
'It's a grim marker': Cork musician to perform his song about housing crisis outside Dáil for 157th time
'It's a grim marker, it's no celebration,' Cork singer-songwriter Martin Leahy said ahead of the three-year anniversary of his weekly housing protest outside the Dáil.
Mr Leahy will perform the song he wrote about the housing crisis while facing eviction, 'Everyone Should Have a Home', for the 157th time on Thursday.
He will be joined by politicians, activists and other musicians to mark the three-year anniversary at the gates of the Dáil.
Mr Leahy, a respected musician who has worked with some of Ireland's biggest songwriters, including Christy Moore and John Spillane, has travelled from West Cork to Dublin every Thursday for the protest.
Mr Leahy wrote the song 'Everyone Should Have a Home' as a personal response to the housing crisis, upon hearing he was to lose his home as his landlord was selling the property.
For the first time in 27 years of renting, he found himself struggling to rent, with prices having risen so sharply he had been priced out of the overheated market in 2022.
Martin Leahy: 'I feel that it's important to lift the shame that is felt by so many people around this housing crisis. People can feel that they have done something wrong in their lives because housing is unaffordable for them, but it's not their fault.' Picture: Moya Nolan
Mr Leahy then travelled to the Dáil out of a sense of hopelessness and despair and staged his one-person protest at the Dáil.
'It was the first time I had ever done anything like this and it felt empowering and worthwhile,' Mr Leahy said.
'I also feel that it's important to lift the shame that is felt by so many people around this housing crisis. People can feel that they have done something wrong in their lives because housing is unaffordable for them, but it's not their fault.
It's a failure on the part of Government. It's important to me to take a stand as one person and say that we should not accept this crisis as part of life.
Homeless figures have continued to creep up since his protest began. This year, there has been a small but steady month-on-month increase in those relying on emergency accommodation. In March, 10,743 adults and 4,675 children were homeless and staying in temporary accommodation.
'When I started, I thought the crisis was at its peak,' Mr Leahy said 'I couldn't have imagined that it would have gotten any worse."
His protest aims to challenge this.
'A lot of people are homeless and not able to afford rent. They might see it as a reflection of themselves and have shame around it.
'But it's not their fault. The fault for this is with the Government in my view. For people not to be able to afford basic human rights, that's not their fault. There should be no shame in talking about it."
Average monthly rents were at almost €2,000 per month nationally, with a 5.7% increases in rental costs last year, according to analysis from Daft.ie.
Cork City rents rose by 10% in the final quarter of last year. In Limerick City, rents were up 19%.
Rents rose by 4% in Dublin last year,to an average of €2,481 per month.
Three years after he first started his protest, Mr Leahy has found somewhere to rent in Bandon.
But it took six months of staying with friends as one of the thousands of 'hidden homeless'. Having nowhere to go other than emergency accommodation was terrifying, he said.
'I felt lucky that I had people to stay with for the six months.
Martin Leahy: 'When I started, I thought the crisis was at its peak. I couldn't have imagined that it would have gotten any worse.'
Both affordability and availability are problems for many renters now, he said.
Having a home to rent now, in Bandon, West Cork, has made him feel 'more secure'.
But he also now feels an extra energy to continue with the protests.
'Because of going through it and hearing about the people in much worse situations than I was. People with families are being evicted.
'If I had my way, there'd be somebody outside the Dáil all the time [protesting].
'I can only do my one day but I just don't think that it should be accepted.
It's a relatively recent thing this crisis. But I feel that it's pushing on so long now I have a fear that it will start to become accepted as part of life here and it shouldn't be.
'That's the reason I keep doing it [protesting].
'It shouldn't be accepted and I want to go up there and just say 'this is not acceptable'.
Mr Leahy will be joined by politicians, activists and fellow musician Jimi Cullen on Thursday from 1pm-2pm outside the Dáil.
Guest speakers will include Sinn Féin housing spokesperson Eoin Ó Broin, Social Democrats housing spokesperson Rory Hearne, and People Before Profit's Paul Murphy.
Read More
Mick Clifford: Cork musician has his own lyrical way of protesting about the housing crisis

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Independent
an hour ago
- Irish Independent
UK Government's £50m pledge for Casement Park an enormous step forward – Michelle O'Neill
First Minister Michelle O'Neill and deputy First Minister Emma Little Pengelly comment on Government allocation of £50 million to Casement Park in the Spending Review.


Irish Independent
an hour ago
- Irish Independent
Taoiseach labelling Israel's actions in Gaza ‘genocide' won't stop Central Bank approving ‘war bonds', governor tells TDs
So-called 'war bonds', which it is claimed are being used to fund the killing of innocent children and civilians in Gaza, are under intense scrutiny as a second Dáil motion was tabled to ban them. The Central Bank faced sustained questioning from TDs and senators at the Oireachtas Finance Committee, but insisted it is legally required to approve the legal document, or prospectus, required for the sale of the bonds. To be sold in the EU, bonds from non-EU countries must have their bond prospectus approved by an EU country. Israel traditionally had its European bond prospectuses approved in the UK, but turned to the Central Bank in Ireland for authorisations after Brexit. The Governor of the Central Bank, Gabriel Makhlouf, said it was 'incorrect' to claim it can impose sanctions on the processing of the bonds on the basis of international court rulings. He said it is up to international bodies including the UN and the EU to respond to breaches of international law by Israel, and to determine if sanctions are necessary. 'The Central Bank cannot impose sanctions on Israel – for example by refusing to approve the Israeli bond prospectus – in circumstances where the EU has not imposed any such sanctions itself,' he told TDs and senators. The Central Bank said its approval for Israel trading bonds in the EU is due for renewal in September. 'We will look extremely carefully at the facts that pertain at that time and will make a judgment on it,' said the Central Bank governor. A number of TDs, including Sinn Féin's Pearse Doherty and Cian O'Callaghan of the Social Democrats, said Ireland was a signatory to the Genocide Convention and this would enable the Central Bank to reject Israel's bond prospectuses. But Mr Makhlouf said the body is not bound by the Genocide Convention, but rather EU financial regulations, when deciding whether to facilitate the sale of bonds. ADVERTISEMENT The current prospectus is due for renewal again in September. 'If, when the state of Israel looks to renew its prospectus we will look extremely carefully at the facts that pertain at the time and we will make a judgment on it,' he said. But this will be based on the requirements of the financial regulations. 'The fact that the Taoiseach made the statement at the time, that is not going to change the judgement we come to,' he said, referring to Micheál Martin's comments last month that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. Ahead of last night's Dáil vote on a Bill enabling the Central Bank to stop facilitating Israeli bonds. Sinn Féin urged government TDs to 'have a backbone'. Deputy Doherty said: 'We have to ensure the State has no hand, act or part in facilitating the sale of Israeli war bonds. These aren't just financial instruments, this is the money that is raised that pays for the bombs that pays for the bullets that pays for the destruction of the lives of men, women and children across Palestine as we speak.' Deputy O'Callaghan said while Independent TDs backing the Government had a free vote on the motion, Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael TDs had to vote along with the party whip. 'That is utterly unjust and unfair,' he said. 'If there was a free vote, this motion would pass and that would put the Central Bank under severe pressure to stop facilitating the sale of these bonds and would cut off a source of finance for the genocide that is taking place.' Labour's Conor Sheehan said: 'It is not enough to just call this a genocide. We need to make Israel an international pariah.'


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Q&A: What is the pension payment error all about and can the money be recouped?
Unions and representatives of retired civil servants say they are awaiting detail of the errors made in relation to the pensions of their current or former members . However, there is concern that some of the issues could require legislation and that senior politicians could be impacted by any changes to the law. What has happened? On Tuesday the Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers said 'serious and systemic operational issues' had been identified at the National Shared Services Office (NSSO), which employs about 850 people and handles payroll administration for all government departments. The belief is these errors have resulted in some retired civil servants being underpaid in their pensions; incorrect pension contributions having been deducted from current and previous ministers; and the wrong amount of tax being deducted from the lump sums paid to about 30 senior civil servants upon retirement. With a review of 13,000 retirees' positions under way, however, and an external audit of the NSSO to be undertaken, it is uncertain how the situation will develop. READ MORE What will happen in respect of people who owe or are owed money? Mr Chambers said he was committed to ensuring 'all monies owed to the State are fully recouped and monies owed to individuals are refunded'. The former is likely to create issues, however, especially in relation to the larger amounts, with one retiree said to owe €280,000. With Mr Chambers suggesting some ministers may be asked to repay more than €30,000, the tax issue could be considerable. Details of the time frame have not been clarified, but Ciaran Rohan of the Association of Higher Civil and Public Servants says recouping overpayments stretching back more than four years could leave retirees, or potentially some politicians, substantially out of pocket. This is because current legislation would only allow the reclaiming of the extra tax paid as a result of receiving the extra money for the past four years, even if the overpayments stretched further back. Could that be changed? Only by legislation, says employment lawyer Barry Kenny, who says the issue means 'the original error has financial implications beyond a simple repayment issue'. It also has the potential to make it a political one. How could the money be recouped? A government circular in 2018 sets out the various ways in which overpayments can be reclaimed but there is no provision for anything like a liability of €280,000. The intention should be to recoup all the money and ideally within a year, it suggests, usually by deductions from pay or pensions of up to 8 per cent of the gross amount the person is receiving. But these people can afford to repay, no? The largest figures relate to people who had pension funds on retirement worth more than €2 million. That would certainly suggest they are well off but coming up with the funds to repay a six-figure sum is likely to be regarded as an issue. Cloda Ryan of the Retired Civil and Public Servants Association (RCPSA), which has some 7,000 members, says the vast majority of amounts involved are likely to be far smaller but still have the potential to cause problems for the pensioners concerned. 'Contrary to public perception, the majority of Civil Service pensioners have moderate pensions, in many cases lower than they would receive under the social welfare State pension for which, in general, civil servants recruited before April 6th, 1995 do not qualify.' The organisation is seeking assurances 'that no recovery of pension overpayments would take place without consultation and agreement with each pensioner affected'. And if an agreement can't be reached? 'Any civil servant faced with a request to refund money, large or small, should take legal advice to clarify the legal basis for the demand to repay and whether the figures are accurate,' says Mr Kenny. He says where the validity is established, 'reasonable' deductions or instalments would need to be agreed.