logo
US Tech Visa Applications Are Being Put Through the Ringer

US Tech Visa Applications Are Being Put Through the Ringer

WIRED15-05-2025

May 15, 2025 12:00 PM Silicon Valley's coveted work visas are under heavy scrutiny from the Trump administration, and immigration lawyers say requests for documentation are increasing. Passengers arriving at Newark Liberty International Airport line up at US Customs and Border Protection. Photograph:Since the end of January, Ryan Helgeson, a Chicago-based immigration attorney, has noticed an unusual trend: He's been getting significantly more pushback from US Citizenship and Immigration Services as he files employment visa petitions on behalf of his foreign-born clients.
Helgeson's firm, McEntee Law Group, represents tech workers who hope to emigrate or remain in the US by way of visas granted for specialty occupations or extraordinary abilities. On average, Helgeson's firm files 50 to 75 visa petitions per month. This goes up to as many as 90 per month at the height of 'H-1B season,' when employers enter a lottery for visas on behalf of foreign workers, and candidates then file a formal petition. During his many years of practicing law, Helgeson and his team have occasionally received requests for additional evidence, or RFE's, from USCIS, as a part of the agency's process for vetting applicants.
But since Donald Trump took office and began cracking down on immigration, Helgeson says, there has been 'an absolute increase in the number and rate of RFE's' on the visa petitions he has filed. That tracks with what three other immigration attorneys told WIRED. Whether their clients are applying for H-1B visas, O-1 extraordinary ability visas, intracompany visas for foreigners looking to move to a US office, or visas specific to traders and investors, USCIS has been seeking an increased amount of information from applicants.
This includes more requests for letters of support, certificates of education, and biometric data, immigration lawyers tell WIRED. Some of the pushback is based on 'adverse information' about the applicant or an applicant failing to update their address, lawyers say. But other RFE's are redundant, requesting information that has already been provided. In some cases, attorneys are struggling to determine what else USCIS could be seeking.
'The tone of the requests for evidence has remained the same, but the whole process is overtly more hostile,' Helgeson says. These requests from USCIS can double the amount of time it takes for a visa to be processed, he adds.
It's also expensive to resubmit visa petitions. Matt Doyle, a British-born tech entrepreneur living in Austin, Texas, and one of McEntee Law Group's clients, recently had his EB-1 visa application denied. Now he's having to reapply. Doyle will pay another $4,000 to the government to expedite his reapplication, on top of the $20,000 he says he has already spent in legal fees for him and his family. For now, the law firm is waiving any additional fees.
'I was approved on two out of the three criteria, and they acknowledged [my company's] innovation and uniqueness, but they didn't feel the evidence showed broader impact,' Doyle says. The entrepreneur is now soliciting several additional letters of support from customers and colleagues. He's paying to expedite the process, he says, in the hopes that his visa gets approved before his current extension expires this fall.
'In the 30-plus years combined of me and my legal partner practicing immigration law, we have seen more denials in cases like Matt's within the past few weeks than we had cumulatively seen before in our careers,' Helgeson says.
Immigration lawyers and technologists are concerned that a more restrictive visa process could limit the talent pipeline in Silicon Valley. Around 66 percent of tech workers in the Valley are foreign-born, according to the think tank Joint Venture Silicon Valley. US tech companies like Amazon, Microsoft, Google, and Meta are some of the largest recipients of H-1B visas.
H-1B visas are for newly-employed, high-skilled workers. First introduced in 1990, the visas are issued for three years and allow a worker to extend by three years. The allotment is capped at 65,000 per year, with an additional 20,000 available for workers with a master's degree or higher. Workers from India make up the overwhelming majority of H-1B petitioners—73 percent—while workers from China and Hong Kong are the next largest group, at 12 percent.
Proponents of the H-1B say it's a way to fill highly specialized roles within US companies and help those companies remain competitive. Critics say it undercuts the US job market and that the petition process is rife with fraud. During his first presidential run, Trump lambasted the H-1B visa as part of a system that took jobs from Americans and vowed to 'end forever the use of the H-1B as a cheap labor program.'
During the Biden administration, H-1B applications jumped up 61 percent, and USCIS began investigating whether multiple applications were being filed for the same visa. Shortly before Biden left office, his administration attempted to modernize the H-1B visa by expanding eligibility categories and speeding up the application process, while also allowing immigration officials to defer to previous approvals on visa extensions. In theory, this would reduce the need for requests for evidence.
The influence of immigrant founders on Silicon Valley is undeniable. Several tech unicorn founders and top CEOs are immigrants, including Sergey Brin, Sundar Pichai, Satya Nadella, Max Levchin, and perhaps most famously, Elon Musk. Musk, Trump's unofficial adviser, has expressed support for bringing in outside talent to the US. So has Sriram Krishnan, a former partner at Andreessen Horowitz and currently one of Trump's AI advisers, who posted on X in November that 'anything to remove country caps for green cards / unlock skilled immigration would be huge.' The following month, Trump softened his tone on H-1B's: 'I've always liked the visas, I have always been in favor of the visas. That's why we have them,' he told the New York Post.
But in the absence of any official policy directives on employment or skill-based visas, and amid a broader crackdown on immigration in the US, attorneys and technologists believe that the administration's hard-line approach is beginning to impact the tech sector.
In late April, Pejman Nozad, an Iranian American who runs a Palo Alto venture capital firm called Pear VC, posted on X that 'too many Pear VC founders are getting their visas challenged—and it's downright absurd. Entrepreneurs build America, so let's open the doors for innovators, not shut them!' Nozad tagged Musk and David Sacks, a South African–born venture capitalist and Trump's AI and crypto czar. (Nozad declined to elaborate on his remarks when contacted by WIRED, saying that the founders he was referring to were too nervous to speak out.)
Aizada Marat, a lawyer and cofounder of the firm Alma Immigration in Menlo Park, California, says her firm processes 'hundreds' of visa petitions per month, including extraordinary ability visas like the O-1 visas and EB-1. Marat says that her firm has seen a recent jump in RFEs, estimating that last year 8 percent of petitions were sent back with RFEs and that this year, the number has nearly doubled.
'It's alarming,' Marat says.
Marat recently filed an O-1 visa petition on behalf of a client who was a board member of a national bank in their home country and who had raised venture capital funding from well-known angel investors and VCs in order to start a company in the US. She says the person's accomplishments were well-documented in the press. USCIS rejected their application—twice—due to a supposed lack of evidence, Marat says. She resubmitted a third time, and the visa was later granted. If it had been denied again, she planned to sue USCIS.
'We suspect the agency is just rejecting certain petitions without reading through them first, and asking for more evidence right off the bat,' Marat says. 'It has definitely changed since the [2024 US presidential] election.'
Nell Barker, a partner and immigration lawyer at the Chicago-based firm Kempster, Corcoran, Quiceno & Lenz-Calvo, works with academics and tech workers filing for visas. She recently received a request for more information on a postdoctoral researcher who was applying for an H-1B. She says USCIS was seeking more evidence certifying that the person's degree supported their work in the field. 'If the person is a postdoc in physics, they likely studied physics,' Barker says dryly.
Another client of Barker's who was petitioning for an H-1B received notice that USCIS couldn't process the application until the client presented in person at an application support center and submitted their biometric data, including a photograph and fingerprint scan. Barker says this request for biometrics is standard for many types of visa applications, including green cards, but it's 'new for I-129 applicants,' meaning employer-led visa petitions.
At the time of publication, USCIS hadn't responded to WIRED's request for information about the increase in RFE's.
The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA), a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization with more than 16,000 members, recently acknowledged the uptick in RFEs. In early May, the AILA put out a practice advisory to its members, telling them that 'while the information being requested on RFEs may appear duplicative, RFEs must still be responded to in order to prevent any application or petition denials.'
USCIS told the AILA that 'as part of the Trump administration's commitment to restoring integrity to our immigration system, we are increasing the screening and vetting of all aliens filing for immigration benefits and reserve the right to request additional information and conduct additional security checks at any point in the immigration lifecycle,' according to a copy of the advisory viewed by WIRED. The agency said that collecting beneficiary information and biometric data is a necessary part of USCIS's efforts to promote national security and public safety and to mitigate fraud.
Some lawyers say that the jump in RFEs is unsurprising: It happened with certain visa categories during Trump's first term, too. The Massachusetts law firm Parker Gallini noted that from 2016 through 2021 the RFE rate for H-1B's doubled, based on USCIS data. H1-B final approvals also dropped to 85 percent, down from 94 percent, during Trump's first term. But other visa categories, like the one for extraordinary abilities, only saw single-digit increases in RFEs during Trump's first term, and RFE's actually rose from 26 percent during Trump's term to 31 percent during the early months of Biden's presidency.
While requests for evidence from USCIS appear to be on the rise again, it's too soon to determine if outright visa denials will increase as well. Still, immigration attorneys say, the effects of a more stringent petition process are already being felt by their clients.
'I do think a lot of what the administration is doing, between a surge in RFEs, USCIS staff cuts, and erratic immigration policies, is a deterrent for both foreign talent and US employers,' says Ayda Akalin, a Los Angeles–based lawyer at LandUS Law who has also encountered more RFEs in her practice. 'And this is ultimately bad for the US economy and harmful to American companies, particularly those in tech and the creative industries.'
Helgeson also believes this will have a 'chilling effect' on the US tech industry, especially for young people who might have once found their way into the US through the education system and remained in the US on specialty visas to build companies.
'A lot of people are reconsidering right now whether they want to deal with this uncertainty,' he says. 'If the administration gets its way, the US risks becoming a technological backwater. And the talent will just drain.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Los Angeles imposes downtown curfew as protests against Trump's immigration crackdown continue
Los Angeles imposes downtown curfew as protests against Trump's immigration crackdown continue

Hamilton Spectator

time13 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Los Angeles imposes downtown curfew as protests against Trump's immigration crackdown continue

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Los Angeles leaders imposed a downtown curfew through Wednesday morning to deal with protests against President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown, while the governor accused him of drawing a 'military dragnet' across the nation's second-largest city with his escalating use of the National Guard. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom asked a court to put an emergency stop to the military helping federal immigration agents, with some guardsmen now standing in protection around agents as they carried out arrests. He said it would only heighten tensions and promote civil unrest. The judge chose not to rule immediately, giving the administration several days to continue those activities before a hearing Thursday. The change moves troops closer to engaging in law enforcement actions like deportations as Trump has promised as part of his administration's immigration crackdown . The Guard has the authority to temporarily detain people who attack officers but any arrests ultimately would be made by law enforcement. Trump has activated more than 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines over the objections of city and state leaders, though the Marines have not yet been spotted in Los Angeles and Guard troops have had limited engagement with protesters. They were originally deployed to protect federal buildings. As the curfew went into effect Tuesday night, a police helicopter flew over downtown federal buildings that have been the center of protests and ordered people to leave the area. Riot police on horses and foot surrounded a group of a few hundred that had gathered in the area, shouting: 'Move!' Most of the protesters scattered, with some regrouping and refusing orders to disperse. Officials said the curfew was necessary to stop vandalism and theft by agitators looking to cause trouble. Demonstrations have spread to other cities nationwide, including Dallas and Austin, Texas, Chicago and New York, where a thousand people rallied and multiple arrests were made. In Texas, where police in Austin used chemical irritants to disperse several hundred demonstrators Monday, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott's office said Texas National Guard troops were 'on standby' in areas where demonstrations are planned, Abbott spokesperson Andrew Mahaleris said Tuesday evening. Guard members were deployed to San Antonio, according to assistant police chief Jesse Salame. He said he did not know how many were sent or details on the deployment. LA mayor puts curfew in place Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass declared a local emergency on the fifth day of protests and said the curfew will run from 8 p.m. Tuesday until 6 a.m. Wednesday. She said it was expected to last for several days. 'We reached a tipping point' after 23 businesses were looted, Bass said during a news conference Tuesday. The curfew covers a 1 square mile (2.5 square kilometer) section of downtown that includes the area where protests have occurred since Friday. The city of Los Angeles encompasses roughly 500 square miles (nearly 2,300 square kilometers). The curfew doesn't apply to residents who live in the designated area, people who are homeless, credentialed media or public safety and emergency officials, according to Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell. McDonnell said 'unlawful and dangerous behavior' had been escalating since Saturday. 'The curfew is a necessary measure to protect lives and safeguard property following several consecutive days of growing unrest throughout the city,' McDonnell said. Trump says he's open to using Insurrection Act Trump left open the possibility of invoking the Insurrection Act, which authorizes the president to deploy military forces inside the U.S. to suppress rebellion or domestic violence or to enforce the law in certain situations. It's one of the most extreme emergency powers available to a U.S. president. 'If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it. We'll see,' he said from the Oval Office. Later the president called protesters 'animals' and 'a foreign enemy' in a speech at Fort Bragg ostensibly to recognize the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. Trump has described Los Angeles in dire terms that Bass and Newsom say are nowhere close to the truth . In a public address Tuesday evening, Newsom called Trump's actions the start of an 'assault' on democracy. 'California may be first, but it clearly will not end here. Other states are next,' he said. Newsom warned people against inciting violence, but urged them to stand up to the president's actions. 'What Donald Trump wants most is your fealty, your silence. To be complicit in this moment,' he said. 'Do not give it to him.' The protests began Friday after federal immigration raids arrested dozens of workers in Los Angeles. Protesters blocked a major freeway and set cars on fire over the weekend, and police responded with tear gas, rubber bullets and flash-bang grenades. The demonstrations have been mostly concentrated downtown in the city of 4 million. Thousands of people have peacefully rallied outside City Hall and hundreds more protested outside a federal complex that includes a detention center where some immigrants are being held following workplace raids. Despite the protests, immigration enforcement activity has continued throughout the county, with city leaders and community groups reporting ICE present at libraries, car washes and Home Depots. School graduations in Los Angeles have increased security over fears of ICE action and some have offered parents the option to watch on Zoom. McDonnell said that police had made 197 arrests on Tuesday, including 67 who were taken into custody for unlawfully occupying part of the 101 freeway. Several businesses were broken into Monday, though authorities didn't say if the looting was tied to the protests. The vast majority of arrests have been for failing to disperse, while a few others were for assault with a deadly weapon, looting, vandalism and attempted murder for tossing a Molotov cocktail. Seven police officers were reportedly injured, and at least two were taken to a hospital and released. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth suggested Tuesday that the use of troops inside the U.S. will continue to expand . The Pentagon said deploying the National Guard and Marines costs $134 million. ___ Baldor and Copp reported from Washington. Associated Press writers Dorany Pineda and Christopher Weber in Los Angeles, Amy Taxin in Orange County, California, John Seewer in Toledo, Ohio, Jim Vertuno in Austin, Texas, Hallie Golden in Seattle, and Greg Bull in Seal Beach, California, contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Newsom Warns ‘Other States Are Next' in Speech Against Trump
Newsom Warns ‘Other States Are Next' in Speech Against Trump

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Newsom Warns ‘Other States Are Next' in Speech Against Trump

California Gov. Gavin Newsom delivers an address on June 10, 2025. Credit - Office of the California Governor via AP 'What's happening right now is very different than anything we've seen before,' Gavin Newsom, the Governor of California, said in a speech Tuesday night that was seemingly addressed as much to his own state's residents as to the nation. 'This isn't just about protests here in Los Angeles. When Donald Trump sought blanket authority to commandeer the National Guard, he made that order apply to every state in this nation,' Newsom said amid days of unrest in southern California after the President mobilized troops to quell violence and vandalism that had broken out during demonstrations against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids—an escalation Newsom called a 'brazen abuse of power' that 'inflamed a combustible situation.' 'This is about all of us. This is about you,' Newsom said. 'California may be first, but it clearly will not end here. Other states are next. Democracy is next.' Newsom lambasted Trump, calling him a President who 'wants to be bound by no law or constitution, perpetuating a unified assault on American traditions.' And he repeated his assertion that Trump was 'fanning the flames' in Los Angeles 'on purpose.' Newsom claimed that California could have managed the criminal behavior on its streets with its own law enforcement. 'The situation was winding down and was concentrated in just a few square blocks downtown,' Newsom said. 'But that—that's not what Donald Trump wanted. He again chose escalation. He chose more force. He chose theatrics over public safety.' Newsom said the deployment of National Guard and Marine forces was done 'illegally and for no reason' and pointed to a legal challenge filed by the state against the Trump Administration. 'These are the men and women trained for foreign combat, not domestic law enforcement. We honor their service, we honor their bravery, but we do not want our streets militarized by our own armed forces—not in L.A., not in California, not anywhere.' Newsom, whose second and final term ends in 2027 and is considered to be a potential Democratic presidential candidate in 2028, focused much of his less-than-10-minute speech on pushing back against Trump's mass deportation effort, which the California Governor linked to a broader slide toward authoritarianism. 'California is no stranger to immigration enforcement, but instead of focusing on undocumented immigrants with serious criminal records and people with final deportation orders, a strategy both parties have long supported, this Administration is pushing mass deportations, indiscriminately targeting hard working immigrant families regardless of their roots or risk,' Newsom said. He spoke of the fear undocumented residents feel, saying that the Trump Administration is 'pulling a military dragnet' across Los Angeles. 'We're seeing unmarked cars in school parking lots, kids afraid of attending their own graduation. … His agents are arresting dishwashers, gardeners, day laborers, and seamstresses. That's just weakness, weakness masquerading as strength. Donald Trump's government isn't protecting our communities. They're traumatizing our communities. And that seems to be the entire point.' 'If some of us could be snatched off the streets without a warrant, based only on suspicion or skin color, then none of us are safe,' Newsom added. 'Authoritarian regimes begin by targeting people who are least able to defend themselves, but they do not stop there. Trump and his loyalists—they thrive on division because it allows them to take more power and exert even more control.' The 57-year-old Democrat who has been criticized by some for earlier this year appearing to take a more moderate tack as his national ambitions grow also outlined a list of criticisms of Trump that extend beyond immigration, including the firing of government watchdogs; attacking news organizations, universities, law firms, and the judicial branch; and holding a military parade on Saturday, 'forcing them to put on a vulgar display to celebrate his birthday, just as other failed dictators have done in the past.' 'Democracy is under assault before our eyes,' Newsom said, charging Trump with taking 'a wrecking ball' to the principle of three co-equal branches of government. 'There are no longer any checks and balances. Congress is nowhere to be found. Speaker Johnson has completely abdicated that responsibility. The Rule of Law has increasingly been giving way to the Rule of Don.' Trump, who has nicknamed Newsom 'Newscum' on social media and called for the Governor to be arrested earlier this week, did not immediately respond to Newsom's remarks on Tuesday night. Newsom ended the speech with a call to action. 'The Founding Fathers—they didn't live and die to see this kind of moment. It's time for all of us to stand up,' he said. 'If you exercise your First Amendment rights, please, please do it peacefully. I know many of you are feeling deep anxiety, stress, and fear, but I want you to know that you are the antidote to that fear and that anxiety. What Donald Trump wants most is your fealty, your silence, to be complicit in this moment. Do not give in to him.' Contact us at letters@

Trump's Threats Against Musk and Newsom Reflect an Authoritarian Intolerance of Dissent
Trump's Threats Against Musk and Newsom Reflect an Authoritarian Intolerance of Dissent

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's Threats Against Musk and Newsom Reflect an Authoritarian Intolerance of Dissent

On Monday, President Donald Trump endorsed the arrest of California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who irked him by criticizing his militarized response to Los Angeles protests against his administration's immigration raids. Just four days earlier, Trump had suggested that billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, his former ally, could lose his government contracts for going public with concerns about the president's fiscal recklessness. It's not clear whether Trump was serious in either case, whether he intends to follow through on his threats, or exactly how that would work. But the authoritarian intolerance of dissent reflected in those comments is consistent with the various ways Trump already has used the powers of his office to punish people whose views offend him. Over the weekend, Trump deployed 2,000 members of California's National Guard to protect federal personnel and property, invoking a law that authorizes such action when "there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion" against the U.S. government's authority. That unilateral step, Newsom argued, was unnecessary, provocative, and illegal because local and state law enforcement agencies were willing and able to maintain order without federal intervention. This was the context in which a reporter asked Trump whether Newsom should be arrested, noting that border czar Tom Homan had threatened that consequence for "anybody," including Newsom, who interferes with the immigration crackdown. "I would do it if I were Tom," Trump replied. "Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing." Maybe Trump was joking. Maybe he also was joking when he argued, during the public flap that Musk provoked by slamming a Trump-backed bill as a "disgusting abomination" that would add trillions to the national debt, that "the easiest way to save money in our Budget" would be to "terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts." Then again, maybe not. No such excuse is available for Trump's plainly serious crusades against foreign students, lawyers, universities, and new outlets he portrays as enemies of democracy and American values. By deporting students who criticize the Israeli government, Trump says, he is fighting antisemitism and protecting U.S. foreign policy interests. The goal, he explains, is to make students think twice before they open their mouths. "Any student that protests," Trump said during his 2024 campaign, "I throw them out of the country. You know, there are a lot of foreign students. As soon as they hear that, they're going to behave." To justify his executive orders against disfavored law firms—which aimed to ruin them by revoking their security clearances, restricting their access to federal officials and buildings, canceling their government contracts, and threatening other contractors with ties to them—Trump likewise cited their support for causes and clients he abhors. Federal judges therefore had no difficulty concluding that the orders violated the First Amendment. Trump's conflict with Harvard, framed as an attempt to enforce federal civil rights laws, extends far beyond that goal. The administration has said the university cannot regain access to federal research grants unless it surrenders academic freedom by implementing a litany of hiring, admission, administrative, curricular, and disciplinary reforms. Trump is still pursuing his legal vendetta against CBS News, which he absurdly claims committed consumer fraud by editing a pre-election 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris in a way that made her seem slightly more cogent. In February, he upped the ante by raising his already risible estimate of the damages inflicted by that interview from $10 billion to $20 billion. Trump's beef with CBS is not limited to his abuse of the legal process as a private litigant. Brendan Carr, the Trump-appointed chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, reopened an equally groundless investigation of the network for "broadcast news distortion" based on the same interview—a probe that entails second-guessing journalistic judgments protected by freedom of the press. Given this track record, it may not be safe to assume that Trump is only kidding when he threatens government retaliation for constitutionally protected speech. © Copyright 2025 by Creators Syndicate Inc. The post Trump's Threats Against Musk and Newsom Reflect an Authoritarian Intolerance of Dissent appeared first on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store