logo
Juice Cleanses Likely Good for Nothing, Bad for Much

Juice Cleanses Likely Good for Nothing, Bad for Much

Medscape5 days ago

'It's a great way to get those fruits and vegetables into my diet, especially since I can't be bothered peeling or preparing them…' 'I lost weight and felt lighter…' 'I'm helping my body detox, and that's a good feeling.'
Social media is rife with statements like the above about juice cleanses. It's a favorite topic as well as something patients often ask about. The perception is that by doing a juice cleanse, they're doing something healthy for themselves — yet experts agree that in most cases, they're not. But if they're having a conversation or asking about it, it offers an opportunity to provide evidence-based guidance.
American Gastroenterological Association Spokesperson Fazia Mir, MD, clinical assistant professor at the University of New Mexico and a gastroenterologist with Presbyterian Healthcare Services, both in Albuquerque, New Mexico, said some of her patients ask about juice cleanses because they're interested in doing a liver detox or helping their gut inflammation.
'I tell them that, in fact, it does the opposite,' she told Medscape Medical News .
'The majority of juice cleanses impact gut health negatively. They can cause bowel habit irregularity and even precipitate inflammatory bowel disease, as the gut microbiota is disrupted due to the lack of fiber in these cleanses. And we see patients all the time whose irritable bowel syndrome worsens after they've embarked on a juice cleanse.'
What the Evidence Says
There's little evidence to support the use of juice cleanses for eliminating toxins from the body, according to the US National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Furthermore, some juices used in 'detoxes' and 'cleanses' haven't been pasteurized or treated in other ways to kill harmful bacteria, meaning they can expose individuals to toxigenic E coli, Salmonella , hepatitis A, and Cryptosporidium .
In addition, some juices are made from foods high in oxalate, such as leafy green vegetables and beets. Individuals susceptible to kidney stone formation should limit their consumption of high-oxalate foods, which can present a health threat.
In fact, a case report published several years ago documented acute oxalate nephropathy caused by a 'green smoothie cleanse' prepared from juicing oxalate-rich green leafy vegetables and fruits.
'Reality Check'
Two recent studies highlight the negative impact of juice cleanses. In a small randomized, three-arm intervention study with 14 healthy participants published online in Nutrients , 'a 3-day exclusive juice cleanse (800-900 kcal/d) led to shifts in the oral and gut microbiome, with increases in taxa linked to inflammation, gut permeability, and even cognitive decline after juice consumption,' said principal author Melinda Ring, MD, executive director, Osher Center for Integrative Health at Northwestern University in Chicago.
Participants followed one of three diets — juice only, juice plus food, or plant-based food — for 3 days. Microbiota samples (stool, saliva, and inner cheek swabs) were collected at baseline, after a pre-intervention elimination diet, immediately after the juice intervention, and 14 days after the intervention. Gene sequencing was used to analyze microbiota taxonomic composition.
The juice-only group showed the most significant increase in bacteria associated with inflammation and gut permeability, as well as associated changes in the saliva and cheek microbiota — particularly in the relative abundances of proinflammatory
bacterial families. These changes are potentially due to the high sugar and low fiber intake of the juice-related products, the authors suggested.
Ring said the study 'offers a reality check' on juice cleanses. 'Whether a cleanse is 'healthy' depends on the individual and the intent behind it,' she told Medscape Medical News . 'A short, structured cleanse, ideally lasting no more than 1-3 days, can be safe for many people if it focuses on polyphenol-rich, low-sugar vegetables rather than fruit, retains some fiber (as in blended rather than pressed juices), and avoids extreme calorie restriction.'
Pediatricians should also be aware that a high-sugar, low-fiber diet may promote the growth of pro-inflammatory taxa, first author Maria Luisa Savo Sardaro, PhD, a professor of food microbiology at San Raffaele University in Rome, Italy, told Medscape Medical News .
'Families often rely on juice boxes in lunch packs, believing they're a healthy substitute for whole fruit, and school cafeterias frequently offer sugary drinks throughout the day,' she said. 'Together, these habits may contribute to an early life increase of inflammation in children.'
Change Dietary Guidelines?
Although it did not address juice cleanses per se, a new review published online in Nutrition Bulletin specifically compared evidence on whole fruit and 100% fruit juice with regard to nutrient composition, impact on hunger and satiety, and association with chronic health conditions.
Lead author Hemangi Mavadiya, a PhD candidate at the Joe C. Wen School of Population & Public Health, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, said that, like the Nutrients study, the review of 83 studies found juicing does indeed remove much of the dietary fiber that has beneficial effects on the gut. In addition, processing and/or storing 100% fruit juice reduces vitamins and other antioxidant contents and transforms intrinsic sugars in the whole fruit into free sugars, which have little nutritional benefit.
Furthermore, fruit consumed in solid form provides greater satiety due to delayed gastric emptying and related physiological reactions, and 'the synergistic effects of polyphenols and fiber in whole fruit benefit the gut microbiome by acting as prebiotics and producing short-chain fatty acids that reduce inflammation,' the authors wrote.
The review also showed that consuming high amounts of fruit juice is associated with increased risks for certain types of cancer, while results were mixed for type 2 diabetes and hypertension.
As a result of their findings, the authors recommended that the next version of the next set of Dietary Guidelines for Americans, coming out at the end of 2025, be updated to better reflect the amount of whole fruit and 100% fruit juice adults and children should consume. Current guidelines recommend that at least half of the daily recommended fruit intake of two cups a day should come from whole fruits, potentially allowing the other half to be fulfilled by 100% fruit juice.
Tips for Patients
What are clinicians telling their patients regarding juice cleanses? 'When used as a bridge to more sustainable, whole-food, high-fiber eating habits, a brief cleanse might serve as a motivational tool,' Ring said. 'However, clinicians should counsel patients that detoxification is a natural, ongoing function of the liver and kidneys, not something that requires commercial juice products.'
Patients should also be told that juice cleanses may temporarily disrupt the body's microbial balance, likely due to their high sugar and low fiber content and may not support long-term gut health. 'Cleanses may offer a psychological 'reset,' but without adequate fiber and protein, they could undermine microbial diversity and resilience, especially if repeated or prolonged.'
Patients who love juicing can consider blending instead, to keep the fiber intact, or pairing juices with whole foods to balance the impact on the microbiome, she suggested.
Mavadiya advises patients read food labels, which can help distinguish between fruit juice and fruit drinks, since the latter 'is loaded with added sugars,' and it's easy to confuse the two.
'Ultimately, the healthiest path forward is not a periodic cleanse, but a consistent, nutrient-dense, fiber-rich diet that supports gut and systemic health over the long term,' Ring concluded. Furthermore, clinicians should assess for underlying conditions such as diabetes, eating disorders, or frailty, which may make juice cleanses inadvisable.
No conflicts of interest were declared.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tomatoes Recalled After FDA Warns of Severe Health Riskt
Tomatoes Recalled After FDA Warns of Severe Health Riskt

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Tomatoes Recalled After FDA Warns of Severe Health Riskt

Before you throw some tomatoes on your sandwich this week, think again. On June 1, The New York Times announced that the FDA escalated a tomato recall to a high warning due to a threat of severe illness and even death. The outlet added that the hazardous bacteria found on select tomatoes in three southern states "can survive for weeks in dry environments and months in wet ones." The infected tomatoes were distributed between April 23 and 28 in Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina by the H&C Farms Label. At this time, the source of contamination is unknown. The NYT writes, "Exposure to salmonella, a bacteria, can be deadly, especially in adults over 65, children under 5 and people with compromised immune systems, who have the highest risk of severe illness." Salmonella contamination causes symptoms that range from diarrhea, abdominal cramps, and fever within 8 to 72 hours after exposure, per Mayo Clinic. This update comes amid a wave of other product recalls. On May 29, Newsweek reported that a food company in Georgia has issued a voluntary recall on "hundreds of thousands of pounds of canned beef stew products due to potential foreign material contamination." In total, 256,185 pounds of Dinty Moore Beef Stew were recalled. Per the outlet, the recall included 20-oz cans of the product marked with a "best by" date of February 2028. "The problem was identified after Hormel Foods Corporation notified the FSIS of three consumer complaints reporting pieces of wood in the beef stew." In a statement, Hormel Foods Corporation told Newsweek that "no other Dinty Moore products are affected, and no illnesses or injuries have been reported in association with this recall."Tomatoes Recalled After FDA Warns of Severe Health Riskt first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 1, 2025

Benefit cheat mum must repay £22k after being caught out by innocuous Facebook post
Benefit cheat mum must repay £22k after being caught out by innocuous Facebook post

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Benefit cheat mum must repay £22k after being caught out by innocuous Facebook post

A benefits cheat who claimed more than £20,000 while competing in scores of running events has been ordered to repay the money. Sara Morris was diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis in 2005 but in 2020 she exaggerated the extent of her condition and claimed Personal Independence Payment (PIP). The mum-of-three lied about the severity of her MS and said she lacked the power to stand at the cooker, lacked balance and experienced difficulties getting out of the bath unassisted. She also claimed to be so anxious when she left the house and even a trip to the pharmacy to collect her medication left her in tears, Stoke-on-Trent Live reports. Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court heard she was paid £2,292.63 in PIP a month. But she failed to mention to the Department for Works and Pensions (DWP) that she was in fact a member of the Stone Master Marathoners and regularly ran 5km and 10km races. She was caught out by her own Facebook posts of her running. READ MORE: Lidl pulls popular product from shelves following urgent 'do not eat' warning READ MORE: Brit, 60, dies after being 'punched and kicked in the head' at 3am in popular tourist town Morris, of Walton Way, Stone, was overpaid £20,528.83 between October 20, 2020 and April 25, 2023. She pleaded guilty to dishonestly making a false statement to obtain a benefit and was jailed for eight months last July. The 50-year-old has reappeared at the same court for a Proceeds of Crime hearing. Judge Graeme Smith was told Morris benefited from her criminality by £22,386.02 and the available amount was £60,000. He ordered Morris to repay £22,386.02 within 28 days or serve nine months in prison in default. The court heard investigators carried out surveillance on Morris from February 5 to February 20, 2023. Prosecutor Regan Walters said: "On February 5 she took part in a five-mile race and was seen running without assistance and showed no signs of balance problems. On February 11 she was seen running with the Stone Master Marathoners and showed no signs of discomfort." The investigation uncovered that Morris competed in 73 races between May 2019 and December 2022. The defendant was interviewed on May 11, 2023 and she stated her MS had worsened and she was suffering from fatigue. But she confirmed she had been a member of Stone Master Marathoners running club prior to making her claim. She added she filled in her PIP form on her worst day. Paul Cliff, mitigating, said Morris was diagnosed with MS 19 years ago and the 'severity of its impact ebbs and flows to a degree'. Mr Cliff said: "But it is accepted by her that the application did not give the full picture. It crossed over into the realms of dishonesty." He said Morris's marriage broke down in the spring of 2020. He said Morris did not enjoy a lavish lifestyle as a result of her fraudulent claim. Mr Cliff said: "She lost her home because of financial problems and was struggling to keep her head above water financially. "The application did not give the full picture. She did say running was one of the ways she tried to manage her MS. She has found it difficult to come to terms with her dishonesty." Morris must also pay a £187 surcharge.

F.D.A. Updates Recall of Tomatoes, Warning of a High Risk of Illness or Death
F.D.A. Updates Recall of Tomatoes, Warning of a High Risk of Illness or Death

New York Times

timea day ago

  • New York Times

F.D.A. Updates Recall of Tomatoes, Warning of a High Risk of Illness or Death

The Food and Drug Administration has updated an ongoing recall of tomatoes distributed in three states to its most severe warning, saying there is a higher probability that potential salmonella contamination could lead to 'serious adverse health consequences or death.' It is unlikely that consumers will encounter any fresh tomatoes from the recalled batch, but the bacteria can survive for weeks in dry environments and months in wet ones, such as the freezer, according to the F.D.A. The tomatoes, which were sold in packages as small as a three-pack and as large as 25 pounds, were distributed between April 23 and 28 to Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina under the name H&C Farms Label. They were first voluntarily recalled at the beginning of May for possible salmonella contamination. No illnesses were reported at the time, according to the F.D.A. The recall was updated on Wednesday to Class I, which the F.D.A. describes as 'a situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of, or exposure to, a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death.' The potential source of contamination was not immediately known. Williams Farms Repack, the South Carolina-based firm that distributed the tomatoes, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Saturday. H&C Farms declined to comment on Saturday. Exposure to salmonella, a bacteria, can be deadly, especially in adults over 65, children under 5 and people with compromised immune systems, who have the highest risk of severe illness. But healthy people should also avoid eating the tomatoes. Exposure to salmonella, usually from contaminated foods, sickens more than one million people in the United States each year and it is responsible for more than 400 deaths annually. The infection caused by salmonella can trigger symptoms including fever, diarrhea and abdominal pain that may last for days.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store