Elisabeth Moss on 'The Handmaid's Tale' finale moment that gave her chills
Red cloaks. Stiff white bonnets. Bent heads. If there's a single image that Hulu's "The Handmaid's Tale" leaves audiences with as it ends its six-season run this week, it's this one: That of women in a dystopian anti-America called Gilead, evolving from anonymous sexual slaves into rebels, warriors and, sometimes, survivors.
But for "Handmaid's" creator Bruce Miller and star Elisabeth Moss, who also directed several episodes in the final season, the series, based on the 1985 book by Margaret Atwood, was never about what the women wore. It was about the women inside the color-coded uniforms.
"June started out as a normal person, a mom, a wife," says Moss, whose other long-running roles include 'The West Wing' and 'Mad Men.' She won an Emmy for playing the "Handmaid's" title character in 2017, the same year the show took home the first drama series prize for a streaming show.
"Then [June] had to shut down and become something that I don't think she wasn't proud of," Moss continues. "But I feel she comes out of that into a place of true heroism, where she is able to be herself, be generous, forgive, inspire other people, lead — but also be vulnerable, ask questions, not know everything."
Miller, who stepped back from showrunning duties for the final season, with Eric Tuchman and Yahlin Chang taking over, especially wanted to ensure that as a man, he was telling a female-forward story from the female point of view — both in the writers' room and on camera.
Read more: Commentary: From 'The Last of Us' to 'Handmaid's Tale,' women are angry and vengeful. Good
"I'm very mindful of the fact that I'm a boy, and who do I think I am?" he says, adding that winning the Emmy boosted his confidence in being a man telling a story about women's rights. (The series has 15 Emmys total.) "Definitely, when you win an Emmy it helps you feel a bit less like you have one penis over the limit."
Knowing that, Miller says he centered the story on June and Moss alike, adjusting camera angles to focus on her point of view — but lowered to an eye level that corresponded with the actress' 5-foot-3 height. "The crowd scenes get much more scary" when you do that, he says. "I want to see the world not just through June's eyes — but also Lizzie's eyes, as much as she's able to show me those things."
Meanwhile, Moss used roles as executive producer and director to focus on the show's look and how June came across on camera. Frequently, she's shown smoldering with fury or dark intent, gazing up from under her brows with a lowered chin, something Moss says she lifted from Stanley Kubrick's films. "That is 'Clockwork Orange,'" she says. "I am certainly not the first person to do that look."
But she might be one of very few actresses to convey it onscreen. "It's definitely not something women do [on camera]," she says. "Women aren't allowed to get angry. [June] uses her anger and weaponizes it at so many points during the show — and by the final season, she knows when to do that and when not to."
The journey June, Elisabeth and "Handmaid's" have been on began at an uncomfortably synergistic time in American politics: Amid the airing of a series about women subject to state regulation of their bodily autonomy, real-world politicians were successfully rolling back women's reproductive rights. In 2018, protestors began showing up at real-world events in those handmaid-red cloaks and white bonnets, putting the show in an unexpected spotlight.
"Art does have an impact," says Moss about that kind of a response, but suggests that repurposing the show's images, outfits or story in service of real-world politics misses a key element of the series. "I don't think any of us necessarily set out, when you're making a TV show, to [make a political statement], because that's the wrong way to go about it. You're telling this one woman's story. … It's always been 'The Handmaid's Tale,' her story."
Read more: Under her eye: The blessings of Ann Dowd as Aunt Lydia in 'The Handmaid's Tale'
That's one reason why after six seasons the series chose to end as it did: With June back in the house where it all began, starting her memoirs — "The Handmaid's Tale." When Miller pitched that final episode script, Moss says it made her cry.
"I love the idea that at the end is when she starts to tell the story that is the book, and the circular nature of that gives me chills," she says. "The fact that she realizes that she has to tell it because it wasn't all bad."
But the ending also does one more thing: It shows how little is truly resolved. June's daughter Hannah is still trapped in Gilead, for example. And fans of the series know the action will pick up 15 years later when "The Testaments," based on a 2019 sequel by Atwood and now in production, begins airing. (Moss won't say whether she'll cameo.)
So this is an ending — just not the ending. Now, the story leaves off, still focused on the woman who escaped the bonnet and cloak and not about the trappings of her enslavement. "For me, the ending is perfect," says Moss. "I also don't feel like it is an ending. The war is not over. June's journey is not over."
Get the Envelope newsletter, sent three times a week during awards season, for exclusive reporting, insights and commentary.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
17 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Disney laying off several hundred employees worldwide
The Walt Disney Co. is laying off several hundred employees worldwide as the entertainment giant looks to trim some costs and adapt to evolving industry conditions. A Disney spokesperson confirmed the action on Tuesday. The exact number of jobs being cut is unknown, but layoffs will occur across several divisions, including television and film marketing, TV publicity, casting and development, and corporate financial operations.


New York Times
39 minutes ago
- New York Times
Saquon Barkley isn't the top fantasy football pick and shouldn't even be a first-rounder
Saquon Barkley shouldn't be a first-round pick in any fantasy football league next season, and it has nothing to do with the Madden Curse. I'm not even sure he should be selected in the first two rounds, given the massive gamble he represents in 2025. I realize that sounds ludicrous, but hear me out. Advertisement Barkley set all sorts of records this past season, but there's one milestone the Philadelphia Eagles star hit that might have gone unnoticed amid all the massive stats he piled up. Barkley carried the ball more times this year (436, including the playoffs) than any running back this century, with one exception: 2014 DeMarco Murray, who matched Barkley at 436. That name — and that workload — should scare the hell out of you. At 26 years old, Murray delivered a fabulous 2014 for the Dallas Cowboys, rushing for 1,845 yards and 13 touchdowns on 392 carries in the regular season to go along with 57 receptions and 416 receiving yards. He finished as the RB2 in half-PPR formats (Le'Veon Bell was awesome) before signing with the Eagles for his age-27 season. He then proceeded to deeply vex Philly fans and the fantasy owners who drafted him. Despite appearing in 15 games that season, Murray's production and efficiency nosedived. He delivered a career-worst 3.6 yards per carry en route to 702 rushing yards and six touchdowns to go along with 44 catches for 332 yards. So, a year after easily eclipsing 2,000 yards from scrimmage, Murray barely made it back to 1,000 the following year. He went from the RB2 (322.6) in 2014 to the RB15 (162.1 points) in 2015. Yes, you can counter that Murray switched teams, and the Eagles may not have been as adept at deploying him as the Cowboys a year earlier. And no, he wasn't an abject disaster (and it's fair to note he split carries with Ryan Mathews and Darren Sproles that season), but he was a huge bust as a first-round pick in fantasy. Shockingly, as history is about to show you, for players who take on the workload Barkley just did, Murray's production in 2015 was just about the best-case scenario. And all of these other examples played for the same team following their massive seasons. Below you'll see the 12 running backs who totaled 400-plus carries in a single season (including the playoffs) this millennium, along with their total carries and fantasy finishes that year and the year after. Full disclosure: I almost included a column that displayed total touches for no other reason than to show you how ridiculously close Barkley came to touching the ball 500 times last year. He finished at 482. That's 54 more than Detroit Lions running back Jahmyr Gibbs — a 23-year-old back being drafted behind the 28-year-old Barkley — has tallied in his first two NFL seasons combined. Fair warning, Barkley fans. The following graphic is not pretty. Grim, right? Murray and his RB15 finish the following year was indeed the best-case scenario. In almost every other instance, backs who shouldered this much workload went from bona fide RB1s to disasters for their league managers. Only four, including Murray, even managed to deliver RB2-type seasons, and all were around the same age as Barkley. Advertisement You know the old fantasy adage: 'You can't win your league in the first round, but you can lose it.' This is how you lose it. Specifically, drafting Barkley in the first round this year is how you lose it. You can go case-by-case — as I did — to see what happened to these backs, but the results won't surprise you. Their bodies just couldn't hold up. They either suffered significant injuries, played through injuries or simply couldn't regain the form they showed the previous year after pushing their bodies to their limits. Now, you might think that all these examples are dated. The NFL has undergone significant changes, and sports science has advanced substantially in the decade since Murray was in the NFL. Maybe. But I'd also suggest there's a reason the NFL stopped giving running backs the type of workloads the Eagles just thrust upon Barkley. (No regrets! They won a Super Bowl!) The last running back to approach 400 carries in a season was the king himself, Derrick Henry. In 2020, the then-26-year-old Titans running back carried the ball 397 times for the Titans, amassing 2,027 yards and 17 touchdowns to finish as the RB2. The next season? Henry played just eight games and finished as the RB18. It's also worth mentioning that entering that 2021 season, Henry had tallied 1,407 touches in his NFL career (regular season and playoffs). Entering the 2025 season, Barkley will have piled up nearly 600 more (1,996). Of course, Henry recovered in 2022 and has been one of the most consistent backs in fantasy since. Perhaps Barkley will prove to be even more resilient and deliver in 2025. He could defy all of the odds, but knowing what we know about his predecessors, there's no other way to look at this: He's a terrible bet to deliver RB1 production this season. The good news is that you don't have to make that bet. Just don't take him. Go with one of the elite receivers, like Ja'Marr Chase (who, coincidentally, The Athletic's Jake Ciely has as the 1.01 pick this year), or if you're hellbent on drafting an RB, Gibbs, Bijan Robinson, Ashton Jeanty and Derrick Henry are much better bets to return RB1 value. Advertisement What you should do, instead, is short the Barkley market. Let others draft Barkley while you target his backups, Will Shipley and AJ Dillon. According to Fantasy Pros' consensus data, Shipley is RB78 and the 269th player overall, while Dillon is RB107 and the 349th player overall. In other words, they're free. And if/when Barkley goes down, you'll have a starting running back playing behind one of the best offensive lines in football. Finally, and this should go without saying, if you're in a dynasty league, it's time to move on from Barkley. Now. You can still likely get a massive haul from a contending team. Even if the managers in your league are wise enough to read articles like this, the temptation to add the consensus RB1 for the 2025 season will be too much to pass up. Take advantage. (Photo by Sarah Stier / Getty Images)

Associated Press
43 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Lionize AI Passes 30M Vetted Creators for Influencer Campaign Matching
Lilly is the first AI Influencer Marketing Manager trained to identify, evaluate, and contract creators on behalf of brands. 'After working with 500+ brands, we've seen how Lilly saves time—cutting 20+ hours a week for those managing 20 influencers monthly. It's all about scaling without the extra effort.'— Austin, COO, Lionize NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES, June 3, 2025 / / -- Lionize, the AI-driven influencer marketing platform, has quietly been training its AI system for the last two years and is setting a new standard for influencer sourcing and campaign management. With a focus on performance and efficiency, Lionize's advanced AI Agent, Lilly, is reshaping how brands connect with influencers. Lionize's AI-powered platform now allows brands to effortlessly source, recruit, and manage influencers with unprecedented speed and precision. Lionize's tech ensures creators are not only found but also activated and delivering results faster than traditional methods. Unlike other systems, Lionize is designed to learn each brand's unique tone and messaging. During the campaign setup, the system undergoes a 'training period' to ensure brand safety and alignment. This process helps maintain authentic, on-message communication between brands and creators, ensuring efficient and relevant influencer partnerships. Here are three interesting stats: 1) AI Agent Lilly has analyzed over 30 million creator profiles across Instagram and TikTok, curating a selection of creators that match brand target demographics and campaign objectives. 2) Vetting process looks at 20+ different attributes across creator details, audience demographics, and content style and format before recommending to the brand. 3) Accelerates the selection and contracting process, resulting in 100,000 creator partnerships 'We tested influencer marketing with another agency after we appeared on Shark Tank, but the process was cumbersome, and the results didn't justify the cost. We moved back to Lionize because everything was easier,' said Robert Peck, CEO of AquaVault. 'Using AI to source, recruit, and manage influencers was not only faster and more efficient, but it also allowed us to build a community of influencers—at a fraction of the cost and time. We got real results, fast.' Traditional influencer marketing platforms focus on dashboards and vanity metrics. Lionize, however, has built an engine that actually delivers. 99,725 vetted influencers, and an unparalleled ability to scale influencer partnerships, Lionize eliminates guesswork and chaos from the process. The time spent sourcing and managing influencers manually would total $20,776,042 alone. Key Benefits of AI-Powered Influencer Platform, Lionize: 1) Efficient Influencer Sourcing: Quickly identify and activate influencers at scale. 2) Reduced Costs: Achieve results at a fraction of the cost compared to traditional agencies. 3) Real Results: Proven ROI with measurable influencer-driven outcomes. Lionize is not just smarter technology—it's a game-changing platform that's setting a new standard in influencer marketing. About Lionize: Lionize is a leading AI-powered influencer marketing platform, revolutionizing how brands source, recruit, and manage influencers. With advanced algorithms and a vast network of vetted creators, Lionize delivers high-performance campaigns that scale effortlessly, saving brands time and money while driving impactful results. Austin Rosenthal Lionize, Inc. email us here Visit us on social media: LinkedIn Legal Disclaimer: EIN Presswire provides this news content 'as is' without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.