
EPA appointee agrees to bow out of work tied to ex-lobbying clients
A top political appointee in EPA's air office has agreed to temporarily steer clear of 'particular' matters pertaining to almost a dozen former clients with a stake in biofuel regulations or other policies.
Alex Dominguez, deputy assistant administrator for mobile sources, bowed out of involvement in matters related to the National Corn Growers Association; Texas power producer NRG; and Oneok, an Oklahoma-based oil and gas industry services provider, according to an amended April recusal statement obtained by POLITICO's E&E News under the Freedom of Information Act.
The three are among 11 former clients listed on the statement, stemming from Dominguez's work for the lobbying firm now known as Massie Partners before returning to EPA as President Donald Trump took office in January for a second term.
Advertisement
The recusal periods run no later than this coming January and do not preclude Dominguez from meanwhile tackling broader regulatory work that could affect those clients and others. Examples of matters involving specific parties from which he must recuse himself include contracts, judicial proceedings and investigations, according to federal ethics rules footnoted on the statement.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
24 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Chill in U.S.-China Relations Hits Stock Listings
Wall Street's welcome mat for Chinese stock listings long transcended rocky U.S.-China relations. Increasingly, the stock market relationship is succumbing to distrust between the world's two largest economies. More than 80 Chinese companies have delisted their shares from U.S. exchanges since 2019, according to data provider Wind. Around 275 China-based companies now represent less than 2% of the capitalization of shares traded on the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq. The NYSE hasn't hosted a new listing from China since carmaker Zeekr went public in May 2024. Chinese initial public offerings still pour in—in fact, 2024 saw the highest number in years—but most are tiny, highly speculative stocks, not the megabillion-dollar 'red chips' of yesteryear. The 62 Chinese offerings last year raised an average of under $7 million. Some struggle to maintain the minimum 300 public shareholders, a red flag for investors that they could be risky or outright scams.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Sees Limited Damage to Iran Atomic Sites as UN Watchdog Urges Inspections
(Bloomberg) -- US President Donald Trump disputed an intelligence report that found the airstrikes he ordered on Iran had only a limited impact on its nuclear program, even though the assessment came from the Pentagon. Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice US Renters Face Storm of Rising Costs US State Budget Wounds Intensify From Trump, DOGE Policy Shifts Commuters Are Caught in Johannesburg's Taxi Feuds as Transit Lags 'The nuclear sites in Iran are completely destroyed,' Trump said on Truth Social. He said CNN and the New York Times, which first reported the intelligence findings on Tuesday, 'have teamed up in an attempt to demean one of the most successful military strikes in history.' The assessment from the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency said the bombing on June 22 likely didn't cripple the core components of Iran's program below ground, including its centrifuges, according to people familiar with its contents. The findings are in line with open-source satellite imagery that shows new craters, possible collapsed tunnel entrances and holes on top of a mountain ridge but no conclusive evidence the attack breached the most heavily protected underground facilities. Trump had said the strikes — on atomic sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan — 'totally obliterated' their targets, and dismissed reports casting doubt on the claim. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt posted on X Tuesday that the intelligence finding of limited impact was 'flat-out wrong.' Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy for the Middle East, appeared on Fox News Tuesday night and described the reports as 'completely preposterous.' The head of Israel's military, Eyal Zamir, late on Tuesday said the assaults on Iran had set back its nuclear and missile projects by years. Still, the Pentagon assessment was backed up to some extent by the International Atomic Energy Agency. It's chief, Rafael Grossi, told Fox News that while Iran's atomic program 'has been set back significantly,' it's hard to specify whether that means months or years. Trump brokered a ceasefire to end the 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran that appeared to be holding early Wednesday. The president had lashed out at both countries Tuesday, and particularly Israel, over what he said were early violations of the truce. Both nations have said they'll honor the ceasefire provided their enemy does the same. The de-escalation triggered a slump in oil prices — erasing almost all of its increase since the conflict broke out. Still, the ceasefire remains fragile as the focus shifts back to nuclear diplomacy. A stated goal of the American and Israeli strikes was to destroy Iran's ability to develop a nuclear weapon, adding urgency to assessments of how much damage was done. Witkoff, who told Fox would be almost impossible for Iran to resurrect its nuclear program, said he was already speaking with the country's officials about restarting formal negotiations. The talks so far have been promising, he said. The IAEA's Grossi said inspections by the United Nations atomic watchdog should resume 'as soon as possible' to determine what's happened to Iran's stocks of uranium enriched to 60% levels, not far short of the 90% required to build a bomb. The IAEA says it last verified those inventories a few days before Israel's attacks on Iran started on June 13, and their whereabouts is now unknown. The DIA's report found considerable damage on the surface at the nuclear sites, with the US strikes likely to have set Iran's program back by several months to as much as a year, according to a person briefed on the report's contents. The assessment has been shared with House and Senate leadership. Before the strikes, Trump had said Iran was 'weeks away' from having a nuclear bomb, though some experts and US intelligence estimates said it could take months or years for the nation to develop a weapon. The US strikes involved dropping more than a dozen 30,000-pound so-called bunker-buster bombs on Iranian nuclear sites, their first use in combat, according to the Pentagon. Tomahawk missiles were also fired from a US Ohio-class submarine in the Arabian Sea. Before Israel's attack on Iran, the US had held five rounds of negotiations with the Islamic Republic, seeking a diplomatic solution to concerns over its nuclear program — effectively a replacement for the 2015 nuclear deal that Trump abandoned during his first term. An agreement hadn't been reached, though a sixth round was scheduled before the Israeli missiles led to Iran canceling it. Tehran has insisted on its rights under international law to enrich uranium for civilian purposes such as fueling nuclear power plants. In calls with regional counterparts reported by state media on Tuesday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian appeared to reiterate that stance. 'The Islamic Republic of Iran is solely pursuing its legitimate rights and has no ambitions beyond that,' he told UAE officials. In Iran, 606 people were killed by Israeli strikes, according to the government. Israeli emergency services said 28 people were killed by Iranian missiles, including four on Tuesday morning just as the truce was about to start. Israeli authorities said Tuesday that wartime safety directives had been lifted. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told the nation that immediate threats from Iran's nuclear program and ballistic missiles had been eliminated — though his military chief, Zamir, cautioned that 'the campaign against Iran is not over.' --With assistance from Akayla Gardner, Maeve Sheehey, Erik Wasson, Courtney McBride and Rosalind Mathieson. Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
FedEx Corp (FDX) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Finish with Margin Expansion and ...
Revenue: Up 1% year over year in Q4. Adjusted Operating Income: Increased by 8% in Q4. Adjusted Operating Margin: Expanded by 60 basis points in Q4. Cash Returned to Stockholders: $4.3 billion in FY25. Adjusted Earnings Per Share (EPS): $18.19 for FY25. Capital Expenditure (CapEx): Reduced to $4.1 billion in FY25, lowest in over 10 years. Freight Operating Margin: 20.8% in Q4. Transformation-Related Savings: $1 billion expected in FY26. International Export Package Yield: Declined 1% in Q4. US Domestic Package Yield: Slight increase in Q4. Freight Average Daily Shipments: Up 8.3% sequentially in Q4. Share Repurchases: $3 billion in FY25. Dividend Increase: 5% in FY26. Adjusted Free Cash Flow Conversion: Nearly 90% in FY25. Debt Maturing in FY26: $1.3 billion. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Sign with FDX. Release Date: June 24, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. FedEx Corp (NYSE:FDX) achieved a solid finish to FY25 with adjusted operating income growth and margin expansion despite a challenging demand environment. The company delivered on its $2.2 billion DRIVE structural cost reduction commitment, achieving a two-year $4 billion DRIVE target. FedEx Corp (NYSE:FDX) returned $4.3 billion in cash to stockholders and reduced capital intensity significantly. The company successfully flexed its network to match demand, reducing capacity on the Asia-to-Americas lane by more than 35% in May. FedEx Corp (NYSE:FDX) is well-positioned to support customers amid evolving global trade policies, leveraging its presence in over 220 countries and territories. FedEx Corp (NYSE:FDX) faced major headwinds, including the expiration of the US Postal Service contract and volatility related to global trade policy. Higher-margin B2B volumes remain pressured, affecting both FedEx Express and Freight results. The company experienced a material headwind on its Asia-to-US lane due to escalating trade barriers, particularly from China. FedEx Freight's operating income declined due to prolonged weakness in the industrial economy. The global demand environment remains volatile, with uncertainties in trade policies impacting revenue projections. Q: Can you discuss the expected development of the $1 billion in savings from DRIVE and Network 2.0 throughout the year? A: Rajesh Subramaniam, President and CEO, explained that they anticipate $200 million of the $1 billion savings in the first quarter, with a ramp-up throughout the year. The financial returns from Network 2.0 are expected to be more significant by the end of fiscal year 2027. DRIVE savings achieved $650 million in Q4, contributing to a two-year $4 billion target. Q: How is the competitive pricing environment evolving, and what strategies are you using to manage it? A: Brie Carere, Executive Vice President and Chief Customer Officer, noted an improvement in the pricing environment, compounded by the team's focus on revenue quality. They have implemented multiple pricing strategies, including adjustments to large package pricing and fuel surcharges, resulting in yield improvements for key products. Q: Can you elaborate on the $170 million headwind from international trade impacts and how it might evolve? A: Brie Carere explained that the majority of the $170 million headwind is due to the China-to-US lane, particularly the impact of de minimis. The trade environment is dynamic, and changes are expected in the next 30 to 60 days, which will provide more clarity on future impacts. Q: How should we think about the cadence of fiscal year earnings given the headwinds and cost savings? A: Rajesh Subramaniam indicated that Q1 might have a lower weight than usual due to the USPS contract expiration and the ramp-up of cost savings throughout the year. The structural cost savings are expected to increase as the year progresses, potentially influencing typical seasonality. Q: How is Network 2.0 progressing, and what are the expected impacts on margins? A: Brie Carere stated that they are pleased with the execution of Network 2.0, with significant savings in pick-up and delivery costs. The full financial impact is expected by FY27, as initial costs are incurred to ensure service continuity during transitions. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data