
Congressmen "So Disgusted With Sanjay Gandhi That...": Indira Gandhi Aide In Book
New Delhi:
As principal secretary to Indira Gandhi in the run up to the Emergency and during her authoritarian regime of 21 months, PN Dhar had a rare insight into the goings-on of the period, and one central character who gets the most unflattering portrayal in his otherwise sober account of the era is the former prime minister's younger son Sanjay Gandhi.
In his book 'Indira Gandhi, the Emergency, and Indian Democracy', Mr Dhar says the PMH (Prime Minister's Home) became a hive of "extra-constitutional" activities as leaders junior in the Congress hierarchy but having the ears of an increasingly distrustful prime minister and another set of functionaries loyal to her son undermined the PMS (Prime Minister's Secretariat).
Critical of the power centralised in the PMS, Morarji Desai reduced its strength and rechristened it as Prime Minister's Office, a moniker which has continued, after replacing Indira Gandhi.
Sanjay Gandhi and his loyalists like Haryana leader Bansi Lal gained ascendency in the Congress during the era. Even the prime minister was left alarmed by their move to have state assemblies pass resolutions in support of forming a constituent assembly for sweeping changes in the Constitution.
Aware of her obsessive love for Sanjay Gandhi, Mr Dhar said in the book published in 2000 that he would normally have attributed all this to temporary annoyance.
"But it was more than a passing mood this time. I knew how carefully she had kept Sanjay out of all discussions on constitutional reforms. I also knew how much she had resented the passage of the constituent assembly resolutions by the three assemblies without her knowledge, but with Sanjay's approval. Was Sanjay proving too wild even for her?" he wondered.
He said the main purpose of the constituent assembly appeared to be continuing the Emergency regime and postponing elections. Bansi Lal told Mr Dhar that it would be to make "behan ji" (Indira Gandhi) president for life.
When the Congress suffered a stunning loss in the March 1977 elections after the Emergency was lifted, Delhi turned into a "vast whispering gallery" echoing with stories of Indira Gandhi's alleged crimes and the plans of the Janata Party, which had won a majority, to destroy her and Sanjay Gandhi.
She was more worried about Sanjay Gandhi and found herself isolated in her own family.
"Rajiv had no sympathy for his brother. He came to see me, very concerned about his mother and full of anger against his brother. He said he had been a helpless observer of his brother's doings," Dhar writes.
He said the Congress' defeat in the Gujarat assembly elections, which were held after the assembly was dissolved following student protests over a host of issues including corruption, and the Allahabad High Court's decision to disqualify Indira Gandhi from the Lok Sabha on the same day in June 1975 paved the way for the declaration of Emergency as the Jayaprakash Narayan-led opposition "cast off all restraint" to oust her.
He said, "Indira Gandhi withdrew into her lonely self. At the moment of her supreme political crisis, she distrusted everybody except her younger son Sanjay." Sanjay Gandhi disliked his mother's colleagues and aides who had opposed his Maruti car project, or had otherwise not taken him seriously, Mr Dhar said.
"He knew he would get into serious trouble if his mother were not around to protect him. For all her childhood insecurities, Indira Gandhi had compensated, one should say over-compensated, her sons, particularly Sanjay, with love and care. She was blind to his shortcomings. Her concern for Sanjay's future well-being was not an inconsiderable factor in her fateful decision," Mr Dhar said.
Indira Gandhi, he added, accepted the self-serving opinion of her party colleagues that the JP-led opposition's attacks on them were really attacks on her.
The Communist Party of India, her ally during the Emergency, had dubbed JP's agitation as a fascist movement supported by the US, a theory she embraced as she decided to suspend democracy, jail opposition leaders and censor the press to continue her rule.
In the book written with a distance afforded to bureaucrats, no leading figure associated with the Emergency who comes in contact with Mr Dhar comes out an unblemished hero, not even the venerable JP, whose call for 'Sampoorna Kranti' (total revolution) and mass agitation for removing duly elected Congress governments in states and the Centre are questioned for their defiance of the rule of law and constitutional democracy.
However, the leadership of JP, as Jayaprakash Narayan was often called, was instrumental in galvanising popular sentiments against Indira Gandhi as his role in the Quit India Movement had cast him in a heroic mould and his rejection of Jawaharlal Nehru's offer of a Cabinet post gave him high moral stature in a country where renunciation of power is held in high esteem, Mr Dhar noted.
Soon after extending the tenure of the fifth Lok Sabha for another year till February 1978 on November 1976, Indira Gandhi was shown by Mr Dhar a report of "extreme coercion" inflicted on a group of school teachers for not fulfilling their sterilisation quota, one of the five-point programmes of Sanjay Gandhi beyond the 20-point programme of her government.
"She fell silent after reading it. This was the first time she did not dismiss such allegations as false as had become her habit. After a long pause, she asked me in a tired voice how long I thought the Emergency should continue," he said.
"Odd as it might seem, some Congressmen who believed that their party would lose in the elections also supported the idea of holding them.
"They were so disgusted with Sanjay and his associates that they did not hesitate to tell his mother the opposite of what they believed would be the outcome of the elections," he added.
Mr Dhar wrote that he invited the then chief election commissioner on January 1, 1977, for tea at home and took him into confidence for holding elections.
The delighted CEC sent him a bottle of whiskey in the evening. On January 18, 1977, Gandhi announced that the Lok Sabha had been dissolved and fresh elections would be held two months later, leaving the opposition, people and the press stunned.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
10 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
The Emergency and politics of the body
For the average Indian, it was through the tyranny of the dreaded nasbandi (sterilisation) camps that the worst consequences of the suspension of civil and political rights under the Emergency manifested itself in their everyday lives. In September 1976, India recorded over 1.7 million sterilisations, a figure that equalled the annual average for the 10 preceding years. By 1977, Sanjay Gandhi, the younger son of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, and his bulldozer gang had overseen the conduct of more than 8 million sterilizations. The predominance accorded to forced sterilisation was intertwined with Sanjay Gandhi's growing influence. He needed to consolidate his hold on power within the Congress, family planning (and his other obsession, urban gentrification) became his preferred tools. In the process, he unleashed the worst form of State violence, stripping ordinary citizens of agency over their bodies. The political and administrative zeal to comply with Sanjay Gandhi and his bulldozer gang was shaped by the nature of power he wielded over regional leaders. (HT Photo) Much has changed in India's approach to family planning since those dark Emergency years. However, 50 years on, Sanjay Gandhi's weaponisation of family planning and exertion of power over individual bodily rights afford important lessons for how we respond to demographic challenges in the contemporary moment. Above all, it serves as a critical reminder to be patient with democracy, for it is the only pathway for sustainable, socially just economic growth and development. On the surface, Sanjay Gandhi's approach to family planning was not new. Malthusian worries had shadowed India's demographic debates long before independence and India became the first country in the world to launch a national family planning programme in 1952. And as Christophe Jaffrelot and Pratinav Anil argue in India's First Dictatorship: The Emergency, 1975-77, elements of eugenics, visible in the Emergency, undergirded these debates. 'Undesirable others' – minorities and lower castes – were the targets. Coercive population control measures were introduced as necessary tools for 'modernisation' and 'development'. But it was only in the late 1960s that sterilisation acquired wide policy acceptance. On paper, India took a 'cafeteria approach' with sterilisation offered as one of many forms of family planning. In practice, however, sterilisation was prioritised. Targets were introduced and vasectomy camps, cash incentives, citizen motivators, and active coercion became acceptable methods to control India's 'population bomb'. But like most policies, implementation waxed and waned. India's sterilisation drive peaked in 1972-3 with 3.1 million sterilisations, falling to just under a million the next year. What differentiated mass sterilisation during the Emergency from the past was the scale and aggressiveness with which it was pursued. International agencies from the World Bank to the United Nations played their part, financing what they called 'crash sterilisation'. Sanjay Gandhi effectively leveraged Emergency conditions to direct political and administrative functionaries to use force and coercion with a vengeance. He bypassed the health ministry to directly hand out targets to states and used his powers to harass and intimidate regional leaders, bureaucrats and district administrators to comply. Over time, his tactics became almost necessary to feed the Emergency myth: That suspension of democracy and centralisation of power was necessary to ensure the 'trains run on time'. Eugenics, Jaffrelot and Anil, note were implicit in this framing in the targeting of Muslims and the poor. The horror that unfolded has been widely chronicled. The political and administrative zeal to comply with Sanjay Gandhi and his bulldozer gang was shaped by the nature of power he wielded over regional leaders. Inevitably, Delhi and the Hindi heartland became Sanjay Gandhi's playground, with party leaders and willing bureaucrats jostling to curry favour. Family planning policy was now no longer about broader societal goals but a weapon for political power and control. In the process, individual citizens were effectively stripped of any agency over their bodies. From nudging railway commuters to getting vasectomies if caught ticketless by waiving paying fines, to threatening slum dwellers with eviction notices, denying government benefits and when needed enabling violent use of force, Gandhi's bulldozer gang zealously did all that was demanded of them to coerce the poorest and most vulnerable citizens into sterlisation camps thereby fulfilling the political myth of the Emergency. Those who sought to protect their dignity and individual agency by escaping the sterilisation net, lived in terror. As ethnographer Emma Tarlo notes in her account of the nasbandi tyranny in Delhi, for anyone who escaped, public spaces and civic institutions like hospitals, schools and government offices, were places to avoid. Unsurprisingly, in many parts of the country, fear led to violence. Nasbandi was widely attributed to have contributed to Indira Gandhi's resounding electoral defeat. In a direct and tactile way, the ordinary Indian experienced the terror of the powers of the State over their bodies and they used democracy to reclaim control. Since that dark period, India's family planning policy, in tune with global trends, has evolved adopting a much more central focus on reproductive rights. Sterilisation, and associated policies like incentives and camps, continue to be part of the repertoire, indeed they often make headlines for medical negligence and death, but it no longer carries the zeal of the Emergency. The burden has now shifted to female sterilisation. The Emergency was an illustration of how the body is used as a site for exerting State power. In the contemporary moment, loose remarks by politicians in South India telling women to 'have more children' as they navigate delimitation politics is a warning signal that population policy may once again be weaponised. Ironically, these very states offered India an alternative to the tyranny of nasbandi: A model embedded in economic growth, choice and reproductive rights. Democracy afforded the path to achieve population goals. Today's politicians would do well to heed to the message that Indians gave to Indira and Sanjay Gandhi in 1977. Yamini Aiyar is senior visiting fellow, Brown University. The views expressed are personal.

The Hindu
16 minutes ago
- The Hindu
BJP workers hold protests against ‘anti-people' policies of State government outside 399 gram panchayats in Dakshina Kannada, Udupi: Capt. Chowta
Member of Parliament and BJP State secretary Captain Brijesh Chowta said that the party workers protested against the 'anti-people' policies and failures of the Congress-led State government outside all 399 gram panchayat offices in Dakshina Kannada and Udupi on Monday. Capt. Chowta who took part in the protest outside Gurupura Gram Panchayat office in Mangaluru taluk posted on X that 'Endless list of the government's failures include issues with 9/11 site regularisation, rejection of Akrama-Sakrama, hike in electricity tariffs, delay in approving for housing for the poor, old-age pension release issues and delay in release of funds under Sandhya Suraksha Scheme.' Speaking at the protest site, Capt. Chowta said that the days are not far when people themselves will come onto the streets to protest against the government. About Forms 9 and 11 Meanwhile, speaking at the protest outside Kotathattu Gram Panchayat (I) in Udupi district, Member of Parliament for Udupi-Chikkamagaluru, Kota Srinivas Poojary, stated that the State government had recently taken away the power to issue Form-9 and Form-11 certificates from gram panchayats by transferring it to the urban development authorities. For the gram panchayats, Form-9 and Form-11 were essentially instruments for property tax collection. The government has made Form-9 and Form-11 mandatory documents for non-agricultural properties coming under the jurisdiction of grama panchayats for property registration. Hence, citizens seeking to sell their property were applying for Form 9 and 11 in the gram panchayats. The government should restore the power of issuing the certificates to gram panchayats, he said. Mr. Poojary said that with the latest decision of the government, about 10,000 files are pending for approval (for issuing the certificates) in the office of the Udupi Urban Development Authority alone. The decision has given scope for corruption in urban development authorities. The Chief Minister, Siddaramaiah, should intervene to restore the powers to the gram panchayats. The MP stated that the government has withheld over 9 lakh old-age pensions and 14 lakh Sandhya Suraksha schemes in the State under the guise of reviewing them. The government should not stop them from getting what they deserve. Mr. Poojary said that the government should establish a Special Investigation Team to probe the allegations of corruption made by senior Congress MLA B.R. Patil regarding the allotment of houses to the poor by the Rajiv Gandhi Housing Development Corporation.


Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kerala bypoll: UDF wrests Nilambur from LDF; Congress' Aryadan Shoukath wins by 11,077 votes
NEW DELHI: In a setback for Kerala's ruling LDF, the Congress-led UDF on Monday won the Nilambur assembly bypoll, with Congress candidate Aryadan Shoukath defeating CPI(M)'s M Swaraj by 11,077 votes. This is the first time the LDF has lost a sitting seat during its current term. Shoukath, son of veteran Congress leader Aryadan Mohammed, secured 77,737 votes (44.17%), while Swaraj received 66,660 votes (37.88%). Independent candidate and Trinamool Congress state convenor P V Anvar polled a surprising 19,760 votes (11.23%), pushing BJP's Mohan George to the fourth spot with just 8,648 votes (4.91%). The victory marks the fourth consecutive byelection defeat for the CPI(M)-led front, following earlier losses in Puthuppally, Palakkad, and Thrikkakara. The Nilambur contest, seen as a semi-final ahead of the 2026 state election, had drawn intense campaigning and sharp political rhetoric. Reacting to the result, Congress general secretary and newly elected Lok Sabha MP from Wayanad, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra , congratulated the UDF team and the voters of Nilambur. In a post on X, she wrote: 'We worked as a team, each one with commitment and single pointed focus, that is the most important lesson of this success. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed! IC Markets Start Now Undo Heartiest congratulations to Aryadan Shoukath whose dedication and service has shone through and to all the leaders and workers of the UDF whose efforts made this victory possible. Most of all a big thank you to my sisters and brothers of Nilambur for your support. Your trust and belief in the values of our constitution, and in the UDF's vision for progress will be the guiding light for our way forward. ' Shoukath attributed his victory to public dissatisfaction with the LDF, calling it a "mandate against misrule." The CPI(M) accepted the verdict, with state secretary M V Govindan saying the party would introspect and make corrections where necessary. Issues like welfare pensions, human-animal conflict, and communal politics dominated the campaign. The UDF's association with the Welfare Party, backed by Jamaat-e-Islami, drew criticism from the LDF, which accused the Congress of communal appeasement. The Congress, in turn, blamed the LDF for attempting to polarise voters in the Muslim-majority constituency. Opposition leader V D Satheesan called the victory a precursor to the UDF's return to power in 2026, while AICC General Secretary K C Venugopal termed it the 'people's verdict against misrule under Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan.'