Sad story behind viral image of emu toes amid Australia's invasive species crisis
It's common to hear stories of foxes getting into chicken coops and causing mayhem, or a farmer losing the odd lamb to a fox attack. But this incident shows just how lethal the invasive species can be for Aussie homeowners owners.
Jo Caminiti has a property in Central Gippsland in Victoria where she fosters and homes domesticated emus. "They occupy the old orchard here with emu fencing, and they sleep all snuggled down together on the ground," she told Yahoo News.
It's not your typical pet, and nor is it your typical fox victim. But she has shared the "devastating" story of losing a female emu, walking out to the orchard one day to find it killed and its head removed.
"I found her dead a few metres away with her head gone. Of course that's very typical of foxes, they take what they can back to their cubs.
"You could tell what had gone on in the grass that they [the emus] had been surprised at night... there were feathers where they were sleeping.
"It looked like they got up and she hit another tree and fell down ... she tripped over and that's where her body was, with the head removed. There were lots of bite and scratch marks.
"It was all a bit sad …. They'd been raised in a petting zoo in Melbourne originally."
Jo, who holds a basic wildlife licence, shared a photo of her holding the feet of the deceased emu on social media this week in response to another social media post. When the image was re-shared by an Australian wildlife page, it attracted lots of attention.
"If they can bring down such a massive bird imagine what they are doing to the numbers of our smaller more vulnerable natives," Wild Animals Australia wrote.
"There was quite a lot of comments saying it couldn't possibly be a fox... well, you know, good on them," Jo told Yahoo, completely dismissing their skepticism.
While the incident happened a couple years ago, Jo said there is no doubt in her mind that a fox was responsible.
"There are lots of foxes around here," she said Friday. "You see them all the time... I'm just glad I've got a neighbour that has a gun licence and can keep the numbers down."
Feral cats and red foxes have had a devastating impact on Australia's unique ecosystems, contributing significantly to the country's status as having the worst mammal extinction rate in the world.
According to recent research by the Australian National University, there are thought to be some 1.7 million foxes in the country, with populations found on 80 per cent of the continent.
Each year, foxes kill about 300 million native mammals, birds and reptiles.
The species was introduced in the 19th century for recreational hunting, and now prey on native wildlife while also being a disruptive force in the agricultural industry by attacking livestock and poultry. While they're often less numerous than cats, foxes can be just as ecologically destructive in areas where native species haven't evolved defences against such efficient predators.
Their presence is a key reason why efforts to recover threatened species often require large-scale predator control or the creation of fenced sanctuaries to give native wildlife a fighting chance.
☠️ Plea to Aussies over controversial substance found in bush
🦊 Aussie council under pressure as iconic species ravaged by foxes
🐜 Aussie mum's brutal injuries as property owners warned over fire ants
Foxes are increasingly making their way into suburbs and built up metropolitan areas. But there are things you can do to help protect local wildlife and deter foxes, population management specialist Gillian Basnett explained recently to Yahoo.
Her tips include:
Don't leave pet food outside overnight
Use enclosed compost bins
Keep domestic animals secure at night
Remove fallen fruit around fruit trees
Keep garbage bins covered
Block entry points to drains
Close off access to underneath buildings
Use fox-proof enclosures for poultry – remember foxes dig and can climb
Turn off outside lights that might attract insects
Reduce weeds that provide food and shelter, such as Blackberries
Record sightings in FoxScan.
Deterrents need to be intermittent as they will habituate quickly. E.g. sensor spotlights rather than lights on all the time.
Have gardens with lots of plants that wildlife can hide in, grasses, shrubs, rocks, logs, etc.
Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@yahoonews.com.
You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Constance Marten victim of ‘relentless and dogged' smears, court told
Wealthy aristocrat Constance Marten and her partner have been subjected to 'relentless and dogged' attempts to tarnish their names, jurors have been told. Marten, 38, and convicted rapist Mark Gordon, 51, are on trial at the Old Bailey accused of the manslaughter of their newborn baby Victoria, who died in a tent on the South Downs. In a closing speech on Wednesday, Marten's barrister, Tom Godfrey, said: 'The persistent attempts to tarnish the defendants' names have been relentless and dogged. It really boils down to what happened in that tent.' He rejected the prosecution case that Victoria died from hypothermia or was smothered, saying it was a 'tragic accident' and no-one can be sure how she died. Marten gave birth to Victoria in 'secret' after four other children were taken into care, the Old Bailey was told. At the time, the defendants mistakenly believed they were 'being watched', as Marten's parents had deployed private investigators in a 'menacingly' named Operation Lynx in 2021, Mr Godfrey said. It was against this background that the couple opted to go off grid and live in a tent, after their car burst into flames near Bolton, Greater Manchester, jurors heard. Mr Godfrey told jurors: 'Why do they flee and hide as they did? The prosecution seem to be saying it was because they cared not a jot for Victoria and they focused on their selfish needs? Can that be right? 'You may think their greatest fear was they would lose her. Constance Marten feared the baby would be taken from her so they fled. 'Did they behave sensibly and rationally? They could have sought assistance from police, explained their predicament. 'We can all criticise decisions, and there are many decisions by Constance Marten that are open to criticism. 'This case is not about what could have been done differently.' Mr Godfrey said the police appeal to find the baby made 'instant headline news around the country' and the 'country became obsessed'. He told jurors: 'It was from this moment on, Constance Marten and Mark Gordon determined the only way to keep Victoria to themselves was to avoid detection. 'Irrespective of the rights and wrongs, the net effect was to drive Constance Marten and Mark Gordon further underground.' After Victoria's death, they were reduced to a 'state of near derangement', and a 'feeling of hopelessness and guilt', Mr Godfrey said. He rejected any suggestion the defendants had made a 'nefarious pact' not to answer questions, having each cut short their evidence before they could be cross-examined. Mr Godfrey suggested Gordon's decision was sparked by the jurors being told about his 1989 rape conviction in the United States, and two assaults on police officers at a maternity unit in 2017, where Marten gave birth to their first child. He said: 'Why did you hear about those matters? Because Mark Gordon sought to mislead you about his character by telling you he had empathy and respect for the law. 'We say these convictions, and ones from Wales from 2017, are of no assistance whatsoever in determining how baby Victoria died. 'We ask you to ignore them, as with a lot of smoke and mirrors put up, and focus on the issue in this case. How did baby Victoria die? That is what this case is about. 'If there was a wall of silence being maintained they would say nothing at all. Nothing in interview and nothing in evidence. That is not the position here.' Marten and Gordon, of no fixed address, have denied the gross negligence manslaughter of their daughter and causing or allowing her death between January 4 and February 27 2023. Jurors have been told the defendants were convicted at an earlier trial of concealing the birth of a child and perverting the course of justice. The trial continues.
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Australian murder suspect denies drying deadly mushrooms
An Australian woman accused of murdering three people with death cap mushrooms denied Wednesday that she turned the fungi into dry powder for the fatal meal. Erin Patterson, 50, is charged with murdering her estranged husband's parents and aunt in July 2023 by spiking a beef Wellington lunch with the mushrooms. She is also accused of attempting to murder a fourth lunch guest -- her husband's uncle -- who survived the dish after a long stay in hospital. Patterson denies all charges in the trial, which has made headlines worldwide. She says the beef-and-pastry dish, which she cooked in individually sized portions, was poisoned by accident. Three months before the lunch, phone records placed Patterson in the Victoria state township of Loch, where a sighting of death cap mushrooms had been posted online, the court heard. Prosecutor Nanette Rogers alleged that within two hours of finding death cap mushrooms in Loch, Patterson bought a dehydrator to use on the fungi. Patterson admitted to buying the dehydrator. But she denied purchasing it to dry the death cap mushrooms or that she went to Loch to find the dangerous fungi. A month later, phone records placed Patterson in a second town in the area, Outtrim, just days after a sighting of death cap mushrooms had been posted online, the court heard. Patterson denied she went to the area to find the fungi, but said she may have driven by the area. Rogers suggested Patterson "blitzed" the death cap mushrooms into a powder in order to hide them in the meal. "Disagree," Patterson said. - Leftovers a 'lie' - The court heard Patterson had told people that she served the beef Wellington leftovers to her children a day after the lunch, as her sickened guests lay in hospital. The accused said she scraped off the mushroom and pastry from the dish because her children were fussy eaters. The prosecutor asked Patterson why she would feed leftovers to her children, while knowing or suspecting that the same meal had put her guests in hospital. "I didn't know or suspect that," Patterson replied. The prosecutor accused her of telling a "lie about feeding the leftovers" because it gave her "some distance from a deliberate poisoning". Patterson replied: "I don't see how it could, but I disagree." The home cook had also invited her estranged husband Simon to join the family lunch at her secluded home in the Victoria state farm village of Leongatha. But Simon turned down the invitation saying he felt uncomfortable going, the court heard previously. The pair were long estranged but still legally married. Simon's parents Don and Gail, and his aunt Heather Wilkinson, attended the lunch. All three were dead within days. Heather's husband Ian fell gravely ill but recovered. The trial in Morwell, southeast of Melbourne, is expected to last another two weeks. lec/djw/mtp
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Australian murder suspect denies drying deadly mushrooms
An Australian woman accused of murdering three people with death cap mushrooms denied Wednesday that she turned the fungi into dry powder for the fatal meal. Erin Patterson, 50, is charged with murdering her estranged husband's parents and aunt in July 2023 by spiking a beef Wellington lunch with the mushrooms. She is also accused of attempting to murder a fourth lunch guest -- her husband's uncle -- who survived the dish after a long stay in hospital. Patterson denies all charges in the trial, which has made headlines worldwide. She says the beef-and-pastry dish, which she cooked in individually sized portions, was poisoned by accident. Three months before the lunch, phone records placed Patterson in the Victoria state township of Loch, where a sighting of death cap mushrooms had been posted online, the court heard. Prosecutor Nanette Rogers alleged that within two hours of finding death cap mushrooms in Loch, Patterson bought a dehydrator to use on the fungi. Patterson admitted to buying the dehydrator. But she denied purchasing it to dry the death cap mushrooms or that she went to Loch to find the dangerous fungi. A month later, phone records placed Patterson in a second town in the area, Outtrim, just days after a sighting of death cap mushrooms had been posted online, the court heard. Patterson denied she went to the area to find the fungi, but said she may have driven by the area. Rogers suggested Patterson "blitzed" the death cap mushrooms into a powder in order to hide them in the meal. "Disagree," Patterson said. - Leftovers a 'lie' - The court heard Patterson had told people that she served the beef Wellington leftovers to her children a day after the lunch, as her sickened guests lay in hospital. The accused said she scraped off the mushroom and pastry from the dish because her children were fussy eaters. The prosecutor asked Patterson why she would feed leftovers to her children, while knowing or suspecting that the same meal had put her guests in hospital. "I didn't know or suspect that," Patterson replied. The prosecutor accused her of telling a "lie about feeding the leftovers" because it gave her "some distance from a deliberate poisoning". Patterson replied: "I don't see how it could, but I disagree." The home cook had also invited her estranged husband Simon to join the family lunch at her secluded home in the Victoria state farm village of Leongatha. But Simon turned down the invitation saying he felt uncomfortable going, the court heard previously. The pair were long estranged but still legally married. Simon's parents Don and Gail, and his aunt Heather Wilkinson, attended the lunch. All three were dead within days. Heather's husband Ian fell gravely ill but recovered. The trial in Morwell, southeast of Melbourne, is expected to last another two weeks. lec/djw/mtp
