
Woodland Joint Unified is "failing" special education students, parent and advocate allege
WOODLAND — In part one of a three-part investigative series, CBS13, for months, has looked into allegations that the Woodland Joint Unified School District (WJUSD) is violating the federal education rights of some of its most vulnerable students: those in special education.
Staffing and funding challenges, especially within special education departments, exist at schools nationwide and are not unique to WJUSD.
However, a parent, a regional special education advocate and former teachers share stories of their experience at WJUSD schools that they hope will shine a spotlight not only on this district but problems within special education across the country.
Sunday night, one day before CBS13 alerted the district that this series would begin to air, the district's superintendent, Elodia Ortega-Lampkin, sent out an email blast to all parents within WJUSD.
The email alerted parents that a CBS13 story would be airing and even outlined steps the district is taking to improve their special education department -- a response that included information not provided to CBS13 when we asked multiple times over the course of four months for the district to respond to these allegations.
The district's response provided to CBS13 and the subsequent email sent to parents will be included in full at the end of this story.
In part, Ortega-Lampkin told parents in her email that, "School districts across California are grappling with similar struggles as they work to meet growing demands with limited resources."
At Zamora Elementary School in Woodland, one mother feels that her fight for her child echoes the struggles of other parents within WJUSD.
"They talk to us parents like we don't know what's best for our child," Surrina Oliver said.
Oliver's daughter, Natalie, is in kindergarten at Zamora Elementary. Oliver said Natalie was diagnosed with autism when she was two years old and was placed in special needs day classes within the district for preschool.
But this school year, upon Natalie's transition to kindergarten, is when Oliver says the problems started.
"Natalie is behind educationally. The tests show it, and they didn't want to help support her," Oliver said. "They were going to put her into general education with no support at all."
At Natalie's first kindergarten IEP meeting, Oliver said she felt silenced.
An IEP, or individualized education program, is required by federal law under the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)
. The IEP document is agreed upon between a student's parent, teacher and school district representatives, outlining what classroom supports are needed for a child in special education.
Oliver alleges the district excluded verbally agreed-upon supports from Natalie's IEP document and even lied about her daughter's progress to support a move out of special education.
"They weren't taking it serious. It seemed like they were just trying to throw all the kids in mainstream. That's where the majority of her preschool class ended up. They pushed them into mainstream, general ed with very little support," Oliver claimed.
Educating one California student in special education can be three times as expensive as general education, based on state spending data.
For the 2023-24 school year, state data shows WJUSD had 1,770 students enrolled in special education, the highest of any district in Yolo County. The next closest was Davis Joint Unified with 1,288 students.
In Natalie's case, Oliver said her child has also been in the wrong class this entire school year.
It is in violation of her original IEP, which stated she should be in a kindergarten class for kids with "mild to moderate" needs. Instead, she was placed in a class for children with "severe" needs, something Oliver further alleges the district did not make her aware of and she instead found out on her own.
After a follow-up IEP meeting with the district, Oliver eventually opted to keep Natalie in the wrong class, worried that further disrupting her autistic child's routine would only make her school year even worse.
"For her to dislike kindergarten as much as she does is really sad. It's just the beginning. She has so many years to go. It's shaping her education in a negative light," Oliver said.
Surrina Oliver is one of dozens of WJUSD parents who reached out to the
Sacramento Autistic Spectrum and Special Needs Alliance (SASSNA)
for help.
"This is why I reached out to [SASSNA], I've been told by the district, 'we don't offer that,' and 'we don't have that,' or 'we can't help you there or support your daughter.' They do have it, but they were trying to make me believe they didn't," Oliver said.
Dave Gaines, CEO of SASSNA, first reached out to CBS13 last fall with a long list of allegations against the district.
"This is a crisis on the federal level, but most people don't even know it exists," Gaines said.
The nonprofit advocates for students with special needs and their families regionwide, providing help navigating social services and even attending students' IEP meetings to act as an advocate on behalf of the child and their parents when negotiating needed supports in the classroom.
Gaines said that he learned through his own advocacy work that within WJUSD, Natalie's story is one example of many.
"We started getting a stream of requests for help from parents in Woodland Joint Unified. We had never seen anything like it before from this district," Gaines said.
Gaines said that he is currently working with around 40 clients, all current or former parents and teachers and all bringing forward their own allegations against the district.
"It's probably the most severe situation I've seen in my 15 years of doing this kind of work," Gaines said.
So what are the allegations?
Broadly, considering confidential information from his clients cannot be shared without their permission, Gaines said that recurring allegations based on his interviews with parents include claims that:
Concerning the allegation of students having no teacher at all, Gaines alleges, "I have information, very credible information, that that happened for a period up to seven months. For a class with 12 to 14 significantly disabled students, bigger students, students with behavioral concerns, students that run away, there are safety concerns there."
Gaines said that happened at a district adult education class for those with special needs.
This school year, SASSNA sent a letter to the district offering to collaborate to address alleged "substantial legal deficiencies" and a "cover-up of systemic problems."
He said the district has provided no real response to SASSNA. It is why he contacted CBS13.
Gaines also emailed the school board and district that he believes they have, on multiple occasions, "criminally" violated students' federal education rights.
It's why he filed a complaint with the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) last year.
The DOJ, in response, directed its Office of Civil Rights to look into his concerns. Gaines said that he is currently cooperating with federal Department of Education staff and that their inquiry is ongoing.
"In a lot of cases, Woodland and other school districts, they know they are in violation of the law. The system doesn't allow them to not be in violation of the law. It says you have to do all this by law, but we are not going to give you enough resources to do it," Gaines said.
Gaines said the problem stems from a funding and staffing deficit, decades in the making. He hopes that calling attention to it to can make a difference.
"What we don't want is what's been going on for a long time. Complaint after complaint after complaint, single complaints are resolved, but the problem is never resolved," Gaines said.
CBS13 sent a Public Records Act request to the California Department of Education (CDE) to try and contextualize this issue.
The request for information revealed there were at least six complaints in the 2023-24 school year against WJUSD that were investigated and closed. (Complaints still actively being investigated by CDE are not provided in a records request.)
In one of those six cases, CDE ruled the district was breaking the law on the finding that WJUSD did not comply with one student's IEP and that it "did not provide speech and language services during the 2023-24 school year, until January 30, 2024."
For at least one still-open complaint, in a letter obtained by CBS13, CDE told WJUSD superintendent Elodia Ortega-Lampkin on December 6, 2024, that CDE would investigate further claims "alleging violations of special education laws."
In addition, a CDE spokesperson told CBS13:
A full list of every allegation against the district posed by Surrina Oliver, Dave Gaines and two former teachers (who share their accounts in part two of this series) was sent by CBS13 to WJUSD's spokesperson and special education director on December 11, 2024.
A spokesperson chose not to respond to the allegations directly, but sent CBS13 this statement:
WJUSD's special education director, Michael Allum, then declined to provide information that CBS13 requested concerning administrative hearings, which are proceedings similar to civil lawsuits against the district, under California's Public Records Act.
Allum told CBS13, in part: "The District determined that it does not possess disclosable public records responsive to your request."
Over the next four months, CBS13 followed up multiple times, requesting information on the status of the internal review that the spokesperson said the district would start to conduct in December.
As of April 2025, the district confirmed that the review is still ongoing. The district in April also declined to provide an updated response to CBS13 when told this story would begin airing on April 21.
However, on Easter Sunday, the night before this series started to air, WJUSD's superintendent sent an email out to all district parents with further examples of how the district is working to better its special education department that were not provided to CBS13.
CBS13 obtained a copy of the email. The subject line is "Important Message from the Superintendent" and it reads, in full:
CBS13's three-part series looking into concerns within WJUSD and the nationwide crisis in special education continues Tuesday, April 22, with accounts from two former teachers and a deeper dive into federal education funding.
On Wednesday, April 23, we investigate claims presented in a civil lawsuit one parent filed against WJUSD concerning her child, which is set for trial next year in Yolo County court.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
John Oliver Exposes 'Absolute Disgrace' Government System That Makes 'No F**king Sense'
'Last Week Tonight' host John Oliver on Sunday delivered a scathing takedown of America's juvenile justice system, which he slammed as an 'absolute disgrace' for the way it locks up children at rates far higher than other nations ― and then treats them atrociously after doing so. Oliver acknowledged that some of the tens of thousands of children who are put behind bars each year have created serious crimes. But many, he noted, are locked up for minor offenses, like truancy or breaking curfew. In one shocking case, Oliver recalled, a six-year-old was reportedly arrested for picking a tulip from a yard. Part of the problem, said Oliver, is how the system is shrouded in secrecy and therefore there's a lack of accountability. The juvenile justice process is like a game of Plinko because factors beyond a child's control — like which judge they face — can lead to wildly different outcomes, he said, while youth detention facilities — which are in some cases rebranded as academies, state schools or youth centers — are often prisons in all but name. The entire system makes 'no fucking sense,' he railed. Oliver urged a radical rethink of how youth offenders are dealt with. Children 'deserve safety, respect, protection and a chance to grow beyond their mistakes,' he added. Watch here: Fascism Expert Shares Big Fear That Prompted Her To Leave Trump's America MSNBC Unpacks The 1 Constant In The 10 Chaotic Years Since Trump's Escalator Ride MAGA Boxer Ryan Garcia Punches Back At Trump: 'I Can't Stay Silent…'
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Police Find Body Believed to Belong to Woman, 35, Who Went Missing 1 Day Prior: 'Heartbreaking'
A body has been recovered amid a search for a missing woman in northern England South Yorkshire Police said a body was found on Saturday, June 14, as authorities searched for a woman from Doncaster, identified only as 35-year-old Natalie Authorities said that while investigators have not formally identified the body, officers believe it to be Natalie, who was reported missing on Friday, June 13Police have found a body they believe to be a woman who was reported missing just one day ago. According to the South Yorkshire Police in England, a body was found on Saturday, June 14, as authorities searched for a woman from Doncaster — located about 60 miles east of Manchester — who was identified only as 35-year-old Natalie. "Officers searching for missing woman Natalie from Doncaster have sadly found a body today," police wrote in a statement on Facebook. Authorities said that while investigators have not formally identified the body, officers believe it to be the missing 35-year-old. "Her family have been informed, and our thoughts are with them and all of Natalie's friends and loved ones," police added in their statement. The Doncaster Free Press reported that police said Natalie was last seen on Friday, June 13, just before 12 p.m. local time. She was described as "White, 5ft 7ins with brown shoulder-length hair." Authorities said she was wearing glasses and all-black clothing and carrying a rucksack at the time of her disappearance. "Officers are becoming increasingly concerned for Natalie's welfare and want to speak to anybody who has seen her," police said when she was first reported missing, per the Free Press. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Members of the local community shared their condolences with the missing woman's loved ones on social media. "This is so sad," one person wrote on Facebook. "Sending love and deepest sympathy to her family and loved ones." "Heartbreaking," another person added. "RIP, young lady." Read the original article on People
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
RIDE disability rights case settlement disrupts R.I. House final budget preparations
The Rhode Island Department of Education's Westminster Street entrance in Providence is shown. (Photo by Alexander Castro/Rhode Island Current) The Rhode Island Department of Education (RIDE) may soon have to pay $1.86 million to settle a class action lawsuit that claimed the state had failed to provide special education services for students with disabilities between the ages of 21 and 22. That news presented a last minute complication for the Rhode Island House Committee on Finance's fiscal 2026 state budget preparations Tuesday. 'We literally worked to, like, 15 minutes ago to do this budget,' House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi told reporters at a press briefing on the $14.33 billion spending plan that began after 9 p.m. Tuesday night. He cited a figure of nearly $2 million needed because of an adverse ruling against RIDE, but details were unavailable at the time. The case of K.L. v. Rhode Island Board of Education is close to a settlement, Victor Morente, a RIDE spokesperson, confirmed via email on Wednesday morning. He said officials were still drafting a 'tentative' agreement that is still subject to approval from Rhode Island District Court as well as the Council on Elementary and Secondary Education, RIDE's governing body. The settlement comes nearly seven years after a federal appeals court ruled that RIDE shortchanged students with disabilities in the 2010s. The class action suit began in 2014 with a single plaintiff: A Warwick parent filing on behalf of their daughter, a Rhode Island student on the autism spectrum who also had ADHD and severe anxiety. But the student, named K.L. in the lawsuit, aged out of state-sponsored educational accommodations at age 21, before she could finish her high school diploma — something she should have been eligible to receive until age 22 under federal disability laws, her attorneys argued. K.L. had an individualized education program (IEP), which tailors learning for students with disabilities and helps to address their needs. These support programs are the roadmaps to ensure local schools education agencies supply students with a free and 'appropriate' public education per mandates derived from the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Students 'who were over 21 and under 22 as of February 10, 2012, or turned 21 before July 1, 2019,' Morente wrote, would be eligible for relief under the draft settlement if they did not receive their high school diploma and aged out of support services under previous Rhode Island law. When the case came before the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island, it ruled in favor of RIDE by determining that 'public education' under the federal law would not include adult learning for students with disabilities over age 21. The class members then took their case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Boston, which vacated the lower court's judgment. We literally worked to, like, 15 minutes ago to do this budget. – House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi during a press briefing Tuesday Senior Judge Kermit Victor Lipez wrote in the first circuit's October 2018 majority opinion that the lower court had relied on too 'narrow' a definition of public education. 'At present, if a 21-year-old student in Rhode Island does not complete high school for a non-disability related reason — say, because she was previously incarcerated — the state will provide her the services needed to attain a secondary-school level of academic proficiency and a route to obtain a high-school level degree,' Lipez wrote. 'However, if the same 21-year-old does not complete high school due to a qualifying disability, the state currently does not offer her ability-appropriate services to attain the same level of educational achievement.' That imbalance violated disability law, the First Circuit decided, and the court boomeranged the case back to the District of Rhode Island for the two parties to determine remedies for class members. Sonja Deyoe, the attorney representing class members since the suit's inception, wrote in an email Wednesday that the First Circuit ruling was pivotal for disability rights in Rhode Island. 'The law previously had limited that education until the age of 21,' Deyoe wrote. 'This was a major change for disabled individuals in Rhode Island.' The First Circuit's ruling predates current RIDE leadership, and in August 2019, then-new education Commissioner Angélica Infante-Green issued a memo instructing how state education officials should comply with the ruling. 'It is now clear that if they have not already done so, school districts … must comply with the recent First Circuit decision and should make services available and give careful consideration to the cost of prospective compliance,' Infante-Green wrote, adding that it was still unclear 'how appropriate remedies will be provided to those eligible class members.' Deyoe echoed that sentiment, saying that determining damages under the lawsuit 'did span a very long time,' with both parties trying to avoid forcing a legal decision as to whether individual class members could receive relief for damages. 'Whether individualized compensatory education damages could be awarded to the individual class members was always disputed by the RI Department of Education,' Deyoe said. The settlement also needs to be approved by the members of the class, Deyoe said. The currently draft spares class members from having to undergo individual trials to determine compensational education benefits. 'We are very hopeful the settlement will be approved, but the class members always have the opportunity to object and the Court may approve the settlement only with certain changes,' Deyoe wrote. 'We cannot predict that yet…While all of this took a long time to achieve, we do believe this is a good resolution for the class members.' The funding source to resolve the settlement was not immediately available from RIDE or the House on Wednesday. But Shekarchi detailed in a statement over email that the sudden news had cost the House some time on Tuesday. 'After the budget is posted for consideration by the House Finance Committee 48 hours in advance, there are always a number of policy decisions, options and calculations that must be finalized,' wrote the Speaker. 'The notification of a $1.86 million additional expense on the morning of the budget adoption certainly complicated the final process.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX