The World's Best Supply Chains
Lora Cecere
Every year, the well-known industry analyst firm Gartner publishes a list of the 25 companies with the best supply chains. This report gets a lot of attention. Some supply chain leaders admit that their performance on this list affects their performance evaluation.
But Lora Cecere's methodology leads to a more objective list of companies with truly excellent supply chains. Lora Cecere is one of the most respected supply chain analysts. She founded a boutique analyst firm called Supply Chain Insights. Her report is called Supply Chains to Admire 2025.
Supply Chains to Admire Winners for 2025
Gartner's scoring is based on a composite score. A company is graded on what its supply chain peers think. This is 25% of the score. Another 25% is based on how Gartner's supply chain analysts evaluate a company. This is also 25%. There is a significant element of subjectivity in these scores.
Another 20% of the score is based on a company's ESG score. While I am all in favor of corporate environmentalism and good governance, ESG is not the same as supply chain management.
That leaves only 30% of the Gartner score which is arguably correlated with supply chain performance. Those measures include return on physical assets, the change in ROPA, revenue growth, and inventory turns.
Ms. Cecere's methodology does not believe that one composite score should be used to rank all companies. Companies should be compared to their industry peer group. Some industries just have an easier time achieving high margins, inventory turns, and growth than others.
Supply Chain Insight's core metrics, metrics correlated with market capitalization, include year-over-year progress in the areas of growth, operating margin, return on invested capital, and inventory turns. 530 companies across 28 industries were examined in these areas. Georgia Tech helped with the analysis.
Only four companies appear on both Gartner's 2024 list and Supply Chain Insight's 2025 list. Those are L'Oreal, Lenovo, Inditex, and Nike.
It takes four to five years to achieve supply chain excellence. So, what leads to supply chain excellence according to Supply Chain Insights?
'The most critical factor is leadership.' It is easier to drive improvement than sustain improvement.
Surprisingly, there is no correlation based on the technology employed or the consultant used by a company.
A balanced scorecard approach, not focusing solely on reducing costs, is critical. 'Many misinformed business executives believe that the most effective supply chain is efficient, operating at the lowest cost per unit.' Such companies suboptimize market capitalization. 'An efficient supply chain does not create the greatest value.'
There are factors that work against the achievement of excellence:
Positive factors, factors correlated with supply chain excellence include:
A shift in metrics is often necessary to drive improvement. In forecasting, the right path is to move away from measuring the size of the forecast error toward measuring forecast value added. Similarly, companies measuring inventory should move away from measures of safety stock toward inventory value added.
In manufacturing, companies should move from measures of operational equipment efficiency to schedule adherence and first pass yield.
In transportation, companies should move away from focusing on transportation costs to focusing more on on-time performance and the ability of carriers to quickly accept tenders. For supplier management, similarly, there should be less reliance on costs and more focus on the reliability and quality of supply.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
18 minutes ago
- CNN
Most US workers say they have unpredictable, inflexible schedules, new survey finds
FacebookTweetLink Follow After seven years as a retail associate at a big-box store in Virginia, Alicia Costello still did not have a consistent schedule week to week, and requesting paid time off was a hassle. For a while, Costello got by — until she became pregnant with her first child. Doctors' appointments had to be noted at least a month in advance, and approval wasn't guaranteed, she said. 'It's frustrating to be limited on the time that you've accrued and worked so hard for, not knowing when you can and cannot use that time,' Costello said. 'There's only so much that we can take on physically and mentally.' Needing a job that would allow her to spend more time with her family, Costello quit in April, and her experience is shared by a majority of the US workforce. Almost two-thirds of US workers struggle with volatile, inflexible work schedules, according to a new national Gallup survey, called the State of American Jobs Study, published Tuesday. Meanwhile, workers with predictable schedules enjoy more financial security, better work-life balance and more overall satisfaction with their jobs, according to the survey of 18,000 employees. 'I think one of the biggest questions on people's minds right now is, even though unemployment is fairly low, why are millions of workers still feeling so disillusioned and disengaged and struggling to get by?' said Rachel Korberg, executive director and cofounder of the Family and Workers Fund, which partnered to create the survey. 'We need to shift from a conversation that's just about job quantity to a conversation also about job quality.' Most notably, about 41% of those surveyed said they had little to no control over how many hours they work, what days they work or when they can take time off. Additionally, more than one quarter of workers said they don't know their schedule two weeks or more in advance. 'I think the important thing to underscore here is not just that everyone wants a 9-to-5 with the exact same hours all the time Monday through Friday,' Korberg said. 'It's actually about the worker having a say in their schedule.' Unpredictable schedules often involve frequent schedule changes and shift cancellations, making it difficult to plan for life events or maintain a second form of employment, according to the survey. For this reason, about 38% of those with low-quality schedules reported facing financial hardship. Many employers may cut hours in the week to be just below 40 hours so that overtime pay won't be necessary — a small adjustment that can have a big impact for low-wage workers, Korberg said. In Costello's case, she had to work 39-hour weeks. 'There was never any approval for overtime,' Costello recalled. 'That was difficult because, especially in preparation for the holidays, it would be nice to save up money and get overtime here and there.' Schedule volatility was found to be especially common among part-time workers and those without a college degree, even when controlled for age, gender, education and industry, according to the survey. 'There's an (attitude) that these employees are potentially more replaceable and may have less say in their workplace,' said Guy David, the Alan B. Miller Professor and Chair of Health Care Management at the Wharton School and professor of medical ethics and health policy at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. He was not involved in the survey. From his own research into the working conditions of health care employees, David found those with unreliable schedules were more likely to quit. However, many employers may be unaware of just how important work-life balance has become for workers, he added. 'I think this (survey) confirms our findings and is a wake-up call for companies wishing to increase or improve retention without potentially increasing payroll,' David said. 'Newer generations especially want to have very clear boundaries.' The Covid-19 pandemic was likely a big driver in this attitude change as well, suggested Maria Flynn, CEO and president of Jobs for the Future, which also partnered to create the survey. As more companies shifted to at-home work, the labor force became more accustomed to greater flexibility. Though automated scheduling systems are widely used across industries already, in the future more companies may adopt artificial intelligence-driven systems capable of studying the needs of workers and balancing them with the demands of the company, David said. While Flynn and Korberg suggested workers communicate openly about schedule preferences with their managers, they also acknowledged the change will largely have to take place among employers. 'A good schedule helps businesses engage and retain workers, and that contributes to the bottom line,' Korberg said. 'I'm hoping companies will take note of the study and look at (whether) there (are) changes, they could make to their scheduling practices.'
CNN
19 minutes ago
- CNN
Most US workers say they have unpredictable, inflexible schedules, new survey finds
After seven years as a retail associate at a big-box store in Virginia, Alicia Costello still did not have a consistent schedule week to week, and requesting paid time off was a hassle. For a while, Costello got by — until she became pregnant with her first child. Doctors' appointments had to be noted at least a month in advance, and approval wasn't guaranteed, she said. 'It's frustrating to be limited on the time that you've accrued and worked so hard for, not knowing when you can and cannot use that time,' Costello said. 'There's only so much that we can take on physically and mentally.' Needing a job that would allow her to spend more time with her family, Costello quit in April, and her experience is shared by a majority of the US workforce. Almost two-thirds of US workers struggle with volatile, inflexible work schedules, according to a new national Gallup survey, called the State of American Jobs Study, published Tuesday. Meanwhile, workers with predictable schedules enjoy more financial security, better work-life balance and more overall satisfaction with their jobs, according to the survey of 18,000 employees. 'I think one of the biggest questions on people's minds right now is, even though unemployment is fairly low, why are millions of workers still feeling so disillusioned and disengaged and struggling to get by?' said Rachel Korberg, executive director and cofounder of the Family and Workers Fund, which partnered to create the survey. 'We need to shift from a conversation that's just about job quantity to a conversation also about job quality.' Most notably, about 41% of those surveyed said they had little to no control over how many hours they work, what days they work or when they can take time off. Additionally, more than one quarter of workers said they don't know their schedule two weeks or more in advance. 'I think the important thing to underscore here is not just that everyone wants a 9-to-5 with the exact same hours all the time Monday through Friday,' Korberg said. 'It's actually about the worker having a say in their schedule.' Unpredictable schedules often involve frequent schedule changes and shift cancellations, making it difficult to plan for life events or maintain a second form of employment, according to the survey. For this reason, about 38% of those with low-quality schedules reported facing financial hardship. Many employers may cut hours in the week to be just below 40 hours so that overtime pay won't be necessary — a small adjustment that can have a big impact for low-wage workers, Korberg said. In Costello's case, she had to work 39-hour weeks. 'There was never any approval for overtime,' Costello recalled. 'That was difficult because, especially in preparation for the holidays, it would be nice to save up money and get overtime here and there.' Schedule volatility was found to be especially common among part-time workers and those without a college degree, even when controlled for age, gender, education and industry, according to the survey. 'There's an (attitude) that these employees are potentially more replaceable and may have less say in their workplace,' said Guy David, the Alan B. Miller Professor and Chair of Health Care Management at the Wharton School and professor of medical ethics and health policy at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. He was not involved in the survey. From his own research into the working conditions of health care employees, David found those with unreliable schedules were more likely to quit. However, many employers may be unaware of just how important work-life balance has become for workers, he added. 'I think this (survey) confirms our findings and is a wake-up call for companies wishing to increase or improve retention without potentially increasing payroll,' David said. 'Newer generations especially want to have very clear boundaries.' The Covid-19 pandemic was likely a big driver in this attitude change as well, suggested Maria Flynn, CEO and president of Jobs for the Future, which also partnered to create the survey. As more companies shifted to at-home work, the labor force became more accustomed to greater flexibility. Though automated scheduling systems are widely used across industries already, in the future more companies may adopt artificial intelligence-driven systems capable of studying the needs of workers and balancing them with the demands of the company, David said. While Flynn and Korberg suggested workers communicate openly about schedule preferences with their managers, they also acknowledged the change will largely have to take place among employers. 'A good schedule helps businesses engage and retain workers, and that contributes to the bottom line,' Korberg said. 'I'm hoping companies will take note of the study and look at (whether) there (are) changes, they could make to their scheduling practices.'
Bloomberg
28 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
How Do You Pick the Best Wealth Manager?
By and Merryn Somerset Webb Save Subscribe to Merryn Talks Money on Apple Podcasts Subscribe to Merryn Talks Money on Spotify The more than $100 trillion wealth transfer that's projected to be passed down from older to younger generations over the next quarter century is set to reshape the wealth management industry. And younger investors plan to move their money to new advisors, according to a report by IT services and consulting group Capgemini.
