Trump warns of decision time as Iran prepares nuclear counter-proposal
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump said Monday that new US-Iran talks this week could make clear if a nuclear deal is possible to avoid military action, as Tehran readies a counter-proposal on a potential agreement.
Trump spoke by telephone with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whose office said the US leader informed that he had made a 'reasonable offer' to Iran.
Netanyahu has threatened to strike the nuclear sites of Iran, whose cleric-run government he sees as Israel's existential enemy, but Trump has said he has held him back.
'We're trying to make a deal so that there's no destruction and death,' Trump told reporters after what he described as a positive call with Netanyahu.
'But it might not work out that way. We'll soon find out,' Trump said.
Trump said the latest meeting with Iran was expected Thursday, although a source familiar with preparations said it would more likely be on Friday or Saturday.
In a key sticking point, Iran has insisted on the right to enrich uranium at low levels for civilian use -- as allowed under a 2015 deal negotiated by former president Barack Obama which Trump tore up in his first White House term.
'They seek enrichment. They can't have enrichment,' Trump said.
'So far, they're not there. I hate to say that because the alternative is a very, very dire one,' he said.
'But they're not there. They have given us their thoughts on the deal and I said, it's just not acceptable.'
'Reasonable, logical and balanced'
Iran and the United States last held talks on May 31, after which Iran said it had received 'elements' of a US proposal.
Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi later said the text contained 'ambiguities.'
Foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei criticized the US proposal as 'lacking elements' reflective of the previous rounds of negotiations mediated by Oman, without providing further details.
'We will soon submit our own proposed plan to the other side through Oman once it is finalised,' Baqaei told a press briefing.
'It is a proposal that is reasonable, logical and balanced, and we strongly recommend that the American side value this opportunity.'
Also on Monday, Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht-Ravanchi told state news agency IRNA that Iran's response 'is a framework for agreement.'
'If we reach an understanding on this framework in principle, further extensive negotiations will begin on its details,' he added.
Iran's parliament speaker has said the US proposal failed to include the lifting of sanctions -- a key demand for Tehran, which has been reeling under their weight for years.
Israel has hit Iran directly, impeding its air defenses, since the October 7, 2023 deadly attacks by Tehran-sponsored Hamas which also triggered its Gaza offensive.
Iran's top security body, however, warned Monday that it had intelligence on Israeli nuclear facilities and could carry out counterattacks should Israel strike.
IAEA tension
Iran currently enriches uranium to 60 percent, far above the 3.67-percent limit set in the 2015 deal and close though still short of the 90 percent needed for a nuclear warhead.
Western countries, including the United States, have long accused Iran of seeking to acquire atomic weapons, while Iran insists its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes.
The United Nations nuclear watchdog on Monday began a Board of Governors meeting in Vienna that will last until Friday to discuss Iran's nuclear activities among other topics.
'I call upon Iran urgently to cooperate fully and effectively with the International Atomic Energy Agency,' said IAEA chief Rafael Grossi in his opening speech.
'Unless and until Iran assists the agency in resolving the outstanding safeguards issues, the agency will not be in a position to provide assurance that Iran's nuclear program is exclusively peaceful,' he added.
Iran has warned European powers of counter-measures to reduce cooperation with the IAEA if European powers back a draft resolution that accuses Tehran of non-compliance.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
With Marines, Guard deployment up, protests against U.S. ICE spread to other cities
NEW YORK, June 10 (Xinhua) -- The standoff between the White House and California Governor Gavin Newsom seemed to escalate on Tuesday, even as protests in downtown Los Angeles appeared to quiet overnight. Newsom responded to the Trump administration's order to deploy 700 active-duty Marines and 2,000 additional National Guard troops by pledging to file a second lawsuit and "surging" 800 additional state and local law enforcement officers to the region. President Donald Trump ordered the mobilization of 2,000 more California National Guard troops on Monday night, in addition to the 2,100 already activated over the weekend. Hours earlier, the Pentagon mobilized 700 active-duty Marines for deployment to the Los Angeles area. Newsom said Monday he would challenge the legality of the Marines' deployment, criticizing it on social media as a "blatant abuse of power." Trump on Tuesday continued to defend his decision to deploy National Guard troops to Los Angeles, reviving attacks on Democratic leaders in California and invoking the wildfires that devastated the city earlier this year. "If I didn't 'SEND IN THE TROOPS' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now," Trump wrote on his Truth Social network. As the federal response to the protests against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in Los Angeles escalates, demonstrators in San Francisco, New York, Philadelphia, Austin and other cities across the United States are also rallying against immigration raids. In San Francisco, police said they detained "multiple" people around midnight after two small groups of demonstrators splintered off from "overwhelmingly peaceful" protests and committed acts of vandalism, said The Washington Post. Thousands of people marched for miles Monday night before police declared an unlawful assembly around 10 p.m. A contingent that refused to disperse appeared to resist arrest, and were met with force by San Francisco police. Meanwhile, people gathered near the Independence Hall in Philadelphia on Monday to protest the deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles and the detainment of union leader David Huerta. In New York City, an anti-ICE protest was staged outside the Ted Weiss Federal Building with police officers maintaining their presence at the scene on Monday. A protest took place at the Texas State Capitol in downtown Austin on Monday, with organizers saying this was in solidarity with the protests taking place in Los Angeles. "Activists are calling for an end to the Trump administration's crackdowns on illegal immigration," reported FOX7 about the developments. "The protests against the Trump administration's immigration policies that started in Los Angeles have spread to at least two dozen cities, including San Francisco, Dallas, Austin and New York City," said The New York Times. These solidarity demonstrations on Monday were largely contained and peaceful, although some skirmishes broke out between protesters and law enforcement officers as night fell, it noted. In Dallas, about 400 protesters gathered on the edge of downtown. The demonstration began peacefully but brief skirmishes later occurred between protesters and the police, it added.
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
US Justice Department 'weaponization' reviews spark calls to drop prosecutions
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -As the federal public corruption prosecution of former Tennessee House Speaker Glen Casada neared trial this spring, his lawyers made one last effort to kill the case, by petitioning senior Justice Department officials that it was "weaponization," according to three people familiar with the matter. Under President Donald Trump, the department in February created a "Weaponization Working Group" meant to identify improper politically motivated cases, a response to what the Republican says without evidence was the misuse of prosecutorial resources against him under his Democratic predecessor, Joe Biden. In court filings, prosecutors said that Casada's lawyers met with a senior Justice Department official on March 24, where they alleged the "Deep State" had initiated a "weaponized" prosecution and they sought dismissal of the charges. The plan almost worked, according to three people familiar with the matter. With the Deputy Attorney General's office poised to kill the case, prosecutors in the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section pushed back, reviewing their evidence with the higher-ups, the sources said, adding that the Nashville U.S. Attorney's office and the Criminal Division also supported the case. The request was rejected the next week, according to court filings. Both Casada and the DOJ declined to comment. The case is among at least seven Reuters identified where defense attorneys or Justice Department officials have sought to have prosecutions reviewed for possible dismissal, citing Trump's "weaponization" argument or making other arguments about weaknesses in the cases. In a Tuesday speech, Acting Assistant Attorney General Matthew Galeotti urged defense attorneys to be "conscientious about what, when and how" they appeal prosecutors' decisions. "Seeking premature relief, mischaracterizing prosecutorial conduct, or otherwise failing to be an honest broker actively undermines our system," Galeotti said. The increase in lobbying started not long after the Weaponization Working Group was created, and after the department's February decision to dismiss criminal corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams, six sources familiar with the dynamic told Reuters. To date, the Adams case is the only one to be dismissed over 'weaponization,' three of those sources told Reuters. The lobbying wave comes as the Trump administration has dramatically scaled back the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section, reduced the size of its foreign bribery unit and advised department attorneys that tax enforcement is "not a priority," two of the people familiar with the matter said. A department spokesman said the DOJ will "continue to enforce our nation's tax laws." Trump has said the changes are necessary to root out Justice Department lawyers he derides as 'hacks and radicals' for prosecuting him and some supporters while he was out of power. NEW GROUP HAS BROAD REMIT The working group is empowered to review any 'civil or criminal enforcement authority of the United States' exercised under Biden. A lawyer for Robert Burke, a former Navy admiral who was convicted in May on bribery charges, wrote to the department ahead of trial raising concerns about witness credibility, which failed to convince prosecutors to drop the case. Now the lawyer, Tim Parlatore -- a former Trump defense lawyer -- plans to seek a pardon. "I would be crazy not to at least inquire about a pardon," Parlatore said. Another example is a case involving billionaire Britannia Financial Group founder Julio Martín Herrera-Velutini, who is facing an August trial alongside Puerto Rico's former governor on bribery charges. Herrera-Velutini is represented by former Trump defense attorney Chris Kise, who has sought to convince the Justice Department to dismiss or reduce the charges, though the outcome of such efforts is unclear, three people familiar with the case told Reuters. Kise did not return requests for comment, and Reuters could not determine what arguments he has made to the department about the case. WEAPONIZATION REVIEW While many of the reviews of cases are spurred by aggressive lobbying, some requests are coming from within the DOJ. In early February, prosecutors in the department's Tax Division were ordered by senior Justice Department officials to write a memo explaining why the prosecution of Paul Walczak was not an example of "weaponization," two of the people familiar with the matter told Reuters. Walczak, of Florida, pleaded guilty in November to not paying employment taxes and not filing his individual income tax returns, and the trial team was preparing for his sentencing. Prosecutors were baffled, the people said, and only discovered after a few Google searches that Walczak's mother Elizabeth Fago was a Trump donor who, according to a New York Times report, hosted a political fundraiser where portions of a diary written by Biden's daughter Ashley were circulated. The department let the case proceed, and Walczak was sentenced to 18 months in prison. Trump in April spared him any prison with a pardon, which according to the New York Times, was handed down shortly after Fago attended a $1 million fundraising dinner for Trump. The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the pardon. An attorney for Walczak said he was unaware of any interactions by the defense team with the Weaponization Working Group. In a statement, the Fago and Walczak families said media reports have painted an "incomplete and inaccurate" picture of the pardon application, and that Trump had "ample grounds to grant the pardon on the merits." Although no criminal prosecutions have been dismissed, prosecutors are bracing for impact since Trump in May named Ed Martin, a supporter of Trump's false claims that his 2020 election defeat was the result of fraud, to lead the working group and serve as pardon attorney. Martin has already successfully encouraged Trump to approve pardons for some of the president's supporters, according to his social media posts. Casada, who was convicted at trial in May on multiple counts of fraud, money laundering and bribery, is now expected to seek a pardon, a person familiar with the matter said. "We've also been getting more folks coming forward within the government as well as outside, saying, 'Can you look at this? Can you look at that?'" Martin recently told reporters. "It's a problem that seems to be growing faster than we can capture it." (Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch and Peter Eisler in Washington and Ned Parker in New York, additional reporting by Andrew Goudsward; Editing by Scott Malone and Deepa Babington)
Barnama
3 hours ago
- Barnama
1st Meeting Of China-US Economic, Trade Consultation Mechanism Opens In London, Attracting Global Attention
WORLD U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese vice premier He Lifeng pose for a photo with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao, and China's International Trade Representative and Vice Minister of Commerce Li Chenggang, in London, Britain June 9, 2025. United States Treasury/Handout via REUTERS LONDON, June 10 (Bernama-Xinhua) -- The first meeting of the China-US economic and trade consultation mechanism opened here on Monday, attracting global attention. Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng, also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, attended the meeting with US representatives, Xinhua news agency reported. Business leaders welcomed the meeting, expecting win-win outcomes. "Only through mutual respect can we achieve win-win cooperation," said Yang Ming, CEO of Westwell Holdings (Hong Kong) Ltd, a Chinese artificial intelligence (AI) technology company. Attend the ongoing London Tech Week events, Yang said she wished to see normalised economic and trade relations restored between the two nations, calling on both governments to strengthen collaboration in AI and join forces to create new frontiers in global innovation. OBE Chief Executive Officer at London & Partners Laura Citron told Xinhua that stable trade relationships between the biggest economies in the world would always be a good thing for the global economy, adding that London as a city is a very outward-facing trading economy. "We're very keen to see strong and predictable trade relationships between the U.S. and China," she said. -- BERNAMA-XINHUA
