the Freedom Charter a nd the 1996 Constitution, belongs to all who live in it. That was first expressed in the Freedom Charter in 1955, and the charter was completely at odds with the notion of citizenship that came to be applied under apartheid South Africa. Then, all black people — and African people particularly — were denationalised and told, in the case of Africans, that their nationhood would be realised in the Bantustans, demarcated for African occupation and 'self-determination'. In post-apartheid South Africa, the emphasis on active and free citizens has itself contributed to denationalisation in that there is — in this discourse — no place allotted for people who have full rights as foreign nationals to participate in the South African body politic without being citizens. It was surprisingly part of the discourse of former UDF leaders when they celebrated the 40th anniversary of the front in 2023. (See here and here). We have to remedy this slippage and ensure the full rights of migrants to be present here, subject to them having relevant papers and not being without these due to the delay of Department of Home Affairs officials. If one says that freedom and liberties are allotted purely to those who have South African citizenship, you are running against the key principles of South African freedom which did not distinguish between the liberties of those who are citizens by virtue of birth in South Africa, and those who acquired rights to freedom in this country through other means. The notion of freedom advanced in South Africa derives from universalism, a desire to bring all people under its banner. This is not to say that there are not any rights allotted purely to citizens, but it is important that we put that in the context of South Africa belonging to all who live in this country. Hurtful attacks Freedom belongs to all, obviously — it is not freedom when some people are excluded. We must find the modalities for working this out in a way that does not repeatedly create hurtful attacks on foreign nationals, as with the poisonous food allegedly emanating from some of the spaza shops run by foreign nationals. When one examines the evidence, it's clear that a lower threshold is applied in making a claim of criminality against people who are foreign nationals. That lack of basic respect must end. It is important that we do not restrict our commentary on Gayton McKenzie's statements to whether or not he should remain a member of the Cabinet. McKenzie might be removed from the Cabinet, although it seems unlikely in the light of the low weight that is placed on xenophobic statements. But the problem of xenophobia remains. It will continue to be a serious question in that there is no clarity as to why or whether xenophobia is wrong, or whether we are confronted by xenophobic incidents in South Africa. It's important that we have people grow up in a country that does not condone any statements that are part of racism, and which does not require that the victim should be a citizen. There are certain values, mainly in regard to apartheid manifestations, but it does not seem to be a recognised moral question in people's minds to see xenophobia as serious wrongdoing. That must be remedied, because to voice xenophobic statements and behaviour is to spit on the freedom of all South Africans because, as mentioned earlier, freedom is universal. Excluding some means we do not have freedom. Naming Consequently, while the remedying of the question of xenophobia can be treated separately, it may be that it will not start to happen until the democratic foundations of the country are restored more generally. Commentary on xenophobia is inhibited by the hypersensitivity of ANC politicians who insist, as many autocrats have done in the past, on demanding that xenophobia is not called by that name. For example, then Police minister Nathi Mthethwa on 15 July 2010 said 'there is no such systematic thing as xenophobia in the country' and that violence against foreign nationals was perpetrated by 'criminal elements'. Just prior to this, the South African Communist Party stated that 'these are not xenophobic attacks… but acts of criminality'. It is simply crime in some cases, but generally there is a simple failure to treat xenophobia as a hate crime or other form of criminality. Feminists such as Adrienne Rich and African-American writers like James Baldwin have recognised the power of naming more generally, the name having a crucial impact on how a struggle or other phenomena are understood. Liberation movements were called terrorists by their opponents, and much of the discourse of the ANC and other liberation movements demanded that they be called by their name, freedom fighters, or alternatively a more neutral term like insurgents or armed militants. The power of naming is important for any attempt to combat xenophobia to succeed, because of statements to the media and other anti-xenophobic agencies by government spokespersons after xenophobic attacks not to call them xenophobia, but instead to call them 'crimes'. Such instructions are made aggressively, one suspects because the publicity is bad. McKenzie's threats against civil society and those fighting xenophobia are threats against our democracy. In a recent interview with The Africa Report, he said 'I will get rid of illegal foreigners. I will close this type of charity because we need patriotic charities in our country. I will close down the charities that are anti-government, that are anti-South African.' When asked if that included the Ahmed Kathrada Foundation, he said: 'I've never heard them speak about the poorest of the poor not having jobs. They must go to hell. I said it. They should go. They are a disgrace to the memory of Ahmed Kathrada.' We need to assert that in actions against xenophobia, we are in fact claiming our rights as heirs to South African freedom, as heirs to constitutionalism, the foundational values of the new democratic South Africa. These are being buried every year, and this very silence that we are now experiencing after the new xenophobic utterances of McKenzie is more important than the name 'Gayton McKenzie'. It has great importance as a claiming of democratic life and values in South Africa. Combating xenophobia in the rest of the world The question of xenophobia and combating it is in this context one of the true claims of fidelity to non-racialism, to tolerance and internationalism in South Africa. Beyond South Africa, both the late Pope Francis and the new Pope Leo XV have aligned themselves with anti-xenophobic forces and preached mutual respect. Pope Leo, from his earliest statements in masses and other occasions has taken up similar themes to Francis. At the same time, as both the Popes came to spread a message of peace and mutual respect, Donald Trump was elected to the US presidency for the second time with xenophobia at the centre of his message, as it had been in his previous presidency. We have had two contrasting examples in the world today at the level of world leaders, that of the Popes and that of Donald Trump. Obviously, there are other lesser figures who are making their marks in either of these directions or somewhere in between. South Africans, whatever their source of ethics, need to carefully consider the commentaries of faith-based organisations and others who have intervened on humanistic grounds. DM
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
Reimagining unity: The imperative of National Dialogue 2.0 in SA's political crisis
It is a common cause that 31 years after the formal demise of apartheid, the promises, great expectations and dreams of democracy are rapidly turning into horrific nightmares for the poor and disadvantaged. At the same time (new and old) elites rule the roost. Socioeconomic and spatial inequalities of the apartheid era widened while the politically connected continued to accumulate wealth and power at the expense of the poor. Crime and corruption escalated exponentially and are inextricably connected to political elites; global mafia operations of every genre magnetically gravitate to our country; and gender-based violence is a pandemic. South Africa has one of the highest unemployment rates in the world (33%), especially among young adults. The poor have inadequate access to essential services like water, electricity, healthcare and basic education. Many of these challenges were aggravated by State Capture. As highlighted by the Zondo Commission, State Capture in South Africa involved the systematic and deliberate subversion of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) for private gain. State Capture eroded good governance practices within SOEs and government departments (including law enforcement and intelligence services), decreasing operational performance and effectiveness. This entailed influencing appointments, procurement procedures, governance, and institutional structures to favour specific individuals and organisations. Key SOEs like Eskom, Transnet, and South African Airways were significantly affected by State Capture, with subsequent multiplier effects on all aspects of South African life, destroying the economy. Hegemonic rule of the ANC All these problems and challenges were aggravated during the hegemonic rule and reign of one political party, the ANC. Not surprisingly, some of its senior members were implicated in the State Capture report. Still, no one has yet been convicted because of the hollowing out of capacity in the National Prosecuting Authority. When he was firmly ensconced on the throne, Jacob Zuma said on more than one occasion that the 'ANC will rule until Jesus returns'. However, there were some obvious indications that the ANC was haemorrhaging — for example, in the 2021 Local Government Elections it received 45.59% of the vote. In the May 2024 General Elections, the ANC lost its parliamentary majority, winning 40.18% of the vote. Ironically, Zuma's newly established uMkhonto Wesizwe (MK) party (while he still claimed to be a disciplined member of the ANC) eroded the support of the ANC, winning 14.58% of the vote. The notion of a National Dialogue entered the public domain against the background of the ANC's declining electoral support. Former president Thabo Mbeki initially proposed a national dialogue in May 2024, calling for 'seismic reflections'. This was endorsed by President Cyril Ramaphosa, who in his inauguration address after the May 2024 national elections, invited 'all parties, civil society, labour, business and other formations to a National Dialogue on the critical challenges facing the nation'. Ramaphosa said: 'By establishing the Government of National Unity, by preparing for a National Dialogue, we have deliberately set ourselves along the path towards a 'co-operation nation'. We would like all of us as South Africans to behave like 'weaver birds'… despite all the challenges, despite our differences, despite all the headwinds.' Political legitimacy There is a view that ruling elites have frequently utilised National Dialogues to obtain or regain political legitimacy. According to the Geneva-based Inclusive Peace and Transition Initiative: 'National Dialogues are typically convened when the fundamental nature or survival of a government in power is questioned. Thus, they usually intend to redefine the relationship between the state, political actors, and society by negotiating a new social contract.' A National Dialogue can be used for peacebuilding and reconciliation to increase confidence and trust among national actors, encourage inclusive engagement, and advance agreement on critical social, political, and economic challenges. The National Dialogue Handbook defines National Dialogues as 'nationally owned political processes aimed at generating consensus among a broad range of national stakeholders in times of deep political crisis, in post-war situations or during far-reaching political transitions'. The goal is for national leaders (political, business, religious, civil society, sports, etc.) across the ideological spectrum to debate, discuss and encourage inclusive engagement and advance agreement on significant social, political, and economic challenges. It is worth noting that the first National Dialogue was the Convention for a Democratic South Africa (Codesa), which took place in Johannesburg in December 1991. It was a critical step in the process of transitioning South Africa from apartheid to a democratic state. Nineteen political organisations participated, including the ruling National Party and the dominant African National Congress (ANC), comprising 228 delegates. Key aspects of Codesa included signing a 'Declaration of Intent' committing to negotiations and creating a new, democratic Constitution. The parties agreed on the principles of a unified, democratic, and non-racial South Africa, with a supreme Constitution and an independent judiciary. Crucial step Codesa established the foundation for negotiations for a democratic South Africa. While there were many disagreements, Codesa was a crucial step in the process of dismantling apartheid and building a new nation. The procedure was sufficiently adaptable to permit the creation of new forums and committees and modifications to existing ones based on political exigencies. As South Africa's transition from apartheid proceeded (with all its twists and turns), a Multi-Party Negotiating Process was established in March 1993, culminating in the adoption of an interim Constitution and preparations for the country's first non-racial elections. Parties with opposing views had to make substantial concessions during this process. Given the protracted conflict and violent past, the comparatively quiet and orderly democratic transition was praised globally as a miracle. Essential outcomes from the first National Dialogue were the Reconstruction and Development Programme and the Constitution. The National Development Plan, which presented a long-term vision and goals for South Africa to achieve by 2030, was released in 2012. All three documents can influence outcomes in the National Dialogue 2.0. There is no need to reinvent the wheel. Almost a year after it was initially proposed, on 10 June 2025, Ramaphosa released the names of the Eminent Persons Group to 'guide and champion the National Dialogue'. The problems in South Africa cannot be solved by National Dialogues alone. For a National Dialogue to be successful, several challenges must be addressed, including political actors' opposition and resistance to change, a lack of support from groups, persistent violence, crime, corruption, instability, and a lack of inclusivity. The National Dialogue 2.0 should not be about saving the ANC. It is about saving our country. All stakeholders must put their shoulders to the wheel, rise above personal, parochial, and party interests, and put South Africa first.
