‘This is what democracy looks like.' Thousands protest Trump administration at KC march
Thousands gathered to 'March for Democracy' in downtown Kansas City on Saturday, voicing concerns about what several marchers called an overreach by the federal government on citizen's rights.
Furrowed brows, smiles, shouts and tears occupied the faces of passionate protesters, who bellowed chants that echoed off the concrete sky-rise buildings.
By mid-morning, thousands of marchers lined the sidewalks of 13th Street, wrapping around several blocks from Oak Street to Main Street. The massive crowd walked a little over a mile from downtown to the west side of Union Station, culminating in a huge gathering on the lawn of the National World War I Museum and Memorial.
The march brought people together with a collection of causes weighing heavily on their hearts, some deeply personal.
Susan Wyssmann, 73, said her daughter works for a federally funded grant program that teaches children about the environment. That program, she said, was slashed among other federal cuts by the Department of Government Efficiency headed by Elon Musk.
'I am sure there are government inefficiencies,' Wyssmann said. 'But to take a sledge hammer and crash agencies, jobs and rights of people without any kind of due process... is truly horrifying and offensive to me.'
Kansas Citians are among thousands across the country feeling the effects of a federal workforce reduction. Some have previously spoken to The Star about losing their jobs and feared effects of fewer federal workers.
Many in the crowd on Saturday said they shared similar fears. Several picket signs were decorated with messaging against Musk and President Donald Trump.
People with megaphones positioned throughout the crowd on Saturday led chants, including, 'This is what democracy looks like,' 'Hey hey, ho ho, Elon Musk has got to go,' and 'Love, not hate, makes America great.'
Cars passing by on the street beside them obeyed signs reading 'honk for democracy,' prompting loud cheers.
A mother among the crowd said she decided to march because she was deeply concerned about government overreach.
Pushing her toddler in a stroller, Michaela Meckel said the federal government was going against her values and that she wanted to raise awareness.
'I'm really concerned about threats to free speech,' Meckel said.
Meckel discussed the Trump administration's immigration policy and its attempt to use a wartime law to allow certain deportations. She said using a war law at a time of peace concerned her.
'I think free speech and checks and balances (in) our Constitution are all so foundational to what makes America a place that has been, you know, a world leader for so long,' Meckel said. 'And I think the current policies are really threatening our democracy and our ability to be a leader in the world.'
Protestors Kim VanMaren and her husband Roger VanMaren arrived at the march well before it began.
Kim VanMuren said she believes she has seen a gradual dismantlement of the democratic system as she once knew it.
'We both see executive power taking way, way too much space, way too much power, way too much word away from the other balancing factors of our of our federal government,' Kim VanMuren said. 'We're frustrated that Congress is not standing up and assuming their responsibilities to balance power.'
Drums and voices boomed around them as Kim and her husband spoke to The Star about their concerns. They called on more people to speak up, saying the massive turnout Saturday was encouraging, but that the march itself would not be enough.
Roger VanMuren, a former school district superintendent, said he was concerned about the Trump administration's executive order to dismantle the education department. Neither he nor his wife have shown up to an organized protest before. But a laundry list of unknowns prompted them to come Saturday, he said.
'Kids are being told they're of no value when you get rid of the Department of Education, especially the marginalized,' Roger VanMuren said. 'That really makes me angry.'
Sitting on a concrete slab near Union Station, Linda Jurkiewicz, 66, criticized the federal government for what she said she feels to be a lack of diplomacy.
'I am shocked that we've gotten to be a country of such ugliness,' Jurkiewicz said.
Jurkiewicz said she feels like much of the nation is not well informed on current events and called for younger leaders to get more involved in the democratic process. Partisan politics have driven a wedge between 'real problem solvers,' she said.
'And I will admit, honestly, I mean, I wish I did more,' Jurkiewicz said. 'I wish I called my senators, you know, I wish I did that stuff, wrote them, and I don't do hardly any of that.'
Attending the protest with her grandmother on Saturday, Chloe Fischer, 19, said feelings of hurt and hope can live at the same time.
A University of Missouri Kansas City student studying journalism, Fischer said she felt compelled to march for freedom of the press and free speech.
'It's important to be able to empathize with other people,' Fischer said. 'When other people are under attack, that's still important to me, even if it doesn't affect me personally. Other people are just as important.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
32 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Republicans are right to blanch at this Elon Musk gravy train
Elon Musk last week slammed President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' for the trillions in new federal debt it is projected to cost — a subject well worth the nation's attention. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana), however, pointed to a different possible motive for the tech billionaire's dissatisfaction with the bill: It 'has an effect on his business,' the speaker said. Johnson suggested that Musk began his campaign against the bill after they spoke about an obscure policy the act would roll back — one that has directed billions of dollars to Tesla, Musk's electric vehicle company. Johnson's claims provide a revealing look at the side effects of well-meaning — but not all that well designed — government mandates (in this case, for the automobile industry to reduce emissions in specific ways), and how they can distort both politics and the economy. While the bill has many flaws, Republicans are right to object to the Tesla gravy train. Rather than keep it, as Musk would probably prefer, they should replace it with clean energy policies that promote competition and choice. Tesla heavily depends on selling automotive regulatory credits to traditional automakers. Manufacturers of gas-powered cars are failing to produce as many zero-emissions vehicles as national and state-level mandates from Washington, Sacramento and Brussels require. Consumers' appetite for EVs has grown, but not enough for traditional carmakers to transition off gas as quickly as the mandate-writers would have liked. So those companies must buy credits from EV-makers such as Tesla, which produces only zero-emissions vehicles. In 2024, Tesla made $2.76 billion on emissions deals, a 54 percent increase from the year before. During the first quarter of 2025, Tesla reported earning $595 million in regulatory credits, even as its total net income for the period was only $409 million. A February Post analysis found that Musk and his businesses received at least $38 billion in government contracts, loans, subsidies and tax credits over the years, including $11.4 billion through automotive regulatory credits. 'About a third of Tesla's $35 billion in profits since 2014 has come from selling federal and state regulatory credits to other automakers,' The Post tabulated. 'These credits played a crucial role in the company's first profitable quarter in 2013 and its first full year of profitability in 2020. … Without the credits, Tesla would have lost more than $700 million in 2020, marking a seventh-consecutive year with no profits.' If you haven't heard of these regulatory credits, you're not alone. Even for those paying close attention, the EV policy fight that has attracted the most attention has been the One Big Beautiful Bill's proposed phaseout of $7,500 tax credits for electric car-buyers. Musk has expressed openness to eliminating the policy; analysts speculate that doing so could entrench his dominance in the U.S. EV market by making it harder for new entrants to break in. Such are the arcane politics and weird incentives that complex government regulations can promote, as companies compete for the profits that can flow from getting a clause inserted or deleted from the federal code. To be sure, the federal EV mandate's writers were well-intentioned. They wanted to accelerate the needed transition to electric vehicles, as transportation overtook electricity generation as the country's largest source of planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions. They used various policy levers available to them — from the Clean Air Act to the Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards — because Congress failed to enact more efficient clean energy policies. Republicans can change that, eliminating the mandates, tax credits and other subsidies that riddle federal law and replacing them with a robust and rising carbon tax. This policy would empower consumers and companies — each acting according to what makes the most sense for themselves, without government micromanagement — to decide how to green the economy. Maybe consumers would prefer to buy more plug-in gas-electric hybrid cars that eliminate 'range anxiety' before fully moving to EVs, which will be easier when electric car technology is more mature and charging infrastructure more ubiquitous. That's the beauty of a carbon tax: The emission costs from consumers' decisions would be reflected in the sticker prices they pay, maximizing choice and minimizing federal micromanagement — all while reducing the overall expense of a green energy transition. Admittedly, carbon taxes have been less politically successful than other policies that disguise their costs to consumers. (EV mandates boost car prices across the board; renewable electricity requirements increase power bills; etc.) But the politics cannot be as unflattering as the Musk-Trump meltdown the country had to endure last week.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Now is the time for all Americans to come to the aid of their country
(Photo: Brandon Kingdollar/NC Newsline) So, I was at a protest last month in Cleveland, where I was visiting my dying mother. I told her I needed to leave her to go downtown for the protest on that damp, windy spring day. She understood. The turnout was okay. My reporter's eye would have put the crowd at around a thousand. I usually attend protests in Raleigh, and the one a couple weeks previously hit around five thousand, though I'm told the protest I missed while I was in Cleveland was somewhat smaller. A little more recently I went to another protest, and that hit a nice crowd of maybe 500 or more in downtown Durham on a Thursday afternoon. Then I was going to join the one in Raleigh on the same day but a friend said don't bother, it's ending and had only a few hundred people. So, I have a single question, a question for the folks of Cleveland and Raleigh and North Carolina and everywhere else: Where the hell are you people? What are you waiting for? Illegal deportations? Check. Anonymous secret police grabbing people up and disappearing them regardless of rights or status? Done. Wholesale refusal to respect the Constitution, whether that means abiding by judicial rulings and the emoluments clause or simply respecting citizens' first, fourth, fourteenth, and fifteenth amendment rights? Already there. Nothing is lacking; all the signs and actions are there. The current regimes — both in North Carolina and Washington DC — do not respect the courts, the ballot box, the people, or the rule of law. And here came nationwide protests and you — you personally! You! — where the hell were you? What, did you have errands to run? Yoga? The lawn looked like a mess? You had the sniffles? 'I was GOING to stand up to fascism,' we will say in the future, 'but I had an orthodontist appointment.' We laughed scornfully about Trump's refusal to honor World War I dead in France because of rain. Well, where the hell are we and what's keeping us away? You guys: we don't have time for this bull. I mean we don't have time for all the protests, sure; that's part of the plan. If we're exhausted and poor and worn out, we're less likely to protest. But just like you never have time for a doctor's appointment until what the doctor could have quickly solved puts you in the hospital or the grave? We either protest now like our lives depend on it — spoiler alert — or we let them do as they please with our lives. Those are the only options. Nobody is coming to help us; those who can, like corporations (with the usual few noble exceptions: Penzeys, Ben & Jerry's, Costco) or political leadership, won't. Those who wish they could (the entire rest of what we once called the free world) can't. It's us or nobody. And just the way more than a third of our population looked at a choice between trying to solve our problems on the one hand and electing a vast new and terrifying parcel of much worse problems on the other, said 'So sorry, busy, can't be bothered,' you — You! You personally! — are going about your business. Dude. Your business is saving your life. You may love the game you're playing on your phone, and you should play it and enjoy it — but if you fall into the sea while you're playing it, don't keep playing: swim for your life. You may need to work out for your health, but if someone tries to kidnap you while you're jogging by, you don't get to say, 'I'd love to fight back, but, you know: leg day.' You have to inconvenience yourself. A meme went around during the first Trump administration that said, 'I don't know how to explain to you that you should care about other people.' It was a wonderful symbol of the great divide among us. Now we're in the same place, only I'm talking to my fellow non-Fascist Americans. I don't know how to tell you that when someone is trying to enslave you, you fight: you fight and you do not stop fighting, because it's now or never. I'm told that if we get 3.5 percent of the people in the streets, we're going to win. What are we telling them if we don't? My wife tells me she has been taught that if someone has her in their control and plans to rape her, the calculations are complex. If I choose to go along, will that let me live through it? Should I run? Can I keep him talking? Will fighting make things worse? It's unimaginable but correct: whatever keeps you alive, do that, and live to work through the horrible consequences. But if in that situation your captor tries to pull you into a vehicle? Fight for your life: you won't come back out. Once he gets you in that car? You're as good as dead. Fight. You guys, they've got us, and they're trying to pull us into the car. I personally am fighting for our lives. What do you plan to do? June 14th there's another nationwide protest, scheduled for the same day as the idiot birthday parade. You guys, it's now or never. Fight or die.


Forbes
37 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump Confirms Imminent Fed Decision—Bitcoin And Crypto Brace For Huge Price Earthquake
Bitcoin has struggled to break out in recent months despite hitting a fresh all-time high in May and fears building over a $37 trillion 'ticking time bomb.' Front-run Donald Trump, the White House and Wall Street by subscribing now to Forbes' CryptoAsset & Blockchain Advisor where you can "uncover blockchain blockbusters poised for 1,000% plus gains!" The bitcoin price rocketed higher following U.S. president Donald Trump's November election victory but has struggled to hold onto that momentum as Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell grapples with a looming, 'cataclysmic' crisis that's headed for the U.S. dollar. Now, as Tesla billionaire Elon Musk quietly backs a shock dollar collapse warning, Trump has confirmed a decision on the next Federal Reserve chair will be coming out soon, priming the bitcoin price and crypto market. Sign up now for the free CryptoCodex—A daily five-minute newsletter for traders, investors and the crypto-curious that will get you up to date and keep you ahead of the bitcoin and crypto market bull run "It's coming out very soon," Trump told reporters on Air Force One, it was reported by Reuters, referring to his pick for the next Fed chair. 'If we had a good Fed chairman, he would lower rates and if inflation happened in a year from now or two years later, [he would] raise rates,' Trump said in a video posted to X, reiterating his earlier calls for Fed chair Powell to cut interest rates immediately. The Federal Reserve is now overwhelmingly expected to keep rates on hold during its June and July meetings, with the market split over its September decision, according to the CME FedWatch tool. Trump added that former Fed governor Kevin Warsh, who's currently the front-runner to be named as next Fed chair on the crypto-powered prediction platform Polymarket, is 'very highly thought of,' when asked what he thought of him. Last month, Warsh outlined how he believed the Fed could lower interest rates if he shrunk its balance sheet, telling a monetary policy panel at Stanford University's Hoover Institution that "if the printing press could be quiet, we could have lower policy rates." If the Fed were to cut rates, it 'would be bullish for risk assets like bitcoin,' bitcoin price and crypto market analysts with the Bitfinex exchange said in emailed comments. 'We believe if bitcoin maintains support above $105,000, it could target the $120,000 to $125,000 range in June. This will not be catalysed just from the labour market but it could be a domino in multiple catalysts prompting the Fed to cut rates at a faster than expected pace.' This week, Trump again called for Powell to lower rates, which have been held steady for months after the Fed surprised markets by beginning its rate cutting cycle in September. The Fed has pointed to the looming impact of Trump's global trade tariffs as the reason it has left rates on hold, predicting Trump's so-called Liberation Day barrage of tariffs will cause inflation to spike. Sign up now for CryptoCodex—A free, daily newsletter for the crypto-curious This coming week, the latest U.S. consumer price index (CPI) inflation data is expected to show an uptick in prices after inflation eased in the first few months of 2025. In April, the White House confirmed Trump was exploring whether he could fire Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell over Powell's refusal to lower rates, though Trump has since said he won't try to remove Powell before his term as chair ends next year. "With rate cuts looking less likely, Fed chair Jay Powell can expect to remain firmly in the president's firing line," Nicholas Hyett, investment manager at Wealth Club, said in emailed comments and pointing to Friday's stronger than expected jobs data. 'That will be taken as vindication by the Trump administration–which has been clear that the tariffs are aimed squarely at supporting Main Street rather than pleasing Wall Street. Less positive from the White Houses' point of view is that a strong economy and rising wages gives the Federal Reserve less reason to cut interest rates–pushing yields a touch higher and making the fiscal splurge built into Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' that bit more expensive.'