Oscars 2025 latest: After parties under way; Brutalist actor defies cue to leave stage; Demi Moore unexpectedly misses out
Backstage highlights: From Mikey Madison's puppies to Adrien Brody's grandparents
By Lauren Russell, news reporter
After seeing off the competition and collecting their statuettes, the winners at this year's Academy Awards head to the winners' room.
Here are some of those backstage highlights:
Anora director calls for decriminalisation of sex work
Anora director Sean Baker said his last four films have covered the topic of sex work, with his latest - which just scooped five gongs at the Oscars - being the culmination of his work.
Asked what his message is to those who criticise sex workers, Baker said: "I have been pretty outspoken about my stance on sex work.
"It is our oldest profession, yet it has an incredibly unfair stigma attached to it, and what I have been trying to do with my films is chip away at that very unfair stigma
"Personally I think it should be decriminalised and through my work through humanising my characters... it will help do that."
Adrien Brody honoured his grandparents in The Brutalist
Taking one of the big three awards of the night, Adrien Brody said appearing in The Brutalist gave him the opportunity to be a part of something with "importance".
The actor, who has Jewish family, said he was able to honour his grandparents in the film - which focuses on a Hungarian-Jewish architect who escapes the Holocaust and rebuilds his life in the US.
"My grandparents' struggles and their loss and their resilience paved a way for my own good fortune, and I had an opportunity to honour them in this film," he said.
Mikey Madison's new furry friends will help keep her feet on the ground
Still high off her win for best actress, Anora's Mikey Madison said she never thought anything like this would happen in her lifetime.
"I dreamed of being an actress that could be in a film like Anora. [It is a] huge honour, one that will sink in later down the line," she said.
Quizzed on what she thinks the future holds for her, the actress said she did not know her long-term plans, but tonight she needs to go back to being a dog parent.
She said: "Tonight I will go home to my new puppies and probably clean up their mess, and it will bring me right back down to earth."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Evening Standard
7 hours ago
- Evening Standard
Samantha Morton made an OBE for services to drama and charity
The actress and director has also been nominated for two Oscars – one in 2000 for playing Hattie in Sweet And Lowdown and four years later for In America.
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
A Useful Ghost: Recognised in Cannes, Thai director hopes film stirs political debate at home
When Ratchapoom Boonbunchachoke became the first Thai director to win the Critics Week's Grand Prize in May, he paid an unusual tribute. 'I would like to dedicate this award to all the ghosts in Thailand,' he told the audience. Ratchapoom's film, A Useful Ghost, tells the story of a man whose wife dies after falling ill from dust pollution, and whose spirit returns by possessing a vacuum cleaner. It is a quirky story full of symbolism and dark humour that explores power and political oppression in Thailand. 'One of the main intentions for the film would be [to talk about] how we deal with injustice in the past,' says Ratchapoom. 'There's so many people who suffered, who got punished, who disappeared,' he adds, referring to Thailand's turbulent political history, marked by military coups, protests and deadly crackdowns. A Useful Ghost's success comes at a time of increased optimism about Thailand's film industry. Domestic productions are increasingly driving box office sales, claiming a greater share of ticket sales than Hollywood movies, and achieving success abroad. This includes the 2024 release of How To Make Millions Before Grandma Dies, which broke records for Thai film in neighbouring countries, and became the first Thai film shortlisted for the international feature film at the Oscars. The Thai government, keen to foster the country's film sector, has launched a $6.4 million film fund to support productions. Censorship rules are also being relaxed - though content that may affect the monarchy remains prohibited. The powerful royal family is shielded from criticism by a strict lese majesty law, which carries a jail sentence of up to 15 years. Ratchapoom says he is unsure what kind of reaction his film will generate when it premiers in Thailand. 'I think it will cause some discussion,' he said. The film touches on history some would prefer to forget but which, over recent years, younger people have grown increasingly keen to uncover. 'Trying to unearth what is censored or suppressed is one way to fight the authoritarian,' said Ratchapoom. 'History is one of the battlefields.' Ratchapoom, 38, grew up in a Thai Chinese family in Bangkok, in a household full of film. His father, who had a small business, was obsessed with watching movies, mostly from the US and Hong Kong. Ratchapoom would pour over his dad's film magazines in his spare time, and seek out international releases at pirate DVD shops in Bangkok's Chatuchak market. He went on to study film at Chulalongkorn University, in Bangkok, and worked as a TV script writer before gaining international recognition with his short film Red Aninsri; Or, Tiptoeing on the Still Trembling Berlin Wall, about a transgender sex worker who goes undercover as a spy, which won the Junior Jury award at Locarno film festival in 2020. Ratchapoom began writing A Useful Ghost in 2017, three years after the military seized power in a coup, arresting its critics, and pressuring news outlets into self-censorship. The film's obsession with memory and mind control is inspired by a creeping trend that emerged under the junta: the destruction of monuments commemorating the 1932 revolution, when the absolute monarchy was overthrown and democracy introduced to Thailand. One plaque, which had laid on the ground in Bangkok for decades, was replaced in 2017 with a new monument that read: 'To love and respect the Buddhist trinity, one's own state, one's own family, and to have a heart faithful to your monarch, will bring prosperity to the country'. In A Useful Ghost the destruction of monuments creates dust, a reference to Thailand's continued air pollution crisis. But dust is also a symbol for 'powerless people who are voiceless', said Ratchapoom. Thai filmmakers have a long history of using metaphors and symbolism to allude to sensitive political topics. It wasn't until the pandemic that Ratchapoom was able to put together the first draft of the screenplay. By then, youth-led pro-democracy protests had filled the streets, demanding the removal of the former junta leader, and then prime minister, Prayuth Chan-ocha, and breaking a major taboo to make an unprecedented call for reforms of the country's powerful monarchy. Protest leaders proclaimed that the 'ceiling had been lifted'; the unspeakable was now being said. At the time, Ratchapoom wondered if his own film would appear old-fashioned, given how outspoken younger generations had become. Ironically, in the past few years, such expansions of freedom of expression have been reversed, he said, adding: 'Suddenly, it's not so obsolete. The ceiling has been lowered again.' Many protest leaders are in prison, facing charges or in exile. Thailand is no longer ruled by former military generals, following elections in 2023, but Ratchapoom does not feel hopeful about Thailand's politics. Under the junta, there was at least a sense that 'there's every reason to fight, to resist', he said. Such momentum has dissipated. He does, however, feel more hopeful about the state of Thailand's film industry. 'I believe that in the next few years there will be more exciting projects, films or series coming off Thailand,' he said. The film's premier in Thailand and elsewhere is yet to be confirmed. Ratchapoom hopes it will open fresh debate. 'I hope these things that I talk about - the silenced and suppressed past, the injustice in the past – could be brought up or unearthed and people will start like talking about it again.'
Spectator
2 days ago
- Spectator
Should family history, however painful, be memorialised forever?
Be under no illusions: this is not a food memoir. Chopping Onions on My Heart is a linguistic exploration of belonging; a history of the Jewish community in Iraq; and an urgent endeavour to save an endangered language. Above all, it is a reckoning with generational trauma. The subjects of Samantha Ellis's previous books include the life of Anne Brontë, heroines of classic literature, feminism and romantic comedy. She is the daughter of Iraqi Jewish refugees, and the language she grew up around, the language of her people and culture, is dying. Judeo-Iraqi Arabic 'came out of the collisions of Hebrew-speaking Jews and Aramaic-speaking Babylonians, and then absorbed linguistic influences from all the other people who conquered Iraq'. Ellis is irrepressible in the way she talks about her mother tongue, calling it 'earthy, sinewy, witty, excessive, wry, noisy, vivid… Hot, where English often seems cold. Mouth-filling, where English seems empty. Patterned, when English seems plain.' Jewish people first came to Iraq in 586 BC. At the community's height in the 1940s there were 150,000 Jews living in the country. At best guess, by 2019 just five remained. Most left in the decade following Farhud, the pogrom carried out against the Jews of Baghdad over two days in 1941. More than 180 Jews were murdered and countless raped and injured. Ellis's father's family left for Israel, while her mother's stayed on for more than 20 years. But both her parents eventually ended up in London, where Ellis was born. She was raised speaking English, 'but all the gossip, all the stories, all the exciting, forbidden grown-up life happened in Judeo-Iraqi Arabic'. She quietly absorbed the language, but as she grew up, lost it. Now, as an adult and mother, she is acutely aware of the consequences for herself and her son. The mass exodus of Iraqi Jews in 1950-51, and their assimilation into adopted countries, meant that the language was marginalised, and speaker numbers dwindled fast. Ellis's early investigations are urgent, panicked, motivated by a combination of incredulity and guilt that a language that informs her heritage, but that she doesn't speak, isn't being preserved by someone else: 'I raced to my laptop to find out if anyone was saving my language. Someone had to be!' She begins language classes, visits museums and consults relatives. She attempts to trace the history of her people. She cannot accept that the reason languages become extinct is because second generation, non-native speakers 'didn't value or care for them, that we were recklessly letting them die'. She realises that 'there was always violence somewhere in the vanishing of languages. There certainly was in mine'. The mother tongue is 'earthy, sinewy, witty, excessive, wry, noisy, vivid…Hot, where English often seems cold' The psychological effect of being brought up by families who have experienced war, discrimination and displacement is what makes Ellis both neurotic and determined not to pass on that inherited fear to her son. When he garbles the history of how they came to Britain, Ellis decides: 'If I was going to unmuddle him, maybe I had to try to unmuddle myself first.' But how does one preserve the stories of a culture's past without also holding on to the pain that imbues them? In her search for home and belonging, she finds solace in cooking her country's traditional dishes. But this is not a tidy personal narrative that finds resolution in a comforting stew or finishes with a glorious homecoming wrapped neatly in bread dough. Ellis is wary of simplifying the past and making it more palatable through food. The problem is not Iraqi Jewish cuisine; that's the easy bit. It's the gnarly, traumatic parts that are harder to engage with. So, no, this is not a food memoir. And if at times it doesn't seem to know quite what it is, then isn't that sort of the point? Unpicking, extricating different facets of heritage is near impossible, compounded by the conflicting motivations of a second generation immigrant. What begins as a shapeless mass, a grey cloud of uncertainty, slowly morphs into a full-colour, defined picture of a more confident, peaceful acceptance of Ellis's duality – of being Judeo-Iraqi, but not in Iraq, of belonging to two places at once, even if one place cannot be visited. Like her identity, Ellis's book contains multitudes.
