HC dismisses plea from ex-CBI judge Parmar in disciplinary proceedings
The Punjab and Haryana high court (HC) has dismissed a petition filed by former CBI special court judge Sudhir Parmar in a disciplinary proceedings case arising out of April 2023 criminal case. The HC bench of chief justice Sheel Nagu and justice HS Grewal ruled that a delinquent judicial officer has no right to submit a reply to the chargesheet beyond the outer limit of 45 days as mandated by the rules.
Now, the court has set a deadline of six months and 25 days as the outer limit for completion of all current and future disciplinary proceedings. It said, failure to adhere to the same would invite punitive action against the inquiry officer or any other erring personnel of the high court, it added.
The petition was from Parmar, a suspended officer, seeking directions to the court's administrative side to allow filing of a reply to the chargesheet slapped on him at a belated stage. Parmar was booked in an FIR, under sections 7, 8, 11 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code in April 2023. At that point of time, he was special CBI judge, Panchkula, and was accused of alleged favouritism towards some real estate developers, being probed by CBI and ED. FIRs pertaining to them were pending before the court presided over by Parmar. However, he failed to submit reply within the given time frame.
He was suspended on April 27, 2023, and issued a chargesheet on July 24, 2023.
The court observed that as per Rule 7 of Haryana Civil Services (Punishment & Appeal) Rules, 2016, upon being issued chargesheet, the delinquent employee has to submit his response within an outer limit of 45 days. However, he failed to do so.
'..the inquiry officer ought to have proceeded ex-parte against the delinquent employee on his failure to file the written statement of defence and proceeded to examine the witnesses and the documents produced by the employer instead of adjourning the proceedings repeatedly on one pretext or the other,' the court observed with a direction to the inquiry officer to conclude the disciplinary proceedings by submitting the inquiry report as early as possible. Thereafter, the high court should also make its recommendations expeditiously, it said further asking the court's administration to ensure that in all ongoing as well as disciplinary inquiries to be initiated in the future, the timeline is adhered to.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
36 minutes ago
- News18
Supreme Court Sets Aside Patna HC Order Allowing Blanket Use Of Narco Test On All Accused
Last Updated: An order of the Patna High Court had allowed the police to subject all accused persons to narco-analysis tests during the course of investigation. The Supreme Court on Monday held that an accused person does not have an indefeasible right to undergo a narcoanalysis test, while at the same time clarifying that such a test may be permitted at an appropriate stage of trial upon application, provided the Court is satisfied that there is free consent and adequate safeguards in place. The Court made the observation in an Appeal challenging an order of the Patna High Court, which had allowed the police to subject all accused persons, including the Appellant, to narco-analysis tests during the course of investigation. The Bench of Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Prasanna B Varale allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's order, stating that it was contrary to the principles laid down in Selvi v State of Karnataka (2010), where the apex court had held that involuntary subjection to scientific techniques such as narco-analysis, lie detector, and brain mapping violates the fundamental right to personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. 'The accused has a right to voluntarily undergo a narcoanalysis test at an appropriate stage. We deem it appropriate to add, that the appropriate stage for such a test to be conducted is when the accused is exercising his right to lead evidence in a trial," the Court observed. However, the Bench emphasised that such a right is not absolute, and that any application made by an accused must be judicially assessed, taking into account factors such as free will, voluntariness, procedural safeguards, and the overall circumstances of the case. Facts of the Case The family members of the wife got an FIR lodged on August 24, 2022 under Sections 341, 342, 323, 363, 364, 498(A), 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, suspecting foul play and alleging that the accused made repeated demands of dowry and used to beat the victim since the marriage on December 11, 2020. The Appellant contended the acceptance of such a submission by the High Court was in direct contravention of the exposition of law laid down by this court in the Selvi case, wherein it was observed that forceful subjection of an individual to techniques, such as the narco-analysis test, violates personal liberty enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution. Senior Advocate Gaurav Agrawal, acting as amicus curiae, pointed out that there has been a divergence of views taken by High Courts on the issue as to whether a narco-analysis test can be claimed by an accused as a matter of right. Given the suspect nature of a report of narco-analysis, he said that this position must be clarified. Court Decries Blanket Testing of All Accused Criticising the blanket direction of the Patna High Court that allowed narco-tests to be conducted on all accused persons based on a submission made by the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, the Supreme Court noted that such an order could not have been passed while dealing with a regular bail application under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). 'We fail to understand how such an endeavour was accepted by the High Court while adjudicating an application for regular bail. It is settled law that while entertaining such an application, the Court must confine itself to considerations such as the nature of the crime, allegations, evidence, period of custody, and possibility of tampering with evidence," the Bench said. The Court also took note of the suspect evidentiary value of narco-analysis tests and made it clear that results of such tests, even if voluntarily undergone, cannot by themselves form the sole basis for conviction. 'A report of a voluntary narco-analysis test with adequate safeguards in place, or information found as a result thereof, cannot form the sole basis of conviction of an accused person," the Court held while answering the second legal issue involved in the matter. Right to Lead Evidence Not a Justification The State had attempted to justify the High Court's direction by arguing that the accused had a right to lead evidence in their defence, and a voluntary narco-test was a part of that right. Rejecting this argument, the Supreme Court categorically held that such a view was untenable in light of the principles laid down in Selvi and the inherently unreliable nature of the technique. 'It cannot be said that undergoing a narco-analysis test is part of the indefeasible right to lead evidence, given its suspect nature," the Court remarked, adding that the Rajasthan High Court's earlier view to the contrary could not be sustained. Assistance by Amicus and Legal Representation Given the complexity of constitutional and procedural issues involved, the Court had appointed Senior Advocate Gaurav Agrawal as Amicus Curiae. The Appellant was represented by AOR Mithilesh Kumar Singh, while the Respondent-State was represented by Additional Standing Counsel Anshul Narayan. The Court rejected a submission by the state government that since modern investigative techniques are the need of the hour, the High Court was correct in accepting the submission that a narco analysis test of all accused persons will be conducted. 'While the need for modern investigative techniques may be true, such investigative techniques cannot be conducted at the cost of constitutional guarantees under Articles 20(3) and 21," the Bench said. Conclusively, the Court set aside the impugned Order dated 9th November 2023 passed by the Patna High Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 71293 of 2023 and allowed the appeal. First Published: June 10, 2025, 13:39 IST News india Supreme Court Sets Aside Patna HC Order Allowing Blanket Use Of Narco Test On All Accused
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
ED attaches assets worth Rs 100 crore held by dummy owners in Muda case
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has provisionally attached 92 immovable properties with an estimated market value of Rs 100 crore in connection with the Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam. The attachment was carried out on June 9 under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), to the ED, the properties in question include Muda sites that are registered in the names of housing cooperative societies and individuals who are alleged to be front persons or cummies for influential individuals, including officials of the enforcement action stems from an investigation initiated on the basis of a First Information Report (FIR) registered by the Lokayukta Police in Mysuru. The FIR was filed under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860, and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Among those named in the FIR is Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, along with others. The ED's investigation has uncovered what it describes as a large-scale scam involving the allotment of Muda sites. The agency claims that statutory provisions and government orders or guidelines were flouted to carry out fraudulent allotments. It further stated that the role of former Muda commissioners, including GT Dinesh Kumar, has emerged as central to the illegal allocation of compensation sites to individuals and entities who were ineligible. The investigation is
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Honeymoon murder: Meghalaya minister seeks apology from Raj & Sonam's kin for 'tarnishing state's image', warns of defamation case
SHILLONG: Following the arrest of Sonam Raghuvanshi and four others in connection with the murder of her husband, Raja Raghuvanshi, during their honeymoon in Meghalaya, the state's political leadership has hit back at earlier allegations that painted Meghalaya in a poor light. Meghalaya minister Alexander Laloo Hek said the families of Raja and Sonam owe an apology for remarks that, he claimed, tarnished the reputation of the state and its people. He also stated that if they don't apologise to the people of Meghalaya, a defamation case will be filed against them. "Now we are seeking an apology from the families of Raja and Sonam Raghuvanshi for tarnishing the image of Meghalaya and its people," Hek added. "The people of Meghalaya demand an apology; otherwise, we will file a defamation case against them,' Hek warned. Hek also praised the swift and efficient action taken by Meghalaya Police. 'We are thankful to the Meghalaya Police for their crackdown and complete investigation within seven days,' Hek said. He also confirmed that Sonam Raghuvanshi will be brought back to Shillong as the investigation progresses further. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The statement comes amid widespread public and media attention on the murder case, which unfolded during the couple's honeymoon in Meghalaya. From marriage to custody: Details on how the murder unfolded May 11 | Sonam and Raja Raghuvanshi marry May 15 | She goes to her parents; begins plotting murder with lover, say police May 20 | Raja and Sonam leave for Kamakhya Temple. Make unscheduled trip to Meghalaya May 23 | Travel to Nongriat village near Double Decker Living Root Bridge in Shillong. Same day, village head alerts police that a scooter is abandoned, with keys in ignition May 24 | Raja's family contact police after learning about a 'missing couple' on a Trip Advisor review May 25 | Meghalaya police start intensive search. Raja's brother arrives in Shillong May 27 | Home minister Amit Shah informed about the case. CM Mohan Yadav sends police team to Shillong June 2 | Drone spots Raja's decomposed body in a deep gorge near Wei Sawdong Waterfall. He is identified from a tattoo June 3 | Postmortem confirms he was killed with a 'dao' June 4 | Raja's body brought to Indore for funeral. Family demands CBI probe June 6 | 14-minute CCTV footage of couple at a hotel surfaces June 7 | CM Yadav urges Amit Shah for CBI probe June 8-9 | Sonam arrested in Ghazipur, UP, 1200km from Shillong., Four others nabbed in Indore, Lalitpur & Bina
