Conservation groups hit out at ‘unfulfilled promises' over Scotland's seabed
Conservation campaigners said they were 'deeply disappointed' by John Swinney's failure to include protections for 'under threat marine habitats' ahead of next year's Holyrood election.
More than 150 groups, which are part of the Open Seas coalition, hit out in the wake of the First Minister announcing his programme for government for the coming year.
In a letter to Rural Affairs Secretary Mairi Gougeon and acting Energy and Net Zero Secretary Gillian Martin, the groups claimed the Scottish Government had 'systematically neglected' the country's seabed – which they said was 'one our greatest assets'.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
Their letter, they said, was sent to 'mark an unfortunate and deeply disappointing milestone of unfulfilled government promises'.
The groups told Ms Gougeon and Ms Martin: 'Our primary concern is that less than 5% of Scotland's coastal seabed is protected from bottom-trawling and scallop dredging, two highly destructive methods of fishing that need much more effective management.'
They made the plea as they said the new Ocean film by Sir David Attenborough is 'set to lift the lid on the environmental damage caused by bottom-trawling'.
The coalition, which includes organisations such as the Blue Marine Foundation and the National Trust for Scotland, as well as groups such as the Scottish Creel Fishermen's Federation and the Sustainable Inshore Fisheries Trust, hit out at 'broken promises' from the Government on the issue of marine protection.
When is the SNP's leadership going to get their environmental priorities back on track?
Read our new blog https://t.co/Ir2LirNAjy pic.twitter.com/5n0bIPbJRw
— Open Seas (@TheOpenSeas) May 5, 2025
These, they claimed, 'have led to serious environmental harm' and also 'disadvantaged small-scale, inshore, fishing businesses'.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
The coalition wants a minimum of 30% of Scotland's inshore waters to be protected from bottom-trawling and dredging, saying this will help the marine ecosystem and allow 'sustainable fishing to continue'.
Calling on ministers to act, the groups said: 'The Scottish Government needs to deliver the protection of our inshore waters, as they hold the majority of Scotland's most important yet vulnerable habitats, species and ecosystems.
'Protecting Scotland's inshore waters will safeguard economically and culturally significant low impact fisheries, fishing jobs in coastal communities and ensure a healthy marine environment that will benefit people and the planet.
'The failure to deliver these policy measures is having continued, direct, negative impacts on the health of our marine environment and its capacity to support future generations.'
The Scottish Govenrment has been contacted for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
No decision on winter fuel allowance until autumn, minister says
No decision will be taken on the winter fuel allowance until the Autumn budget – dispelling speculation that the government would make an announcement on it at next week's spending review. Sir Keir Starmer last month announced his intention to give more people access to winter fuel payments, just months after Labour decided to means test the previously universal payment. But weeks later, chaotic government messaging had left millions of pensioners with no idea what the changes will look like or when they will be announced. Asked about the changes, Peter Kyle, the secretary of state for science, innovation and technology, told Sky News: 'These issues are going to be dealt with in the run up to the autumn where these decisions are going to be taken and announced. 'But this is a spending review that's going to set the overall spending constraints for government for the next period, the next three years.' Pressed on whether that means no details will be unveiled on winter fuel next week, the technology secretary said: 'I think what you're going to see is the overall spending constraints and allowances for each government department, and then each department is then going to start talking about how it's going to allocate those.' Last week, Rachel Reeves confirmed the expected U-turn on the controversial cuts would be in place for this winter, meaning that the government will be faced with a scramble to get the changes rolled out between the October budget and the winter months. While the chancellor had previously confirmed that they would not set out how the changes would be paid for until the autumn, there was a growing suggestion from the government that details on who the changes would affect could be set out at next week's spending review. The chancellor is expected to unveil a swathe of spending cuts on Wednesday as she attempts to walk the tightrope between delivering on the party's election promises and sticking within the bounds of her self-imposed fiscal rules. Mr Kyle's comments come days after pensions minister Torsten Bell confirmed there was no prospect of returning to a universal winter fuel payment for all, saying that '95 per cent of people agree that it's not a good idea that we have a system paying a few hundreds of pounds to millionaires, and so we're not going to be continuing with that.' Winter fuel payments are a £300 payment to help with energy costs in the colder months. In July, the chancellor announced that pensioners not in receipt of pension credits or other means-tested benefits would no longer receive the benefit. As a result, just 1.5 million pensioners received the payment in winter 2024-25 – a massive drop from the 10.8 million pensioners who received it the year before. The cuts were deeply unpopular because they were seen as being disproportionately damaging to vulnerable people, and were criticised for leaving thousands of poorer pensions who were on the borderline missing out on the payment. In November, it was revealed that the government's own figures indicated it would force 100,000 pensioners into poverty in 2026. The policy was partly blamed for Labour's poor performance at the local elections – which saw them lose two-thirds of the council seats they had in 2021– as well as the previously Labour-held Runcorn and Helsby parliamentary seat to Reform UK. The cuts – combined with the £5bn welfare cuts and the party's decision to keep the two child benefit cap in place – have sparked growing concern over the direction of the government among Labour MPs.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Voices: Government needs the can-do mindset I experienced in the Army to push change through fast
Government moves too slowly. That's not just the fault of the current government or the last one – it's the system. Slowed down by bureaucracy. Paralysed by 'can't-do' figures. Obsessed with process over progress. I come from a background of delivery. In the Army, working in a 'human intelligence unit' – liaising with agents and special forces – we had to move from first gear to fifth in an instant. Lives depended on it. Getting ahead of the enemy, protecting our people and achieving results was the mission – not talking it to death. Confirming the location of a high-value target, whilst also ensuring they were alone and targetable, or identifying the precise site of an improvised explosive device factory, required creativity and a determined mindset – a willingness to take calculated risks to save lives and win. When I worked in counterterrorism at the Ministry of Defence, delivery wasn't optional. We built a culture of 'can-do'; creative, risk-aware and focused on action. It wasn't about perfection. It was about progress. Government could learn a lot from the mindset of the finest military in the world and the departments that work every day to protect the public from the threat of terrorism. An unstoppable political will must go hand in hand with a mindset of delivery. I think back to our counterterror planning meetings. The mission? To stop terrorists attacking our great country. No timewasters. Just serious professionals putting ideas on the table, pulling them apart, war-gaming every outcome, then locking in a plan and going all-out to deliver. That mindset – challenge, rigour and rapid execution – is what the system of government has desperately lacked for decades. Too often, it's delay by design. Endless consultations. Five-year strategies that take ten. Pet projects blocked by internal turf wars. Take the Lower Thames Crossing: more than £1.2 billion spent before a single spade in the ground – all because of drawn-out decision-making and red tape. Or the A9 dualling project in Scotland – promised by 2025, now pushed back to 2035. Ten years of drift. These delays are not acts of God. They are failures of will. The truth is, Whitehall needs reform. There are dedicated, brilliant people across the civil service – but too many are trapped in a system built to say 'no'. Risk aversion is often rewarded, not challenged. Delivery is too often deprioritised in favour of process, and meaningful reform is blocked by a sprawling web of arms-length bodies and quangos that diffuse responsibility and stifle urgency. We need a leaner, more focused state – one that empowers departments to move at pace and is held accountable for outcomes, not paperwork. That means streamlining quangos where appropriate, ending duplication, and changing the mindset within government itself. Ministers must be prepared to challenge officials – not to attack, but to sharpen decision-making and force clarity on delivery. Wes Streeting's approach to the NHS offers a blueprint. He's made clear that, as health secretary, he expects faster delivery, more accountability, and a culture that doesn't settle for 'this is just how things are done'. Abolishing NHS England shows a steely commitment to the change he expects. But reforming structures is only half the battle – changing the culture is the real prize. Government must operate with a sense of mission, not maintenance. The British public doesn't care whether a successful policy comes from Bevan or Thatcher. They care that it works. That it's delivered. We need to strip out the ideology and face complex problems with a solutions-based mindset. Let the evidence lead. Move fast. Be willing to make mistakes in the name of making progress. And above all, get things done. Because there's serious work to do.
CNN
4 hours ago
- CNN
GOP senator defends Trump sending National Guard into Los Angeles
Republican Sen. Markwayne Mullin tells CNN's Dana Bash, "If the governor or the mayor of a city isn't willing to protect the citizens of his state or the city, then the president will."
