
Doctors warn of rise in terrifying flesh-eating genital disease - and grooming mistake could be to blame
British gynaecologists have been warned of a startling rise in cases of a deadly flesh-eating disease that affects patients' genitals.
Medically known as necrotising fasciitis, doctors from Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust said they had seen 20 confirmed incidences over the last two years - compared to 18 over the previous decade.
While the cause of the spike was unknown, the medics said it could be a due to a rise in bacterial infections or from lowered immunity due to the Covid lockdown.
To demonstrate the dangers, they highlighted three cases whereby women had contracted the flesh-eating disease in their vulva, the external parts of female genitalia.
In one case recorded by the report authors, the woman died mere hours after being admitted.
Experts in the field have suggested the disease could be caused by injuries that result from shaving the intimate area, or even rough sex.
Necrotising fasciitis occurs when bacteria enters an existing wound and infiltrates the deeper layers of the skin.
Once there the bacteria begin to multiply and spread rapidly over mere hours.
As they do so they release toxins that destroy tissue, giving the condition its 'flesh-eating' nickname.
The authors, who published their report in the journal BMJ Case Reports, said they wanted to raise awareness of necrotising fasciitis in the genital region.
'This case series aims to raise awareness of this life-threatening condition among gynaecologists and hence prevent delay in diagnosis and treatment crucial to avoid poor patient outcomes,' they wrote.
The first patient detailed — the most serious of the three — noticed she had developed a small spot on her mons pubis the area of fatty tissue located just above the genitals.
At first, she waited to see if it would resolve on its own but later sought help from her GP who — suspecting it was skin infection — gave her a basic course of antibiotics.
However, the spot and her health deteriorated over the next five days.
WHAT IS NECROTISING FASCIITIS?
Necrotising fasciitis is most commonly caused by an infection with group A Streptococcus.
Those infections normally last just a few days - they are mild and typically clear themselves up.
But in some unusual cases it can develop into necrotising fasciitis.
They infect flat layers of a membrane known as the fascia, which are connective bands of tissue that surround muscles, nerves, fat, and blood vessels.
The infection also damages the tissues next to the fascia.
Sometimes toxins made by these bacteria destroy the tissue they infect, causing it to die.
When this happens, the infection is very serious and can result in loss of limbs or death.
After seeking help at A&E it was discovered necrotising fasciitis had taken hold, spreading from the spot to her outer labia, as well as her through her lower abdomen in general.
Despite medics rushing to cut away the dead tissue the patient died from sepsis, an immune system reaction to an infection, just 28 hours after being diagnosed.
The second patient sought emergency help with a 3cm lump in her vulval region that turned out be abscess a build-up of pus from an infection.
Medics noted that over the next 12 hours the upper third of the patient's outer labia 'broke down' due to the flesh-eating disease.
She would end up needing three operations to remove the dead tissue as well as reconstructive surgery to restore the look of her genitalia.
The last patient, in contrast to the other cases, suffered necrotising fasciitis in her vulval region after a scheduled hysterectomy — a procedure that removes the womb.
This patient came back to hospital complaining of discomfort at the operation site and a fever.
Investigations then found dead tissue and she was rushed for an operation to cut this away.
She survived but medics noted that she had been left in significant pain and discomfort from this operation, and she was currently waiting for follow-up care.
Professor Bill Sullivan, an expert in microbiology and immunology at Indiana University, who was not involved in the case report, said necrotising fasciitis can occur anywhere in the body which suffers a wound.
He said cases in the female genital region had numerous potentially be causes.
'Vaginal necrotising fasciitis could be contracted through rough sex, a piercing, or cosmetic and surgical procedures,' he told Live Science.
Other nicks and scrapes, for example via personal grooming, are another potential trigger.
In 2017 one woman reported how she almost lost her legs to necrotising fasciitis after cutting a spot on her groin while shaving her bikini line.
Professor Sullivan added that he agreed with the report authors' call for gynaecologists to be more aware of flesh-eating disease in this area.
'Vaginal necrotising fasciitis could be considered more dangerous in the sense that it might be more difficult to diagnose in time,' he said.
'Gynaecologists may not have necrotising fasciitis on their diagnostic radar, and surgical interventions, which are usually required to stop necrotising fasciitis from spreading and remove dead tissue, may be limited.'
Necrotising fasciitis, of any form is rare in the UK with only an estimated 500 cases recorded each year.
Outcomes for patients mostly depend on how quickly the condition is diagnosed and prompt access to surgery and antibiotics.
Sometimes patients may need to have entire limbs amputated to save their lives.
Previous studies in the US have found only about half of patients who contract vulval necrotising fasciitis survive.
Initial signs of necrotising fasciitis include intense pain or numbness around a cut or wound, swelling in the affected area, and flu like symptoms like a fever and fatigue.
This later develops to vomiting and diarrhoea, mental confusion and black, purple or grey blotches or blisters emerging on the skin.
Necrotising fasciitis is a medical emergency and anyone with these symptoms is advised by the NHS to call 999 or be taken to A&E.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
11 hours ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Kennedy's new vaccine adviser was expert witness against Merck vaccine
June 12 (Reuters) - One of the new vaccine advisers picked by U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has earned thousands of dollars as an expert witness in litigation against Merck's (MRK.N), opens new tab Gardasil vaccine, court records show. Martin Kulldorff, a biostatistician and epidemiologist who publicly criticized COVID-era lockdowns, is one of eight new members named by Kennedy on Wednesday to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, a highly influential panel that recommends which shots should be administered to the American public. Kennedy fired the entire previous 17-member committee of expert vaccine advisers this week, claiming they were "plagued with persistent conflicts of interest" from financial ties to drugmakers. Kulldorff recently served as an expert witness for plaintiffs who accused Merck of concealing the risks of Gardasil, which is intended to prevent cancers caused by human papillomavirus (HPV). In March, a federal judge in North Carolina ruled in favor of Merck in one of those cases that included about 200 lawsuits. At a deposition in October, Kulldorff testified that the plaintiffs paid him $400 an hour and he had already billed for about $33,000 in legal work on the case through late September. He said he also received a $4,000 retainer in the North Carolina case, according to court documents. Kulldorff is also listed as an expert witness in a similar case pending against Merck in Los Angeles state court, records show. Under ACIP's rules, committee members cannot serve as a "paid litigation consultant or expert witness in litigation involving a vaccine manufacturer' during their tenure on the panel. Prior work as an expert witness against drugmakers may require a waiver from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and recusal from votes involving Merck and HPV vaccines. The agency has said in its rules it "will generally consider issuance of waivers in specific situations." Kulldorff did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Merck declined to comment. A spokesman for Kennedy's Health and Human Services Department said on Wednesday that "all newly appointed ACIP members were thoroughly vetted." HHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Kulldorff.


North Wales Chronicle
12 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Council tax bills set to rise at fastest rate for two decades, economist warns
Paul Johnson said that local government in England did 'perhaps a little bit better than it might have expected' out of the Chancellor's statement on Wednesday, but the 'sting in the tail' is the assumption that 'council tax bills will rise by 5% a year' as part of the funding. The core spending power of councils is set to increase by 2.6% a year from next year, and 'if English councils do choose 5% increases – and most almost certainly will – council tax bills look set to rise at their fastest rate over any parliament since 2001-05', Mr Johnson said on Thursday. On Wednesday, Ms Reeves said that ministers will not be 'going above' the 5% annual increases in council tax. She told ITV: 'The previous government increased council tax by 5% a year, and we have stuck to that. We won't be going above that. 'That is the council tax policy that we inherited from the previous government, and that we will be continuing.' The biggest winner from Wednesday's statement was the NHS, which will see its budget rise by £29 billion per year in real terms. Ruth Curtice, the chief executive of the Resolution Foundation, has said that Britain is turning into a 'National Health State'. Overnight, the think tank said Ms Reeves' announcements had followed a recent trend that saw increases for the NHS come at the expense of other public services. Ms Curtice said: 'Health accounted for 90% of the extra public service spending, continuing a trend that is seeing the British state morph into a National Health State, with half of public service spending set to be on health by the end of the decade.' Defence was another of Wednesday's winners, Ms Curtice said, receiving a significant increase in capital spending while other departments saw an overall £3.6 billion real-terms cut in investment. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) made similar arguments about 'substantial' investment in the NHS and defence coming at the expense of other departments, although Mr Johnson warned on Wednesday the money may not be enough. In his snap reaction to the review, Mr Johnson said: 'Aiming to get back to meeting the NHS 18-week target for hospital waiting times within this Parliament is enormously ambitious – an NHS funding settlement below the long-run average might not measure up. 'And on defence, it's entirely possible that an increase in the Nato spending target will mean that maintaining defence spending at 2.6% of GDP no longer cuts the mustard.' Ms Curtice added that low and middle-income families had also done well out of the spending review 'after two rounds of painful tax rises and welfare cuts', with the poorest fifth of families benefiting from an average of £1,700 in extra spending on schools, hospitals and the police. She warned that, without economic growth, another round of tax rises was likely to come in the autumn as the Chancellor seeks to balance the books. She said: 'The extra money in this spending review has already been accounted for in the last forecast. 'But a weaker economic outlook and the unfunded changes to winter fuel payments mean the Chancellor will likely need to look again at tax rises in the autumn.' Speaking after delivering her spending review, Ms Reeves insisted she would not have to raise taxes to cover her spending review. She told GB News: 'Every penny of this is funded through the tax increases and the changes to the fiscal rules that we set out last autumn.' Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch described rising health spending as a 'conundrum', with a similar approach having been taken 'again and again' as she spoke at a business conference in central London on Thursday morning. In reference to a pro-Brexit campaign stunt, Mrs Badenoch said: 'I mean, who remembers the side of a red bus that said 'we're going to give the NHS £350 million more a week'? 'Many people don't know that we did that. We did do that, and yet, still we're not seeing the returns. 'We've put more and more money in, and we're getting less and less out.' The Government have not explained how and why the NHS will be better as a result of its spending plans, the Tory leader added, and claimed the public know 'we need to start talking about productivity reforms, public sector reforms'.


South Wales Guardian
12 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Council tax bills set to rise at fastest rate for two decades, economist warns
Paul Johnson said that local government in England did 'perhaps a little bit better than it might have expected' out of the Chancellor's statement on Wednesday, but the 'sting in the tail' is the assumption that 'council tax bills will rise by 5% a year' as part of the funding. The core spending power of councils is set to increase by 2.6% a year from next year, and 'if English councils do choose 5% increases – and most almost certainly will – council tax bills look set to rise at their fastest rate over any parliament since 2001-05', Mr Johnson said on Thursday. On Wednesday, Ms Reeves said that ministers will not be 'going above' the 5% annual increases in council tax. She told ITV: 'The previous government increased council tax by 5% a year, and we have stuck to that. We won't be going above that. 'That is the council tax policy that we inherited from the previous government, and that we will be continuing.' The biggest winner from Wednesday's statement was the NHS, which will see its budget rise by £29 billion per year in real terms. Ruth Curtice, the chief executive of the Resolution Foundation, has said that Britain is turning into a 'National Health State'. Overnight, the think tank said Ms Reeves' announcements had followed a recent trend that saw increases for the NHS come at the expense of other public services. Ms Curtice said: 'Health accounted for 90% of the extra public service spending, continuing a trend that is seeing the British state morph into a National Health State, with half of public service spending set to be on health by the end of the decade.' Defence was another of Wednesday's winners, Ms Curtice said, receiving a significant increase in capital spending while other departments saw an overall £3.6 billion real-terms cut in investment. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) made similar arguments about 'substantial' investment in the NHS and defence coming at the expense of other departments, although Mr Johnson warned on Wednesday the money may not be enough. In his snap reaction to the review, Mr Johnson said: 'Aiming to get back to meeting the NHS 18-week target for hospital waiting times within this Parliament is enormously ambitious – an NHS funding settlement below the long-run average might not measure up. 'And on defence, it's entirely possible that an increase in the Nato spending target will mean that maintaining defence spending at 2.6% of GDP no longer cuts the mustard.' Ms Curtice added that low and middle-income families had also done well out of the spending review 'after two rounds of painful tax rises and welfare cuts', with the poorest fifth of families benefiting from an average of £1,700 in extra spending on schools, hospitals and the police. She warned that, without economic growth, another round of tax rises was likely to come in the autumn as the Chancellor seeks to balance the books. She said: 'The extra money in this spending review has already been accounted for in the last forecast. 'But a weaker economic outlook and the unfunded changes to winter fuel payments mean the Chancellor will likely need to look again at tax rises in the autumn.' Speaking after delivering her spending review, Ms Reeves insisted she would not have to raise taxes to cover her spending review. She told GB News: 'Every penny of this is funded through the tax increases and the changes to the fiscal rules that we set out last autumn.' Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch described rising health spending as a 'conundrum', with a similar approach having been taken 'again and again' as she spoke at a business conference in central London on Thursday morning. In reference to a pro-Brexit campaign stunt, Mrs Badenoch said: 'I mean, who remembers the side of a red bus that said 'we're going to give the NHS £350 million more a week'? 'Many people don't know that we did that. We did do that, and yet, still we're not seeing the returns. 'We've put more and more money in, and we're getting less and less out.' The Government have not explained how and why the NHS will be better as a result of its spending plans, the Tory leader added, and claimed the public know 'we need to start talking about productivity reforms, public sector reforms'.