
SpaceX, Palantir, Anduril Power The Golden Dome Defense Push
Potential Golden Dome Space Initiative
A new kind of arms race is underway—not for nuclear stockpiles or territorial conquest, but in the contested domains of artificial intelligence, autonomous systems, and space-based defense. With rising threats ranging from hypersonic missiles to rogue-state satellite programs, the United States is laying the foundation for what could be the most ambitious defense upgrade in decades: a next-generation missile shield known informally as the 'Golden Dome.'
This emerging infrastructure—designed to detect and intercept airborne threats in real time using a constellation of satellites and AI-driven command platforms—is being shaped by a growing coalition of public and private innovators. Among the most prominent are SpaceX and Anduril Industries—both privately held—along with Palantir Technologies, a public company. Together, this triad is helping to define the future of national security architecture. The presence of such influential yet privately controlled firms underscores a key challenge: much of the groundbreaking innovation in defense is now happening outside the reach of traditional public markets.
Historically, retail investors have been excluded from participating in the private companies driving these breakthroughs—despite the fact that many of these firms experience their most significant growth while still private. This raises an important structural question: how can individual investors gain exposure to these high-growth sectors before an IPO? One example of a fund aiming to address this gap is the XOVR ETF, which includes both public and select private companies in its portfolio. Managed by ERShares, the fund holds positions in SpaceX—currently its largest private holding—and, more recently, Anduril. While access to private firms remains limited, structures like this offer a new approach to bridging the divide between public markets and early-stage innovation.
Unlike legacy missile defense systems, which rely heavily on ground-based radars and static interceptor platforms, the Golden Dome is designed for mobility, scale, and rapid response. The concept involves deploying hundreds of low-Earth orbit satellites, backed by terrestrial and edge-based AI systems, to form a real-time surveillance and defense grid capable of neutralizing threats in seconds.
Estimates suggest this system could command over $175 billion in long-term defense spending. With the U.S. Department of Defense emphasizing rapid procurement and modernization, the initiative has shifted from concept to reality far faster than previous military-industrial efforts.
Anduril Industries, founded by Oculus VR creator Palmer Luckey, exemplifies the next wave of defense tech startups. Combining Silicon Valley speed with mission-first hardware development, Anduril has quickly grown into a major defense player through its Lattice OS platform—an integrated operating system that fuses sensor data across drones, towers, and autonomous vehicles in real time.
Less visibly, Anduril also reflects a broader trend: the emergence of a 'Palantir diaspora' in the national security ecosystem. Several of Anduril's co-founders and early engineers previously worked at Palantir, and the company continues to attract top-tier talent from its orbit. This growing network of Palantir alumni has seeded a dense cluster of growth-stage firms across aerospace, cyber, and battlefield AI—contributing to a broader acceleration in U.S. defense innovation.
Anduril is currently involved in multiple high-priority U.S. military initiatives, including the Army's TITAN program and the space-based Golden Dome framework. Its role in edge computing and autonomous threat identification is expected to grow in parallel with rising defense procurement in AI and robotics.
Palantir Technologies (NYSE: PLTR) has quietly become one of the most critical software providers to the U.S. government. Its Gotham and Foundry platforms are now embedded across intelligence agencies, defense contractors, and frontline military units, enabling everything from logistics coordination to real-time battlefield analytics.
In both the TITAN and Golden Dome initiatives, Palantir is providing the core artificial intelligence models used to ingest, organize, and act upon vast data flows. These systems are not just reactive—they are predictive, capable of flagging anomalies and modeling threat trajectories before they materialize.
Palantir's strategic value has not gone unnoticed in financial markets. Since the end of 2022, it has been one of the top performers in the Russell 1000 Growth Index, with its stock rising more than 1,950%—second only to Applovin (+3600%), another key AI-driven firm that has also seen substantial gains over that period. The surge in these names underscores investor conviction in the long-term role of software intelligence in both defense and commercial sectors.
Perhaps no company is better positioned to deliver the orbital backbone of the Golden Dome than SpaceX. With its reusable Falcon launch system and Starlink satellite network, SpaceX has the technological and logistical capabilities to deploy and maintain the hundreds of satellites envisioned in the program's first phase.
What makes SpaceX's involvement especially noteworthy is the shift in its strategic identity—from a private aerospace firm to a core U.S. defense asset. The company's satellites are expected to provide not only persistent surveillance but also secure, encrypted communications and early warning detection across global theaters.
SpaceX remains privately held, but its impact on both commercial and government space sectors has been transformative. Its expanding role in U.S. national defense is now considered as critical as its launch dominance.
The convergence of public equities like Palantir and Nvidia with private firms such as Anduril and SpaceX reflects a broader shift in U.S. industrial policy. No longer confined to traditional contractors, the innovation engine in defense now runs through a hybrid pipeline of startups, growth-stage firms, and crossover investment vehicles.
Retail investors, until recently, have had almost no ability to access firms like SpaceX and Anduril prior to their IPOs. That paradigm is beginning to shift. With new vehicles such as crossover ETFs, there is a growing effort to offer partial access to companies that have historically been out of reach. These developments mark a potential turning point in how retail capital intersects with national security innovation.
The Golden Dome is more than a missile defense system. It is a test case for how national security, technological innovation, and capital markets can align in a new era of geopolitical competition. As companies like Anduril, Palantir, and SpaceX help define this frontier, they are not only reshaping defense—they are also redefining how innovation is capitalized, scaled, and accessed by the broader investing public.
--------------------------------------
Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Please refer to the following link for additional disclosures: https://lnkd.in/e29X6rN
Additional Disclosure Note: The author has an affiliation with ERShares and the XOVR ETF. The intent of this article is to provide objective information; however, readers should be aware that the author may have a financial interest in the subject matter discussed. As with all equity investments, investors should carefully evaluate all options with a qualified investment professional before making any investment decision. Private equity investments, such as those held in XOVR, may carry additional risks—including limited liquidity—compared to traditional publicly traded securities. It is important to consider these factors and consult a trained professional when assessing suitability and risk tolerance.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
17 minutes ago
- CNN
Last look: Should Mexico be electing its judges?
Fareed explains how Mexico's controversial judicial elections could radically reshape the country's rule of law — for the worse.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New data confirms it: AI is taking human jobs
In March, Shopify's CEO told his managers he was implementing a new rule: Before asking for more head count, they had to prove that AI couldn't do the job as well as a human would. A few weeks later, Duolingo's CEO announced a similar decree and went even further — saying the company would gradually phase out contractors and replace them with AI. The announcements matched what I've been hearing in my own conversations with employers: Because of AI, they are hiring less than before. When I first started reporting on ChatGPT's impact on the labor market, I thought it would take many years for AI to meaningfully reshape the job landscape. But in recent months, I've found myself wondering if the AI revolution has already arrived. To answer that question, I asked Revelio Labs, an analytics provider that aggregates huge reams of workforce data from across the internet, to see if it could tell which jobs are already being replaced by AI. Not in some hypothetical future, but right now — today. Zanele Munyikwa, an economist at Revelio Labs, started by looking at the job descriptions in online postings and identifying the listed responsibilities that AI can already perform or augment. She found that over the past three years, the share of AI-doable tasks in online job postings has declined by 19%. After further analysis, she reached a startling conclusion: The vast majority of the drop took place because companies are hiring fewer people in roles that AI can do. Next, Munyikwa segmented all the occupations into three buckets: those with a lot of AI-doable tasks (high-exposure roles), those with relatively few AI-doable tasks (low-exposure roles), and those in between. Since OpenAI released ChatGPT in 2022, she found, there has been a decline in job openings across the board. But the hiring downturn has been steeper for high-exposure roles (31%) than for low-exposure roles (25%). In short, jobs that AI can perform are disappearing from job boards faster than those that AI can't handle. Which jobs have the most exposure to AI? Those that handle a lot of tech functions: database administrators, IT specialists, information security, and data engineers. The jobs with the lowest exposure to AI, by contrast, are in-person roles like restaurant managers, foremen, and mechanics. This isn't the first analysis to show the early impact of AI on the labor market. In 2023, a group of researchers at Washington University and New York University homed in on a set of professionals who are particularly vulnerable: freelancers in writing-related occupations. After the introduction of ChatGPT, the number of jobs in those fields dropped by 2% on the freelancing platform Upwork — and monthly earnings declined by 5.2%. "In the short term," the researchers wrote, "generative AI reduces overall demand for knowledge workers of all types." At Revelio Labs, Munyikwa is careful about expanding on the implications of her own findings. It's unclear, she says, if AI in its current iteration is actually capable of doing all the white-collar work that employers think it can. It could be that CEOs at companies like Shopify and Duolingo will wake up one day and discover that hiring less for AI-exposed roles was a bad move. Will it affect the quality of the work or the creativity of employees — and, ultimately, the bottom line? The answer will determine how enduring the AI hiring standstill will prove to be in the years ahead. Some companies already appear to be doing an about-face on their AI optimism. Last year, the fintech company Klarna boasted that its investment in artificial intelligence had enabled it to put a freeze on human hiring. An AI assistant, it reported, was doing "the equivalent work of 700 full-time agents." But in recent months, Klarna has changed its tune. It has started hiring human agents again, acknowledging that its AI-driven cost-cutting push led to "lower quality." "It's so critical that you are clear to your customer that there will always be a human," CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski told Bloomberg. "Really investing in the quality of the human support is the way of the future for us." Will there be more chastened Siemiatkowskis in the months and years ahead? I'm not betting on it. All across tech, chief executives share an almost religious fervor to have fewer employees around — employees who complain and get demotivated and need breaks in all the ways AI doesn't. At the same time, the AI tools at our disposal are getting better and better every month, enabling companies to shed employees. As long as that's the case, I'm not sure white-collar occupations face an optimistic future. Even Siemiatkowski still says he expects to reduce his workforce by another 500 through attrition in the coming year. And when Klarna's technology improves enough, he predicts, he'll be able to downsize at an even faster pace. Asked when that point will come, he replied: "I think it's very likely within 12 months." Aki Ito is a chief correspondent at Business Insider. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BarEhud Barak: Israel Must Back Trump's Gaza Deal
U.S. President Donald Trump greets Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as he arrives at the White House on April 7, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Credit - Alex Wong—Getty Images In the coming few days, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will face a defining choice between a politically motivated "war of deception" in Gaza and a deal to release all hostages while ending the war. He must choose between his extreme-right ministers—Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich—or aligning with Donald Trump. There is no symmetry here. Accepting a hostage deal, ending the war, and working with Trump and free world leaders, won't be effortless. Any choice requires detailed negotiations and compromises. But this path is far superior to any realistic alternative. Based on the achievements of the Israel Defense Forces—including damage to Hamas, weakening Hezbollah, destroying Syria's military arsenal during Assad's collapse, and demonstrating Israel's capability to strike deep into Iran—Israeli leadership could, from a position of strength, pursue releasing all hostages simultaneously, halt this senseless war, end the humanitarian crisis, and uproot Hamas from power. This would enable Israel, though belatedly, to join Trump's vision of a New Middle East, including normalization with Saudi Arabia, regional deployment to tackle the Iranian challenge, and participation in the trade corridor project from India through the Gulf to Europe. Choosing a "war of deception" instead—where misleading propaganda presents political warfare as serving Israel's security—would be a grave mistake. It's highly doubtful that continuing the war could produce results different from previous Gaza rounds over the past 20 months. But it would certainly constitute a death sentence for some or most living hostages and deepen the diplomatic tsunami and International Criminal Court claims Israel already faces. This approach might make sense if it could achieve "total victory" over Hamas, but that won't happen. When this new war inevitably halts—under diplomatic pressure, humanitarian crisis, battlefield events, or domestic political developments—we would find ourselves in precisely the same situation as today. To understand, examine recent history. The October 7th barbaric attack created a compelling imperative for Israel to ensure Hamas could never again reign over Gaza or threaten Israel from there. The question was how to achieve this goal. Since Ben-Gurion, Israel has followed four strategic maxims: wars should be aggressive, fought on enemy territory, ended quickly to translate battlefield results into diplomatic and political realities while maintaining international legitimacy, and—extremely important—never lose the moral high ground. That's how we won in 1967 in six days and 1973 in three weeks. Netanyahu has betrayed almost all these principles. Read More: The Israel-Hamas Ceasefire Was Never Going to Last Another strategic maxim, from Clausewitz to Kissinger, holds that war must have a clearly defined, operationally feasible political purpose. As the Roman saying goes: "If you don't know which port you want to reach, no wind will take you there." This maxim was deliberately ignored. Netanyahu has blocked any discussion of this issue since October 7th, 2023. It was clear to any serious observer that Hamas suffered major military blows daily, losing most weapons systems and leadership figures since October 7th. However, since any Hamas group or individual can easily "disappear" within minutes, hiding among the Strip's 2 million civilians and emerging from tunnels or building windows to attack Israelis, their absolute elimination remains a Sisyphean task. Even after 58 years in the West Bank, we never fully eliminated Hamas' presence in Jenin or Tulkarm. The only way to ensure Hamas cannot reign over Gaza and threaten Israel is by replacing it with another governing entity legitimate to the international community, Arab neighbors like Egypt, UAE, and Saudi Arabia, and Palestinians themselves. Practically, this means a temporary inter-Arab force backed by the Arab League, potentially supported by UN Security Council resolution, funded by Saudi Arabia and UAE, with a technocratic government overseeing Palestinian bureaucracy and a new, non-Hamas security body trained by the inter-Arab force under U.S. supervision. Israel would present only two conditions: no Hamas military branch member could participate in the new entity's organs, and the IDF, initially deployed to the Strip's perimeter, would withdraw to the border only after all pre-agreed security benchmarks are met. This plan, easily implementable a year ago, and appearing to save Gaza and Gazans from further destruction, is harder now, because it could be interpreted as saving Israel from sinking into Gazan mud. But the plan remains viable despite the Israeli government's refusal to consider it. Since this is the only practical "day after" plan, there's no sense sacrificing hostages' lives or endangering Israeli troops in pointless warfare. Who can look into the eyes of future bereaved parents, newly widowed spouses, new orphans, disabled and traumatized soldiers, and claim with clear conscience that everything was done to prevent loss, or that it had justification? As long as Israel rejects hostage release and war's end, the risk increases of international initiatives, including Arab neighbors calling for Israel boycotts and steps toward recognition of a Palestinian state by European countries—many of them stable friends of Israel. Read More: I Am a Former Hamas Hostage. Here's My Message to Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu Permanent occupation of the Gaza Strip, population transfer of 2 million Palestinians, and Israeli resettlement on the that land are base and delusional visions that would backfire and accelerate confrontation with the world. Why is Netanyahu, an intelligent, experienced, savvy politician, failing? The answer isn't simple. Netanyahu has ruled since 2015 through an alliance with ultra-Orthodox parties who don't serve in the army and care only about sectoral needs, and since January 2023 added ultra-right zealots believing Gaza resettlement and Palestinian transfer are heavenly orders. He's caught in a dilemma: 80% of the public sees him as primarily responsible for the country's worst day, 60% believe he should resign. A heavy majority perceives his judicial reform, initiated immediately after January 2023 elections, as a "judicial coup d'état"—an attempt to castrate the legislative branch and demolish Supreme Court independence. Many believe the aim of his blatant attack on democracy is to escape his bribery, fraud, and breach of trust court case. For him, any pause in the war—even 60 days, certainly longer—would immediately bring reckoning and accountability: accelerated court proceedings; demands for national inquiry committee investigating October 7th, and events before, during and after; coalition meltdown; and probable disgraced ejection from public life. I believe Netanyahu genuinely wants all hostages home. But when this clashes with immediate threats to his political survival, he prefers leaving them in Gaza. He has already torpedoed several hostage deal opportunities, and seems to be doing it once again over the weekend, by resisting U.S. guarantee to Hamas for an end to the war in exchange for release of all hostages and entering, together with the Trump Administration, into Trump's New Middle East Order (to include the replacement of Hamas, described above). Netanyahu sticks to his eternal war in order to avoid a pause in fighting, which might lead to the end of his political career. This behavior is unacceptable to Israel and Israelis. We are, as former Supreme Court President Aharon Barak wrote years ago, 'defending democracy' that "should be capable of defending itself against those who try to use the very freedoms and tools it provides to destroy it from within." We're led by someone who lost his strategic and moral compass, dragging the nation into war motivated by personal political interests against our security and common future. Israel urgently needs new, sober leadership with clear realistic vision and self-confidence—leadership capable of reading our people's soul, understanding partners' and rivals' minds, and above all, having courage to make decisions and power to implement them. The world will pass judgment. But the burden of bringing Israel back on track is ours—Israeli citizens. I believe we will overcome. This war will end soon, and Israel's worst ever government will be replaced by a responsible, effective one. A long path of repair must follow. Contact us at letters@