Police Scotland's overtime bill doubles to £28million in five years
And the number of cops is down
BIG BILL Police Scotland's overtime bill doubles to £28million in five years
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
POLICE Scotland's overtime bill has doubled to £28million in five years — amid fears cops are being left 'exhausted'.
Rank-and-file chiefs also warned officers are unable to perform duties 'safely'.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
1
Police Scotland officers at an Anti-racism, pro-refugee demonstration in Glasgow ..
They blasted force cuts as figures showed extra-hours spending rose from £14million in 2020-21 — as the number of full-time officers fell from 17,431 to 16,553.
David Kennedy, of the Scottish Police Federation, said: 'It's dead simple - less police officers mean more overtime.
"With any events, the force can't cope without paying overtime. The attitude of saying 'we're going with 12-hour shifts' is not acceptable.
'We don't have enough officers to police safely. They are being called out on rest days. It's having a detrimental effect on the well-being of officers who are already exhausted.'
Figures show the overtime spend rose to almost £37million in 2021-22, and then peaked at nearly £43million in 2022-23.
It decreased to £25million last year, but is now increasing again.
Bills were inflated by policing of the 2021 COP26 climate summit in Glasgow, mourning of the Queen's death in 2022 and the pandemic.
Tory shadow justice secretary Liam Kerr said: 'These eye- watering figures are a result of the SNP's savage cuts.'
Scottish Lib Dem justice spokesperson Liam McArthur said: 'It is not sustainable to keep asking those keeping us safe day-in day-out to work beyond their limits. Past staff surveys have shown they feel the service and its resources are stretched."
Police Scotland body worn cameras roll out across the country
Scottish Labour Justice spokesperson Pauline McNeill added: 'Soaring levels of overtime are exhausting police officers and draining badly-needed funding.
'The SNP must work with Police Scotland to ensure it has the officers it needs to keep our communities safe.'
A Police Scotland spokesperson said: "Overtime is a flexible mechanism which can help to maintain effective policing for all our communities.
"It is important our people are rewarded for the work they do in line with their terms and conditions."
A Scottish Government spokesperson added: "Scotland's police officers provide a vital service, every day, to ensure we continue to live in safe and protected communities.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
3 hours ago
- Scotsman
Defence Scotland: SNP told to urgently rethink 'mad' strategy as internal fears grow
Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... As governments across the globe grapple with the most dangerous international landscape in a generation, John Swinney is under pressure to allow the SNP to have its first proper debate on where it stands on defence in more than a decade. The alternative risk is of his party 'falling behind' and Scotland potentially missing out on crucial investment. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The defence, aerospace and security industry is estimated to be worth around £3.2 billion to Scotland. The Ministry of Defence spends more than £2bn each year with Scottish industry. The forward section of Type 26 Frigate HMS Cardiff is rolled out from the SBOH at BAE Systems Shipyard in Govan, Scotland. Picture: John Linton/BAE Systems/Royal Navy | John Linton Despite conflict still raging on the European continent and the situation in the Middle East still resulting in lives, including children, being lost every day, the SNP has not had a proper debate about where it stands on defence policy since 2012. Instead a position to block investments perceived to be linked to munitions and an unassailable opposition to the Trident nuclear weapons system, located on the Clyde, are the SNP's flagship defence policies. UK to boost defence spending With Sir Keir Starmer's UK government committing to spend 5 per cent of its GDP on defence by 2035, the SNP has come under intense pressure to shift its long-held opposition to spending public funds on the 'manufacture of weapons or munitions', with a perception Scottish ministers are turning their back on the wider defence industry. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It is understood Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes, who also holds the economy brief, is keen for a rethink on her government's and her party's position. The Prime Minister visited the BAE shipyard in Govan earlier this month to announce his strategic defence review, with an ambition to 'build a fighting force that is more integrated, more ready, more lethal than ever' and 'innovate and accelerate innovation to a wartime pace'. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer speaks during a visit to BAE Systems in Govan, Glasgow, to launch the strategic defence review. Picture: Andy Buchanan/PA Wire Sir Keir also stressed he was 'using this moment to drive jobs and investment', including six new munitions factories and 1,000 new jobs. The Faslane submarine facility on the Clyde will receive £250m of investment as part of a UK government boost announced in Chancellor Rachel Reeves's spending review. Row over welding investment Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Last month, it emerged the economic development agency, Scottish Enterprise, refused to support plans for a new specialist welding centre over fears it could be used to support the building of Royal Navy submarines. Ferguson Marine, which SNP ministers nationalised in 2019, has taken on contracts to construct Royal Navy vessels. The Scottish National Investment Bank, set up by SNP ministers in 2020, 'does not invest in organisations that are primarily engaged in the manufacture of munitions or weapons'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Former SNP MP Stewart McDonald, who spent almost five years as the party's defence spokesperson at Westminster from 2017 to 2022, has warned 'the party needs to have a defence debate again'. Speaking to The Scotsman, he said: 'It hasn't had a proper defence debate since 2012 when we changed the policy on Nato. 'All of this is moving at such pace. The entire international picture is moving at such a rapid pace and if we are a party that seeks to be an independent state - and an independent state in Nato and the EU - then we should have stuff to say on this.' Former SNP defence spokesperson Stewart McDonald Mr McDonald warned 'there is a risk the party falls behind in that debate'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He said: 'That's a debate that is going on in capitals all across Europe. And although Edinburgh is not a state capital, the Scottish Government has a role to play as a domestic partner. SNP's 'awkward' defence stance 'We have an industry in Scotland worth many billions of pounds, employs somewhere between 33,000 and 35,000 people and it has a very awkward relationship with the Scottish Government - it has done so for a very long time.' Mr McDonald has suggested Mr Swinney should gather the major and smaller defence employers in Scotland, 'get the defence procurement minister up from London and say 'how do I marshal the resources of the government, spending, policy, legislative, to better support this industry?'.' READ MORE: BAE Systems funding provides 300 jobs boost for Scottish shipyards Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The former SNP MP added: 'At a time of heightened international conflict, Scotland's defence industry has a part to play. 'I understand there's a bit of political balancing to be done here, but I think that can be over-thought and over-egged. We do live in much more dangerous times and there's a risk we are just saying the same stuff we've been saying for a long time - and that just would not be credible to stand still politically as the entire world changes around you.' Mr McDonald branded the Scottish Enterprise ban on investments relating to munitions 'a stupid policy' and hit out at the restrictions in place for the Scottish National Investment Bank. He said: 'Defence is the one industry that has enormous growth happening in it right now and that's not likely to end time soon. So why should our National Investment Bank not invest in it? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'It's entirely normal in every other country in Europe or the world for your national institutions to support your national interests, including your national security interests. So why is the Scottish National Investment Bank not doing that? I think that's mad.' Vanguard-class submarine HMS Vigilant, one of the UK's four nuclear warhead-carrying submarines, at HM Naval Base Clyde at Faslane | PA Asked whether the SNP needs to revisit whether it opposes Trident, Mr McDonald warned opening up that debate 'would just be self-indulgent' and 'would just say the same thing it's always said'. He said: 'I think it could better focus its attention on other parts of the defence discussion. The reality is it can't move Trident off the Clyde. 'There are areas they can focus on and have genuine positive consequences - working with industry around development of skills. The defence industry really felt that after Brexit.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Labour Glasgow MSP Paul Sweeney, who before entering politics was an arm reservist and Clyde shipbuilder, has branded the SNP's position "really frustrating'. Mr Sweeney first came up against a brick wall trying to encourage Rolls Royce to use Scotland to manufacture small modular nuclear reactors. There was opposition to such a move, even if the reactors weren't being used in Scotland where there is a de-facto ban on nuclear power stations being built due to the SNP's hostility to the technology. 'Bizarre' SNP position Mr Sweeney acknowledged the Scottish Government had previously supported defence industries in Scotland. But he has been left aghast at the decision to block investment in the welding facility. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He said: 'I found the decision of Scottish Enterprise to indicate to Rolls Royce that they would not be able to support grant funding for the naval welding facility extremely bizarre. Labour MSP Paul Sweeney | Supplied 'It's clearly on the back of pressure over comments made by the former first minister Humza Yousaf. There was a recent debate at the Scottish Parliament by the Greens on this stuff.' Mr Sweeney added: 'It's a misnomer to conflate foreign policy issues with domestic security and defence requirements. 'There is a logical absurdity of suggesting that this is about defence exports to unsavoury regimes, when it's primarily about our domestic national security and defence in the context of a pretty fraught geopolitical situation. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'I find the context of this somewhat delusional and frustrating. I think it's fair to say there's certainly a split within the SNP about this.' The MSP insisted that BAE Systems on the Clyde, where he previously worked, 'has no involvement with any regime suspected of human rights abuses', adding 'there's no association with the Israel-Palestine issue'. Protesters form a blockade outside BAE Systems in Govan Picture: Jane Barlow/PA Wire Mr Sweeney said: 'They do not issue vessels for export to those territories - they never have. There is no obvious connection. 'It's also deeply reckless rhetoric in the context of the need to expand the Royal Navy and expand our domestic shipbuilding programme.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Glasgow MSP warned the Scottish Government's opposition 'creates a problem for investment in Scotland that doesn't exist anywhere else in the UK'. He said: 'There's a nervousness about Scotland - there's a more volatile risk of being caught on the horns of a political argument.' Scottish Liberal Democrat MSP Jamie Greene has penned a letter to the Deputy First Minister, Ms Forbes, insisting 'the Scottish Government must also play its part in realising that economic potential' of the defence sector. Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes | PA He added: 'That means creating the right environment for jobs and investment as well as tackling obstacles that could otherwise dampen those opportunities. At the moment there are worrying gaps in Scotland's skills pipeline.' Norwegian potential Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad BAE Systems are building Type 26 frigates for the Royal Navy including HMS Belfast and HMS Birmingham in Govan. More investment could be on its way to the Govan shipyard, with the Norwegian government reportedly keen to purchase Type 26 frigates. Defence Secretary John Healey has told MPs he has 'been working hard to persuade the Norwegians' about taking on the frigates. In response to parliamentary questions, Ms Forbes, in an apparent acknowledgment of the benefits to the economy, has stressed the 'potential industrial and employment opportunities for Scotland are significant' if Norway does press ahead with Clyde-built frigates. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She said: 'Officials from the UK and Scottish governments have held constructive informal discussions around how the bid might be best supported.' A Scottish Government source suggested SNP ministers 'want to move on it', but are wrestling with how to 'manage it within the party'. The insider added: 'Some people find it exasperating and peculiar. It's just a bit out of place now in the new reality we are in.' When the Scottish Enterprise row emerged earlier this month, Mr Swinney told journalists he was sticking to his guns. He said: 'We have a policy position on the use of Scottish public expenditure for the manufacture of munitions. We apply that consistently and that remains the Government's position.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But speaking on the Holyrood Sources podcast this week, he opened the door to a change of heart, stating that 'issues can be reconsidered'.
Scotsman
3 hours ago
- Scotsman
SNP's policy of 'unarmed' Armed Forces is sheer madness
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... As the UK yesterday marked Armed Forces Day – described as 'a chance to show your support' for the men and women in the military – SNP ministers will hopefully have been reflecting on their spectacularly bizarre stance on defence spending. While the nationalists have long opposed nuclear weapons, they are not a pacifist party. They support membership of Nato, pledging an independent Scotland would be a 'reliable and dedicated international partner' like Denmark and Norway. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad They also say our domestic defence industry 'will not just be welcome in an independent Scotland but will be a vital part of our ability to have a defence capability that matches an Independent Scotland's needs and threats' and criticise the UK Government for 'a failure to meet Scotland's specific defence needs'. Ukraine needs munitions and so does the British Army (Picture: Sergey Shestak) | AFP via Getty Images 'Russian threat is very real' So it is all the more difficult to understand why it is a 'long-standing position' of the SNP that government funding should not be provided for the 'direct manufacture of munitions'. So, for example, Scottish Enterprise and the Scottish National Investment Bank do not invest in companies that make weapons. Former SNP defence spokesperson Stewart McDonald has now rightly criticised the ban as 'a stupid policy' and called for a new debate. His comments followed a hint by John Swinney that the party's stance could change as 'we are living in a very different context today' and 'the Russian threat is very real'. However a Scottish Government source explained ministers were struggling with how to 'manage' the issue within the party. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But, with the UK set to increase defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP, now is not the time to tip-toe around the subject. Not only is the manufacturing of munitions and weapons vital to defend this country and to help Ukraine fight off the Russian invasion, it is also a major economic opportunity.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Anas Sarwar urged to stand up against Keir Starmer's welfare plans
The call comes from the SNP ahead of a vote on Labour's Disability Cuts Bill on Tuesday at Westminster, with significant opposition against the welfare cuts still intact despite a deal being reached between the Prime Minister and some Labour MPs. In a late-night climbdown on Friday, the UK Government offered Labour rebels a series of concessions in an effort to head off Starmer's first major Commons defeat since coming to power. Some 126 Labour backbenchers had signed an amendment that would halt the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill in its tracks. READ MORE: Angela Rayner called out over 'tone deaf' message about terminal illnesses However, it is believed the concessions on offer, which include protecting personal independence payments (Pip) for all existing claimants, will be enough to win over a majority. Sarwar, who has consistently backed Starmer's disability cuts, is yet to indicate how he will instruct Scottish Labour MPs to vote. SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn (below) said it was already clear that the late-night deal was 'designed to save the skin of the Prime Minister' and that it will end up 'punishing those who are young or newly disabled'. (Image: James Manning/PA Wire) He has now called on Sarwar not to do his 'usual and ride to the rescue of Starmer' but to stand firm against the proposed welfare changes. Flynn said: 'The details of the deal reveal a Labour Party policy that will be blatantly discriminatory, of questionable legality, and will see disabled people with the exact same needs treated differently just because of when they were born or became sick, injured or disabled. 'In the next 48 hours Anas Sarwar has a choice – he can do his usual and ride to the rescue of Keir Starmer or he can change the habit of a lifetime and choose to stand firm against this two-tier disability system.' The UK Government's original package had restricted eligibility for Pip, the main disability payment in England, and cut the health-related element of Universal Credit, saying this would save around £5 billion a year by 2030. Now, the changes to Pip eligibility will be implemented in November 2026 and apply to new claimants only while all existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will have their incomes protected in real terms. Flynn said that the vote on the UK Government's welfare reform will come down to a test of fairness and of values as he claimed that if Scottish Labour MPs 'truly care', they would vote against it. He said: 'The choice is his – and people in Scotland will be watching to see how he instructs his Scottish Labour MPs to vote on Tuesday. 'This is a test of fairness and a test of values – how can any MP vote for a system that means if you have an accident that causes a disability, develop a disability over time or if you have a child with a disability, you will receive less support than those who have come before you?" Flynn added: 'If Scottish Labour MPs who last week rebelled against Keir Starmer truly care about the cause in the way that they suggest, then they will join the SNP in voting against this legislation and they will tell the Prime Minister to think again, again.' The SNP MP for Aberdeen South's comments come after Disability Rights UK warned the newly proposed cuts to disability and sickness benefits will create 'a two-tiered" system. Speaking on Times Radio earlier this week, campaigner at Disability Rights UK Mikey Erhardt said: 'The idea that you will be less in need, or less deserving of support, depending on the when of the condition that necessitates that support, is something you just have to reject out and out.' Meanwhile, Ian Greaves, who edits the Disability Rights Handbook containing in-depth information on the social security system across the UK, said Labour's 'very small' concessions on welfare reforms will still leave the system 'woefully inadequate'. Greaves told The National he was expecting much more significant changes to be proposed and was surprised MPs like Meg Hillier – whose amendment against the cuts was signed by almost 130 Labour MPs – are now suggesting the changes are a 'real breakthrough' and a 'good step forward'. He added: 'These are not concessions of any significance. 'Fundamentally it is not fair and it is immoral to reduce the health-related support in Universal Credit by 50%. Already people with disabilities on Universal Credit are struggling to pay for their basic needs.' The Scottish Government confirmed that it will not follow Starmer's two-tier system, with the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice Shirley-Anne Somerville saying: 'A two-tier system cannot be a fair system. 'That's what disabled people would have told the Labour Government if they had actually asked them rather than making a backroom late-night deal with their own MPs. 'And this half U-turn still does not scrap the 4+ points rule which will prevent support for hundreds of thousands with diffuse disabilities in the future. The Scottish Government will not follow Labour's lead on any of these changes.' A Scottish Labour spokesperson said: 'With 240,000 children in Scotland living in poverty, record numbers of homeless young people, rising sexual crime and the NHS on its knees, Stephen Flynn should hang his head in shame over what the SNP have done to Scotland. 'With the SNP now reviewing the application of their own Adult Disability Payment benefit, the hypocrisy that they have displayed over the current welfare bill has been exposed for all to see. 'Stephen Flynn should get his own house in order and apologise to the Scots being failed every day by his knackered and incompetent party.'
