
How Chicago plans to help its most rent-burdened residents
Heavy rent burdens disproportionately affect Black and Latino residents on the South and West sides, according to census data released last fall.
Why it matters: Rent-burdened people — meaning those who spend more than 30% of their income on housing — have a harder time affording other essentials and saving for their own homes, which further widens the racial wealth and homeownership gap.
Axios is examining the issue as part of its yearlong Equity Matters series about metrics on several factors across racial lines, income levels and geography.
State of play: Chicago Housing Commissioner Lissette Castañeda tells Axios that the city needs at least 119,000 additional affordable housing units.
Zoom in: Some of the city's most rent-burdened neighborhoods, according to the 2023 data, include South Shore, Englewood and Garfield Park, where the percentage of rent-burdened households exceeds 67%.
Some of the least rent-burdened neighborhoods include Lincoln Park, North Center, West Town and Logan Square, with percentages of 35% or less.
You can find an interactive map with figures for every neighborhood here.
Zoom out: While 45% of Chicagoans carry heavy rent burdens, our percentages trail the national average of 50% and all races do better than their national peers.
In the fourth quarter of 2024, the national average rent remained about 20% higher than pre-pandemic levels despite declines in early 2024, Moody's data shows.
Rent for the average Chicago one-bedroom costs $1,893 today, a 2.2% increase over last year, according to Apartments.com.
That would require a salary of about $76,000 to be considered affordable.
The trends: Chicago housing has become less affordable across more neighborhoods and income brackets over the last century, especially in the last few decades, according to a WBEZ analysis.
Potential solutions: Castañeda says her department is "funding new multi-family developments, supporting inclusionary housing through the Affordable Requirements Ordinance Chicago and investing in permanent supportive housing."
The intrigue: City officials are also proposing a program called Green Social Housing (GSH) to finance and build sustainable affordable units, based on a model that's succeeded in the Washington, D.C. area.
How it works: The program would require the City Council to pass an ordinance to create an independent nonprofit called a Residential Investment Corporation (RIC) to serve as the GSH developer.
The RIC would use $135 million in city bonds approved last year to finance construction of GSH buildings at lower interest rates than private equity would charge, thus reducing construction fees and eventual rental costs.
The nonprofit would partner with private developers to build the properties but retain majority ownership during construction and after tenants fill the building.
This would ensure that a third of the units remain "permanently affordable," meaning always priced for low-income renters, while the rest would be priced at market rates.
Once the buildings are filled, the RIC would refinance the project and repay the loan to the GSH revolving fund, allowing the money to be reinvested in the next GSH building project.
The green part: Castañeda tells Axios the buildings would meet strict environmental standards and could incorporate things like electric heat pumps, solar panels and "passive" building technology that reduces heating and cooling costs.
This, officials note, would require a green investment up front for lower utility costs later.
What's next: A joint City Council committee on housing and finance is expected to vote on establishing the RIC this spring.
If the proposal makes it through a full council vote, Castañeda says, groundbreaking on the first GSH building could start as soon as 2026, possibly on the site of projects that have stalled in Fulton Market or other fast-developing areas.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Aldermen advance measure allowing Airbnb bans in Chicago precincts
Aldermen took a step Wednesday toward giving themselves the power to ban Airbnb's and other short-term rentals from opening in their wards. The City Council's License and Consumer Protection Committee advanced the ordinance that would allow aldermen to unilaterally block new short-term rentals one precinct at a time. It could now face a final vote by all aldermen as soon as next week. Sponsor Ald. Anthony Napolitano, 41st, called the city's current ordinance made a decade ago 'extremely sloppy.' The existing law allows short-term rentals to be blocked only when 25% of a precinct's registered voters sign a petition calling for it. 'This is the only ordinance written in the city of Chicago where, when there is a problem in the industry, the onus is put on residents to fix it,' Napolitano said. The Far Northwest Side alderman's ordinance seeks to reverse that, allowing aldermen to block short-term rentals in a precinct on their own. It would then give companies the chance to overturn the ban by collecting signatures from 10% of the precinct's voters. Most aldermen in attendance backed the ordinance in a voice vote. Several cited issues in their ward with disruptive parties at short-term rentals, a problem Ald. Brendan Reilly, 42nd, said is 'on steroids' in dense downtown high rises. 'The guests are taking over common areas, pool decks, lobbies, fitness rooms,' he said. 'With the late night parties and noise complaints, et cetera, God help you if you own a condo next to one of these nightly rental units.' Napolitano argued the ordinance will not hurt short-term rental companies, but instead simply gives aldermen a tool to advocate for residents when issues arise. But Airbnb is strongly opposed to the proposal. 'Alderman Napolitano's ordinance amendment is an over-broad and misguided violation of Chicagoans' property rights, which would punish responsible homeowners and local businesses who rely on the income from travel on short-term rentals — especially in neighborhoods outside of Chicago's traditional tourism hubs,' Airbnb spokesperson Jonathan Buckner said in a statement Wednesday. Mayor Brandon Johnson is continuing to not take a side on the issue. Asked where he stood on the ordinance at a Wednesday morning news conference, he said he wanted to 'continue to ensure that we are building a safe, affordable city.' 'This particular measure, quite frankly, I'll have to look into a little bit deeper,' Johnson said. 'But I know that there are a number of alders who mean well and are trying to show up for their particular pocket of the city.' Several aldermen noted the absence of staff from Johnson's Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection, adding that they wished someone could answer questions about how bans could affect tax revenue. Alds. Matt O'Shea, 19th, and Bill Conway, 34th, voted against the measure, with O'Shea noting taxes on the rentals sent around $4 million to fight domestic violence. 'Have we thought of how we are going to replace that?' O'Shea asked. 'It's been my experience working with Airbnb that when a problem is identified, it's addressed.' Ald. Marty Quinn, 13th, used the city's current process requiring residents' signatures to ban short-term rentals from every precinct in his Southwest Side ward. The whole-ward ban took 12,000 signatures and seven years to complete, he said. The ward is '95% single family dwellings,' and short-term rentals 'would have an adverse impact on our quality of life,' Quinn said. Asked what he thinks of Airbnb's argument that the ban is similar to historic racist efforts to keep Black and Latino people out of certain neighborhoods, Quinn called it a 'desperate statement from a company who got exactly what they wanted' when the original ordinance passed. 'I'm not saying that Airbnb isn't good in some parts of the city,' he said. 'It's just not good in the Bungalow Belt, and I have 12,000 signatures that would suggest that.' Aldermen also Wednesday advanced a measure to crack down on illegal pedicabs with potential impoundments.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Was Secretly ‘Hurt' by Musk's Savage Attacks
President Donald Trump was left emotional after his 'first buddy,' Tesla CEO Elon Musk, engaged in a bitter online feud with him last week, an insider revealed. 'The president was actually hurt,' a Trump confidant who spoke with him about their spat told Axios. 'Yes, he has feelings, and he was hurt the way anyone would be when a friend turns on them.' In public, Trump appears to be projecting a defiant front amid the feud. He signaled Saturday that his relationship with Musk was finished and that he had no intention of patching things up. The president's epic falling out with Musk was sparked by a fiery clash over Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act.' Musk blasted the proposed spending package as fiscally reckless and a 'disgusting abomination' that would sabotage his work with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) by adding trillions to the deficit. He even went as far as to post a bombshell claim on X that Trump is named in the so-called 'Epstein files.' But after the explosive allegations, Musk made a groveling U-turn on Wednesday morning. 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far,' he wrote. The Daily Beast has reached out to the White House for comment. Meanwhile, White House insiders told Axios that Trump's response to the Los Angeles protests against actions by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have helped Trump bounce back from the Musk meltdown. 'But that's gone now. L.A. wiped away the Elon drama,' the source said. 'What's driving the president is how the riots of 2020 are seared into his brain, and how he wished he could've sent in the troops to end it.' Musk, who had once enjoyed a cozy relationship with Trump as he headed DOGE, has been doing damage control amid the protests, resharing Trump's Truth Social posts about the riots and posts by Vice President JD Vance, likely in a bid to show some solidarity with the president. Trump unleashed his presidential powers in a dramatic showdown with California Gov. Gavin Newsom over the weekend, moving to federalize the state's National Guard in a rare and controversial move. Protests erupted in downtown Los Angeles amid reports that detainees were being held in the basement of a federal building. ICE has denied these claims. A spokeswoman for the U.S. Northern Command told The New York Times that some 700 Marines are expected to be deployed to the streets of Los Angeles on Wednesday, joining National Guard troops already on the ground.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Inside Austin's Agenda: City Council Member Marc Duchen
AUSTIN (KXAN) — On Wednesday's episode of Inside Austin's Agenda, host Grace Reader will sit down with Austin City Council Member Marc Duchen to talk about upcoming budget conversations now that the council has wrapped up for its summer break. Austin is projecting a budget deficit heading into the next fiscal year. Austin Mayor Kirk Watson has also stated that the city will need to address 'budget asteroids' — including the state tax cap and the expiration of American Rescue Plan Act, or ARPA, dollars. KXAN has covered ARPA funding running out extensively. The Austin City Council will have to work with city staff to address those budget concerns and approve the final budget before the fiscal year begins on Oct. 1. Inside Austin's Agenda: Mayor looks to beef up budget process amid financial uncertainty Inside Austin's Agenda is live every other Wednesday at 3 p.m. Watch every episode at the top of this article, on Facebook, and on our KXAN+ streaming app. You can find previous episodes here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.