What could the new, sub-$30k Dodge sports car look like?
The idea of an affordable performance car from Dodge seems like one that's been long lost to the sands of time. Gone are the days of the turbocharged Neon SRT4, the Challenger R/T, and the glorious, 8.4-liter V10-powered Viper. Instead, we've been left with the Hornet–a crossover that shares its platform with the Alfa Romeo Tonale–an all-electric quasi-Charger, and the Dodge Durango, which is almost old enough to vote. But, according to Dodge's current CEO, Matt McAlear, our luck may turn around.
According to our very own Elijah Nicholson-Messmer, Dodge's CEO has hinted at the possibility of an upcoming, sub-$30,000 sports car. If McAlear's statements are to come true, it could very well mean that we'll see a new roadster from the marque in the not-so-distant future.
According to an interview with The Drive, McAlear said: "I think there's a market for people who just want to have that weekend car again, who would like a Viper, but don't have that $100 or $120K. Something that doesn't need all the safety features, doesn't need the heated seats. Just a car.' His idea of a sort of "baby Viper" reminds us of a few of Dodge's past concept vehicles that never quite came to fruition.In 1997, Dodge showed the world the Copperhead Concept–a functioning, prototype roadster equipped with a 2.7-liter V6, which sent power to the rear wheels through a 5-speed manual transmission. It not only captured the hearts of car enthusiasts–it helped shape an entire generation of new enthusiasts. Featured as a drivable vehicle in the first two Gran Turismo franchise entries and as a pushable vehicle in the form of a Hot Wheels toy, the Dodge Copperhead Concept inspired automotive awe in children of all ages during the late-1990s and early-2000s.
That very same year, Plymouth introduced the Prowler–a two-door, two-seater roadster with a unique, open-wheel design and a design that has aged like fine wine, in my own humble opinion. The Prowler packed a more muscular 3.5-liter V6, compared to the Copperhead's smaller 2.7, but in the many years since its debut, enthusiasts have managed to cram Hemi V8s and even supercharged Hellcat motors under their hoods–thus affording the Prowler true hot rod status.
In subsequent years, Dodge would go on to produce two more concept cars that resembled traditional roadsters but were noticeably more compact than the grizzly Viper. In 2004, Dodge would show the world the Slingshot, a two-seater roadster that packed a turbocharged 3-cylinder engine under the hood. It, too, was equipped with a 5-speed manual transmission and rear-wheel drive.
In 2007, Dodge showed off a revised roadster concept–the Dodge Demon Concept–which used a 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine, rear-wheel drive, and a 6-speed manual transmission. This was meant to chase after similar models being offered by rival manufacturers at the time, such as the Pontiac Solstice and Saturn Sky. Obviously, the general idea is also very reminiscent of the legendary Mazda MX-5.Unfortunately, Dodge has never actually sent any of these wonderful concept vehicles to the production line. The closest thing we ever saw from Mopar, besides the Plymouth Prowler, was the Chrysler Crossfire–a two-door, two-seater coupe or roadster, which shared its platform and most of its parts with the R170-generation Mercedes-Benz SLK.
Although it could be had in SRT6 guise with a supercharged, 3.2-liter V6, only the less-powerful, naturally-aspirated models were ever offered with a manual transmission. All models came equipped with rear-wheel drive, but the Crossfire was marketed as something of a "grand tourer", meaning more of them ended up living in retirement communities rather than living out glory on race tracks.
Dodge is a brand that has found itself backed into a corner. With a lineup of just three models–all of which are either quite dated or not selling as well as they had hoped–Dodge desperately needs to do something fresh to win over the hearts of enthusiasts and buyers alike. A sub $30,000 roadster could bring some much-needed excitement to the brand without fantastically heavy research and development costs.
Dodge could use a revised version of the Crossfire's Benz-based platform, which isn't entirely unreasonable considering the current Durango still uses a 1990s Mercedes-derived platform, as did the Charger and Challenger up until the end of 2023 when they were discontinued in favour of the new, electric Charger.
Alternatively, a shrunken Alfa Romeo Giulia platform may also work, if that would somehow be more cost-effective. Regardless of the ins and outs of its development logistics, it's not an impossible task for Dodge to create an affordable, rear-drive roadster.Using generative text-to-image artificial intelligence, we take an imagined look at what a revived, true-to-its-heritage Dodge two-seat roadster could look like, incorporating recent Dodge styling cues and imagining what currently existing powertrains it could optimize. These images are for speculation purposes only and in no way depict any actual Stellantis products.
To keep its base MSRP under the $30,000 mark, a likely powertrain candidate for Dodge's new sports car would be the turbocharged, 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine currently being used in the Dodge Hornet crossover. With a power figure of 286 horsepower and 295 lb-ft of torque, it would certainly pack a healthy punch–enough to provide the Mazda MX-5, Toyota GR86, and Subaru BRZ with a serious showdown.
As Matt McAlear made clear, things on the inside should remain simple and driver-focused. An infotainment screen with smartphone integration is a must these days, but it doesn't have to be much more than that, and it certainly doesn't need to occupy the entire dash as it does with far too many contemporary vehicles.
Another must-have feature is rear-wheel drive, but we're praying that a 6-speed manual transmission is made available as well. An optional ZF-sourced 8-speed automatic wouldn't be unwelcome either, and it would certainly help boost those pesky sales figures.
Perhaps a cheeky V8-powered model could come along at some point, as well. There's just something about the idea of a factory Hellcat-powered two-seat roadster that should raise the hair on the back of every car enthusiast's neck.
Considering the Dodge Hornet's pricing starts at $31,585, it's not so far-fetched to think that a small roadster with an identical powertrain could end up with a price tag just shy of $30,000, albeit in relatively stripped-down, base model guise. We'd love to see more affordable, enthusiast-oriented vehicles like this from as many manufacturers as possible, so it's comforting to see that a large manufacturer like Dodge recognizes a desire for these kinds of vehicles.Ultimately, news of a potential sports car with a driver-oriented design focus in this day and age is both massively exciting and a bit of a relief. If you're a driving enthusiast these days, it's easy to feel like manufacturers can't seem to justify offering the exciting, charismatically engaging vehicles that many of them used to. Hearing Dodge's CEO speaking directly to that crowd is refreshing to see, and we hope that this sentiment continues to make its return into the mainstream automotive industry.
For now, nothing is officially confirmed, so we'll just have to await the upcoming turbocharged inline-six-powered Charger, which should arrive sometime this year. We're looking forward to getting behind the wheel and seeing how it compares to its all-electric counterpart.
Do the hairs on the back of your neck tingle at the thought of an affordable roadster from Dodge, and would you like to see one stuffed with a 6.2-liter, supercharged Hellcat V8? Would you like to see more brands hop back on the affordable sports car bandwagon, or do you think the segment is a lost cause entirely? Let us know what you think in the comments–we love to hear from you!
Love reading Autoblog? Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get exclusive articles, insider insights, and the latest updates delivered right to your inbox. Click here to sign up now!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Study: Rising bonnet heights in Europe raise risks for pedestrians
The rising popularity of larger cars such as SUVs in Europe is driving up the height of car bonnets, raising concerns about road safety - especially for children - according to a report by the European Federation for Transport and Environment (T&E). Higher front ends reduce drivers' ability to see small children directly in front of the vehicle, the Brussels-based NGO warned. In accidents, SUVs and pick-up trucks tend to hit adult pedestrians above the centre of gravity, often impacting vital organs and increasing the likelihood that victims are thrown forward and run over. In contrast, smaller cars strike lower on the body, making it more likely that pedestrians fall onto the bonnet and roll off to the side, improving chances of survival. The average bonnet height in the European Union and United Kingdom has increased by 0.5 centimetres annually since 2010, reaching 83.4 centimetres in 2024, T&E said. Nearly half of all newly registered vehicles now have bonnet heights exceeding 85 centimetres. A cited study based on Belgian data found that raising bonnet height from 80 to 90 centimetres increases the risk of death for pedestrians and cyclists in case of an accident by more than 25%. The growing heights of bonnets is mainly due to the increasing popularity of SUVs and off-road vehicles. These two segments accounted for more than 40% of all new registrations in Germany last year, according to the Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA). As of January 1 this year, approximately 6.6 million SUVs were registered in Germany, a nearly 10% annual increase. SUVs now make up more than 13% of all cars registered in Germany. German experts say larger vehicles offer better protection for occupants, but increase injury risks for others due to their mass and shape. However, the German Insurers Accident Research group (UDV) urged caution in interpreting the findings. While bonnet height can be a risk factor, injury severity also depends on speed, vehicle design, and use of driver-assistance systems, it said.

The Drive
2 days ago
- The Drive
The Chevrolet Blazer EV With the Best Range and RWD Is Already Dead
The latest car news, reviews, and features. Chevrolet's already quietly paring down the Blazer EV lineup, and the ones that will get hurt the most are various types of enthusiasts. The Chevrolet Blazer EV is the sole vehicle on sale that is available with front-wheel, all-wheel, and rear-wheel drive. But while that's true for the 2025 model year, it's going to become false for 2026. The rear-wheel-drive Blazer EV will not be making a return. The change in the lineup also lowers the model's maximum EPA-rated range, eliminates the second-most-powerful variant, and undoubtedly is a loss for sunbelt state buyers and enthusiasts. Chevrolet confirmed the lineup change to The Drive on Tuesday. Chevrolet spokesperson Genna Young told The Drive , 'In an effort to simplify the product lineup while still offering the most popular options for consumers, RWD will not be available beginning with the 2026 model year. The Chevrolet Blazer EV is now available in FWD, AWD, and performance AWD in the new SS trim.' The rear-wheel-drive Blazer EV has a single permanent magnetic motor and gearset mounted in the rear with a final drive ratio of 11.63:1. Output is rated at 365 horsepower and 325 lb-ft of torque. This powertrain was the longest-range Blazer EV on sale with an EPA-rated 334 miles of range. The next closest model is the new FWD Blazer EV, with 312 miles of range. The new SS model checks in with 303 miles, and the standard AWD model, which uses a dual-motor setup, can go 283 miles on a full charge. That means the new range king of the Blazer EV lineup has an electric motor mounted up front rated at 220 hp and 243 lb-ft of torque with an 11.59:1 final drive ratio. Factoring into all this is battery size. Blazer EVs with rear-wheel drive and the SS model currently get a larger 102-kWh battery pack, while front-wheel and dual-motor, all-wheel-drive models get a smaller 85-kWh pack. The packs are all the same lithium-ion NCMA chemistry, and no Blazer EV uses an LFP battery. Blazer EVs with the larger 102-kWh battery can charge at a rate of up to 190 kW, while the smaller 85-kWh models have a lower 150-kW peak charge rate. At $57,090, including a $1,495 destination charge, the rear-wheel-drive Blazer EV was also the second most expensive model. The most expensive trim is currently the SS at $62,590, and the new FWD range king costs $46,095, though that's for a 2025 SUV. Pricing for 2026 is still to come. Got a tip? Send us a note: tips@
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Buying a new car? Why picking yellow, orange and green will help your car retain its value
Vehicles that experience high rates of depreciation after a few years aren't great for new car buyers, but they can be great for used car buyers. In fact, researching vehicles with high depreciation rates can be a good way to find a deal on a used car. On the other hand, some drivers may avoid vehicles that rapidly depreciate to retain some trade-in value or sell their cars later on. Some car colors have worse depreciation rates than others, according to a study conducted by an automotive search engine and research website. Gold: 34.4% three-year depreciation White: 32.1% three-year depreciation Black: 31.9% three-year depreciation Most vehicles tend to depreciate the second they roll off of dealer lots, but the rates of depreciation listed above are beyond average rates. So, if you're in the market for a new vehicle, you may not want to buy it in gold. Paying extra money for a gold color model could prove to be even more costly. Thankfully, there are plenty of car colors with below-average rates of depreciation. Yellow: 24.0% three-year depreciation Orange: 24.4% three-year depreciation Green: 26.3% three-year depreciation "Yellow cars hold their value the best" according to the study results. So if you're looking for a new vehicle, this may be a color to consider for value retention. If you're hunting for a used vehicle deal, avoiding this color could save you some money because of the lower depreciation rate. The overall average three-year depreciation rate of the colors included in the study was 31%. Finding a good deal on a used car can be difficult, but refining your search by including vehicles with high depreciation rates can save drivers thousands of dollars. Vehicles with high rates of depreciation after just a few years can have low mileage and much lower prices than their original MSRP. One example of a vehicle with a high depreciation rate is the 2023 Dodge Hornet. The 2023 model year is the first of its production history. Just a few years after its initial release, the Hornet has depreciated by over 31%. The 2023 Hornet has an original MSRP of $31,590. It now has a fair purchase price of $20,154 according to Kelley Blue Book. That's a value decrease of a whopping $11,436, making it a steal for interested parties as a used model. Another great example of vehicle depreciation is the 2022 Nissan Leaf. The 2022 Leaf has an original MSRP of $27,400 and a Kelley Blue Book fair purchase price of just $14,258. That's a depreciation rate of around 47%. Car buyers can save big bucks on a Nissan Leaf by purchasing a used model that has depreciated severely over the last few years. There's no surefire way to avoid car depreciation entirely, but proper maintenance and upkeep can help drivers retain as much of their vehicle's value as possible. Regular maintenance Interior cleaning Exterior protection According to State Farm, there are several ways car owners can minimize depreciation. Ultimately, proper car care can equate to less depreciation in the long run and a higher resale value, so take those oil changes seriously. The more presentable your car is, the easier it is to get a fair purchase price or trade-in value later on. This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: What car colors are best to buy? These will retain your car's value Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data