
‘Really a mess': America's air traffic control system suffering from years of neglect
Twice in the past two weeks, communications between air traffic controllers and airplanes at Newark Liberty, one of the US's busiest airports, have failed – leaving controllers unable to communicate with pilots.
The outages have, thankfully, only led to massive delays, not disaster. But they have also once again focused a harsh light on the persistent safety problems at US airports, which handle over 50,000 flights a day.
As a result of that estimated 90-second communications breakdown on 28 April, many air traffic controllers said they felt traumatized, and thousands of passengers suffered from the hundreds of canceled and delayed flights. A brief radar outage on Friday morning left radar screens black for another 90 seconds – underlining a growing crisis.
Political leaders were quick to criticize the rickety state of the air traffic system. Senator Charles Schumer of New York said the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) was 'really a mess', while New Jersey's governor, Phil Murphy, decried 'decades of underinvestment' in air traffic control infrastructure, 'delays' in modernizing technology, and 'inadequate air traffic control staffing'.
The transport department's inspector general has found that at 20 of the nation's 26 most critical airports, air traffic control staffing falls below the 85% minimum level, with many controllers forced to work 10-hour days and six-day weeks. After the communications breakdown in Newark, several air traffic controllers there was so shaken that they went on 'trauma leave', leaving that airport even more understaffed.
The Trump administration moved swiftly to respond after the alarming episode at Newark. On Thursday, Sean Duffy, the secretary of transportation, unveiled a plan to build a new state-of-the-art system that would overhaul the technology used by the nation's air traffic controllers. Duffy said his plan would replace 'antiquated telecommunications, with new fiber, wireless and satellite technologies at over 4,600 sites'.
'A lot of people have said: this problem is too complicated, too expensive, too hard,' Duffy said on Thursday. 'But we are blessed to have a president who actually loves to build and knows how to build.'
Airlines and the air traffic controllers' union applauded Duffy's proposal, but several airline industry experts voiced fears that it would fall short, as have many past plans to fix the system. In a statement, the Modern Skies Coalition, a group of industry associations and experts, said: 'We are pleased that the secretary has identified the priorities of what must be done to maintain safety and remain a leader in air navigation services.'
The air traffic control system has been through some tough months. In January, a commercial jet collided with an army helicopter near Reagan Washington National airport, killing 67 people in the deadliest aviation disaster in the US since 2001. Trump upset many aviation industry experts and outraged many Americans when he, even before an investigation was begun, rushed to blame the crash on diversity, equity and inclusion.
On 1 May, another army helicopter forced two flights to abort their landings at Reagan airport. Newark airport has suffered at least two other similar communications breakdowns since last August. A New York Times investigation in 2023 found that close calls involving commercial airlines occurred, on average, several times each week – with 503 air traffic control lapses occurring in the 12 months before 30 September 2023.
For some these latests issues are part of a much older story. 'The system's staffing problems started when Ronald Reagan fired over 10,000 air traffic controllers,' after they went on strike in 1981, said Sara Nelson, president of the Association of Flight Attendants.
'And those problems were worsened by his pushing the hatred of government and the dismantling of government. That's what's put us on the track to where we are today. There were budget cuts and tax cuts for the rich, and all that stopped us from doing the infrastructure projects and hiring and training that we needed to have a stable system.'
The nation's air navigation system has just under 10,800 certified controllers, but their union, the National Air Traffic Controllers Association, says there needs to be more than 14,300, the number recommended by an arm of the FAA, called the Collaborative Resource Workgroup. There are over 2,000 controllers in training, and the union has urged the Trump administration to increase the number in the pipeline. Training usually takes 18 to 24 months, and getting up to speed to work at the most demanding airports such as JFK and Newark can take more than three years.
'There is a shortage of controllers nationwide, but not to the degree it's occurring at Newark,' said Jeff Guzzetti, an industry consultant who was an investigator for the FAA and National Transportation Safety Board.
'There's been a shortage of controllers for years, if not decades. That shortage was exaggerated by Covid; they couldn't conduct training for new controllers. Beyond that, they've always had a problem finding the right people with the right skills to control traffic and to get people to pass the course work at the training academy and then to get them up to speed.'
Many trainees drop out and don't pass their exams, and many controllers don't stay in the job because it is so stressful. In recent years, the number of controllers has been relatively flat. The total has declined by 10% since 2012 due to retirements and trainees failing to finish their requirements.
'It's not only the shortage of air traffic controllers. It's antiquated facilities and equipment and software,' Guzzetti said. Many facilities still rely on floppy disks and copper wire.
He said: 'It's all coming to a head now in New York and Newark. Newark has always been the worst in terms of air traffic staffing and modernizing its equipment.'
Last September, the Government Accountability Office said the FAA needed to take 'urgent action' to deal with its antiquated air traffic control systems. It said 51 of the FAA's 138 air traffic control systems were unsustainable.
On Thursday, Duffy did not say what his modernization plan would cost. The House transportation and infrastructure committee says it would cost $12.5bn to overhaul the air traffic control system, but Duffy says his plan would cost more than that. 'Decades of neglect have left us with an outdated system that is showing its age,' he said. 'Building this new system is an economic and national security necessity.'
On May 1, Duffy announced a related plan filled with incentives that he said would 'supercharge the air traffic controller work force.' It includes $5,000 bonuses to new hires who successfully finish the initial training.
Joseph McCartin, a labor historian at Georgetown University who wrote a book about the 1981 air traffic controllers' strike, said that ever since Reagan fired 11,345 striking controllers, 'the system has been out of sync'.
'The natural rhythm of the system broke down and we never fully recovered,' he said. 'We've improved over time, but the FAA still has grave difficulty staffing facilities.'
McCartin added: '[Elon Musk's] Doge has made things only worse. The entire system that federal employees operate under has been terribly destabilized. The FAA exists in a world where this entire project of the federal government is teetering.'
Robert W Mann Jr, an aviation industry analyst, said that for 40 years there have been FAA reauthorizations approved by Congress, but they haven't fixed the problems. 'Unless you do it right, it doesn't make a difference what you spend,' he said. 'You won't have solved the root causes.'
Nonetheless, Mann said he remained confident about airline safety. He said: 'There's a primacy in this business. Whether you're working at airlines or the FAA, safety is the first thing.'
Mann said that days when an airport faces severe understaffing of air traffic controllers or a crush of airplanes eager to take off as bad weather lifts, there will often be delays to ensure safety. 'I'm not worried about safety,' Mann said, 'but I might be worried that my flight will be four hours' late.'
Nelson, the flight attendants' president, said that the US should be thankful to air traffic controllers because their job is so hard, stressful and important. 'They should be commended for working in a system that's crumbling,' she said. 'They're the ones we all need to applaud right now. They're like the nurses during Covid, when everyone came out at 6 o'clock to bang pots and pans.'
A big question now is whether Congress will approve the money for Duffy's ambitious modernization plan. Nelson said: 'I hate to say we're a canary in the coalmine, but those of us in the airline industry have known for a long time that a lot of this [the air traffic control equipment] has been a problem. What happened in Newark is a sign of what will come in other airports if we don't get the budget we need.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The reason why Americans like William and Kate more than Meghan and Harry
Americans like Prince William more than Prince Harry - and the Princess of Wales more than Meghan Markle - because the Sussexes' have chosen celebrity and self-martyrdom over royal duty, it was claimed today. A recent YouGov poll in the US revealed Prince William enjoys a 63 per cent favourability rating among Americans - comfortably above Harry's rating of 56 per cent. The Princess of Wales has a 49 per cent rating in the US compared to the only American on the list, Meghan Markle, who has a 41 per cent rating. Even worse for the Duchess of Sussex, 25 per cent of Americans view her unfavourably compared to six per cent for her British sister in law, best known as Kate Middleton across the Atlantic. UK-US politics expert and policy maker Lee Cohen has said that the polls show that Americans prefer the 'unshowy sense of duty' of the Wales' over the 'self-promoting' Sussexes. He believes that Meghan and Harry have come to 'personify grievance, vanity and betrayal'. 'Even in a land that rejected monarchy, public sentiment favours hands down the Prince and Princess of Wales over the rogue runaways who swapped Buckingham for Beverly Hills', he said. Mr Cohen is a trade expert and senior Fellow of the London Centre for Policy Research who worked in Congress. Having worked in both countries he has also become a commentator for issues on both sides of the Atlantic. Writing for The Spectator US, he said that Americans are tiring of Meghan and Harry, who is viewed negatively by one in five in the US - but is more popular than his wife. 'In an age of cultural decay and institutional collapse, Americans crave continuity. We are drawn to symbols of permanence and poise', he said. 'William and Kate, with their unshowy sense of duty, offer exactly that. The Sussexes, by contrast, offer only the fleeting buzz of celebrity – and worse, a corrosive kind of self-martyrdom disguised as liberation. Fame is not the same as honour. Accepting disingenuous awards, peddling lifestyle brands and monetizing private grievances may pay the bills, but it commands revulsion rather than respect. True nobility lies in service, not self-promotion'. He said that the Sussexes, in 'casting off' royal duties, have also lost their 'mystique' and Americans are 'running out of patience'. 'William and Kate, by simply showing up, remind us of a forgotten truth: that dignity, loyalty and service are not relics of the past but virtues still worth aspiring to. 'As Harry and Meghan sink into self-inflicted irrelevance, the Wales' soar – not because they bully nor shout the loudest, but because they understand Queen Elizabeth's example of the power of humble duty done well'. The most popular royal overall is William and Harry's late mother Princess Diana, who died in 1997, with a 79 per cent positive rating and 4 per cent negative. The late Queen Elizabeth II, who died in 2022, is in second place with a 73 per cent positive and 8 per cent negative ranking. William is in third overall and Harry fourth. The Prince of Wales has a 63 per cent positivity rating in America and 10 per cent negative, which puts him in first place among living royals. Some 56 per cent of US adults have a positive view of the Duke of Sussex while 21 per cent a negative opinion, according to the YouGov study for The Times. The Princess of Wales has a 49 per cent positive rating and 6 per cent negative All the senior royals are more popular than Meghan, the only US citizen on the list, whose ratings are 41 per cent positive and 25 per cent negative. The poll of 1,296 US adults was carried out between April 21 and 23, before Harry's bombshell BBC interview in which he called for 'reconciliation' with his family. Some 61 per cent have not changed their opinion on the couple since their move to the US, but 17 per cent said it was now worse and 10 per cent said it was now better. Yesterday it emerged that Prince Harry sought advice from Princess Diana 's brother about changing his family name to Spencer. Sources told the Mail on Sunday the Duke of Sussex actively explored ways to assume his mother's surname – a move that would have involved ditching Mountbatten-Windsor, used by his children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet. It is understood he discussed the issue with Earl Spencer – whose family seat is Althorp in Northamptonshire – during a rare visit to Britain, but was told that the legal hurdles were insurmountable. 'They had a very amicable conversation and Spencer advised him against taking such a step,' said a friend of Harry. Nevertheless, the fact that he consulted the Earl over the issue – a proposal that would dismay his brother and father – is a vivid expression of the toxic rift with his family. Mountbatten-Windsor is the surname available to descendants of the late Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip. It combines the Royal Family 's name of Windsor and the Duke of Edinburgh 's adopted surname. On their birth certificates, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's children are Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor and Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor. Royal author Tom Bower has claimed that 'Meghan decided her real object in life was to be Diana'. If the name change had succeeded, Meghan's daughter, who is believed to have met the King only once, would have become Lilibet Diana Spencer, a more fulsome tribute to Harry's late mother. The move would be particularly hurtful to King Charles, who cherishes the Mountbatten name just as his father did. A mentor to Prince Philip, the 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma was also a strong influence on his great-nephew, the future King Charles. Philip adopted the Mountbatten name when he became a naturalised British subject and renounced his Greek and Danish royal title in 1947. The Queen and Philip decided in 1960 that they would like their own direct descendants to be known as Mountbatten-Windsor. According to the Government, you do not have to follow a legal process to start using a new name, but it suggests on its official website using a 'deed poll' to apply for or to change official documents such as a passport or driving licence. Names and titles are a highly sensitive subject for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. They were given their Sussex titles by Queen Elizabeth on the day of their wedding in 2018. Meghan recently insisted her surname is Sussex, correcting a guest on her Netflix cookery and lifestyle programme. In episode two of With Love, Meghan, which was released in March, the 43-year-old former actress was joined by comedienne Mindy Kaling. Meghan told her: 'It's so funny you keep saying 'Meghan Markle' – you know I'm Sussex now.'


The Guardian
42 minutes ago
- The Guardian
China accuses US of ‘seriously violating' trade truce
China has accused the US of 'seriously violating' the fragile US-China detente that has been in place for less than a month since the two countries agreed to pause the trade war that risked upending the global economy. China and the US agreed on 12 May to pause for 90 days the skyrocketing 'reciprocal' tariffs that both countries had placed on the others goods in a frenzied trade war that started a few weeks earlier. Tariffs had reached 125% on each side, which officials feared amounted to virtual embargo on trade between the world's two biggest economies. Donald Trump had hailed the pause as a 'total reset' of US-China relations. But since then, trade negotiations have faltered, with the US complaining that China has not delivered on promises to roll back restrictions on the export of key critical minerals to the US. The US president said on Friday that China had 'totally violated' the agreement. The US Treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, said on Sunday: 'What China is doing is they are holding back products that are essential for the industrial supply chains of India, of Europe. And that is not what a reliable partner does.' During the period of aggressive retaliatory trade measures between the US and China in April, China had restricted the export of certain rare earth minerals and magnets, which are critical for US manufacturing. The restrictions were expected to be relaxed after the 12 May agreement but the process appears to have been patchy at best. Now, US companies, particularly car manufacturers, are reportedly running out of magnets. China hit back on Monday, accusing the US of violating and undermining the agreements reached in Geneva in May, and the consensus between Trump and Xi Jinping, China's president, on their 17 January phone call. China's commerce ministry said on Monday: 'The US has successively introduced a number of discriminatory restrictive measures against China, including issuing export control guidelines for AI chips, stopping the sale of chip design software to China, and announcing the revocation of Chinese student visas.' The ministry said China 'is determined to safeguard its rights and interests' and denied the accusation from the US that it had undermined the 12 May agreement. The US has indicated that another Xi-Trump call is expected soon. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion But outside the trade talks, US-China relations have soured in a number of areas. Last week, China condemned the announcement from the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, that the US would 'aggressively' revoke the visas of Chinese students in his country. And over the weekend, China and the US traded barbs over comments made by the US defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, at a conference in Singapore. Hegseth said that China was potentially an 'imminent' threat, while China's foreign ministry said that his comments were 'filled with provocations and intended to sow division'.


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Eight injured in petrol bomb and 'flamethrower' attack at rally for Hamas-held hostages in Colorado
Why you can trust Sky News Eight people have been injured at a US rally for Israeli hostages after they were attacked by a man with a makeshift flamethrower and petrol bombs. A group of people in Boulder, Colorado, were holding a regular demonstration to raise awareness of Hamas-held hostages in Gaza when they were allegedly targeted by a man who shouted "Free Palestine" on Sunday. The suspect was arrested at the scene. Four women and four men aged between 52 and 88 were injured and transported to hospitals, Boulder police said. Some of them were airlifted to hospital. Authorities had earlier put the count of the injured at six and said at least one of them was in a critical condition. The FBI says the attack was a targeted "act of terrorism" and named the suspect as 45-year-old Mohamed Soliman from El Paso County, Colorado. He was also taken to hospital after the alleged attack. Two senior law enforcement officials told Sky News' US partner network that Soliman is an Egyptian national who seemingly acted alone. They said he has no previous significant contact with law enforcement. The White House described the suspect as an "illegal alien" who had received a work permit under the Biden administration despite overstaying a tourist visa. A large part of downtown Boulder was cordoned off as sniffer dogs and the bomb squad searched for potential devices. However, police currently believe no one else was involved Police chief Steve Redfearn said the attack happened around 1.26pm on Sunday and that initial reports were that "people were being set on fire". He said injuries ranged from "very serious" to "more minor". "When we arrived we encountered multiple victims that were injured, with injuries consistent with burns," Mr Redfearn told the media. The police chief also said he did not believe anyone else was involved. "We're fairly confident we have the lone suspect in custody," he said. Boulder's police chief said the attack happened as a "group of pro- Israel people" were peacefully demonstrating. The walk is held regularly by a volunteer group called Run For Their Lives, which aims to raise awareness of the hostages who remain in Gaza. Video from the scene showed a bare-chested man shouting and clutching two bottles after the attack. Other footage showed him being held down and arrested by police as people doused one of the victims with water. Nearby there appears to be a large black burn mark on the ground. Brooke Coffman, a 19-year-old student, described seeing four women on the ground with burns on their legs. She said one appeared badly burned on most of her body and had been wrapped in a flag. She described seeing a man whom she presumed to be the attacker standing in the courtyard shirtless, holding a glass bottle of clear liquid and shouting. "Everybody is yelling, 'get water, get water,'" Ms Coffman said. Lady on fire 'from head to toe' Another eyewitness, who did not give his name, said he saw the suspect throw Molotov cocktails - an improvised bomb made from a bottle filled with petrol and stuffed with a piece of cloth to use as a fuse. He said: "It was very strange to just hear a crash on the ground of a bottle breaking and then it sounded like a boom and then people started yelling and screaming. "But I saw fire, I saw people screaming and crying and tripping and I saw the attacker - he had three Molotov cocktails. "One of them he threw inside a group and one lady lit on fire from head to toe and then the other four people were also injured in the fire, but not as bad as the first one." The eyewitness continued: "The attacker came out from the bushes and the trees... he threw another cocktail, and on the second one he lit himself on fire - I imagine accidentally. "He seemed to have a bullet proof vest on, or some kind of vest, and then a shirt underneath it. "And after he lit himself on fire he took off the vest and the shirt and he was shirtless. "But he still had his Molotov cocktails in his hands ready to use them... ready to throw them and explode them on people." Lynn Segal, another eyewitness, said: "These shoots of fire, linear, about 20 feet long, spears of fire, two of them at least, came across right into the group, about 15 feet from me." The 72-year-old said two neighbours of hers, a husband and wife in their 80s, were at the demonstration. She added that the wife was one of the victims and appeared to be the most seriously injured. "They're both elders in their 80s, and you can't take something like this assault to your body as easily as someone younger." Ms Segal, who was wearing a "Free Palestine" T-shirt, said she watches the demonstrations to "try and listen" to what the volunteers are "talking about" because she is concerned about the hostages. She added that she is concerned the attack will "divide this community". Another eyewitness told MSNBC that he saw the suspect "lighting people on fire while spraying gasoline on them". Brian, who is himself Jewish and asked that his last name not be made public, added that he saw victims "having their skin melt off their bodies". A statement from Boulder's Jewish community said "an incendiary device was thrown at walkers at the Run for Their Lives walk on Pearl Street as they were raising awareness for the hostages still held in Gaza". Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu later said in a statement this morning: "This attack was aimed against peaceful people who wished to express their solidarity with the hostages held by Hamas, simply because they were Jews. "I trust the United States authorities to prosecute the cold blood perpetrator to the fullest extent of the law and do everything possible to prevent future attacks against innocent civilians. "The antisemitic attacks around the world are a direct result of blood libels against the Jewish state and people, and this must be stopped." US Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a prominent Jewish Democrat , said it was an antisemitic attack. "This is horrifying, and this cannot continue. We must stand up to antisemitism," he said on X. Boulder is a university city of about 105,000 people on the northwest edge of Denver, in the foothills of the Rocky Mountains. The attack follows the arrest of a Chicago-born man in the fatal shooting of two Israeli embassy employees in Washington DC two weeks ago. Tensions are simmering in the US over Israel's war in Gaza. There has been an increase in antisemitic hate crime, as well as moves by some supporters of Israel to brand pro-Palestinian protests as antisemitic. President Trump's administration has detained protesters without charge and pulled funding from elite universities that have permitted such demonstrations.