&w=3840&q=100)
MCA may amend IBC to scrap prior CCI approval for insolvency bids
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) is likely to amend the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) to clarify that prior permission of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) is not required for submitting bids under the corporate insolvency resolution process, government sources indicated.
This comes in the backdrop of the Supreme Court (SC) rejecting the winning bid of AGI Greenpac for Hindustan National Glass in January due to its failure to get CCI approval before the nod of the plan by the Committee of Creditors (Coc).
'We want to reduce the burden on CCI. We will try to address this issue in the IBC through an amendment,' the official source said.
The provision in question is Section 31A (4) of the IBC which states, '...where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as referred to in section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002, the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that Act prior to the approval of such resolution plan by the committee of creditors.'
The SC in its January order had said, 'AGI Greenpac's resolution plan is unsustainable as it failed to secure prior approval from the CCI, as mandated under the provision to Section 31(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Consequently, the approval granted by the Committee of Creditors to the resolution plan dated October 28, 2022, without the requisite CCI approval, cannot be sustained and is hereby set aside and quashed.'
The SC's decision would impact future mergers that happen through IBC.
Experts feel a clarity by the government on this matter would bring relief to bidders who were concerned about approaching CCI before the CoC approval.
'Post the first submission of the plan, it could be significantly amended at the time of final submission for CoC approval. If the bidder approaches the CCI before final submission of the plan, there is no certainty that the plan being reviewed by the CCI would be the same that would be approved by the CoC,' said Anshul Jain, Partner & Leader - Regulatory, PwC India.
The top court on May 8 agreed to look into a request made by the CCI to reconsider its earlier judgment from January.
AGI Greenpac and Independent Sugar Corp (INSCO), were vying for HNG which went into insolvency in October 2021.
INSCO secured CCI clearance in 2022, but AGI Greenpac emerged as the successful bidder chosen by the CoC, despite not having received approval from the CCI at the time. INSCO challenged this in the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).
The crux of the dispute was whether CCI approval was mandatory before the CoC approved a resolution plan or if it could be granted afterward.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Distribution of 56 kiosks marks first phase of roadside vendors' rehabilitation
The Kochi Corporation has initiated the rehabilitation of roadside vendors, starting with the distribution of kiosks to 56 vendors in Fort Kochi as part of the first phase on Tuesday (June 10). The move was in keeping with the provisions of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014. Cochin Smart Mission Limited designed and built the kiosks. In the next phase, roadside vendors will be moved into dedicated vending zones. No vendor will be allowed space beyond 25 sq ft. Vending hindering the movement of pedestrians will not be allowed, nor will they be permitted to expand the vending space by drawing overhead sheets, said Mayor M. Anilkumar. An effective rehabilitation plan will be drawn up. Even smaller kiosks are being prepared at select locations. Vendors will be responsible for the treatment of waste that their units generate. Encroachment on roads will not be allowed. The Corporation Council has taken all necessary measures for a more beautiful Kochi. The Act, among other things, has provisions for issuing identity cards to vendors, their registration, and the identification of vending zones. The town vending committee played a critical role in the rehabilitation of roadside vendors. The Corporation has identified 2,351 vendors through a survey conducted with the help of various agencies. So far, 69 vending zones have been recognised. Nine representatives have been elected from among the recognised roadside vendors. Mr. Anilkumar hailed the cooperation extended by various trade unions to the endeavour. According to the Act, municipal corporations are required to draw up separate vending by-laws. Councillors P.S. Viju, Priya Prashanth, Antony Kureethara, and V.K. Minimol were entrusted with preparing the by-law. The draft by-law was approved by the vending committee and the Corporation Council and submitted to the State government, which approved it on October 9, 2023. The government approved the vending plan on June 27, 2024. Mr. Anilkumar said the Corporation was the first civic body in the State to prepare a vending by-law and vending plan and identify separate vending zones. 'The by-law prepared by us now serves as a guide for other corporations,' he said in his inaugural address after distributing the vending kiosks. Deputy Mayor K.A. Ansiya presided over.
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Andhra changes labour laws to raise private sector working hours to 10
The Andhra Pradesh government has amended the state's labour laws to increase the maximum working hours for private sector employees, in what it said was with the aim of boosting investment and decision, to increase the working hours from nine to ten hours per day, was approved by the TDP-led NDA government during a recent cabinet meeting. They will be incorporated through changes to the Andhra Pradesh Factories Act. Earlier, the limit was eight hours per day, which was extended to nine hours nearly a decade new regulation will apply to all private firms and factories operating in the state. Information and Public Relations Minister K Parthasarathy announced the amendment, saying the changes were part of the government's broader 'Ease of Doing Business' elaborated that under Section 54 of the Act, the working hours have been raised from nine to ten hours a the prescribed break period under Section 55 has been changed. 'There used to be a one-hour rest for five hours (work); now that has been changed to six hours,' he Act currently also allows a maximum of nine working hours per day, with a mandatory 30-minute break after five hours of continuous overtime cap has also been increased, from the existing 75 hours to 144 relaxation of rules will help attract more investments,' he unions, however, have strongly criticised the move, warning that it could lead to excessive working hours. They fear that some employers may compel workers to stay beyond the revised schedule, pushing daily shifts beyond 12 hours in parties and users on social media also voiced concern, calling the policy anti-worker and demanding that it be rolled inputs from agenciesMust Watch
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
DDA moves Delhi HC against RERA order for registering housing projects
New Delhi, Jun 10 (PTI) The Delhi Development Authority has moved the Delhi High Court after the Real Estate Regulatory Authority in the capital directed the registration of its housing projects. On May 28, Justice Sachin Datta issued notice to Delhi Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) and the Centre on DDA's plea and asked for their responses. Senior advocate Ramesh Singh and advocate Vrinda Kapoor Dev represented DDA and referred to RERA's 2021 order directing it to register projects under Section 3 of Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The provision prescribes "prior registration of a real estate project with Real Estate Regulatory Authority". The Real Estate Appellate Tribunal had upheld the RERA decision in September 2024. The petition argued that the statutory exercise of obligations by the DDA was ex-facie not covered under the provisions of Real Estate Act as it was governed by the Delhi Development Authority (Management and Disposal of Housing Estates) Regulations, 1968 and Nazul Rules, 1981. DDA, it said, was not a "promoter" of housing projects under the RERA Act and unlike other promoters and developers, it was not required to mandatorily register under the RERA Act. The plea, as a result, sought RERA's decision to be reined in. DDA argued the preamble of the Delhi Development Act established the authority to fundamentally differ from private developers' commercial and profit-motivated objectives and claimed having "comprehensive in-house mechanisms" for quality control, grievance redressal, and accountability, making additional RERA oversight redundant. "The statutory scheme of the Delhi Development Act keeps the petitioner distinct from the other developers and promoters of the real estate on account of the fact that the disposal of the developed land and built-up properties are governed by the statutory rules and regulations framed under the DD other promoters and developers as is commonly understood the petitioner does not require mandatory registration....," the plea said. The matter would be heard on July 7.
