GISB CEO and wife lose habeas corpus appeal
PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court has dismissed an appeal by Global Ikhwan Services and Business Holdings (GISB) chief executive officer Datuk Nasiruddin Mohd Ali and his wife, Azura Md Yusof, seeking to have their habeas corpus application remitted to the High Court for a full hearing on its merits.
Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, who chaired a three-member panel, delivered a unanimous decision that the appeal was devoid of merit.
The panel upheld the Johor Baru High Court's decision to strike out the couple's habeas corpus application on grounds that the matter had become moot.
Also sitting on the Federal Court panel were Justices Abu Bakar Jais and Vazeer Alam Mydin Meera.
Nasiruddin, 65, and Azura, 58, had filed the application to challenge their detention under the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (Sosma).
On Jan 14, the Johor Baru High Court, presided by Justice Abu Bakar Katar, struck out the couple's application after allowing the respondents' preliminary objection that the matter had become moot.
The judge held that at the time the application was filed on Oct 24 last year, the applicants were no longer detained under Sosma, but were held under a valid warrant of arrest issued by the Selayang Sessions Court.
The respondents named in the application were the Home Minister, Inspector-General of Police, Public Prosecutor, directors of the Selangor and Kuala Lumpur Prisons Departments, and the government.
The couple were initially arrested on Sept 19, 2024 and subsequently detained under Sosma on Oct 10.
They were among 22 individuals charged in the Selayang Sessions Court on Oct 23 last year with being members of an organised criminal group operating in Bandar Country Homes, Rawang, Selangor, between October 2020 and September 2024.
During yesterday's proceedings, their counsel Najib Zakaria contended that the habeas corpus application remained relevant notwithstanding its academic nature, as it raised live legal issues warranting adjudication, Bernama reported.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sinar Daily
11 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
Prime Minister is not above the law
Hamzah Zainudin. KUALA LUMPUR - Opposition leader Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin has reminded that the Prime Minister is not above the law and should not use his position to shield himself from legal proceedings, especially in the eyes of both the people and the international community. In a statement on Friday, Hamzah stressed the importance of upholding justice, saying that dignity and accountability go hand in hand for any national leader. He criticised the move by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's legal team to file an extraordinary application to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court, including the matter of immunity in a civil lawsuit filed by former aide Muhammed Yusoff Rawther. Hamzah criticised the move by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's legal team to file an extraordinary application to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court, including the matter of immunity in a civil lawsuit filed by former aide Muhammed Yusoff Rawther (in white).. 'Defending the honour of a leader, particularly the Prime Minister, is important because it reflects the authority of the nation. However, at the same time, the supremacy of the Constitution and the rule of law must be upheld 'Those in power must never abuse the justice system because doing so would erode public trust in the leadership and the country's legal institutions,' he warned. He reminded that the courts are the rightful avenue for individuals to defend themselves fairly under the law, and any failure to uphold justice could lead to perceptions of double standards. He warned that such a scenario would erode public trust and send a signal to foreign investors that the country operates without proper legal order. The Larut Member of Parliament (MP) added that such actions could have a lasting impact on Malaysia's stability and economic growth. Citing Article 8(1) of the Federal Constitution, he said: 'All individuals are equal before the law and entitled to equal protection under it. If this right is denied, the people will rebel and the system will collapse. 'The position of Prime Minister does not provide immunity from the law. In this case, he must defend his personal honour and the integrity of the Prime Minister's institution, not seek immunity from the court. 'The role of Prime Minister is a trust given by Allah SWT, for which one will be held accountable not only in this world, but also in the hereafter,' he said. More Like This
The Star
18 hours ago
- The Star
PM immunity: High Court to rule on legal questions referral tomorrow
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here has set Wednesday (June 4) for its decision on an application by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court, including whether a Prime Minister enjoys immunity from lawsuits. The legal questions relate to a lawsuit filed by Anwar's former research assistant, Muhammed Yusoff Rawther, concerning an alleged sexual assault seven years ago. Judge Roz Mawar Rozain fixed the date on Tuesday (June 3) after hearing submissions from lawyer Alan Wong Teck Wei, representing Anwar, and lawyer Muhammad Rafique Rashid Ali, acting for Yusoff, during in-chamber proceedings. Anwar filed the application on May 23, seeking to have the High Court, which is hearing the suit, refer the eight legal questions to the Federal Court. The eight legal questions include whether, under Articles 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution, a sitting Prime Minister enjoys limited immunity from lawsuits concerning allegations of personal conduct that occurred before his appointment. According to a supporting affidavit for the application, lawyer Datuk Megat Abdul Munir Megat Abdullah Rafaie, who is authorised to represent the defendant (Anwar), said that if the suit were to proceed, it would affect Anwar's ability to effectively perform his executive functions and undermine the doctrine of separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution. "The plaintiff's (Yusoff's) claim is politically motivated and, if not examined constitutionally at an early stage, could erode public confidence, diminish the dignity of the constitutional office, and disrupt the executive's ability to perform its constitutional duties," Megat Abdul Munir said in the affidavit. Megat Abdul Munir further stated that if the court intends to refer these constitutional questions to the Federal Court as a special case, it would be appropriate for the suit's proceedings to be stayed pending the Federal Court's determination of these questions. Yusoff filed the suit on July 14, 2021, and Anwar, in his statement of defence, contended that Yusoff had lied under oath to the authorities regarding the alleged sexual assault incident. The PKR president, who filed a counterclaim on Sept 28, 2021, alleged that Yusoff had fabricated the story about the sexual assault to tarnish his political career and prevent him from becoming prime minister. The High Court last year set June 16 to 19 and June 23 to 25, 2025, for the hearing of the lawsuit.- Bernama
The Sun
18 hours ago
- The Sun
PM immunity: High Court to rule on legal questions referral tomorrow
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here today set tomorrow for its decision on an application by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court, including whether a Prime Minister enjoys immunity from lawsuits. The legal questions relate to a lawsuit filed by Anwar's former research assistant, Muhammed Yusoff Rawther, concerning an alleged sexual assault seven years ago. Judge Roz Mawar Rozain fixed the date after hearing submissions from lawyer Alan Wong Teck Wei, representing Anwar, and lawyer Muhammad Rafique Rashid Ali, acting for Muhammed Yusoff, during in-chamber proceedings today. Anwar filed the application on May 23, seeking to have the High Court, which is hearing the suit, refer the eight legal questions to the Federal Court. The eight legal questions include whether, under Articles 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution, a sitting Prime Minister enjoys limited immunity from lawsuits concerning allegations of personal conduct that occurred before his appointment. According to a supporting affidavit for the application, lawyer Datuk Megat Abdul Munir Megat Abdullah Rafaie, who is authorised to represent the defendant (Anwar), said that if the suit were to proceed, it would affect Anwar's ability to effectively perform his executive functions and undermine the doctrine of separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution. 'The plaintiff's (Muhammed Yusoff's) claim is politically motivated and, if not examined constitutionally at an early stage, could erode public confidence, diminish the dignity of the constitutional office, and disrupt the executive's ability to perform its constitutional duties,' Megat Abdul Munir said in the affidavit. Megat Abdul Munir further stated that if the court intends to refer these constitutional questions to the Federal Court as a special case, it would be appropriate for the suit's proceedings to be stayed pending the Federal Court's determination of these questions. Muhammed Yusoff filed the suit on July 14, 2021, and Anwar, in his statement of defence, contended that Muhammed Yusoff had lied under oath to the authorities regarding the alleged sexual assault incident. The PKR President, who filed a counterclaim on Sept 28, 2021, alleged that Muhammed Yusoff had fabricated the story about the sexual assault to tarnish his political career and prevent him from becoming prime minister. The High Court last year set June 16 to 19 and June 23 to 25, 2025, for the hearing of the lawsuit.
