
Mass immigration means the water will run out and we are not prepared
The boss of Southern Water has told households that they need to ration their water use because the region is ' drier than Sydney, Dallas, Marrakesh and Istanbul '. Needless to say, given the appalling way most of these privatised companies have been run, Tim Mcmahon was denounced for blaming the consumer for the failings of his business. Why don't you repair the leaks properly and invest more in infrastructure before passing the buck, was a characteristic response.
But Mr Mcmahon has a point. We often forget that rainfall levels in London and the Home Counties are among the lowest in Europe. In some years, the annual total in Essex is even below that of Jerusalem. However, our rain normally falls throughout the year rather than in monsoon-like summer deluges, which means the reservoirs and aquifers are routinely replenished and the water retained.
Rain is needed, indeed expected, in winter and spring; yet the first four months of this year have been exceptionally arid. Some areas have had their driest start to the year in almost a century. We have seen heath fires raging and reservoirs emptying and it is just the start of May.
Water is our most precious commodity yet we are reckless with its use because we always imagine there will be no shortages. When there are – as during the drought of 1976 – and we have to use standpipes, everyone complains about the lack of resilience and then forgets about it once the heavens open again.
The population of England in 1976 was 46 million; today it is 57 million. Moreover, most of the increase has been in the very areas where rainfall is lowest. So the demand is growing while supply is not keeping up. Even in a normal rainfall year this would be problematic. In a drought, a crisis looms. Mr Mcmahon says the answer is to reduce demand by rationing, But the solution, surely, is to increase supply.
This country is cursed by short-termism in public policy and especially where water is concerned. It is more than 30 years since the last major reservoir was opened in England at Carsington in Derbyshire.
A four-decade planning battle has been waged over a new reservoir near Abingdon which would supply the parched South East. Southern Water is planning to construct a reservoir near Portsmouth but it will be years before it comes on stream.
The Government has promised to speed up planning for new water projects, even as it seeks to build 1.5 million new homes, mostly in areas with shortages. If ever there was a failure of joined-up thinking, here it is. It is madness to keep building houses, mainly to meet the demands caused by years of mass immigration, if the water is running out.
There is an answer. Since our maritime climate brings great variations in rainfall, and parts of the country have copious amounts, we could move water from the places that have got it – but don't need so much – to drier, more populous parts that risk being left parched. Indeed, it is an answer that has been staring us in the face for more than 80 years.
A national water grid was proposed back in 1943 by the engineer J F Pownall. He produced plans for a canal running down the spine of England at the 310ft contour and connecting the most populated towns and cities. This Grand Contour Canal would have no locks, other than at the entry and exit points, and would serve as a grid able to distribute water around the country.
Needless to say it never got built. A canal was seen as old hat in a world in thrall to the internal combustion engine and despite the fact that many countries have such schemes (as, indeed, did the Romans).
It is another good idea that fell victim to the post-war insularity that has suffocated the life out of a country that was once adventurous and innovative but became tentative and lacking in ambition. The Grand Contour Canal joins the nuclear power stations we never built, the tidal energy we could have had and the bigger airports that never materialised (and never will).
We have a national grid for electricity, so why not a national water grid? It is hardly a new concept: the ancient Chinese built one nearly 2,000 years ago while aqueducts testify to Roman ingenuity in this field.
Yes, we can build more reservoirs, but they will take years. We could and should open more desalination plants beyond the one that currently lies dormant in east London. But the former cause major local issues, as Abingdon has found, while the latter are seen as inefficient and bad for the environment.
We don't need a Pownall-style scheme to use the existing river and canal systems much better to move water around. It already happens in some parts, such as the provision of water to Merseyside from north Wales.
A study by the Institute of Civil Engineers a few years ago concluded that a grid is both feasible and cheaper than building new reservoirs in the South. One option is to tap the vast reservoirs in Wales and transfer the water from the Severn to the Thames through a pipeline or aqueduct linking the two rivers. Better still, use the existing canals.
Overall responsibility for policy lies with the National Rivers Authority and the Environment Agency, who are opposed to inter-regional transfers on grounds of cost (although it would be a fraction that of HS2). They decided as long ago as 2006 that the demand could be met by other means, such as new reservoirs, but have failed to take into consideration the huge population increase in the meantime.
Some objections are irrational, seeing the transfer of 'the North's water' to the South East as somehow unethical, though we move electricity and gas around without moral qualms.
It is simply a matter of time before a drought puts water resources under stress and everyone starts to ask why successive governments and their agencies did nothing to prepare. Thames Water expects demand in drought years in the South East to exceed supply by some 60 million litres per day by 2035, so where will it come from?
While repairing leaks is important, it is not sufficient. It is one thing to face the prospect of power blackouts because of the net zero policy. Just wait until the water runs out.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Reform Civil War: Now Richard Tice says chairman who quit was WRONG to oppose burka ban
Nigel Farage 's deputy has said he is 'enormously sad' that Reform's chairman resigned – but insisted he was wrong to oppose a burka ban. Richard Tice said Zia Yusuf, who plunged Reform into chaos after resigning on Thursday, had worked 'incredibly hard' and helped the party win hundreds of council seats in last month's local elections. But he insisted that banning the burka was right because the Islamic veil is 'a repressive item of clothing'. However, Downing Street said Sir Keir Starmer did not support a ban, with a spokesman saying: 'This Government does not believe in mandating what people should or shouldn't wear in public.' Mr Yusuf's departure came just hours after he hit out at one of Reform's own MPs for a 'dumb' question in the House of Commons about banning the burka. He publicly questioned why Sarah Pochin, Reform's recently elected MP for Runcorn and Helsby, had challenged Sir Keir about the issue in the Commons on Wednesday when a ban is not official party policy. In a post on X/Twitter on Thursday morning, he said: 'I do think it's dumb for a party to ask the PM if they would do something the party itself wouldn't do.' By the evening he had resigned, saying he no longer felt that working with Mr Farage to try to win the next election was 'a good use of my time'. Asked about his departure yesterday, Mr Tice, Reform's deputy leader, said: 'I'm enormously sad that Zia has resigned. He's worked incredibly hard. I've sent him a message of thanks.' Asked if he agreed with Mr Yusuf that the party should not pledge to ban the burka, he added: 'No, I don't. 'The reality is that I think it is right that we should have a debate about whether or not the burka is appropriate in a nation that's founded in Christianity, where women are equal citizens and should not be viewed as second-class citizens. 'If we're a great democracy that believes in free speech, let's have a calm and respectful debate.' Asked by the BBC Radio 4's Today programme if he supported a ban, he added: 'Yeah, I'm pretty concerned about whether or not the burka is essentially a sort of repressive item of clothing, whether women have the choice.' Wearing face-covering clothes is currently banned in seven European countries – France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland, Austria and Bulgaria – while other countries have enacted partial bans. His resignation comes after Great Yarmouth MP Rupert Lowe was kicked out of Reform in March for criticising Mr Farage's leadership. Mr Yusuf also clashed with Mr Lowe and said he made verbal threats of violence against him. Mr Lowe always denied the allegations and was later cleared by Scotland Yard after Mr Yusuf reported the incident. Labour and SNP 'terrified' after Reform's poll surge By David Churchill, Chief Political Correspondent Reform claimed Labour and the SNP were in a 'coalition of the terrified' after the party notched up a staggering 26 per cent of the vote in a Scottish by-election. Reform deputy leader, Richard Tice made the jibe yesterday after coming third in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse Holyrood by-election. While Labour's candidate Davy Russell won the contest with 8,559 votes (31.6 per cent), the SNP came second with 7,957 (29.4 per cent). This was followed by Reform with 7,088 (26.2 per cent), meaning they came within 1,500 votes of winning. The leading pollster professor Sir John Curtice said the result showed Reform also posed a serious threat to Labour north of the border. Last week, SNP Scottish First Minister John Swinney accused Reform leader Nigel Farage of being 'fundamentally racist'.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Elon Musk's estranged dad tells his 'gorilla' son to make friends again with the president: Trump will prevail
Elon Musk 's estranged father Errol told his 'gorilla' son to get back on President Donald Trump 's good side. The elder Musk told The Times of London Friday that his son's feud with Trump resembled male animals fighting for dominance - but since Trump is the president of the United States, he'll 'win this round.' 'In any successful group of animals, whether gorillas, elephants or human beings, the dominant males will always fight for dominance,' Musk said. 'The problem you get with really good quality people is that the men all think they should be the general.' 'They will have to sort it out and because Trump is the one who was elected, Elon is going to have to accept he is not going to be the general,' the Tesla CEO's father added. A week ago, Musk was being feted in the Oval Office alongside Trump for the work he did for DOGE - the Department of Government Efficiency - as he headed back into the private sector. But Musk's complaints about the 'big, beautiful bill' spilled Thursday into an all-out war between the most powerful man in the world and the richest. 'I have had this trouble with Elon my whole life,' his father observed. 'If something doesn't look right to him, he can't help himself but say so on principle.' 'But I always said to him that he can do that without getting nasty,' the elder Musk added. Errol Musk (left), the estranged father of Elon Musk (right), said like a 'gorilla' Musk and President Donald Trump were fighting for dominance, but because Trump is the president of the United States, he'll 'win this round' The fight got so brutal that the SpaceX CEO accused the president of being 'in the Epstein files,' a reference to serial pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. The younger Musk also appeared supportive of Trump being impeached - and replaced by 40-year-old Vice President J.D. Vance. Trump made clear to reporters Friday morning that he would not be calling Musk to make peace. He also floated that he planned to sell the Tesla - a purchase he made to prop up Musk's electric car business as liberals started boycotting the vehicles. Errol Musk didn't seem surprised. 'But Elon is a man who has never known a day's hardship in his life,' he said. 'He has had a charmed life and so has never had to learn that the hard way.' At the same time, the elder Musk believed that the Musk-Trump row 'would now fizzle out.' 'Trump has to put things in that budget to make the Democrats vote for it. Elon saw things he didn't like and spoke up, but that should be the end of it now,' he said. 'Trump isn't vengeful. He will win this round with Elon and not hold it against him,' he continued. 'A big person can forgive easily, only small people can't. Things have gone over the top, but this is the situation when alphas fight it out. I've told Elon he has said his part, but now he must allow things to calm down - and I hope he will,' the elder Musk added. The former leader of DOGE appeared more restrained Friday, though placed blame on Trump for things getting so heated. 'Elon criticized Congress, not Trump,' read an X post Friday that Musk commented on. 'Trump then attacked Elon personally.' 'Exactly,' Elon Musk wrote. Trump spent his Friday behind closed doors and didn't talk to reporters on the South Lawn as he departed for a Bedminster weekend.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Pret A Manger brews up stock market listing
The private equity owners of Pret A Manger are preparing to list it on the stock market. Luxembourg-based JAB Holding – which bought the coffee and sandwich chain for £1.5billion in 2018 – is exploring options, with an initial public offering (IPO) a possibility. This could involve selling a stake to another investor to shore up its finances ahead of a listing. A spokesman for JAB said: 'As we move closer to a potential IPO, we may evaluate bringing on a pre-IPO investor.' It is thought to mark the first time Pret has publicly confirmed IPO plans. Pret recently announced it was dropping its plan to double its £5 monthly subscription as it looks to retain customers. The deal was an overhaul of Pret's £360-a-year subscription which offered five free coffees a day. The new subscription offers 50 per cent off five drinks per day. Pret opened its first shop in London in 1986, where the company remains based. It has 700 shops worldwide with around 12,500 employees across 21 markets.