Algeria and Tunisia… A Common Target for External Blows and Paid Trolls
Algeria and Tunisia remain among the countries known for their sovereign stances in a time of great flight from the values of dignity in the Maghreb region.
This has made them vulnerable to 'malicious' agendas carefully crafted and executed by hired parties who have sold their conscience for a cheap price, primarily targeting the symbols and institutions of these countries that refuse to follow the current trend.
Recently, voices have emerged on social media networks targeting the stances of countries that stick to their people's values, or at least casting doubt on them, through calls to reconsider these positions in the name of protecting interests and avoiding pressures they cannot face, especially concerning essential national interests such as the Palestinian issue, which has suffered months of betrayal beyond imagination.
Both Algeria and Tunisia are seen as symbols of courageous positions and not following the current tide, which has placed them at the eye of the storm of parties that have lost what remains of their honor and innocence. They thus desperately attempt to impose a false reality via social media, through paid voices that have also lost their remaining credibility.
What is noteworthy is that the targeting of national regimes known for defending their sovereignty, independence of decision, and territorial integrity in Algeria and Tunisia is carried out through paid and frantic campaigns aimed at destabilizing their stability for the benefit of dubious agendas and cooperating parties.
This campaign is led by moving puppets through social media platforms, exploiting their distance from accountability and encouraging sinister intelligence circles to promote rumors, spread toxins, incite sedition, and smear leaders and high officials, especially in sensitive sectors.
In contrast, these paid parties, also known for their treachery, try to clean the scene of the treacherous and submissive regimes from dirt and filth, portraying them as the actual advocates of the interests and values of the Arab nation, in a distorted yet exposed scene, since such voices are no longer 'gathering,' as some like to describe them.
Given the danger of the role social media networks now play in directing public opinion—or rather, creating chaos within societies and destabilizing them—these paid voices have been exploiting routine problems and ordinary difficulties that communities in countries refusing to trade their stances face, in an attempt to rally them against the symbols of their essential institutions.
These maneuvers have failed multiple times, thanks to the awareness gained by Algerians and their Tunisian brothers in recent years, which have been full of external conspiracies executed by internal paid hands.
Despite the organized campaign against Algeria, which continues, these conspiracies have been shattered on the walls of its national independence and the strength of its political system, thanks to the consciousness of the people and their support for President Abdelmadjid Tebboune, who explicitly stated that in Algeria's international relations, regardless of the amount of defamation and incitement, dealings are based on dignity, respect, and independence.
What happened to Algeria also affected sister Tunisia, which is still paying the price for the national policy chosen by President Qais Saeed—relying on self-reliance, refusing interference in internal affairs, and confronting external impositions.
The defamation campaigns, especially those originating from social media platforms targeting state leaders, including security and military figures, are systematic smear campaigns aimed at insulting Tunisia and sowing discord and doubt in its leadership.
The cohesion of state institutions and the awareness and unity of the people in both countries can help thwart the 'malicious campaign' targeting these two neighboring states, thereby maintaining regional security and stability, and protecting the systems that defend their independence—an inevitable result of the conspiracies of any malicious observer.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khabar Agency
11 hours ago
- Khabar Agency
US Congress Nears Move To Designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a Terrorist Organization
Momentum has built for the U.S. government to formally designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization in the weeks since President Donald Trump's Middle East trip, lawmakers and other sources familiar with the effort tell the Washington Free Beacon. While the parties involved iron out the final details, sources working on the effort said that lawmakers have multiple avenues to financially cripple the Muslim Brotherhood, a global Islamist organization that preaches terrorism against Israel, the United States, and Western governments. The recent push began building steam last month, when the Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy (ISGAP) held a closed-door briefing for congressional staff that "focused on developing strategies to ban the growing threat of the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States," the group said in a press release. The Muslim Brotherhood is already designated as a terror outfit in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Syria, and Bahrain. But the United States has failed to follow suit, even though Congress attempted multiple times in the past. During Trump's first term in office, officials in both the White House and Congress began laying the groundwork to sanction the Muslim Brotherhood's global affiliates, but a formal designation never materialized. With Trump back in office and the GOP holding slim majorities in Congress, insiders say a fresh push to designate the Muslim Brotherhood would likely draw broad Republican support. It also has the important backing of key Arab allies that already identify the Brotherhood as a purveyor of violent extremism and discussed the issue during Trump's visit to the Gulf states. "There are several ways the U.S. designates groups as terrorists, and they do different things so Congress may have to choose between options, but momentum is building," said one senior GOP congressional source who works on Middle East and counterterrorism issues. "President Trump went to the Middle East and had an amazingly successful trip, in which he heard from our allies about their concerns—and most of those allies consider the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization." An Arab official agreed, saying many Arab states would like to see the United States take action against the Muslim Brotherhood. "Any of the countries in the Middle East who have already designated the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization would welcome the United States doing the same," the official told the Free Beacon. One method the United States could use involves classifying the Brotherhood as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO), which would sanction the group's leaders and freeze its assets. A second option would see it added to the Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) organization list, which imposes similar financial penalties, according to those briefed on the effort. Sen. Ted Cruz (R., Texas) has long sought tougher action against the Muslim Brotherhood and told the Free Beacon that now is the right time to get it done. "The Muslim Brotherhood uses political violence to achieve political ends and destabilize American allies, both within countries and across national boundaries," Cruz said. "The Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood is Hamas, a terrorist group which on Oct. 7 committed the largest one-day massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, and which included the murder and kidnapping of dozens of Americans." The Brotherhood, Cruz argued, "used the Biden administration to consolidate and deepen their influence, but the Trump administration and Republican Congress can no longer afford to avoid the threat they pose to Americans and American national security." Rep. Ashley Hinson (R., Iowa), who sits on the House Appropriations Committee's Homeland Security subcommittee, said the Trump administration's ongoing efforts to target terror factions tied to the Iranian regime could provide the groundwork for an expansion that covers the Muslim Brotherhood's international affiliates. "[The] Muslim Brotherhood—or any terrorist organization, for that matter—should be designated as such," Hinson told the Free Beacon. "I'm thankful to the Trump Administration for defending the U.S. from our adversaries and brutal terrorists—something Biden failed to prioritize. Peace through strength is back in the White House, and we must continue signaling deterrence." A 2023 ISGAP report noted that when "Hamas was created, it designated itself as 'one of the wings of Moslem Brotherhood in Palestine.'" While the Brotherhood's Qatari branch was formally dissolved in 1999, its "ideology, network, and influence remain prominent in Qatar today, having developed a mutually beneficial relationship with the royal family."
El Chorouk
14 hours ago
- El Chorouk
Debate on Colonial Crimes and Their Impact on the Algerian-French Crisis
In line with the French historian of Algerian origin, Benjamin Stora, who argues that the memory file can help ease tensions between Algeria and Paris, two countries experiencing an unprecedented political and diplomatic crisis, the French capital is hosting a debate on the French colonization of Algeria and its impact on the current disputes between the two capitals. The roundtable discussion will take place on June 14 in Paris, under the title 'The French Colonisation's Past in Algeria and the Current Diplomatic Dispute Between the Two Countries.' It will feature well-known historians, academics, and journalists in France, including Alain Riscio (historian), Jean-Pierre Sereni (journalist at Orient XXI), a French historian of Algerian origin, Nedjib Sidi Moussa, sociologist Aïssa Kadri, jurist Mouloud Boumgar, and moderated by the Egyptian journalist (PhD in French Literature) and editor in chief of the leading newspaper of the Arab and Muslim community. The round table discussion is prepared and organised by the Association for Colonial and Postcolonial History, in collaboration with Orient XXI magazine and , to 'decode the current crisis between France and Algeria.' The Association for Colonial and Postcolonial History is known for its tireless efforts to combat colonialist ideology and call for rectifying the disasters of colonialism by offering an apology to the peoples affected by it. Organisers open the debate for the public with free admission at the International Centre for Popular Culture in Paris, on Saturday, June 14, from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. The title of this debate highlights the extent of the impact that France's colonial past has had on Algeria, which has been escalating since last summer. The work of the mixed committee on memory was halted, coinciding with Algeria's recall of its ambassador, Mohamed-Antar Daoud, from Paris, following French President Emmanuel Macron's shift in position on the Western Sahara issue. A few days ago, historian Benjamin Stora, who chairs the French Memory Commission, said that the memory issue 'represents a possible way out of the crisis, and is indispensable in any case, and necessary in any case, because we cannot consider the Algerian history to be like all others.' On this occasion, he called for working towards a quick settlement: 'We need strong initiatives, especially regarding the issue of the French colonisation of Algeria in the nineteenth century. But today, in my opinion, considering the possibility of launching initiatives on memory could serve as an alternative to resuming political relations, which is necessary to resolve immigration or visa issues.' Benjamin Stora is presented as an advisor to the French president on memory matters. He has previously blamed the French side for the ongoing tensions, accusing Macron personally of causing the crisis in a previous interview with France 24, where he stated: 'First, it is important to note that French President Emmanuel Macron's statement regarding the Moroccan regime's (alleged) sovereignty over the Sahrawi territories has added fuel to the fire.' Since the outbreak of the crisis, French officials have not stopped demanding the resumption of work on the memory file. However, the Algerian side has shown no response. Rather, it has raised its demands for the return of all the looted Algerian archives in French vaults, as stated by the head of the Algerian memory commission, Mohamed Zeghidi. The possibility of resuming work on this file appeared on the horizon after the visit that led the French Minister of Foreign Affairs, Jean-Noël Barrot, to Algeria on April 6th. However, the recklessness of Bruno Retailleau, the Interior Minister in the government of François Bayrou, by kidnapping an Algerian consular employee in a Parisian street outside diplomatic norms, brought the crisis back to square one. This incident also revealed the existence of a real crisis in the decision-making circles in Paris, and that the French President had lost control of things, even if some tried to talk about a well-crafted scenario for exchanging political roles in relations with the former colony.
El Chorouk
25-05-2025
- El Chorouk
Retailleau ruined relations with Algeria, and the French colonization was brutal.
The French Press Agency (AFP) acted suspiciously in the interview it conducted with the French historian, Benjamin Stora, last Wednesday, focusing on a small aspect of the dialogue related to the role of memory in reviving relations between Algeria and France, while ignoring more important points concerning the heinous crimes of French colonialism in Algeria and the role of the far-right, represented by the Minister of the Interior, Bruno Retailleau, in destroying the bridges of communication between the two countries. The French Press Agency summarized the interview in a brief dispatch that various French media outlets covered last Wednesday, while the full interview was only disseminated through the agency's YouTube channel on Saturday, May 24. The full interview was rich in details of great importance that the dispatch did not mention. It was striking in following the 'video dialogue,' which lasted for 35 minutes, the disappearance of many points that the French historian discussed regarding Algerian-French relations from the past and present, especially concerning the description of the occupation crimes during the initial period of colonization that lasted for eighty years, as well as the crisis instigated by the far-right to destroy the relations between Algeria and Paris. What Benjamin Stora said: 'The French colonization of Algeria cannot be considered a trivial matter, because it was a colonization unlike any other. There was a colonial invasion that lasted for eighty years. It was truly horrific; there were atrocious massacres that the French only discovered recently. Entire villages and cities were destroyed, and this cannot be ignored. There were burnings (the caves), forced relocations of Algerians from their land, and their confinement in camps.' He adds: 'These are painful memories in the history of Algerians that cannot be underestimated. Algeria was part of France, not just a protectorate like Morocco and Indochina. France's borders, until the 1960s, extended south to Mali, Niger, Libya, and Mauritania… The French believed it was impossible to abandon Algeria, which is rich in oil, gas, phosphate, and gold, which led some of the French people to consider Algeria's independence a betrayal.' General Charles de Gaulle was accused of committing this betrayal, and he was the target of assassination attempts several times until his death in 1970. As for the telegram reported by the French Press Agency last Wednesday (France Press), it focused on the role of memory in bridging the gap between the two countries. It quoted Stora: 'We need strong initiatives, especially regarding the issue of French colonization of Algeria in the 19th century. But today, in my opinion, considering the possibility of launching memory initiatives could serve as an alternative to resuming political relations,' which is 'necessary to resolve issues of immigration or visas.' The agency also overlooked an important aspect of the dialogue, which is the role of Algeria in driving rapprochement through memory. Benjamin Stora pointed out that the idea of creating a joint committee of Algerian and French historians originated in Algeria, and it was an initiative that should have been capitalized on. The historian emphasized that the committee cannot write a shared history because each side has its own perspective. The French consider colonialism as bringing civilization to Algeria, while the Algerians view it as the main reason for the killing of millions, the theft of their wealth, and their illiteracy. In the opinion of the French historian, progress on the memory front could have alleviated tensions through initiatives from the French president, which were embodied in Macron's acknowledgment that the French state is responsible for the assassination of Maurice Audin, Ali Boumendjel, and the martyr Arab Ben Mhidi. However, the controversial shift in the French stance on the Sahrawi issue led to the stifling of that initiative, which was proposed after its crystallization during the visit of French President Emmanuel Macron to Algeria in the summer of 2022. He also accused France of making decisions that intensified the crisis, as it 'reduced the number of visas granted to Algerians without announcing it, from 400 to 200 or 250 thousand, and Algerians are aware of this. Requesting a visa from a holder of a diplomatic passport is considered reaching the brink of a break, which I don't think will happen because there are millions of people from both sides and shared ties of land and lineage.' Stora was asked if he would play the role of mediator to resolve the crisis between the two countries, to which he replied: 'The mediator must be accepted by both parties of the crisis. There is no search for a mediator. The crisis has reduced communication channels. I was indeed received by the two presidents in 2020 and 2021, but many things have changed today; we are in 2025.' He hinted that the French Minister of the Interior is responsible for the deterioration of these bilateral relations.
